On Sun, Apr 05, 2009 at 10:14:58PM -0400, Glen Barber wrote:
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 10:10 PM, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:
well, it wouldve if there were a 3.0.1 d/load for 7.1, but nope.
so far, none of us has been willing to volunteer the months/years
to build
On Sun, Apr 05, 2009 at 09:51:24PM -0600, Tim Judd wrote:
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:
On Sun, Apr 05, 2009 at 09:41:36PM -0400, Glen Barber wrote:
Hi, Gary
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:
Le Sun, 5 Apr 2009 15:49:20 -0700,
Gary Kline kl...@thought.org:
[OpenOffice]
I want any/all the addons or plugins, and the
mozilla browser would be a plus.
What is the goal of this browser option in OOo?
To speed up the compilation of OOo, you can use ccache
(option WITH_CCACHE)
Robert Huff wrote:
Tim Judd writes:
Reference - dependency list for OOo 3.0.1 package, 7.1-R i386:
deleted
I'm not sure why there's so much depenencies, but if anyone wants
me to post it, I want to know.
Because OOo declines to re-invent the wheel?
Oliver Fromme writes:
I'm not sure why there's so much depenencies, but if anyone wants
me to post it, I want to know.
Because OOo declines to re-invent the wheel? Some of these are
easy to understand if you know almost nothing about programming -
the fonts
Robert Huff wrote:
Oliver Fromme writes:
I'm not sure why there's so much depenencies, but if anyone wants
me to post it, I want to know.
Because OOo declines to re-invent the wheel? Some of these are
easy to understand if you know almost nothing about
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 12:02:07AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
Tim Judd writes:
I don't understand the months/years or weeks/days symptom of OOo.
On my dual-core system at work, Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6600 @
2.40GHz
Took about 4 hours. It only seemed to utilize
Gary Kline wrote:
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 12:02:07AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
Tim Judd writes:
I don't understand the months/years or weeks/days symptom of OOo.
On my dual-core system at work, Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6600 @
2.40GHz
Took about 4 hours. It only
Adam Vandemore wrote:
Gary Kline wrote:
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 12:02:07AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
Tim Judd writes:
I don't understand the months/years or weeks/days symptom of OOo.
On my dual-core system at work, Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU
6600 @
2.40GHz
Took
Hi, Manolis
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Manolis Kiagias sonic200...@gmail.com wrote:
My tinderbox machine (see ports-mgmt/tinderbox and
http://tinderbox.marcuscom.com/README.html) builds this in 8 hours
(assuming the distfiles are already available locally). It is a modest
2.5Ghz P4 with
Somebody thoughtfully posted a location where we could download a
package of OOo-3.01 for the i386 recently. I thought that I had
bookmarked that site that began ooo and had built packages for
the openoffice suite.
One, can anybody give the the correct
Hi, Gary
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:
Somebody thoughtfully posted a location where we could download a
package of OOo-3.01 for the i386 recently. I thought that I had
bookmarked that site that began ooo and had built packages for
On Sun, Apr 05, 2009 at 09:41:36PM -0400, Glen Barber wrote:
Hi, Gary
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:
Somebody thoughtfully posted a location where we could download a
package of OOo-3.01 for the i386 recently. I thought that I had
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 10:10 PM, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:
well, it wouldve if there were a 3.0.1 d/load for 7.1, but nope.
so far, none of us has been willing to volunteer the months/years
to build a 7.1 version for the i386.
i'm down to 5GB of freespace
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:
On Sun, Apr 05, 2009 at 09:41:36PM -0400, Glen Barber wrote:
Hi, Gary
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:
Somebody thoughtfully posted a location where we could download
a
Hi, Tim.
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Tim Judd taj...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't understand the months/years or weeks/days symptom of OOo.
On my dual-core system at work, Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6600 @
2.40GHz
Took about 4 hours. It only seemed to utilize only 1 CPU... my
Tim Judd writes:
I don't understand the months/years or weeks/days symptom of OOo.
On my dual-core system at work, Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6600 @
2.40GHz
Took about 4 hours. It only seemed to utilize only 1 CPU... my
top always said =50% CPU usage
For
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 10:02 PM, Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com wrote:
Tim Judd writes:
I don't understand the months/years or weeks/days symptom of OOo.
On my dual-core system at work, Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6600 @
2.40GHz
Took about 4 hours. It only seemed to
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Tim Judd taj...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 10:02 PM, Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com wrote:
Tim Judd writes:
I don't understand the months/years or weeks/days symptom of OOo.
On my dual-core system at work, Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU
Tim Judd writes:
I don't understand the months/years or weeks/days symptom of OOo.
On my dual-core system at work, Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU 6600 @
2.40GHz
Took about 4 hours. It only seemed to utilize only 1 CPU... my
top always said =50% CPU usage
Tim Judd writes:
Reference - dependency list for OOo 3.0.1 package, 7.1-R i386:
deleted
I'm not sure why there's so much depenencies, but if anyone wants
me to post it, I want to know.
Because OOo declines to re-invent the wheel? Some of these are
easy to understand if
21 matches
Mail list logo
