> > why are you not using your ISP to relay emails, using its mail
> > gateway (which should have a static IP address)?
...
> I do not like the fact that a number of governments (including
> most european ones) now have the right to access all emails
> that pass through an ISP's server. They do no
David Southwell wrote:
I pay for my connection to receive.. and pay for my connection to send. Some people just want to not paly their part in absorbing the risks that go with participation. It is up to us to defend our systems.
Your server, your rules. You can whitelist or blacklist anyone
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 05:35:14 -0700
David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree and they do BUT they need a warrant to do so!! That is the
> safeguard.
>
> With the internet no warrant is needed. There is no protection for
> civil liberties as applies with pohysical mail.
First of all, th
On Monday 08 September 2008 05:09:03 Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 05:21:03 -0700, David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > If the same protocol was applied to physical mail then we would not
> > have been allowed to send letters unless we had a big building to send
> > it fr
On Monday 08 September 2008 05:03:30 Zbigniew Szalbot wrote:
> David Southwell:
> > In yesterday's world anyone could send a physical letter to any address
> > anywhere in the world. I get spam letters through the letter box it is up
> > to me to chuck them in the bin. Why should the internet be di
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 05:21:03 -0700, David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If the same protocol was applied to physical mail then we would not
> have been allowed to send letters unless we had a big building to send
> it from and all letters would have had to have had a "big building"
> sendin
David Southwell:
In yesterday's world anyone could send a physical letter to any address
anywhere in the world. I get spam letters through the letter box it is up to
me to chuck them in the bin. Why should the internet be different especially
when the restrictions on fixed IPs are brought abo
On Monday 08 September 2008 04:47:49 Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 04:33:14 -0700, David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >On Monday 08 September 2008 03:57:11 you wrote:
> >>On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 02:47:47 -0700, David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >>> Could anyone tel
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 04:33:14 -0700, David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Monday 08 September 2008 03:57:11 you wrote:
>>On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 02:47:47 -0700, David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Could anyone tell me what entry I should make in postfix configuration
>>> files to boun
On Monday 08 September 2008 04:19:11 Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> > I do not like the fact that a number of governments (including most
> > european ones) now have the right to access all emails that pass through
> > an ISP's
>
> only if you use big operators.
All UK operators are "big operators and
I do not like the fact that a number of governments (including most european
ones) now have the right to access all emails that pass through an ISP's
only if you use big operators.
BIG BROTHER is watching far too much. Frankly I am surprised that
we have democracy. in democracy majority de
On Monday 08 September 2008 04:10:11 Sahil Tandon wrote:
> David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sorry to ask the question here but postfix users mailing list is
> > currently rejecting mails from servers on a dynamic ip address
> > - so I cannot get through to ask a question there.
>
> In
On Monday 08 September 2008 03:38:05 Sahil Tandon wrote:
> David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Could anyone tell me what entry I should make in postfix
> > configuration files to bounce mails directed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > that emanate from a source outside my local network.
>
> After
On Monday 08 September 2008 03:57:11 you wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 02:47:47 -0700, David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Could anyone tell me what entry I should make in postfix configuration
> > files to bounce mails directed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] that emanate from a
> > sour
David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry to ask the question here but postfix users mailing list is
> currently rejecting mails from servers on a dynamic ip address
> - so I cannot get through to ask a question there.
Incidentally, your IP is also listed on several RBLs.
--
Sahil Ta
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 02:47:47 -0700, David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Could anyone tell me what entry I should make in postfix configuration
> files to bounce mails directed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] that emanate from a
> source outside my local network.
>
> Sorry to ask the question he
David Southwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could anyone tell me what entry I should make in postfix
> configuration files to bounce mails directed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> that emanate from a source outside my local network.
After permitting your networks in the smtpd_recipient_restrictions, us
Hi
Could anyone tell me what entry I should make in postfix configuration files
to bounce mails directed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] that emanate from a source
outside
my local network.
Sorry to ask the question here but postfix users mailing list is currently
rejecting mails from servers on a dynam
Hello,
My thanks to everyone who has helped me over these past few days. I did
a total reinstall and clean configuration of postfix and amavisd-new, i did
not get the error about the dictionaries again, but this time i got a
message from amavisd:
denied access to 192.168.0.3
for some reason ama
Hello,
Thanks, i did that. The adding of the -v option isn't giving me any
additional information, it's just saying what it said before, smtpd is dying
with exit status 1, and now the error "server did not send an smtp greeting.
I think my next move is to try a complete reinstall. I didn't
dave wrote:
Hello,
Alright, i am still having this issue, and now another has cropped up. I
am getting an error: "server dropped connection before sending the initial
smtp greeting."
The only thing i can think of is i changed some setting trying to get
this working. However like before that
Hello,
Alright, i am still having this issue, and now another has cropped up. I
am getting an error: "server dropped connection before sending the initial
smtp greeting."
The only thing i can think of is i changed some setting trying to get
this working. However like before that is the only
Logan Ashby wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 22:39:40 -0400, dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jun 28 21:35:01 zeus amavis[68580]: (68580-01) WARN: all primary virus
scanners failed, considering backups
Jun 28 21:35:01 zeus postfix/smtpd[68669]: fatal: open dictionary: need
"type:name" form instead of: "#
Hi,
Thanks for your reply. I thought of a misplaced comment in postfix, but
two things lead me away from that. Firstly, this only occurs when i bring
amavisd in to the picture. And secondly, postfix check does not report any
syntax errors.
I'm getting tempted to post these files somewhere, this
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 22:39:40 -0400, dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jun 28 21:35:01 zeus amavis[68580]: (68580-01) WARN: all primary virus
> scanners failed, considering backups
> Jun 28 21:35:01 zeus postfix/smtpd[68669]: fatal: open dictionary: need
> "type:name" form instead of: "#"
> Jun 28
Hello,
My thanks to everyone who has so far offered help. Unfortunately i'm not
any closer to fixing this. I had to enable amavisd to log through syslog and
set it to mail so it would put output in maillog, then i added -v to the end
of the postfix smtpd line in master.cf. I then enabled conten
dave wrote:
Hello,
Thanks for your reply. The strange thing is amavisd isn't logging, i've
got logging set to a file and i'm not getting any feedback. Here's something
strange, i stopped postfix, started up amavisd, then restarted postfix
forgetting inadvertently to uncomment the content_filter
dave wrote:
Hello,
Thanks for your reply. The strange thing is amavisd isn't logging, i've
got logging set to a file and i'm not getting any feedback. Here's something
strange, i stopped postfix, started up amavisd, then restarted postfix
forgetting inadvertently to uncomment the content_filter
Hello,
Thanks for your reply. The strange thing is amavisd isn't logging, i've
got logging set to a file and i'm not getting any feedback. Here's something
strange, i stopped postfix, started up amavisd, then restarted postfix
forgetting inadvertently to uncomment the content_filter line, it di
dave wrote:
Hi,
I've got a FreeBSD 5.2.1 box running postfix 2.1, spamassassin 2.63,
amavisd-new-20030616.p9, dcc-dccd-1.2.48, and razor-agents-2.40 all
installed via ports. I'm having issues with dcc-dccd and razor-agents not
working, but i believe that's due to my firewall, anyone know what po
Hi,
I've got a FreeBSD 5.2.1 box running postfix 2.1, spamassassin 2.63,
amavisd-new-20030616.p9, dcc-dccd-1.2.48, and razor-agents-2.40 all
installed via ports. I'm having issues with dcc-dccd and razor-agents not
working, but i believe that's due to my firewall, anyone know what ports
they us
31 matches
Mail list logo
