hugle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> now the main problem is.. that machine is shaping internet, right?
> >> I did shaping for my subnet, so users in /24 have 100kbits everybody.
> >> But they don't get such speed, they get about 70-80kbps . and if I
> >> try to skipt pipe rules for certain IPs,
BM> hugle wrote:
>> BM> hugle wrote:
>>
BM> hugle wrote:
>>FG> On Mon, 31 May 2004, hugle wrote:
>>
dammit..
why then my users eats so much CPU?
look:
CPU states: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.8% system,
38.0% interrupt, 61.2% idle
Mem:
BM> hugle wrote:
>> BM> hugle wrote:
>>
BM> hugle wrote:
>>FG> On Mon, 31 May 2004, hugle wrote:
>>
dammit..
why then my users eats so much CPU?
look:
CPU states: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.8% system,
38.0% interrupt, 61.2% idle
Mem:
BM> hugle wrote:
>> BM> hugle wrote:
>>
FG> On Mon, 31 May 2004, hugle wrote:
>>dammit..
>>why then my users eats so much CPU?
>>look:
>>CPU states: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.8% system, 38.0% interrupt, 61.2% idle
>>Mem: 21M Active, 177M Inact, 133M Wired, 1228K Cache
BM> hugle wrote:
>> FG> On Mon, 31 May 2004, hugle wrote:
>>
dammit..
why then my users eats so much CPU?
look:
CPU states: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.8% system, 38.0% interrupt, 61.2% idle
Mem: 21M Active, 177M Inact, 133M Wired, 1228K Cache, 199M Buf, 1677M Free
I ha
On Mon, 31 May 2004, hugle wrote:
> dammit..
> why then my users eats so much CPU?
> look:
> CPU states: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.8% system, 38.0% interrupt, 61.2% idle
> Mem: 21M Active, 177M Inact, 133M Wired, 1228K Cache, 199M Buf, 1677M Free
>
> I have only 61% idle ?
> usualy i have ~50 idl
FG> On Mon, 31 May 2004, hugle wrote:
>> The question in what machine do i need?
>> What CPU and how much of ram ?
FG> I set up a firewall for more than 300 users, a DMZ with a public webserver,
FG> webmail and MX on a PII-350MHz with 128 MB RAM.
dammit..
why then my users eats so much CPU?
look: