On Sat, 2 Dec 2006, Kevin Sanders wrote:
On 12/2/06, Alexander Kabaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I personally think that having a dedicated box in disk-less configuration
is the best option out there. The ability to quickly go through series of
hands/reboots without any associated fsck runs a
On 2006-12-02 20:05, Kevin Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 12/2/06, Alexander Kabaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I personally think that having a dedicated box in disk-less
>> configuration is the best option out there. [...]
>
> Alexander, when you say disk-less configuration, are you
>
On 12/2/06, Alexander Kabaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I personally think that having a dedicated box in disk-less
configuration is the best option out there. The ability to quickly go
through series of hands/reboots without any associated fsck runs and
without the risk of terminally damaging an
On Sat, 2 Dec 2006 18:28:57 -0500
"Vishal Patil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have recently moved over from Linux to FreeBSD and would like to if
> there is something similar to UML (User Mode Linux) for doing kernel
> development for FreeBSD. Reading different mailing lists, wikis etc
> it seem
Qemu / vmware is probably the best way to go at the moment.
On 12/2/06, Vishal Patil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have recently moved over from Linux to FreeBSD and would like to if there
is something similar to UML (User Mode Linux) for doing kernel development
for FreeBSD. Reading different ma
I have recently moved over from Linux to FreeBSD and would like to if there
is something similar to UML (User Mode Linux) for doing kernel development
for FreeBSD. Reading different mailing lists, wikis etc it seems that "qemu"
seems to be the best option. Is this tool used by most of the FreeBSD
