On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Joseph Koenig wrote:
> I know this is an issue that comes up a lot, but I wanted to get an opinion
> from some people on the list. We, along with everyone else, have TONS of
> SPAM hit our server. Unfortunately, we haven't found any good way to reduce
> it. We're using ORDB and
Robert Huff wrote:
Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg writes:
SpamAssissin can hog a lot of CPU if you handle a lot of emails,
so make sure you are running it in daemon mode, that helps quite
a bit.
SpamAssassin is Perl, so of ourse it's a hog. I seem to
remember someone trying to write a versi
Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg writes:
> SpamAssissin can hog a lot of CPU if you handle a lot of emails,
> so make sure you are running it in daemon mode, that helps quite
> a bit.
SpamAssassin is Perl, so of ourse it's a hog. I seem to
remember someone trying to write a version in C
Joseph Koenig wrote:
I know this is an issue that comes up a lot, but I wanted to get an opinion
from some people on the list. We, along with everyone else, have TONS of
SPAM hit our server. Unfortunately, we haven't found any good way to reduce
it. We're using ORDB and SpamCop, but neither are rea
only my $ 0,02 about on SpamAssassin usage
try catching SpamAssassin directly from command line of perl doing this:
perl -MCAPN -e'install MAil::SpamAssassin'
this will download Spamassassin and the dependencys , compile test and install.
Is just and advice, about how take better performance of you
wn at least a couple of times a week
to keep up with the latest tactics, and the support is second to none.
Just my $.02 worth
Sean.
-Original Message-
From: Kliment Andreev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: October 3, 2003 9:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FreeBSD & SPAM
I kno
le of times a week
to keep up with the latest tactics, and the support is second to none.
Just my $.02 worth
Sean.
-Original Message-
From: Kliment Andreev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: October 3, 2003 9:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FreeBSD & SPAM
> > > I know thi
> > > I know this is an issue that comes up a lot, but I wanted to get
> > > an opinion from some people on the list. We, along with everyone
> > > else, have TONS of SPAM hit our server. Unfortunately, we
> > > haven't found any good way to reduce it. We're using ORDB and
> > > SpamCop, but neithe
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 11:42:11 -0300 (ART)
Fernando Gleiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Joseph Koenig wrote:
>
> > I know this is an issue that comes up a lot, but I wanted to get
> > an opinion from some people on the list. We, along with everyone
> > else, have TONS of SPAM hi
Joseph:
We use a combination of a number of DNSBLs and MIMEDefang/SpamAssassin,
which between them detect on average 66% of inbound mail as spam/virus, a
small amount of other spam gets through undetected, but it's very little.
MIMEDefang is a great solution that you can customize to suit your
env
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Joseph Koenig wrote:
> I know this is an issue that comes up a lot, but I wanted to get an opinion
> from some people on the list. We, along with everyone else, have TONS of
> SPAM hit our server. Unfortunately, we haven't found any good way to reduce
> it. We're using ORDB and
Joseph Koenig wrote:
I know this is an issue that comes up a lot, but I wanted to get an opinion
from some people on the list. We, along with everyone else, have TONS of
SPAM hit our server. Unfortunately, we haven't found any good way to reduce
it. We're using ORDB and SpamCop, but neither are rea
12 matches
Mail list logo
