Re: Quick perl ports question

2007-08-30 Thread Kurt Buff
On 8/29/07, Matthew Seaman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nikola Lecic wrote: C) port it! is the best. :) Seriously, if you really have a long term need for Net::LDAP module, then porting would be the most convenient for you and for others. It's already been done. I don't know why the

Quick perl ports question

2007-08-29 Thread Kurt Buff
I'm trying to implement a script that I found, and it's referencing Net::LDAP, Net::LDAP::Control::Paged and Net::LDAP::Constant I'm not finding p5-net-ldap in ports, though I do see p5-ResourcePool-Resource-Net-LDAP and p5-perl-ldap. Can I: A) leave the script as-is, and simply install one or

Re: Quick perl ports question

2007-08-29 Thread Nikola Lecic
On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:22:39 -0700 Kurt Buff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm trying to implement a script that I found, and it's referencing Net::LDAP, Net::LDAP::Control::Paged and Net::LDAP::Constant I'm not finding p5-net-ldap in ports, though I do see p5-ResourcePool-Resource-Net-LDAP and

Re: Quick perl ports question

2007-08-29 Thread Matthew Seaman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Kurt Buff wrote: I'm trying to implement a script that I found, and it's referencing Net::LDAP, Net::LDAP::Control::Paged and Net::LDAP::Constant I'm not finding p5-net-ldap in ports, though I do see p5-ResourcePool-Resource-Net-LDAP and

Re: Quick perl ports question

2007-08-29 Thread Matthew Seaman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Nikola Lecic wrote: C) port it! is the best. :) Seriously, if you really have a long term need for Net::LDAP module, then porting would be the most convenient for you and for others. It's already been done. I don't know why the port is