-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 06 August 2004 04:58, Brett Glass wrote:
http://eetimes.com/semi/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=26805631
Probably not. Intel isn't going to keep exactly the same architecture as AMD
has now. They'll make a few minor ajustments to
On 050804, 20:58, Brett Glass wrote:
http://eetimes.com/semi/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=26805631
You should look at the IA64 port, not the AMD64.
Cheers
--
Massimiliano Stucchi
WillyStudios.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Http://www.willystudios.com/max/
pgpIcVzNs8K1y.pgp
Description: PGP
On Aug 6, 2004, at 2:42 AM, Massimiliano Stucchi wrote:
On 050804, 20:58, Brett Glass wrote:
http://eetimes.com/semi/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=26805631
You should look at the IA64 port, not the AMD64.
Why? This Intel chip referenced is NOT an IA64 architecture. It is
Intels EM64T 64/32
it was said:
On Aug 6, 2004, at 2:42 AM, Massimiliano Stucchi
wrote:
On 050804, 20:58, Brett Glass wrote:
http://eetimes.com/semi/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=26805631
You should look at the IA64 port, not the AMD64.
Why? This Intel chip referenced is NOT an IA64
architecture. It is
olloydson
Gesendet: Samstag, 7. August 2004 02:46
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: Does the AMD64 version of FreeBSD run on this?
it was said:
On Aug 6, 2004, at 2:42 AM, Massimiliano Stucchi
wrote:
On 050804, 20:58, Brett Glass wrote:
http://eetimes.com/semi/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 06 August 2004 04:58, Brett Glass wrote:
http://eetimes.com/semi/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=26805631
Probably not. Intel isn't going to keep exactly the same architecture as
AMD
has now. They'll make a few minor ajustments to
At 09:06 PM 8/6/2004, Matt Emmerton wrote:
While Intel (or AMD) may make changes to the underlying silicon to make
things better than their competitors (ie, larger caches, different pipeline
architecture, etc), they are committed to maintain compatibility between
AMD64 and EM64T.
This is good to
At 09:06 PM 8/6/2004, Matt Emmerton wrote:
While Intel (or AMD) may make changes to the underlying silicon to make
things better than their competitors (ie, larger caches, different
pipeline
architecture, etc), they are committed to maintain compatibility between
AMD64 and EM64T.
This is
That, however, is where the similarities end. The Nocona chip is only
64bit on the outside, the internals are essentially built on a 32 bit
legacy system. The end result is that AMD is pure 64 bit and intel's
chip just won't keep up when full 64 bit code hits the market. The new
code will
At 09:18 PM 8/6/2004, Matt Emmerton wrote:
If you would like to ship me one, I'd gladly test it out for you.
If I had one to ship, *I* would test it. But I need to know PRIOR
to purchase.
--Brett Glass
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://eetimes.com/semi/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=26805631
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
11 matches
Mail list logo