Re: MTA on non-standard port

2008-10-29 Thread Jeffrey Goldberg
On Oct 26, 2008, at 7:23 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: 1) Incoming SMTP (e.g. someIP:* --> yourIP:25) 2) Outbound SMTP (e.g. yourIP:* --> someIP:25) #2 has become prominent in the past few years, and is applied by ISPs because they want to curb their customers sending spam out onto the Internet (us

Re: MTA on non-standard port

2008-10-27 Thread Jerry
On Sun, 26 Oct 2008 17:23:59 -0700 Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 06:55:53PM -0500, Kevin Kinsey wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Quick thanks to Andrew Clark, Jeremy Chadwick, Tim Kellers, >> Jeff Goldberg, and anyone whose reply I've not seen re: >> this issue. >> >>

Re: MTA on non-standard port

2008-10-26 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 06:55:53PM -0500, Kevin Kinsey wrote: > Hello, > > Quick thanks to Andrew Clark, Jeremy Chadwick, Tim Kellers, > Jeff Goldberg, and anyone whose reply I've not seen re: > this issue. > > Isn't hard, as several pointed out. Now I've sendmail listening > on any port I want

Re: MTA on non-standard port

2008-10-26 Thread Kevin Kinsey
Hello, Quick thanks to Andrew Clark, Jeremy Chadwick, Tim Kellers, Jeff Goldberg, and anyone whose reply I've not seen re: this issue. Isn't hard, as several pointed out. Now I've sendmail listening on any port I want to. Problem is, still can't touch it from here (and you might have guessed, t

Re: MTA on non-standard port

2008-10-24 Thread Tim Kellers
Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 10:50:39AM -0500, Kevin Kinsey wrote: Hello, For various reasons, I find myself in need of an MTA accepting submission on a port other than 587 (or 25). It'd be Real Nice(tm) if sendmail could Just Do It, but I'd be willing to look at other opt

Re: MTA on non-standard port

2008-10-24 Thread andrew clarke
On Fri 2008-10-24 10:50:39 UTC-0500, Kevin Kinsey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > For various reasons, I find myself in need of an MTA accepting > submission on a port other than 587 (or 25). >From what I can tell Postfix can be configured to listen on any unused port (or multiple thereof) by editin

Re: MTA on non-standard port

2008-10-24 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 10:50:39AM -0500, Kevin Kinsey wrote: > Hello, > > For various reasons, I find myself in need of an MTA > accepting submission on a port other than 587 (or 25). > > It'd be Real Nice(tm) if sendmail could Just Do It, > but I'd be willing to look at other options as well, >

MTA on non-standard port

2008-10-24 Thread Kevin Kinsey
Hello, For various reasons, I find myself in need of an MTA accepting submission on a port other than 587 (or 25). It'd be Real Nice(tm) if sendmail could Just Do It, but I'd be willing to look at other options as well, as long as I can get a good spam solution to play nice with the server (curre