On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 10:50:39PM +0400, Andrew said:
> Hi!
>
> What is the best way to retain most of the NAT functionality?
> If you are happy to not know what Wingate is, try to assume that it is
> just another nat-box. Can bsd somehow "forward" connection, so that the
> nat-box almost feels l
On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 10:50:39PM +0400, Andrew said:
> Hi!
>
> I now need to test some applications, while keeping a part of the load
> on the Wingate machine. What I want to do is connect to internet via
> ADSL, using the bsd box, and let Wingate use the connection through the
> box.
I realise
Peter Risdon wrote:
> Andrew wrote:
> > I've been using Wingate for months now to distribute an internet
> > connection among 10 users (NAT). Stunned by regular failures of
Windows
> > 2000, Wingate and other evil software, I decided to switch to
FreeBSD. I
> > read the handbook and about 3000 more
Andrew wrote:
Hi!
I've been using Wingate for months now to distribute an internet
connection among 10 users (NAT). Stunned by regular failures of Windows
2000, Wingate and other evil software, I decided to switch to FreeBSD. I
read the handbook and about 3000 more pages of manuals / how-to's /
gui
Hi!
I've been using Wingate for months now to distribute an internet
connection among 10 users (NAT). Stunned by regular failures of Windows
2000, Wingate and other evil software, I decided to switch to FreeBSD. I
read the handbook and about 3000 more pages of manuals / how-to's /
guides. I set up
