On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:58:05 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:37:25 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> > It's rather untypical to check out _only_ kernel sources without
> > the "top level" content.
>
> For the update from 8.x to 9.1 I even didn't check out the kernel source,
> this
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:37:25 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
It's rather untypical to check out _only_ kernel sources without
the "top level" content.
For the update from 8.x to 9.1 I even didn't check out the kernel source,
this is something I did much later ;). I simply followed the FreeBSD
ins
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 10:51:21 +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 01:36:36 +0100
> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 13:58 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> > > # 1. `cd /usr/src' (or to the directory containing your
> > > source tree). # 2. `make buildwor
On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 23:57 -0500, kpn...@pobox.com wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 03:24:06AM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-01-25 at 19:24 -0500, kpn...@pobox.com wrote:
> > > You can use mtree against the spec files in /etc/mtree/ to check for and
> > > fix incorrect permissions an
On Mon, 2013-01-28 at 10:51 +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 01:36:36 +0100
> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 13:58 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> > > # 1. `cd /usr/src' (or to the directory containing your
> > > source tree). # 2. `make buildworl
Hi,
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 01:36:36 +0100
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 13:58 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> > # 1. `cd /usr/src' (or to the directory containing your
> > source tree). # 2. `make buildworld'
> > # 3. `make buildkernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE' (default is
On Fri, 2013-01-25 at 19:24 -0500, kpn...@pobox.com wrote:
> You can use mtree against the spec files in /etc/mtree/ to check for and
> fix incorrect permissions and owners on base system files. It won't help
> with /usr/local, but at least you can get the base straight.
>
> As root, from the root
On Mon, 2013-01-28 at 01:46 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 01:36:36 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 13:58 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> > > # 1. `cd /usr/src' (or to the directory containing your source
> > > tree).
> > > # 2. `make buildworld'
> > > #
On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 13:58 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> > If you only will have to handle a few ports, using the "bare
> > ports method" (make) is probably the easiest way (in case
> > everything else stays definitely consistent).
What could become inconsistent without upgrading or downgrading? I
d
On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 13:58 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 15:38:38 +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 09:15:09 +0100
> > "Ralf Mardorf" wrote:
> > > Is there a command to deinstall and reinstall all ports or an idea
> > > for a script to do it?
> >
PS:
On Mon, 2013-01-28 at 01:36 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> # cd /usr/ports/misc/mc && make install clean
> # uname -r
> 8.3-RELEASE
> # freebsd-update -r 9.1-RELEASE upgrade
> # freebsd-update install
> # shutdown -r now
>
> # freebsd-update install
> # cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portupgrade && ma
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 01:36:36 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 13:58 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> > # 1. `cd /usr/src' (or to the directory containing your source
> > tree).
> > # 2. `make buildworld'
> > # 3. `make buildkernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE' (default is
On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 13:58 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> # 1. `cd /usr/src' (or to the directory containing your source tree).
> # 2. `make buildworld'
> # 3. `make buildkernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE' (default is GENERIC).
> # 4. `make installkernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE' (
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 15:28:47 +0100, Erich Dollansky
wrote:
I think that installing it in multi-user mode without other users having
things running, will work in 99.% of the cases. In his special
case, it will work 100% as only the permissions should et changed.
I think so, but I asked, be
Hi,
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 13:58:06 +0100
Polytropon wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 15:38:38 +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 09:15:09 +0100
> > "Ralf Mardorf" wrote:
> >
> > > Good morning,
> >
> > ood morning? The sun is settling soon!
>
> The sun of the planet
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 15:38:38 +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 09:15:09 +0100
> "Ralf Mardorf" wrote:
>
> > Good morning,
>
> ood morning? The sun is settling soon!
The sun of the planet of the ood?
Or the former Sun of one of the microsystems? :-)
> > if I run 'ma
Hi,
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 09:15:09 +0100
"Ralf Mardorf" wrote:
> Good morning,
ood morning? The sun is settling soon!
>
> if I run 'make deinstall reinstall' for a port, it doesn't ask a
> single question, at least not for dbus.
>
> # ls -l /usr/local/bin/dbus-daemon
> -r-xr-xr-x 1 rocketmouse
Good morning,
if I run 'make deinstall reinstall' for a port, it doesn't ask a single
question, at least not for dbus.
# ls -l /usr/local/bin/dbus-daemon
-r-xr-xr-x 1 rocketmouse wheel 377744 Jan 18 22:44
/usr/local/bin/dbus-daemon
# cd /usr/ports/devel/dbus ; make deinstall reinstall
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 10:11:37 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-01-26 at 08:49 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> > On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 23:22:29 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > > On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 22:51:55 +0100, Joshua Isom wrote:
> > > > Sorry if my original command ended up breaking your system
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 10:01:18 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-01-26 at 08:48 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> > On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 16:15:28 -0600, Joshua Isom wrote:
> > > As for the listings in /usr/local
> > > they'll need fixed. On my system, almost everything's owned by root.
> >
> > Th
On Sat, 2013-01-26 at 08:49 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 23:22:29 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 22:51:55 +0100, Joshua Isom wrote:
> > > Sorry if my original command ended up breaking your system
> >
> > Don't worry, I run dump to backup it, but I'll try to
On Sat, 2013-01-26 at 08:48 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 16:15:28 -0600, Joshua Isom wrote:
> > Ignore /proc, unmount it even. You don't need it on FreeBSD and
> > shouldn't expect it to be there.
>
> As far as I know, Gnome (or at least GDM) _requires_ it to
> be able to show
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 16:15:28 -0600, Joshua Isom wrote:
> Ignore /proc, unmount it even. You don't need it on FreeBSD and
> shouldn't expect it to be there.
As far as I know, Gnome (or at least GDM) _requires_ it to
be able to show the available user names. I have no idea
why. :-)
> As for th
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 23:22:29 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 22:51:55 +0100, Joshua Isom wrote:
> > Sorry if my original command ended up breaking your system
>
> Don't worry, I run dump to backup it, but I'll try to fix it without
> restoring it from the backup.
Maybe you can
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 22:51:55 +0100, Joshua Isom wrote:
Sorry if my original command ended up breaking your system
Don't worry, I run dump to backup it, but I'll try to fix it without
restoring it from the backup.
--
Technology doesn't necessarily make you smarter
http://lists.alioth.debian
On 1/25/2013 3:25 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
It still does list directories in /home :(.
This file definitively only is in /home:
$ grep find_ find_1000.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 root rocketmouse 81920 Jan 25 20:52
find_1000.txt
$ ls -ld find_1000.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 root rocketmouse 513434 J
On 1/25/2013 9:12 AM, Polytropon wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 15:26:23 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 15:04:14 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
% ls -lR / | grep -v "/home" | grep "rocketmouse"
It's better I umount at least Arch Linux.
True. :-)
There anyway is an issue,
It still does list directories in /home :(.
This file definitively only is in /home:
$ grep find_ find_1000.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 root rocketmouse 81920 Jan 25 20:52
find_1000.txt
$ ls -ld find_1000.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 root rocketmouse 513434 Jan 25 21:14 find_1000.txt
Others seemin
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 20:41:24 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 16:12:15 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> > find / -exec ls -l {} \; | grep -v "/home" | grep "rocketmouse"
>
> -r-xr-xr-x 1 rocketmouse wheel 32736 Dec 23 18:38 ssh-agent
> -r-xr-xr-x 1 rocketmouse wheel 32736 Dec
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 16:12:15 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
find / -exec ls -l {} \; | grep -v "/home" | grep "rocketmouse"
-r-xr-xr-x 1 rocketmouse wheel 32736 Dec 23 18:38 ssh-agent
-r-xr-xr-x 1 rocketmouse wheel 32736 Dec 23 18:38 /usr/bin/ssh-agent
^C
A lot of stuff from /tmp is show
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 15:26:23 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 15:04:14 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> > % ls -lR / | grep -v "/home" | grep "rocketmouse"
>
> It's better I umount at least Arch Linux.
True. :-)
> There anyway is an issue, it doesn't show the pass, I checked thi
PS:
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 15:26:23 +0100, Ralf Mardorf
wrote:
There anyway is an issue, it doesn't show the pass, I checked this with
$ ls -lR /home/ | grep -v "/home"
after running
$ ls -lR / | grep -v "/home" | grep "rocketmouse"
IOW I get tons of files, but don't know to which directory
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 15:04:14 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
% ls -lR / | grep -v "/home" | grep "rocketmouse"
It's better I umount at least Arch Linux.
# cat /etc/fstab
# DeviceMountpoint FStype Options Dump Pass
/dev/ad4s1b noneswap
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 14:48:19 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 13:33:46 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> >> $ ls -l `which su`
> >> -r-sr-xr-x 1 rocketmouse wheel 16880 Dec 23 18:38 /usr/bin/su
> >
> > Erm... that looks horribly wrong.
> >
> > The permissions indicate that setuid is se
Thank you all :)
everything is ok now. I don't mark the thread as solved, since I still
didn't set up Evolution.
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 13:33:46 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
$ ls -l `which su`
-r-sr-xr-x 1 rocketmouse wheel 16880 Dec 23 18:38 /usr/bin/su
Erm... that looks horribly wrong.
The
Hi Ralf,
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 13:39:07 +0100
"Ralf Mardorf" wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 13:25:07 +0100, Erich Dollansky
> wrote:
> > What happens on a normal TTY?
> >
> >> Ctrl + Alt + F2 >
> >
> > So, you can switch to them. Can you try a su here?
>
> Ctrl + Alt + F* will open a ttyv*
>
>
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 13:39:07 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Hi Erich :)
>
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 13:25:07 +0100, Erich Dollansky
> wrote:
> > What happens on a normal TTY?
> >
> >> Ctrl + Alt + F2 >
> >
> > So, you can switch to them. Can you try a su here?
>
> Ctrl + Alt + F* will open a ttyv*
>
Hi Erich :)
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 13:25:07 +0100, Erich Dollansky
wrote:
What happens on a normal TTY?
Ctrl + Alt + F2 >
So, you can switch to them. Can you try a su here?
Ctrl + Alt + F* will open a ttyv*
I can log in as root, but if I log in as user, I can't run su successfully.
Der
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 13:05:51 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> The user can't become root using Xfce Terminal Emulator or by ttyv1 (Ctrl
> + Alt + F2). This was possible before I switched the uid.
>
> Before the switch PPPoE was enabled automatically, now I have to do it
> manually.
>
> $ su
> su:
Hi,
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 13:05:51 +0100
"Ralf Mardorf" wrote:
> after running '# /usr/sbin/pwd_mkdb
> -d /etc /etc/master.passwd' (FWIW there were no messages)
> I can now log in to a user X session by GDM.
>
this sounds so much better.
> The user can't become root using Xfce Terminal Emulator
Hi :)
after running '# /usr/sbin/pwd_mkdb -d /etc /etc/master.passwd' (FWIW
there were no messages)
I can now log in to a user X session by GDM.
The user can't become root using Xfce Terminal Emulator or by ttyv1 (Ctrl
+ Alt + F2). This was possible before I switched the uid.
Before the s
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 08:32:55 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-01-25 at 08:03 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> > UIDs and GIDs should match here. All files belonging to rocketmouse
> > should be 1000:1000 _and_ the name "rocketmouse" should be
> > associated to those numerical values (see files m
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 07:51:30 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Thank you Kevin, thank you Erich,
>
> On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 21:10 -0500, kpn...@pobox.com wrote:
> > The correct way to edit the password file is with the "vipw"
> > command. When you are done with your changes it rewrites the password
> >
On Fri, 2013-01-25 at 08:03 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
> You should have been reading my advice about changing the
> UID:GID in detail. :-)
I deleted it by accident from the until now _not_ shared mails, IOW I
deleted it from the FreeBSD mails only and missed it, when having a
brief look at the mail
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 02:11:27 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Hi all, hi Joshua,
>
> On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 16:10 -0600, Joshua Isom wrote:
> > find / -uid 1001 -exec chown 1000 '{}' \;
> > find / -gid 1001 -exec chown :1000 '{}' \;
>
> I made one mistake, when I run "find / -gid 1001 -exec chown :100
Thank you Kevin, thank you Erich,
On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 21:10 -0500, kpn...@pobox.com wrote:
> The correct way to edit the password file is with the "vipw"
> command. When you are done with your changes it rewrites the password
> file AND rebuilds the password database.
>
> I'm guessing you have
Hi,
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 02:11:27 +0100
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Hi all, hi Joshua,
>
> On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 16:10 -0600, Joshua Isom wrote:
> > find / -uid 1001 -exec chown 1000 '{}' \;
> > find / -gid 1001 -exec chown :1000 '{}' \;
>
> I made one mistake, when I run "find / -gid 1001 -exec chow
Hi all, hi Joshua,
On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 16:10 -0600, Joshua Isom wrote:
> find / -uid 1001 -exec chown 1000 '{}' \;
> find / -gid 1001 -exec chown :1000 '{}' \;
I made one mistake, when I run "find / -gid 1001 -exec chown :1000 '{}'
\;" for the fist time, I did it without the ":". Later I run it
On 1/24/2013 3:26 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
I was surpriesed, when Evolution from Linux had no permissions anymore
to access the mail folder, after
drwxrwx--- rocketmouse wheel was stable for FreeBSD
I wasn't aware, that even between Linux only, the folders for mount
points share the same permiss
I was surpriesed, when Evolution from Linux had no permissions anymore to
access the mail folder, after
drwxrwx--- rocketmouse wheel was stable for FreeBSD
I wasn't aware, that even between Linux only, the folders for mount points
share the same permissions, once the partition is mounted, si
Hi :)
perhaps good news for me.
That's strange. Now user and group are kept for the mount point of the
ext3 fs. Can I assume that this usually should work and that I just had
bad luck, when permissions, user and group were automatically changed?
root@freebsd:/mnt # ls -l
drwxrwx--- 21 100
On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 11:26:18 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 04:16:42 -0600, Joshua Isom wrote:
On 1/21/2013 5:33 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Hi :)
>
> I'm sharing the same directory for Evolution emails, by several Linux
> installs. For e.g. Ubuntu Precise it's Evolution 3.2.3 and
On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 11:16:42 +0100, Joshua Isom wrote:
It looks like to me you're asking for long term trouble. You're using
multiple versions, so in the future there could be changes that could
corrupt your mail. Why not just use an IMAP server instead? It's what
I do, so my mail's shar
He already mentioned different major versions, and changing to 5.0 in a few
years may need the mail "migrated" for a new feature. Then there could be
trouble. Getting storage away from the client is the most stable. A local
cache will likely provide all the new fancy features.
Polytropon wr
On 22/01/2013 05:32, Polytropon wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 02:31:11 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Tue, 2013-01-22 at 08:18 +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote:
I guess it would be possible to change the id for the existing FreeBSD
user and then to chown /home/user_name to fit to 1000?
Of course, thi
On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 04:16:42 -0600, Joshua Isom wrote:
> On 1/21/2013 5:33 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > Hi :)
> >
> > I'm sharing the same directory for Evolution emails, by several Linux
> > installs. For e.g. Ubuntu Precise it's Evolution 3.2.3 and for e.g.
> > Ubuntu Quantal it's Evolution 3.6.0.
On 1/21/2013 5:33 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Hi :)
I'm sharing the same directory for Evolution emails, by several Linux
installs. For e.g. Ubuntu Precise it's Evolution 3.2.3 and for e.g.
Ubuntu Quantal it's Evolution 3.6.0.
I'm doing it by a link:
It looks like to me you're asking for long te
On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 02:31:11 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-01-22 at 08:18 +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> > > I guess it would be possible to change the id for the existing FreeBSD
> > > user and then to chown /home/user_name to fit to 1000?
> >
> > Of course, this would work. But then
Hi,
On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 02:31:11 +0100
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-01-22 at 08:18 +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> > > I guess it would be possible to change the id for the existing
> > > FreeBSD user and then to chown /home/user_name to fit to 1000?
> >
> > Of course, this would work. Bu
On Tue, 2013-01-22 at 08:18 +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> > I guess it would be possible to change the id for the existing FreeBSD
> > user and then to chown /home/user_name to fit to 1000?
>
> Of course, this would work. But then all existing files of the existing
> FreeBSD would be without own
Hallo Ralf,
On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 01:53:52 +0100
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-01-22 at 07:31 +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> > On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 00:33:49 +0100
> > Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > root@freebsd:/usr/home/rocketmouse # ls -l /mnt
> > > drwxrwx--- 21 1000 1000 4096
On Tue, 2013-01-22 at 07:31 +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 00:33:49 +0100
> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> >
> > root@freebsd:/usr/home/rocketmouse # ls -l /mnt
> > drwxrwx--- 21 1000 1000 4096 Oct 28 19:11 archlinux
> > drwxrwxrwx 2 root wheel 4096 Jan 20 20:09 dump
> >
>
Hi,
On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 00:33:49 +0100
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> root@freebsd:/usr/home/rocketmouse # ls -l /mnt
> drwxrwx--- 21 1000 1000 4096 Oct 28 19:11 archlinux
> drwxrwxrwx 2 root wheel 4096 Jan 20 20:09 dump
>
it seems that you do not have a user with the id 1000 on this machine.
Hello.
2012/09/05 09:06:36 +0700 Victor Sudakov => To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
VS> > Depending on a task I think the most interactive user-friendly solution
here is
VS> > a minicom(s) each in its own ssh'ed jail(s).
VS>
VS> There is special Windows software for managing Natex MUXes. It
per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
>
> > In fact, the question is whether there is a standards compliant
> > (not written for some proprietary hardware terminal server
> > protocol) driver for Windows. Not exactly a FreeBSD question,
> > I know :)
>
> Finding a Windows driver that will work with an exi
Peter Vereshagin wrote:
> Depending on a task I think the most interactive user-friendly solution here
> is
> a minicom(s) each in its own ssh'ed jail(s).
There is special Windows software for managing Natex MUXes. It works
with those MUXes via an RS232 port only. I want to be able to run it
from
Victor Sudakov wrote:
> In fact, the question is whether there is a standards compliant
> (not written for some proprietary hardware terminal server
> protocol) driver for Windows. Not exactly a FreeBSD question,
> I know :)
Finding a Windows driver that will work with an existing FreeBSD
progra
Hello.
2012/09/03 14:29:20 +0700 Victor Sudakov => To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
VS> > > There is a FreeBSD box with several RS232 ports. Can those ports be
VS> > > accessed by Windows hosts over the network? Actually, does anyone
VS> > > have a success story for such a scenario?
VS> At lea
Polytropon wrote:
> >
> > There is a FreeBSD box with several RS232 ports. Can those ports be
> > accessed by Windows hosts over the network? Actually, does anyone
> > have a success story for such a scenario?
> >
> > There is some software like comms/serialoverip, comms/tits etc but are
> > ther
On Mon, 3 Sep 2012 10:02:17 +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote:
> Colleagues,
>
> There is a FreeBSD box with several RS232 ports. Can those ports be
> accessed by Windows hosts over the network? Actually, does anyone
> have a success story for such a scenario?
>
> There is some software like comms/seri
Eric Masson wrote:
>
> > There is a FreeBSD box with several RS232 ports. Can those ports be
> > accessed by Windows hosts over the network? Actually, does anyone
> > have a success story for such a scenario?
>
> Yes, sredird on the FreeBSD box & NetDialout from PCMicro on the Windows
> box.
Oh,
per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> > > There is a FreeBSD box with several RS232 ports. Can those ports
> > > be accessed by Windows hosts over the network?
> >
> > If I understand your question correctly, then AFAICT the only way to
> > access serial ports over the network is with a piece of addition
Peter Boosten wrote:
> On 3-9-2012 5:02, Victor Sudakov wrote:
> > There is a FreeBSD box with several RS232 ports. Can those ports
> > be accessed by Windows hosts over the network?
>
> If I understand your question correctly, then AFAICT the only way to
> access serial ports over the network is
Victor Sudakov writes:
Hi,
> There is a FreeBSD box with several RS232 ports. Can those ports be
> accessed by Windows hosts over the network? Actually, does anyone
> have a success story for such a scenario?
Yes, sredird on the FreeBSD box & NetDialout from PCMicro on the Windows
box.
> There
On 3-9-2012 5:02, Victor Sudakov wrote:
Colleagues,
There is a FreeBSD box with several RS232 ports. Can those ports be
accessed by Windows hosts over the network? Actually, does anyone
have a success story for such a scenario?
There is some software like comms/serialoverip, comms/tits etc but
On 26 June 2010 09:56, Alexander Best wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 4:12 AM, ill...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On 21 June 2010 18:13, Chris Rees wrote:
>>
On 21 Jun 2010 23:12, "Alexander Best" wrote:
hi there,
i can't remember where i read this the other day, but i fo
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 4:12 AM, ill...@gmail.com wrote:
> On 21 June 2010 18:13, Chris Rees wrote:
>
>>>
>>> On 21 Jun 2010 23:12, "Alexander Best" wrote:
>>>
>>> hi there,
>>>
>>> i can't remember where i read this the other day, but i found this to
>>> be a great idea. basically the idea was
On 21 June 2010 18:13, Chris Rees wrote:
>>
>> On 21 Jun 2010 23:12, "Alexander Best" wrote:
>>
>> hi there,
>>
>> i can't remember where i read this the other day, but i found this to
>> be a great idea. basically the idea was to have one code pool which
>> all the *bsd flavours share and also
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 12:13 AM, Chris Rees wrote:
> Politics...
too bad politics get in the way of progress. :(
>
> Sorry for top-posting, Android won't let me quote. There's a bug report on
> it!
>
> On 21 Jun 2010 23:12, "Alexander Best" wrote:
>
> hi there,
>
> i can't remember where i rea
Politics...
Sorry for top-posting, Android won't let me quote. There's a bug report on
it!
On 21 Jun 2010 23:12, "Alexander Best" wrote:
hi there,
i can't remember where i read this the other day, but i found this to
be a great idea. basically the idea was to have one code pool which
all the *
Mel wrote:
On Monday 26 January 2009 16:39:35 Doug Poland wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 09:21:55AM -0900, Mel wrote:
On Monday 26 January 2009 08:23:13 Doug Poland wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 08:25:37AM -0600, Doug Poland wrote:
per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
I've got a network running dif
On Monday 26 January 2009 16:39:35 Doug Poland wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 09:21:55AM -0900, Mel wrote:
> > On Monday 26 January 2009 08:23:13 Doug Poland wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 08:25:37AM -0600, Doug Poland wrote:
> > > > per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> > > I've got a networ
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 09:21:55AM -0900, Mel wrote:
> On Monday 26 January 2009 08:23:13 Doug Poland wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 08:25:37AM -0600, Doug Poland wrote:
> > > per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> > I've got a network running different versions of FreeBSD (6.3,
> > 7.0) on d
On Monday 26 January 2009 08:23:13 Doug Poland wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 08:25:37AM -0600, Doug Poland wrote:
> > per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> I've got a network running different versions of FreeBSD
> (6.3, 7.0) on different architectures (i386, SPARC64).
>
> What I'd
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 08:25:37AM -0600, Doug Poland wrote:
> per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
I've got a network running different versions of FreeBSD
(6.3, 7.0) on different architectures (i386, SPARC64).
What I'd like to do is export the ports hierarchy to all machines,
but
per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
I've got a network running different versions of FreeBSD
(6.3, 7.0) on different architectures (i386, SPARC64).
What I'd like to do is export the ports hierarchy to all machines,
but preserving ports/packages for each version/architecture.
I also want to make rebuild
> > I've got a network running different versions of FreeBSD
> > (6.3, 7.0) on different architectures (i386, SPARC64).
> >
> > What I'd like to do is export the ports hierarchy to all machines,
> > but preserving ports/packages for each version/architecture.
> > I also want to make rebuilding inde
On Saturday 24 January 2009 09:32:54 Doug Poland wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've got a network running different versions of FreeBSD (6.3, 7.0) on
> different architectures (i386, SPARC64).
>
> What I'd like to do is export the ports hierarchy to all machines, but
> preserving ports/packages for each vers
Le 26/09/2007 à 08:47:05+0800, Aminuddin a écrit
> Hi freebsd gurus,
> I'm playing with jail setup and wanted to provide a virtual server to my
> external remote users to login by ssh and run a couple of applications.
>
> Do I need to install the application using the ports in the jail itself or
Hi freebsd gurus,
I'm playing with jail setup and wanted to provide a virtual server to my
external remote users to login by ssh and run a couple of applications.
Do I need to install the application using the ports in the jail itself or
can I just install the application in the host environment?
Nejc Skoberne wrote:
Hello,
I am using a FreeBSD 5.3 server in a company with approx. 30
users. There is also a Samba server as a PDC and a mail server.
The users would like to share their Outlook calendars. What
are my options regarding having FreeBSD as a platform to do this?
OpenGroupware is
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007, Christopher Hilton wrote:
>Has anyone setup (fdisk/newfs) a drive to work on both Mac OS X and
>FreeBSD? I'd like to be able to transfer larger datasets between my Mac
>and my FreeBSD laptop without using my network.
I think that the M$ file system on most external disk dri
On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 02:20:58PM -0800, Simon Gao wrote:
> Is it possible to share ports tree directory? If so, what's the procedure?
As Bill said, you need to set WRKDIRPREFIX in /etc/make.conf; I
generally use /var/tmp/port-builds. I also have a writeable share that
consists of the port distf
Chris Whitehouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Bill Moran wrote:
> > In response to Simon Gao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >> Is it possible to share ports tree directory? If so, what's the procedure?
> >
> > Yes. You generally want to set WRKDIRPREFIX to something like /var/ports
> > or /usr/obj
Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Simon Gao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Is it possible to share ports tree directory? If so, what's the procedure?
Yes. You generally want to set WRKDIRPREFIX to something like /var/ports
or /usr/obj to ward off conflicts. Otherwise, just put it on an NFS server
an N
In response to Simon Gao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Is it possible to share ports tree directory? If so, what's the procedure?
Yes. You generally want to set WRKDIRPREFIX to something like /var/ports
or /usr/obj to ward off conflicts. Otherwise, just put it on an NFS server
an NFS mount it.
--
Bi
Kyrre Nygard wrote:
At 10:45 27.05.2006, Beech Rintoul wrote:
On Saturday 27 May 2006 00:32, Kyrre Nygard wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I have a team of designers working on web 2.0 like sites.
>
> I have added them all to this box, now I'm wondering what's the most
> convenient way of giving them all acc
* Kyrre Nygard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-27 11:12:19 +0200]:
> > > I have a team of designers working on web 2.0 like sites.
> > >
> > > I have added them all to this box, now I'm wondering what's the
> > > most convenient way of giving them all access to /usr/local/www?
>
> > CVS is your friend
Kyrre Nygard wrote:
At 11:50 27.05.2006, Daniel A. wrote:
Hi Kyrre.
Have you tried chmodding the www dir to be group-writable?
Also, as someone else has suggested, SVN og CVS might be a good idea.
They would not solve the problem you have right now, but they might
help you avoid some possibl
At 11:50 27.05.2006, Daniel A. wrote:
Hi Kyrre.
Have you tried chmodding the www dir to be group-writable?
Also, as someone else has suggested, SVN og CVS might be a good
idea. They would not solve the problem you have right now, but they
might help you avoid some possible problems with many
1 - 100 of 195 matches
Mail list logo
