Re: FreeBSD SPAM

2003-10-19 Thread Warren Block
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Joseph Koenig wrote:

 I know this is an issue that comes up a lot, but I wanted to get an opinion
 from some people on the list. We, along with everyone else, have TONS of
 SPAM hit our server. Unfortunately, we haven't found any good way to reduce
 it. We're using ORDB and SpamCop, but neither are really doing the job.

These have been very effective for me:

sbl.spamhaus.org
list.dsbl.org
blackholes.easynet.nl
dynablock.easynet.nl
dnsbl.sorbs.net

Naturally, you should check the web pages for each before using them to
make sure you understand their listing policies.

Commercial DNSBL... no experience there.  Some are quite conservative,
and some are toothless.  The free ones seem better to me.

In combination with DNSBL, I have a large /etc/mail/access file of
rejects.  Bad ISPs, rogue providers, and even much of some countries.
Bandwidth-wise, it's hard to beat--mail from known-bad origins is
rejected outright.

The Windows virus-of-the-week attacks have become so common that I've
also written a little script to add those by /24.  I'll manually
expire them by removing that section from the access file, whenever it
seems like it's rejecting real mail.  Actually, I haven't seen that yet.

-Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD SPAM

2003-10-06 Thread David Landgren
Robert Huff wrote:

Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg writes:


SpamAssissin can hog a lot of CPU if you handle a lot of emails,
so make sure you are running it in daemon mode, that helps quite
a bit.


SpamAssassin is Perl, so of ourse it's a hog.  I seem to
remember someone trying to write a version in C 
Well, they'll still be trying in 2007...

BNy the time you've written the current SA in C, the current Perl 
version will be miles ahead. Programmer productivity is always more 
important than raw power. A 2.8MHz Pentium Xeon with 2Gb RAM doesn't 
cost all that much and offers phenomenal processing power.

If that's not an option, an effective method for reducing SA load is 
to feed it less email :)

I use Postfix and have some pretty extensive correlation checks to 
filter out spam (spoofed sender domains, garbage HELO strings, 
obsolete or spambait recipients, spammer hosts). Since the beginning 
of the month these low-overhad checks blocked 5313 messages of 19990 
total. That's 5300 less that have to be dealt with SA.

To learn more about blocking spam with Postfix, 
http://www.securitysage.com/guides/postfix_uce.html is a good place to 
start these days.

David

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD SPAM

2003-10-05 Thread Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg
Joseph Koenig wrote:
I know this is an issue that comes up a lot, but I wanted to get an opinion
from some people on the list. We, along with everyone else, have TONS of
SPAM hit our server. Unfortunately, we haven't found any good way to reduce
it. We're using ORDB and SpamCop, but neither are really doing the job.
We're a small small company (7 employees) with about 100 mailboxes on the
server. We don't mind paying for a service that works, but we are certainly
on a tight budget. Any recommendations would be greatly appreciated.
Currently, we're using Sendmail, although we're considering (and testing) a
switch to PostFix. TIA for any advice,
Joe

We are running procmail, MIMEDefang and SpamAssassin. After some 
tweaking, it kills about 9 out of 10 spams.
SpamAssissin can hog a lot of CPU if you handle a lot of emails, so make 
sure you are running it in daemon mode, that helps quite a bit.

--
R
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD SPAM

2003-10-05 Thread Robert Huff

Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg writes:

  SpamAssissin can hog a lot of CPU if you handle a lot of emails,
  so make sure you are running it in daemon mode, that helps quite
  a bit.

SpamAssassin is Perl, so of ourse it's a hog.  I seem to
remember someone trying to write a version in C 



Robert Huff


___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD SPAM

2003-10-04 Thread Karl M. Joch
Sean Page wrote:

Granted it's not an inexpensive solution, but we switched from SpamAssassin
to PureMessage by ActiveState.
http://www.activestate.com/Products/PureMessage 
We are thoroughly impressed with the accuracy and the dynamic feature set of
the product. Automatic updates come down at least a couple of times a week
to keep up with the latest tactics, and the support is second to none.
Just my $.02 worth

Sean.

-Original Message-
From: Kliment Andreev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: October 3, 2003 9:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FreeBSD  SPAM



I know this is an issue that comes up a lot, but I wanted to get 
an opinion from some people on the list. We, along with everyone 
else, have TONS of SPAM hit our server. Unfortunately, we haven't 
found any good way to reduce it. We're using ORDB and SpamCop, but 
neither are really doing the job. We're a small small company (7 
employees) with about 100 mailboxes on the server. We don't mind 
paying for a service that works, but we are certainly on a tight 
budget. Any recommendations would be greatly appreciated. 
Currently, we're using Sendmail, although we're considering (and 
testing) a switch to PostFix. TIA for any


Check www.kaspersky.com for anti-virus and anti-spam tools for FreeBSD. If
you decide to use SpamAssassin and if you have a lot of spam-mail coming and
a slow server, mind that it will clog you CPU very, very soon.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


blocking dynamic ip and dialup users with dnsbl lists reduces 60-70% of 
the spam. there is a very good one on an .nl server. for some special 
ones an access list helps. adding a combination of mailscanner and 
spamassassin to sendmail does the rest. the rest which comes thru is not 
really a lot of mails. and all of that stuff is open source and free.

happyly running above things with 50k+ mails / day.

--
Best regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen,
Karl M. Joch

http://www.freebsd.at - Das Power Betriebssystem

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD SPAM

2003-10-04 Thread Luís Vitório Cargnini
only my $ 0,02 about on SpamAssassin usage
try catching SpamAssassin directly from command line of perl doing this:
perl -MCAPN -e'install MAil::SpamAssassin'
this will download Spamassassin and the dependencys , compile test and install.
Is just and advice, about how take better performance of your Perl system because some 
server systems don't need to have the ports collection installed.
and using this procedure you could download 99% of the Perl packages.
be the force with you young Jedi's. 8-)

-- 
Thanks  Regards
Luís Vitório Cargnini
Computer Science Bacharelor
PUC-RS
Pontifícia Universidade Católica - Rio Grande do Sul
Brasil


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: FreeBSD SPAM

2003-10-03 Thread Rob
Joseph Koenig wrote:
I know this is an issue that comes up a lot, but I wanted to get an opinion
from some people on the list. We, along with everyone else, have TONS of
SPAM hit our server. Unfortunately, we haven't found any good way to reduce
it. We're using ORDB and SpamCop, but neither are really doing the job.
We're a small small company (7 employees) with about 100 mailboxes on the
server. We don't mind paying for a service that works, but we are certainly
on a tight budget. Any recommendations would be greatly appreciated.
Currently, we're using Sendmail, although we're considering (and testing) a
switch to PostFix. TIA for any advice,
Joe

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


How about spamassassin ?
(/usr/ports/mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin)
It works great here and catches about 95% of the spam hitting us.
Rob Evers

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD SPAM

2003-10-03 Thread Fernando Gleiser
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Joseph Koenig wrote:

 I know this is an issue that comes up a lot, but I wanted to get an opinion
 from some people on the list. We, along with everyone else, have TONS of
 SPAM hit our server. Unfortunately, we haven't found any good way to reduce
 it. We're using ORDB and SpamCop, but neither are really doing the job.
 We're a small small company (7 employees) with about 100 mailboxes on the
 server. We don't mind paying for a service that works, but we are certainly
 on a tight budget. Any recommendations would be greatly appreciated.
 Currently, we're using Sendmail, although we're considering (and testing) a
 switch to PostFix. TIA for any advice,

Try SpamAssassin (mail/p5-Mail-SpamAssassin). I use it in many of
the servers I administer and it works great. it has Bayesian
filters, so it can learn to tell spam from ham.

I don't use any ORBL directly, since for me they're more trouble
than they're worth, but I use them to bump the spamassassin score.

SpamAssassin also integrates very nicely with MIMEDefang to stop
malware sent via email.

Hope this helps

Fer


 Joe

 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: FreeBSD SPAM

2003-10-03 Thread Barry Byrne
Joseph:

We use a combination of a number of DNSBLs and MIMEDefang/SpamAssassin,
which between them detect on average 66% of inbound mail as spam/virus, a
small amount of other spam gets through undetected, but it's very little.
MIMEDefang is a great solution that you can customize to suit your
environment, assuming you use sendmail and know a little perl.

 - Barry

--
Barry Byrne, IT Manager,
WBT Systems, Block 2, Harcourt Centre
Harcourt Street, Dublin 2, Ireland


 I know this is an issue that comes up a lot, but I wanted to get
 an opinion
 from some people on the list. We, along with everyone else, have TONS of
 SPAM hit our server. Unfortunately, we haven't found any good way
 to reduce
 it. We're using ORDB and SpamCop, but neither are really doing the job.
 We're a small small company (7 employees) with about 100 mailboxes on the
 server. We don't mind paying for a service that works, but we are
 certainly
 on a tight budget. Any recommendations would be greatly appreciated.
 Currently, we're using Sendmail, although we're considering (and
 testing) a
 switch to PostFix. TIA for any advice,

 Joe

 ___
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD SPAM

2003-10-03 Thread Matthew Bettinger
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003 11:42:11 -0300 (ART)
Fernando Gleiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Joseph Koenig wrote:
 
  I know this is an issue that comes up a lot, but I wanted to get
  an opinion from some people on the list. We, along with everyone
  else, have TONS of SPAM hit our server. Unfortunately, we
  haven't found any good way to reduce it. We're using ORDB and
  SpamCop, but neither are really doing the job. We're a small
  small company (7 employees) with about 100 mailboxes on the
  server. We don't mind paying for a service that works, but we
  are certainly on a tight budget. Any recommendations would be
  greatly appreciated. Currently, we're using Sendmail, although
  we're considering (and testing) a switch to PostFix. TIA for any
  advice,
 

You might want to consider investigating a hardware appliance.  Two
that come to mind is 

Borderware MailXtreme and Bluecat Networks Meridius.

re,

-
Matthew Bettinger
System Administrator
Champion Elevators, Inc
Houston, Texas 77061
713.640.8500
-
KeyID: 68F0AAC4
Key Fingerprint: 096F 98AE 74FB 984B 2134 5C41 0E94 CF91 68F0 AAC4
Public Key: http://www.championelevators.com/~mbettinger/pub_key.asc
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FreeBSD SPAM

2003-10-03 Thread Kliment Andreev
   I know this is an issue that comes up a lot, but I wanted to get
   an opinion from some people on the list. We, along with everyone
   else, have TONS of SPAM hit our server. Unfortunately, we
   haven't found any good way to reduce it. We're using ORDB and
   SpamCop, but neither are really doing the job. We're a small
   small company (7 employees) with about 100 mailboxes on the
   server. We don't mind paying for a service that works, but we
   are certainly on a tight budget. Any recommendations would be
   greatly appreciated. Currently, we're using Sendmail, although
   we're considering (and testing) a switch to PostFix. TIA for any

Check www.kaspersky.com for anti-virus and anti-spam tools for FreeBSD.
If you decide to use SpamAssassin and if you have a lot of spam-mail coming
and a slow server, mind that it will clog you CPU very, very soon.

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


RE: FreeBSD SPAM

2003-10-03 Thread Sean Page
Granted it's not an inexpensive solution, but we switched from SpamAssassin
to PureMessage by ActiveState.
http://www.activestate.com/Products/PureMessage 
We are thoroughly impressed with the accuracy and the dynamic feature set of
the product. Automatic updates come down at least a couple of times a week
to keep up with the latest tactics, and the support is second to none.
Just my $.02 worth

Sean.

-Original Message-
From: Kliment Andreev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: October 3, 2003 9:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FreeBSD  SPAM


   I know this is an issue that comes up a lot, but I wanted to get 
   an opinion from some people on the list. We, along with everyone 
   else, have TONS of SPAM hit our server. Unfortunately, we haven't 
   found any good way to reduce it. We're using ORDB and SpamCop, but 
   neither are really doing the job. We're a small small company (7 
   employees) with about 100 mailboxes on the server. We don't mind 
   paying for a service that works, but we are certainly on a tight 
   budget. Any recommendations would be greatly appreciated. 
   Currently, we're using Sendmail, although we're considering (and 
   testing) a switch to PostFix. TIA for any

Check www.kaspersky.com for anti-virus and anti-spam tools for FreeBSD. If
you decide to use SpamAssassin and if you have a lot of spam-mail coming and
a slow server, mind that it will clog you CPU very, very soon.

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]