2009/1/6 Mel :
> On Tuesday 06 January 2009 10:07:17 David Naylor wrote:
>> 2009/1/6 Mel :
>> > On Tuesday 06 January 2009 05:49:22 David Naylor wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> My ISP's NAT, unfortunately, does not work more than it does. This is a
>> >> problem as I need to provide 'direct' internet
On Tuesday 06 January 2009 10:07:17 David Naylor wrote:
> 2009/1/6 Mel :
> > On Tuesday 06 January 2009 05:49:22 David Naylor wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> My ISP's NAT, unfortunately, does not work more than it does. This is a
> >> problem as I need to provide 'direct' internet access for the compute
2009/1/6 Mel :
> On Tuesday 06 January 2009 05:49:22 David Naylor wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> My ISP's NAT, unfortunately, does not work more than it does. This is a
>> problem as I need to provide 'direct' internet access for the computers
>> inside my network.
>>
>> I would like to set up a transparent
On Tuesday 06 January 2009 05:49:22 David Naylor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My ISP's NAT, unfortunately, does not work more than it does. This is a
> problem as I need to provide 'direct' internet access for the computers
> inside my network.
>
> I would like to set up a transparent SOCKS proxy (similar to
Hi,
My ISP's NAT, unfortunately, does not work more than it does. This is a
problem as I need to provide 'direct' internet access for the computers
inside my network.
I would like to set up a transparent SOCKS proxy (similar to transparent HTTP
proxy, aka squid) on the server. Does anyone
