On Friday 10 August 2007 01:16:48 Gary Kline wrote:
Guys,
A couple years ago I got a hold of Ubuntu and until recent months
thought it was the best thing since [[ fill-in ]].
Long-story-shot, I am wedged at 6.06 (a Long Term Support)
version, and because the
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 09:24:00PM -0700, Steve Franks wrote:
My experience with PC-BSD was that it was just different enough to
break alot of FreeBSD's documentation, and they don't have enough of
their own. I was a newbie, of course, but I went with vanilla FreeBSD
because of the handbook
close. Has anybody on this list used the PC version of BSD?
What about a desktop-BSD??
tested both when i needed some humour :)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On 8/9/07 8:16 PM, Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anybody on this list used the PC version of BSD?
What about a desktop-BSD??
I gave them both a try when I first got into FreeBSD. I didn't particularly
care for their package management system. DesktopBSD has a really cool
little
Guys,
A couple years ago I got a hold of Ubuntu and until recent months
thought it was the best thing since [[ fill-in ]].
Long-story-shot, I am wedged at 6.06 (a Long Term Support)
version, and because the *next* LTS isn't due until 2009
and
On 8/9/07, Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guys,
snip
close. Has anybody on this list used the PC version of BSD?
What about a desktop-BSD??
suggestion? advice?
I've used PC-BSD, and agree with Jonathan - it's package management
system is a bit funky. It's
My experience with PC-BSD was that it was just different enough to
break alot of FreeBSD's documentation, and they don't have enough of
their own. I was a newbie, of course, but I went with vanilla FreeBSD
because of the handbook and freebsd-questions, and I've no regrets.
Been at least 9 months.
