On Jul 12, 2013, at 2:57 PM, kpn...@pobox.com wrote:
> I thought MacOS X's rsync did handle resource forks if you gave it the
> proper option. The resource fork is reported by rsync in the usual
> convention of having "._" prefixed to the filename.
My understanding was that the files named ._ wer
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Chris Maness wrote:
> Thank you for the detailed description of what resource forks are. One
> more clue in this mystery is that appending .mov extension to it fixes the
> problem.
That makes some sense, since without the resource fork some MacOS software
would
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Paul Kraus wrote:
> Dropping the list …
>
> On Jul 12, 2013, at 1:49 PM, Chris Maness wrote:
>
> > Checksums are the same. All other files still work however the HUGE
> > rendered Final Cut Pro output, so I guess it is something in .DS_Store.
> > Last time I ju
On 12 July 2013, at 10:49, Chris Maness wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Chris Maness wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Since you are going to wait anyway, why don't you try peeking at some of
>>> the file checksums while this is running?
>>>
>>> MacOS X comes with a shasum utility which i
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Chris Maness wrote:
>
>
>
>
>> Since you are going to wait anyway, why don't you try peeking at some of
>> the file checksums while this is running?
>>
>> MacOS X comes with a shasum utility which implements SHA-256 checksums,
>> so you should be able to look at a
On 07/07/13 00:52, Adam Vande More wrote:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2013-January/038903.html
Thanks Adam.
However: I'm using UFS, not ZFS, so the first part is not applicable.
I have an nfe card, not an em; so again, the second part does not apply.
The only tunable i
On 07/06/13 19:51, Leslie Jensen wrote:
Smb is slow by design compared to nfs.
Sure.
As I said, I was expecting lower performance; not *this* lower, however.
bye & Thanks
av.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freeb
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Sorry to ask here: maybe it's not the best place, but it might be a start
> (the client and server are both FreeBSD).
>
> The server exports the same directory via NFS and via SMB.
>
> I'd expect some performance penalty when u
On 6 Jul 2013, at 21:34, Martin Alejandro Paredes Sanchez
wrote:
> On Saturday 06 July 2013 01:55:31 Andrea Venturoli wrote:
>> On 07/05/13 20:42, Terje Elde wrote:
>>> On 5. juli 2013, at 18:18, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
Is this normal in your experience?
>>>
>>> Did you do them in that o
On Saturday 06 July 2013 01:55:31 Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> On 07/05/13 20:42, Terje Elde wrote:
> > On 5. juli 2013, at 18:18, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> >> Is this normal in your experience?
> >
> > Did you do them in that order, or did you do the smb (slow) one first?
> >
> > If the slow was fir
Smb is slow by design compared to nfs.
/Leslie
Skickat från min Samsung Mobil
Originalmeddelande
Från: Andrea Venturoli
Datum:
Till: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Rubrik: Re: Possibly OT: NFS vs SMB performance
On 07/05/13 20:42, Terje Elde wrote:
> On 5. juli 2
On 07/05/13 20:42, Terje Elde wrote:
On 5. juli 2013, at 18:18, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
Is this normal in your experience?
Did you do them in that order, or did you do the smb (slow) one first?
If the slow was first, I'm thinking caching on the server could be a major
factor.
Yesterday I
On 5. juli 2013, at 18:18, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> Is this normal in your experience?
Did you do them in that order, or did you do the smb (slow) one first?
If the slow was first, I'm thinking caching on the server could be a major
factor.
Terje
___
Hello.
Sorry to ask here: maybe it's not the best place, but it might be a
start (the client and server are both FreeBSD).
The server exports the same directory via NFS and via SMB.
I'd expect some performance penalty when using SMB, but:
"find /nfs_mounted_dir >/dev/null" takes more or less
> Since you are going to wait anyway, why don't you try peeking at some of
> the file checksums while this is running?
>
> MacOS X comes with a shasum utility which implements SHA-256 checksums,
> so you should be able to look at a few random samples of these files,
> e.g. by running on the source
On Tue, 2 Jul 2013 14:48:03 -0700, Chris Maness wrote:
>On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Giorgos Keramidas
>wrote:
>>On Tue, 2 Jul 2013 13:35:00 -0700, Chris Maness wrote:
>>> I have been using rsync with Mac OSX with no issues until today. I
>>> generally use it instead of the copy command beca
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Giorgos Keramidas
wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Jul 2013 13:35:00 -0700, Chris Maness
> wrote:
> > I have been using rsync with Mac OSX with no issues until today. I
> > generally use it instead of the copy command because if the copy fails
> > on large files, I can pick up
On Tue, 2 Jul 2013 13:35:00 -0700, Chris Maness wrote:
> I have been using rsync with Mac OSX with no issues until today. I
> generally use it instead of the copy command because if the copy fails
> on large files, I can pick up where I left off. I have backed up
> entire Final Cut Pro projects
I have been using rsync with Mac OSX with no issues until today. I
generally use it instead of the copy command because if the copy fails on
large files, I can pick up where I left off. I have backed up entire Final
Cut Pro projects this way with no issues. However, I recently synced a
drive to
Many apologies for the off topic post, but my curiosity has got the
better of me.
Every once in a while we get a post with a subject of
"http://localhost/phpmyadmin"; and no body. What is the point of this -
borked mailer, existentialist spam, hacking attempt by a wannabe script
kiddie even m
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 03:02:28PM -0500, Edwin L. Culp W. wrote:
> SIMIoff topic. (I think)
>
> Sorry but I am envious that you have a chrome working. I am stuck with the
> ===> chromium-25.0.1364.172_1 has known vulnerabilities:
> chromium-25.0.1364.172_1 is vulnerable:
> chromium -- multiple
SIMIoff topic. (I think)
Sorry but I am envious that you have a chrome working. I am stuck with the
===> chromium-25.0.1364.172_1 has known vulnerabilities:
chromium-25.0.1364.172_1 is vulnerable:
chromium -- multiple vulnerabilities
WWW: http://portaudit.FreeBSD.org/bdd48858-9656-11e2-a9a8-002
guys,
if goog had their browser from BSD it would help big-time; I use one of the
zillions of linux distros for my desktop. I dont have a bleeding edge
cell. just something to call the cops or "access" [ small bus with wchair
lift.] only have one hand, so cant easily hold cell and "type" bla
On Sun, 2013-04-07 at 18:13 -0400, Rod Person wrote:
> On 04/07/13 15:34, Lynn Steven Killingsworth wrote:
> > Hi BSD -
> >
> > I know on my websites that more worrisome than someone caught reading
> > my poetry as their own is that they have told something is mine that
> > is not.
> >
> > I was th
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 11:16:11 -0500, Teske, Devin
wrote:
Here's what I suggest (the following works for me -- lists all my pools
and shows healthy):
Fantastic! I'd have never considered wrapping the entire thing into
STRING="$STRING$()".
I can't tell you how much I appreciate your assis
On Apr 4, 2013, at 8:11 AM, Mark Felder wrote:
> Sorry, my email client did something weird with collapsing and I didn't see
> you mention that it appeared to be working for you.
>
> On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 08:54:30 -0500, Teske, Devin
> wrote:
>
>> The only things I saw that needed changing to
Sorry, my email client did something weird with collapsing and I didn't
see you mention that it appeared to be working for you.
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 08:54:30 -0500, Teske, Devin
wrote:
The only things I saw that needed changing to go from ksh to /bin/sh
were:
if [ … == … ]; then
Oh, and just to cover all bases…
If you suspect you have sub-shells in the loop, use "export" to export the vars
so that the sub-shells get the vars in the loop.
--
Devin
On Apr 4, 2013, at 8:04 AM, Teske, Devin wrote:
>
> On Apr 4, 2013, at 7:42 AM, Mark Felder wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 04 Apr 2
On Apr 4, 2013, at 7:42 AM, Mark Felder wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 08:54:30 -0500, Teske, Devin
> wrote:
>
>> Wait, you can't? Then I've been doing something wrong all these years…
>> #!/bin/sh
>> printf "line1\nline2\n" | while read line
>> do
>> echo "line=[$line]"
>> done
>
> You so
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 08:54:30 -0500, Teske, Devin
wrote:
Wait, you can't? Then I've been doing something wrong all these years…
#!/bin/sh
printf "line1\nline2\n" | while read line
do
echo "line=[$line]"
done
You sort-of can, but it's not portable at all. As detailed here:
http://ww
On Apr 4, 2013, at 5:32 AM, Mark Felder wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Hopefully someone here is much more clever than I am. I've run out of ideas
> on how to cleanly convert this chunk of ksh to posix sh.
/me takes the challenge (and shame on some of the current responses; this is
trivial in sh and th
On 4/4/2013 3:32 μμ, Mark Felder wrote:
Hi all,
Hopefully someone here is much more clever than I am. I've run out of
ideas on how to cleanly convert this chunk of ksh to posix sh. This is
from a BB/Hobbit/Xymon monitoring script for ZFS. I'd really like to
have this working cleanly on FreeBSD w
fail on an unwritable
filesystem.
...By which I mean you can't create new files because your disk is
completely full or you're booting from a ramdisk that's messed up, etc.
__
it has a certain smooth-brained appeal
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 07:47:09 -0500, Quartz wrote:
I'd really like to
have this working cleanly on FreeBSD without requiring any funky shells
Define "funky shell". Does it have to be straight up plain sh? Can it
use csh or tcsh syntax? Does bash count as 'funky'?
Any shells not in the Fr
I'd really like to
have this working cleanly on FreeBSD without requiring any funky shells
Define "funky shell". Does it have to be straight up plain sh? Can it
use csh or tcsh syntax? Does bash count as 'funky'?
or using any temporary files.
Do you mean "manually created temp files"? bec
Hi all,
Hopefully someone here is much more clever than I am. I've run out of
ideas on how to cleanly convert this chunk of ksh to posix sh. This is
from a BB/Hobbit/Xymon monitoring script for ZFS. I'd really like to have
this working cleanly on FreeBSD without requiring any funky shells o
El día Monday, April 01, 2013 a las 08:13:12AM +0200, Matthias Apitz escribió:
> > > I'm using since some years http://www.aioe.org/ which has no binary
> > > groups (i.e. no porn or warez) and a cache of 25 days. Just works.
> >
> > The remaining users of de.* often say they filter postings inj
El día Monday, April 01, 2013 a las 03:13:07AM +0200, Sabine Baer escribió:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:20:05PM +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > I'm using since some years http://www.aioe.org/ which has no binary
> > groups (i.e. no porn or warez) and a cache of 25 days. Just work
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 02:12:06PM -0400, grarpamp wrote:
[...]
> Back then you had to have brains to be on the net, now everyone is
> web 2.0, and they're satisfied with ridiculous web forums. Any
> brains today are all but forced to use them because the population
> is so slim anywhere else. Us
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:20:05PM +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote:
[...]
> I'm using since some years http://www.aioe.org/ which has no binary
> groups (i.e. no porn or warez) and a cache of 25 days. Just works.
The remaining users of de.* often say they filter postings injected
over this server
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
> There are several free public USENET text servers (no binary
> groups), granted it's nothing like the days when every ISP ran one but
> there are still several about (eternal-september.com is one of the
> biggest). There are als
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 14:12:06 -0400
grarpamp wrote:
> Usenet was great. 'Was' because it really isn't there anymore.
> Servers used to be widespread, you could use your ISP, your school,
> your work, and failing that plenty of free ones even if for the
> asking, even some public/open ones. Now the
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Joshua Isom wrote:
> On 3/27/2013 3:25 PM, Walter Hurry wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 14:12:06 -0400, grarpamp wrote:
>>
>> Now there are very few, if any, free servers
>>>
>>
>> There are still free news servers available. My ISP bundles usenet,
>> nevertheles
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 15:37:43 -0500, Joshua Isom wrote:
> On 3/27/2013 3:25 PM, Walter Hurry wrote:
>> On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 14:12:06 -0400, grarpamp wrote:
>>
>>> Now there are very few, if any, free servers
>>
>> There are still free news servers available. My ISP bundles usenet,
>> nevertheless I
El día Wednesday, March 27, 2013 a las 03:37:43PM -0500, Joshua Isom escribió:
> The last ISP I knew had usenet complained about the bandwidth and
> storage required. They had a dedicated satellite instead of using their
> backbone, and only cached a couple days. All the porn and warez has the
On 3/27/2013 3:25 PM, Walter Hurry wrote:
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 14:12:06 -0400, grarpamp wrote:
Now there are very few, if any, free servers
There are still free news servers available. My ISP bundles usenet,
nevertheless I prefer the free one as it's faster and more reliable.
The last ISP I
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 14:12:06 -0400, grarpamp wrote:
> Now there are very few, if any, free servers
There are still free news servers available. My ISP bundles usenet,
nevertheless I prefer the free one as it's faster and more reliable.
___
freebsd-que
Usenet was great. 'Was' because it really isn't there anymore.
Servers used to be widespread, you could use your ISP, your school,
your work, and failing that plenty of free ones even if for the
asking, even some public/open ones. Now there are very few, if any,
free servers and likely none are pub
On 3/27/2013 6:55, Quartz wrote:
>> Younger generations
>
> In my experience, few people under the age of 30 have used usenet, and
> no one under the age of 20 has even heard of it.
>
19 year old usenet subscriber reporting in!
I subscribe to ASR and c.p.t.ntp which are the only decent newsgrou
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Matthias Apitz wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> This is a bit OT, but maybe some of you FreeBSD folks are as well
> affected like me and/or have any answer or comments...
>
> In the past I've used a lot the so called newsgroups, even running my o
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 6:55 AM, Quartz wrote:
>> Younger generations
>
>
> In my experience, few people under the age of 30 have used usenet, and no
> one under the age of 20 has even heard of it.
>
It's interesting to see all the re-inventions that occur all the time.
It's basically the same st
Younger generations
In my experience, few people under the age of 30 have used usenet, and
no one under the age of 20 has even heard of it.
__
it has a certain smooth-brained appeal
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.o
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 10:49:25 +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> Where have all the people gone?
They're using wibbly wobbly web wonder services, unless
they've been placed in a retirement castle. :-)
> Is USENET coming to its end?
I think it's just changing audiences. A common means of
USENET toda
Is USENET coming to its end?
Yes, for better or worse. It's been a slow downward spiral since the
late 90's. I can't speak for other countries, but in the US the majority
of ISPs started dropping access as a cost cutting measure since your
average layman didn't really understand or use it. Yo
Hello,
This is a bit OT, but maybe some of you FreeBSD folks are as well
affected like me and/or have any answer or comments...
In the past I've used a lot the so called newsgroups, even running my own inn
news server for our company and nn as the newsreader. I liked to post
there tech
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 09:00 -0600, Warren Block wrote:
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Standard practice for this list is to Cc the responder and the list,
because people are not required to subscribe to post.
That makes sense and does explain
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 09:15:43AM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 15:37 -0700, leeoliveshackelf...@surewest.net wrote:
> > Please Cc responses to the mailing list
>
> I know that it's tolerated by the FreeBSD lists, but for most mailing
> lists nowadays it's common to reply to
On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 09:00 -0600, Warren Block wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Mar 2013, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Standard practice for this list is to Cc the responder and the list,
> because people are not required to subscribe to post.
That makes sense and does explain why my last mail came through the
list
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 15:37 -0700, leeoliveshackelf...@surewest.net wrote:
Please Cc responses to the mailing list
Actually, I had written that in a reply.
I know that it's tolerated by the FreeBSD lists, but for most mailing
lists nowadays it's comm
On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 15:37 -0700, leeoliveshackelf...@surewest.net wrote:
> Please Cc responses to the mailing list
I know that it's tolerated by the FreeBSD lists, but for most mailing
lists nowadays it's common to reply to the list only. Most MUA nowadays
provide an option to automatically repl
On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 11:39 +0100, CeDeROM wrote:
> Agree, it contains more information than the second one which is
> picture-flash based and I cannot see ~80% of its content :-)
And the biggest evil is, that those web pages hide important things and
they don't add a site map.
I can't find the
On 01/27/13 17:37, Jimmy Olgeni wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
Possibly, I have the space (~18GB free on my /home partition, even
more free on /). It's just a matter of me taking the time to work on
setting either one up and I seem to be a perpetual "corner case" when
it
On 01/27/13 17:37, Jimmy Olgeni wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
Possibly, I have the space (~18GB free on my /home partition, even
more free on /). It's just a matter of me taking the time to work on
setting either one up and I seem to be a perpetual "corner case" when
it
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
Possibly, I have the space (~18GB free on my /home partition, even more free
on /). It's just a matter of me taking the time to work on setting either one
up and I seem to be a perpetual "corner case" when it comes to software
issues. Either way
On 01/27/13 16:59, Polytropon wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 16:53:05 -0600, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
On 01/27/13 16:49, Polytropon wrote:
Did you have any success using the old-fashioned pkg_add method
with the -f option, and using the FreeBSD 9-STABLE precompiled
package (should work for 9.1-REL
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 16:53:05 -0600, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
> On 01/27/13 16:49, Polytropon wrote:
> > Did you have any success using the old-fashioned pkg_add method
> > with the -f option, and using the FreeBSD 9-STABLE precompiled
> > package (should work for 9.1-RELEASE too)?
>
>
> No, beca
On 01/27/13 16:49, Polytropon wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 16:40:51 -0600, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
At this point I'm not sure what the problem is, though I do appreciate
the help.
root@alex-laptop:/root # pkg add
http://people.freebsd.org/~olgeni/smlnj-110.0.7_3.txz
smlnj-110.0.7_3.txz
On 01/27/13 16:44, Jimmy Olgeni wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
root@alex-laptop:/root # pkg add
http://people.freebsd.org/~olgeni/smlnj-110.0.7_3.txz
smlnj-110.0.7_3.txz 100% 2586KB 287.3KB/s 285.9KB/s 00:09
Installing smlnj-110.0.7_3...pkg: wrong archite
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 16:40:51 -0600, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
> At this point I'm not sure what the problem is, though I do appreciate
> the help.
>
> root@alex-laptop:/root # pkg add
> http://people.freebsd.org/~olgeni/smlnj-110.0.7_3.txz
> smlnj-110.0.7_3.txz 100% 2586KB 287.3K
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
root@alex-laptop:/root # pkg add
http://people.freebsd.org/~olgeni/smlnj-110.0.7_3.txz
smlnj-110.0.7_3.txz 100% 2586KB 287.3KB/s 285.9KB/s 00:09
Installing smlnj-110.0.7_3...pkg: wrong architecture: freebsd:9:x86:32
instead of fre
On 01/27/13 05:20, Jimmy Olgeni wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
Failed to install the following 1 package(s):
ftp://ftp1.us.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-9.0-release/lang/smlnj-110.0.7_3.tbz
My fault - I didn't immediately connect "pkg repo" to pkgng :)
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
Failed to install the following 1 package(s):
ftp://ftp1.us.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-9.0-release/lang/smlnj-110.0.7_3.tbz
My fault - I didn't immediately connect "pkg repo" to pkgng :)
I fired up a 9.1 VM and built an i386 pac
On 27/01/2013 02:57, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
> On 01/26/13 15:52, Jimmy Olgeni wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Sat, 26 Jan 2013, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
>>
>>> The pkg repo's are down. I'm not sure how you got it to work (if you
>>> did). It will not work on this end, thanks though.
>>
>> It seems
On 01/26/13 15:52, Jimmy Olgeni wrote:
Hello,
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
The pkg repo's are down. I'm not sure how you got it to work (if you
did). It will not work on this end, thanks though.
It seems to work from here. Maybe with a mirror?
ftp://ftp1.us.freebsd.org/pu
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 14:50:34 -0600, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
> On 01/26/13 13:44, Polytropon wrote:
> > On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 12:23:42 -0600, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
> >> I've got an amd64 machine (and no spare) and need help getting a binary
> >> for lang/sml-nj (it won't compile on amd64, it's m
On 01/26/13 13:44, Polytropon wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 12:23:42 -0600, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
I've got an amd64 machine (and no spare) and need help getting a binary
for lang/sml-nj (it won't compile on amd64, it's marked ignore for
whatever reason). I can send someone a 'pciconf -lv' of my
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 12:23:42 -0600, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
> I've got an amd64 machine (and no spare) and need help getting a binary
> for lang/sml-nj (it won't compile on amd64, it's marked ignore for
> whatever reason). I can send someone a 'pciconf -lv' of my machine if it
> would help.
1
I've got an amd64 machine (and no spare) and need help getting a binary
for lang/sml-nj (it won't compile on amd64, it's marked ignore for
whatever reason). I can send someone a 'pciconf -lv' of my machine if it
would help.
Thanks!
--
Yours in Christ,
Joseph A Nagy Jr
"Whoever loves instructi
On Thu, January 17, 2013 6:49 am, Dan Nelson wrote:
> First, check /etc/nsswitch.conf and verify that "dns" is listed on the
> "hosts:" line. Next, try disabling nscd ("svcadm disable
> name-service-cache") , and then running "truss ping www.google.com" (make
> sure to reenable nscd when you're d
On Thu, January 17, 2013 6:49 am, Dan Nelson wrote:
> First, check /etc/nsswitch.conf and verify that "dns" is listed on the
> "hosts:" line. Next, try disabling nscd ("svcadm disable
> name-service-cache") , and then running "truss ping www.google.com" (make
> sure to reenable nscd when you're d
On Thu, January 17, 2013 6:49 am, Dan Nelson wrote:
> First, check /etc/nsswitch.conf and verify that "dns" is listed on the
> "hosts:" line. Next, try disabling nscd ("svcadm disable
> name-service-cache") , and then running "truss ping www.google.com" (make
> sure to reenable nscd when you're d
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Wed Jan 16 22:08:13 2013
> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 22:04:15 -0600
> From: Tim Daneliuk
> To: FreeBSD Mailing List
> Subject: OT: What Might Break getbostbyname() ?
>
> This is not really a FreeBSD problem ... in fact, it's h
In the last episode (Jan 16), Tim Daneliuk said:
> This is not really a FreeBSD problem ... in fact, it's happening on a
> Solaris 10 machine. But because the TCP stack and its userland interface
> came from BSD, I am hoping some kind soul might have an insight into
> what's going on ...
Solaris
This is not really a FreeBSD problem ... in fact, it's happening on
a Solaris 10 machine. But because the TCP stack and its userland
interface came from BSD, I am hoping some kind soul might have
an insight into what's going on ...
The machine in question does DNS lookups fine via dig or nslookup
2013-01-16 12:14, Bas Smeelen skrev:
On 01/16/2013 12:08 PM, Leslie Jensen wrote:
I'm using vnc-4.1.3_5 on FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE with xfce4.
I have about 10 different hosts that I usually connect to.
I would like these hosts to be in a drop down menu so I just have to
pick the one I need to c
On 01/16/2013 12:08 PM, Leslie Jensen wrote:
I'm using vnc-4.1.3_5 on FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE with xfce4.
I have about 10 different hosts that I usually connect to.
I would like these hosts to be in a drop down menu so I just have to pick
the one I need to connect to.
From what I can read on-li
I'm using vnc-4.1.3_5 on FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE with xfce4.
I have about 10 different hosts that I usually connect to.
I would like these hosts to be in a drop down menu so I just have to
pick the one I need to connect to.
From what I can read on-line the hosts should be saved to
$HOME/.vnc/rec
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 12:51:19PM +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 15:52:16 -0800
> Gary Kline wrote:
>
> >
> > note that this question is =OT=.
> >
> > sorry if this is a re-request for clues. I =did= ask a very
&
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 06:41:43AM +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 15:52:16 -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
> > I'm looking for a small and portable tablet [or whatever] device
> > to use on the once-every-75-years when I do get out. I am not
> > looking for a cell phone. the
Hi,
On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 15:52:16 -0800
Gary Kline wrote:
>
> note that this question is =OT=.
>
> sorry if this is a re-request for clues. I =did= ask a very
> similar question a year or three ago; I'm just not sure
> where.
Ah, I remember. Wans&#
On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 15:52:16 -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
> I'm looking for a small and portable tablet [or whatever] device
> to use on the once-every-75-years when I do get out. I am not
> looking for a cell phone. the one I have works fine for auto-
> dialing <>. instead,
note that this question is =OT=.
sorry if this is a re-request for clues. I =did= ask a very
similar question a year or three ago; I'm just not sure where.
I'm looking for a small and portable tablet [or whatever] device
to use on the onc
On 11 January 2013 04:06, wrote:
> Recently Opera -- Opera/9.80 (X11; FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE i386)
> Presto/2.12.388 Version/12.12 -- has been crashing whenever I try to
> upload an image in JPEG format ...
>
> http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8364/8369048901_d47c385819_b_d.jpg
> ( opened raw file
On Friday 11 January 2013 03:06:32 p...@pair.com wrote:
> Recently Opera -- Opera/9.80 (X11; FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE i386)
> Presto/2.12.388 Version/12.12 -- has been crashing whenever I try to
> upload an image in JPEG format ...
>
> http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8364/8369048901_d47c385819_b_d.jpg
>
Recently Opera -- Opera/9.80 (X11; FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE i386)
Presto/2.12.388 Version/12.12 -- has been crashing whenever I try to
upload an image in JPEG format ...
http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8364/8369048901_d47c385819_b_d.jpg
( opened raw file in ufraw 0.18_4; sent to gimp 2.6.12,2;
Please don't reply to spam, since this makes it harder to detect spam by
software.
Happy New Year!
Ralf
PS: I've broken the thread intendedly.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
Polytropon edvax.de> writes:
>
> On Sun, 6 Jan 2013 21:21:50 + (UTC), jb wrote:
> >
> >
http://www.businessinsider.com/verizon-dvr-will-know-what-your-doing-and-saying-2012-12
>
> http://boingboing.net/2012/11/08/microsoft-patents-spying-on-yo.html
>
> http://hdguru.com/is-your-new-hdtv-w
On Sun, 6 Jan 2013 21:21:50 + (UTC), jb wrote:
>
> http://www.businessinsider.com/verizon-dvr-will-know-what-your-doing-and-saying-2012-12
http://boingboing.net/2012/11/08/microsoft-patents-spying-on-yo.html
http://hdguru.com/is-your-new-hdtv-watching-you/7643/
--
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Ge
http://www.businessinsider.com/verizon-dvr-will-know-what-your-doing-and-saying-2012-12
jb
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-u
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 08:43:18AM +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 13:59:45 -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 08:03:39AM +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> > > On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 18:27:38 -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
> > > > one question I have may solve the problem of
1 - 100 of 2498 matches
Mail list logo
