> The first step would be to try to quantify the performance
> difference in serving the actual web pages. Find a single
> page that you think is slow on the production system and that
> can be accessed without having to be part of a session, and
> quantify the performance difference for that p
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 05:30:59PM -0400, John Straiton wrote:
> If 5.1-C has debugging on by default then , yes, I'd concur that we have
> those features turned on.
5.1-CURRENT indeed has a number of debugging features enabled by
default, which can cause significant performance loss under load.
> > Post your kernel configs, or better yet, do a diff -u between the
> > 5.0-R and the 5.1-C kernel configs. I bet dime to dollar you've
> > got some debugging options enabled in the 5.1-C config. At the
> > very least you haven't remove the debugging options from your
> > malloc options.
>
> *
> There's lots of tricky stuff that can be going wrong.
> I spent some time in my last two jobs (anybody got
> a new one in NJ?) on speeding up stuff like this
> and the first thing I try to do is put some kind of
> steady-state load on the boxen and monitor each box involved
> with systat 1 -vm
> Post your kernel configs, or better yet, do a diff -u between
> the 5.0-R and the 5.1-C kernel configs. I bet dime to dollar
> you've got some debugging options enabled in the 5.1-C
> config. At the very least you haven't remove the debugging
> options from your malloc options.
*frown* The
John Straiton writes:
> I'm pretty confused right now with trying to
> determine the nature of a performance problem ...
> on one of my servers. ... in pulling up websites
> from the machine, my silly POS development
> box has nearly double performance ...
There's lots of tricky stuff that can b
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003, John Straiton wrote:
> Greets!
>
> I'm pretty confused right now with trying to determine the nature of a
> performance problem I'm having on one of my servers. The server is a
> webserver with a separate db/file server sitting behind it. The issue is
> that in pulling up webs
> > I'm pretty confused right now with trying to determine the
> nature of a
> > performance problem I'm having on one of my servers. The
> server is a
> > webserver with a separate db/file server sitting behind it.
> The issue
> > is that in pulling up websites from the machine, my silly PO
Chris Pressey wrote:
[ ... ]
- Is it possible the server has too much RAM?
I don't remember where I heard that that can degrade performance, but
I'm pretty sure it was on one of the freebsd lists a couple of months
ago.
One of the early Pentium Pro/P2 chipsets, either the 430VX or the 430FX?, was
On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 09:42:41 -0400
"John Straiton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greets!
>
> I'm pretty confused right now with trying to determine the nature of a
> performance problem I'm having on one of my servers. The server is a
> webserver with a separate db/file server sitting behind
10 matches
Mail list logo
