Aryeh Friedman wrote:
On Nov 8, 2007 11:55 AM, Expresso Digital ISP [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, my name is Cesar.
I'd like to know what is the diference between 7.0 and 6.3 and why create a
newest version and after old version.
6.X is the last of versions meant primarilly for single
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Jim Pazarena wrote:
When installing a test of 7.0 B4, I found that directories which I have
traditionally used
(/usr/local/libexec /usr/local/include /usr/local/lib
/usr/local/sbin /usr/local/man/* etc)
and /etc/make.conf are not visible
Jim Pazarena wrote:
Aryeh Friedman wrote:
On Nov 8, 2007 11:55 AM, Expresso Digital ISP [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi, my name is Cesar.
I'd like to know what is the diference between 7.0 and 6.3 and why
create a
newest version and after old version.
6.X is the last of versions meant
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 06:07:32PM +, Chris wrote:
Interesting so I learnt 2 things here csup exists so no need to
install cvsup and I should run 'make delete-old-libs' . Basically I
have done the following.
Well, you don't _have_ to (nobody is forcing you to do it). But if you
don't, old
On 08/11/2007, Roland Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 02:48:47PM -0300, Mario Lobo wrote:
Concerning this, I've cvsuping to 6-CURRENT on a dual-core desktop. The
system is running well, but I'd really like to move up to 7. Can it be done
through cvsup from 6.2-STABLE
Aryeh Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Nov 8, 2007 11:55 AM, Expresso Digital ISP [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to know what is the diference between 7.0 and 6.3 and why create a
newest version and after old version.
6.X is the last of versions meant primarilly for single
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Aryeh Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Nov 8, 2007 11:55 AM, Expresso Digital ISP [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to know what is the diference between 7.0 and 6.3 and why create a
newest version and after old version.
6.X is the last
Albert Shih wrote:
Le 08/11/2007 à 19:32:39+0100, Roland Smith a écrit
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 02:48:47PM -0300, Mario Lobo wrote:
Concerning this, I've cvsuping to 6-CURRENT on a dual-core desktop. The
system is running well, but I'd really like to move up to 7. Can it be done
Le 09/11/2007 à 06:12:48+0100, Roland Smith a écrit
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 11:14:13PM +0100, Albert Shih wrote:
Be careful if you not using standard shell becauseif you using a shell
come from ports
Root should _never_ use a shell from ports. You can use the 'toor'
account for
Hi, my name is Cesar.
I'd like to know what is the diference between 7.0 and 6.3 and why create a
newest version and after old version.
--
Att.
Expresso Digital ISP - tecnologia.multimidia.seguranca
Cesar Vogelsanger
MCSO - Módulo Certified Security Officer
Administrador de Tecnologia
On Nov 8, 2007 11:55 AM, Expresso Digital ISP [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, my name is Cesar.
I'd like to know what is the diference between 7.0 and 6.3 and why create a
newest version and after old version.
6.X is the last of versions meant primarilly for single processing
machines (with some
On Thursday 08 November 2007, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
On Nov 8, 2007 11:55 AM, Expresso Digital ISP [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, my name is Cesar.
I'd like to know what is the diference between 7.0 and 6.3 and why create
a newest version and after old version.
6.X is the last of versions
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 02:48:47PM -0300, Mario Lobo wrote:
Concerning this, I've cvsuping to 6-CURRENT on a dual-core desktop. The
system is running well, but I'd really like to move up to 7. Can it be done
through cvsup from 6.2-STABLE to 7-CURRENT or is it wiser to install from
scratch?
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 14:48:47 -0300
Mario Lobo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 08 November 2007, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
7.X is the beginning of the versions specifically designed with
multiprocessing/cores in mind
Does this mean that 6.x will perform better on single cpu systems?
The
Roland Smith wrote:
Port upgrade tools are not guaranteed to work perfectly in this
situation. I tried doing an update with portmanager and ended up with
some binaries linked against both libc.so.6 and libc.so.7! Some ports
didn't even compile.
Yeah, I almost always delete packages during an
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 07:27:58PM +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
a. Make backups
b. Read /usr/src/UPDATING
1. `cd /usr/src' (or to the directory containing your source tree).
2. `make buildworld'
3. `make buildkernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE' (default is GENERIC).
Mario Lobo wrote:
On Thursday 08 November 2007, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
On Nov 8, 2007 11:55 AM, Expresso Digital ISP [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, my name is Cesar.
I'd like to know what is the diference between 7.0 and 6.3 and why create
a newest version and after old version.
6.X is the last
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 09:32:22PM +0100, Kris Kennaway wrote:
You don't need to delete all the ports in one go and then reinstall
them in another: running 'portupgrade -fa' will do the job.
Port upgrade tools are not guaranteed to work perfectly in this
situation. I tried doing an update
On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 19:27:58 +
Matthew Seaman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Roland Smith wrote:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 02:48:47PM -0300, Mario Lobo wrote:
Concerning this, I've cvsuping to 6-CURRENT on a dual-core desktop. The
system
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 12:28:59PM -0500, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
On Nov 8, 2007 11:55 AM, Expresso Digital ISP [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, my name is Cesar.
I'd like to know what is the diference between 7.0 and 6.3 and why create a
newest version and after old version.
See http
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Roland Smith wrote:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 02:48:47PM -0300, Mario Lobo wrote:
Concerning this, I've cvsuping to 6-CURRENT on a dual-core desktop. The
system is running well, but I'd really like to move up to 7. Can it be done
through cvsup
On Thursday 08 November 2007, Roland Smith wrote:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 02:48:47PM -0300, Mario Lobo wrote:
Concerning this, I've cvsuping to 6-CURRENT on a dual-core desktop. The
system is running well, but I'd really like to move up to 7. Can it be
done through cvsup from 6.2-STABLE to
Roland Smith wrote:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 07:27:58PM +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
a. Make backups
b. Read /usr/src/UPDATING
1. `cd /usr/src' (or to the directory containing your source tree).
2. `make buildworld'
3. `make buildkernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE' (default is
Ivan Georgiev wrote:
On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 19:27:58 +
Matthew Seaman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Roland Smith wrote:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 02:48:47PM -0300, Mario Lobo wrote:
Concerning this, I've cvsuping to 6-CURRENT on a dual-core desktop.
Roland Smith wrote:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 09:32:22PM +0100, Kris Kennaway wrote:
You don't need to delete all the ports in one go and then reinstall
them in another: running 'portupgrade -fa' will do the job.
Port upgrade tools are not guaranteed to work perfectly in this
situation. I tried
Le 08/11/2007 à 19:32:39+0100, Roland Smith a écrit
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 02:48:47PM -0300, Mario Lobo wrote:
Concerning this, I've cvsuping to 6-CURRENT on a dual-core desktop. The
system is running well, but I'd really like to move up to 7. Can it be done
through cvsup from
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 11:14:13PM +0100, Albert Shih wrote:
Be careful if you not using standard shell becauseif you using a shell
come from ports
Root should _never_ use a shell from ports. You can use the 'toor'
account for that.
11. `make delete-old-libs' (in case no 3rd party
Hi Kris,
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 09:17 +0200, Kris Kennaway wrote:
David J Brooks wrote:
Bill Moran wrote:
Note also that a ports freeze is starting soon for 7.0 and 6.3 release.
What are the differences between 6.3 and 7.0? Which should be considered
the
standard upgrade path from
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 11:00:37AM +0100, Vince wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
David J Brooks wrote:
Bill Moran wrote:
Note also that a ports freeze is starting soon for 7.0 and 6.3 release.
What are the differences between 6.3 and 7.0? Which should be
considered the standard upgrade
Kris Kennaway wrote:
David J Brooks wrote:
Bill Moran wrote:
Note also that a ports freeze is starting soon for 7.0 and 6.3 release.
What are the differences between 6.3 and 7.0? Which should be
considered the standard upgrade path from 6.2 release? Is there a
compelling reason to upgrade
Jay Chandler wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
David J Brooks wrote:
Bill Moran wrote:
Note also that a ports freeze is starting soon for 7.0 and 6.3 release.
What are the differences between 6.3 and 7.0? Which should be
considered the standard upgrade path from 6.2 release
On 10/25/2007 11:47 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Jay Chandler wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
David J Brooks wrote:
Bill Moran wrote:
Note also that a ports freeze is starting soon for 7.0 and 6.3
release.
What are the differences between 6.3 and 7.0? Which should be
considered the standard
Johan Andersson wrote:
On 10/25/2007 11:47 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Any good oneliner for rebuild all the ports that you recommend?
portupgrade -afO
--
Jay Chandler / KB1JWQ
Living Legend / Systems Exorcist
Today's Excuse: Melting hard drives
___
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:32:35 -0700
Jay Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Johan Andersson wrote:
On 10/25/2007 11:47 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Any good oneliner for rebuild all the ports that you recommend?
portupgrade -afO
Personally I prefer
portupgrade -f '2007-10-25 11:00'
since
RW wrote:
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:32:35 -0700
Jay Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Johan Andersson wrote:
On 10/25/2007 11:47 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Any good oneliner for rebuild all the ports that you recommend?
portupgrade -afO
Personally I prefer
portupgrade -f '2007-10-25 11:00'
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:59:01 -0700
Jay Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RW wrote:
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:32:35 -0700
Jay Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Johan Andersson wrote:
On 10/25/2007 11:47 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Any good oneliner for rebuild all the ports that you
RW wrote:
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:59:01 -0700
Jay Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RW wrote:
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:32:35 -0700
Jay Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Johan Andersson wrote:
On 10/25/2007 11:47 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Any good oneliner for rebuild all the ports that you
David J Brooks wrote:
Bill Moran wrote:
Note also that a ports freeze is starting soon for 7.0 and 6.3 release.
What are the differences between 6.3 and 7.0? Which should be considered the
standard upgrade path from 6.2 release? Is there a compelling reason to
upgrade to one over the other
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:17:12 +0200 Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
David J Brooks wrote:
Bill Moran wrote:
Note also that a ports freeze is starting soon for 7.0 and 6.3 release.
What are the differences between 6.3 and 7.0? Which should be considered
the
standard upgrade
Kris Kennaway wrote:
David J Brooks wrote:
Bill Moran wrote:
Note also that a ports freeze is starting soon for 7.0 and 6.3 release.
What are the differences between 6.3 and 7.0? Which should be
considered the standard upgrade path from 6.2 release? Is there a
compelling reason to upgrade
Vince wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
David J Brooks wrote:
Bill Moran wrote:
Note also that a ports freeze is starting soon for 7.0 and 6.3 release.
What are the differences between 6.3 and 7.0? Which should be
considered the standard upgrade path from 6.2 release? Is there a
compelling reason
On Wednesday 24 October 2007 02:17:12 am Kris Kennaway wrote:
David J Brooks wrote:
Bill Moran wrote:
Note also that a ports freeze is starting soon for 7.0 and 6.3 release.
What are the differences between 6.3 and 7.0? Which should be considered
the standard upgrade path from 6.2
Bill Moran wrote:
Note also that a ports freeze is starting soon for 7.0 and 6.3 release.
What are the differences between 6.3 and 7.0? Which should be considered the
standard upgrade path from 6.2 release? Is there a compelling reason to
upgrade to one over the other?
David
43 matches
Mail list logo
