RE: Resolution problems

2004-09-21 Thread Tom Connolly
I have 8 Megs of RAM and I have set the DefaultDepth to 16 already. -Original Message- From: Warren Block [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 20, 2004 6:10 PM To: Tom Connolly Cc: FreeBSD_Questions Subject: Re: Resolution problems On Mon, 20 Sep 2004, Tom Connolly wrote

Re: Resolution problems

2004-09-20 Thread Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P.
Tom Connolly wrote: My Sync/Refresh rates are consistent with my monitor documentation but offhand, I'm not sure what they are. I will check when I get on my box. I found out last night (celebrating one year of FBSD on the desktop) that I could gain a higher resolution by increasing those number

Re: Resolution problems

2004-09-20 Thread horio shoichi
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 14:17:12 -0600 "Tom Connolly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello list, > > I am currently running 4.10 with the latest version of xfree86. My video > card is an integrated ATI Rage Pro and I can't seem to get resolutions above > 800 X 600 (at least I think that's what it is).

Re: Resolution problems

2004-09-20 Thread Warren Block
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004, Tom Connolly wrote: I am currently running 4.10 with the latest version of xfree86. My video card is an integrated ATI Rage Pro and I can't seem to get resolutions above 800 X 600 (at least I think that's what it is). I want 1280 x 1024 and I'm sure the hardware is capable of

RE: Resolution problems

2004-09-20 Thread Tom Connolly
ly Cc: FreeBSD_Questions Subject: Re: Resolution problems Tom Connolly wrote: >Hello list, > >I am currently running 4.10 with the latest version of xfree86. My video >card is an integrated ATI Rage Pro and I can't seem to get resolutions above >800 X 600 (at least I think that&#x

RE: Resolution problems

2004-09-20 Thread Tom Connolly
lize it existed. Thanks Fabian, Thomas -Original Message- From: Fabian Keil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 20, 2004 3:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Tom Connolly Subject: Re: Resolution problems On Monday 20 September 2004 22:17, Tom Connolly wrote: > I am currently

Re: Resolution problems

2004-09-20 Thread Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P.
Tom Connolly wrote: Hello list, I am currently running 4.10 with the latest version of xfree86. My video card is an integrated ATI Rage Pro and I can't seem to get resolutions above 800 X 600 (at least I think that's what it is). I want 1280 x 1024 and I'm sure the hardware is capable of this. I

Re: Resolution problems

2004-09-20 Thread Fabian Keil
On Monday 20 September 2004 22:17, Tom Connolly wrote: > I am currently running 4.10 with the latest version of xfree86. My video > card is an integrated ATI Rage Pro and I can't seem to get resolutions above > 800 X 600 (at least I think that's what it is). I want 1280 x 1024 and I'm > sure the

RE: Resolution problems in x and CLI

2003-12-07 Thread Thomas Lippert
on Dec 2003 22:03:14 -0800 (PST) Minnesota Slinky wrote: >Hello all, >I’ve got a couple of questions regarding resolutions. >First, is there a way to increase/decrease the >resolution of the CLI interface? I’ve got a laptop >that only seems to use the center 1/3 of the screen, >I’m thinking 640x48

Re: Resolution problems in x and CLI

2003-12-07 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 11:00:24AM -0500, Chris Hill wrote: > On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Minnesota Slinky wrote: > > > I’ve got a couple of questions regarding resolutions. First, is there > > a way to increase/decrease the resolution of the CLI interface? > > I don't know how to do this, but I'm sure

Re: Resolution problems in x and CLI

2003-12-07 Thread Chris Hill
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Minnesota Slinky wrote: > I’ve got a couple of questions regarding resolutions. First, is there > a way to increase/decrease the resolution of the CLI interface? I don't know how to do this, but I'm sure someone here does. > My next question refers to xfree86. Part of my lo