On 07/10/2007, at 12:56 AM, andrew clarke wrote:
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 04:54:26AM +1000, Jerahmy Pocott wrote:
I'm wanting to use BASH as my root shell, so I compiled a
statically linked
version then tried to log in with only / mounted. But I was locked
out
because elf.ld.so could not b
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 01:55:28AM +0100, RW wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 20:09:46 -0400
> Jerry McAllister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 12:32:22AM +0100, RW wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 16:29:36 -0700 (PDT)
> > > Philip Hallstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
On Saturday 06 October 2007 11:56:03 andrew clarke wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 04:54:26AM +1000, Jerahmy Pocott wrote:
> > I'm wanting to use BASH as my root shell, so I compiled a statically
> > linked version then tried to log in with only / mounted. But I was locked
> > out because elf.ld.s
On Friday 05 October 2007 22:51:53 Jerahmy Pocott wrote:
> On 06/10/2007, at 4:59 AM, Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
> > On Sat, 2007-10-06 at 04:54 +1000, Jerahmy Pocott wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I'm wanting to use BASH as my root shell, so I compiled a statically
> >> linked
> >> version then tried
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 04:54:26AM +1000, Jerahmy Pocott wrote:
> I'm wanting to use BASH as my root shell, so I compiled a statically linked
> version then tried to log in with only / mounted. But I was locked out
> because elf.ld.so could not be found..
>
> I though elf was the native binary f
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 05:52
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said 'Who you talkin' to?
You talkin' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I didn't do
nuttin'. I said:
> Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 20:09:46 -0400
> From: Jerry McAllister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: BASH as root shell (st
On 06/10/2007, at 3:25 PM, Old Ranger wrote:
Hey look,
BASH is not a UNIX shell.
BASH occurred with Linux then carried over into FreeBSD.
While it has "some" advantages, it is still a bastard.
UNIX is written in "C"
Want the best you can get? Use "tcsh" as a shell and let the linux
communit
Am Samstag 06 Oktober 2007 07:25:39 schrieb Old Ranger:
> BASH is not a UNIX shell.
> BASH occurred with Linux then carried over into FreeBSD.
Get your history straight and read up on the heritage of the bash on gnu.org,
please. BEFORE you start making absurd comments like these. (as if the bash
On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 23:25 -0600, Old Ranger wrote:
[...snip...]
> Want the best you can get? Use "tcsh" as a shell and let the linux
^^^
+1
Sincerely,
--
Byung-Hee HWANG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This domain(izb.knu.ac.kr) is testing DKIM(RFC4871); f
RW wrote:
On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 20:09:46 -0400
Jerry McAllister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 12:32:22AM +0100, RW wrote:
On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 16:29:36 -0700 (PDT)
Philip Hallstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 06/10/2007, at 5:45 AM, RW wrote:
On
On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 20:09:46 -0400
Jerry McAllister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 12:32:22AM +0100, RW wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 16:29:36 -0700 (PDT)
> > Philip Hallstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > On 06/10/2007, at 5:45 AM, RW wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> On S
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 12:32:22AM +0100, RW wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 16:29:36 -0700 (PDT)
> Philip Hallstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > On 06/10/2007, at 5:45 AM, RW wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Sat, 6 Oct 2007 04:54:26 +1000
> > >> Jerahmy Pocott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>
On Fri, 5 Oct 2007 16:29:36 -0700 (PDT)
Philip Hallstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 06/10/2007, at 5:45 AM, RW wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, 6 Oct 2007 04:54:26 +1000
> >> Jerahmy Pocott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> I'm wanting to use BASH as my root shell, so I comp
On 06/10/2007, at 5:45 AM, RW wrote:
On Sat, 6 Oct 2007 04:54:26 +1000
Jerahmy Pocott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I'm wanting to use BASH as my root shell, so I compiled a statically
linked
I would suggest using bash as your toor shell instead. toor exist
precisely for this purpose.
On 06/10/2007, at 4:59 AM, Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
On Sat, 2007-10-06 at 04:54 +1000, Jerahmy Pocott wrote:
Hello,
I'm wanting to use BASH as my root shell, so I compiled a statically
linked
version then tried to log in with only / mounted. But I was locked
out because
elf.ld.so could not
On 06/10/2007, at 5:45 AM, RW wrote:
On Sat, 6 Oct 2007 04:54:26 +1000
Jerahmy Pocott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I'm wanting to use BASH as my root shell, so I compiled a statically
linked
I would suggest using bash as your toor shell instead. toor exist
precisely for this purpose.
On Sat, 6 Oct 2007 04:54:26 +1000
Jerahmy Pocott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm wanting to use BASH as my root shell, so I compiled a statically
> linked
I would suggest using bash as your toor shell instead. toor exist
precisely for this purpose.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_U
On Sat, 2007-10-06 at 04:54 +1000, Jerahmy Pocott wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm wanting to use BASH as my root shell, so I compiled a statically
> linked
> version then tried to log in with only / mounted. But I was locked
> out because
> elf.ld.so could not be found..
JP:
Did:
$ ldd /bin/bash
Hello,
I'm wanting to use BASH as my root shell, so I compiled a statically
linked
version then tried to log in with only / mounted. But I was locked
out because
elf.ld.so could not be found..
I though elf was the native binary format these days? But it needs a
library to
run them? Is it
19 matches
Mail list logo