On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Amitabh Kant wrote:
> Devin Teske & Rick Miller have a fairly extensive explanation on their
> blogs on how to create your own modified iso's. Search the archives for
> links. Hopefully they can chime in with their respective links.
Sorry to show up late for the d
On 08/04/13 13:25, Eduardo Morras wrote:
> On Sun, 04 Aug 2013 12:24:46 -0600
> Gary Aitken wrote:
>
>> Can anyone give me some hints on how to manually (or automagically) create
>> mkinstalldirs for a port?
>>
>> ports/graphics/ufraw fails to build due to
>>
>> install: /usr/local/share/glib-2.
On Sun, 04 Aug 2013 12:24:46 -0600
Gary Aitken wrote:
> Can anyone give me some hints on how to manually (or automagically) create
> mkinstalldirs for a port?
>
> ports/graphics/ufraw fails to build due to
>
> install: /usr/local/share/glib-2.0/gettext/mkinstalldirs: No such file or
> directo
Can anyone give me some hints on how to manually (or automagically) create
mkinstalldirs for a port?
ports/graphics/ufraw fails to build due to
install: /usr/local/share/glib-2.0/gettext/mkinstalldirs: No such file or
directory
It's not supposed to be needed if automake is >= 1.9, but automake
>> ALSO NOTE: Yes, the file is dated... it talks about cvsup instead of svn. My
>> hope is that the doco can be a good starting point (even if the data is a
>> bit dated).
>>
>> In there, you'll find things like (relevant to RELENG_9):
>>
>>
starting point (even if the data is a bit
> dated).
>
> In there, you'll find things like (relevant to RELENG_9):
>
> make -f Makefile.sysinstall release \
> MAKE="/usr/bin/env CFLAGS=-DDRUID make" \
> CHROOTDIR=/usr/release
/druidbsd.cvs.sf.net/viewvc/druidbsd/druidbsd/druid/dep/freebsd/patches/README?revision=1.2&view=markup
>
> ALSO NOTE: Yes, the file is dated... it talks about cvsup instead of svn.
> My hope is that the doco can be a good starting point (even if the data is
> a bit dated).
>
&
0 & 9.1) based installers.
>
> Amitabh Kant
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 9:44 PM, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
>
>> one specific question I have, that I can't find in the handbook...
>> To make a FreeBSD release, that is to build the install images... y
wrote:
> one specific question I have, that I can't find in the handbook...
> To make a FreeBSD release, that is to build the install images... you build
> world, and kernel.. then go to /etc/src/release and type make release...
> after this, the release images show up in /usr/obj/usr/
On Aug 1, 2013, at 9:14 AM, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
> one specific question I have, that I can't find in the handbook...
> To make a FreeBSD release, that is to build the install images... you build
> world, and kernel.. then go to /etc/src/release and type make release...
>
one specific question I have, that I can't find in the handbook...
To make a FreeBSD release, that is to build the install images... you build
world, and kernel.. then go to /etc/src/release and type make release...
after this, the release images show up in /usr/obj/usr/src/release
What I WA
he OS source and was surprised to
see that a number of files were checked-out (which should not happen
as I am using RELENG). So I suspect that my previous cvsup was
interruped some how.
After a make buildworld, kernel and installworld, everything is fine.
Now I am puzzeled that the OS managed to
lost at what is happening and what I should try.
On a side note, I noticed that /usr/include/sys/types.h and
/usr/src/sys/sys/include/types.h are different; the first one
appearing to be quite older (older version number). I did the system
upgrade in a very standard way (cvsup, make buildworld, make
world installworld: installcheck
${IMAKEENV} rm -rf ${INSTALLTMP}
.if make(distributeworld)
.for dist in ${EXTRA_DISTRIBUTIONS}
- find ${DESTDIR}/${DISTDIR}/${dist} -empty -delete
+ find ${DESTDIR}/${DISTDIR}/${dist} -empty -exec rmdir {} +
.endfor
.endif
8<
The reason t
Hi
I'm trying to make my own release ...
# cd /usr/src
# make buildkernel KERNCONF=MYKERN
# make -j4 buildworld
# cd release/
# make release NODOC=YES NOPORTS=YES NOSRC=YES
and that's the error while making release:
find //usr/obj/usr/src/release/dist/doc -empty -delete
find: -del
I can`t install xorg when use cd to port dir and run "make install clean"
Before "make install clean" I run make config-recursive and make
fetch-recursive
Here errors
http://dpaste.com/1076927/
But portinstall can install xorg
I not mutch experienced with free bsd, bu
on 17.4.13 21:18 Brett Glass said the following:
> I've just had to resurrect a machine which apparently failed because the
> kernel was built with the make -j option.
[snip]
> The result was a kernel in which some compiled-in modules -- in
> particular, netgraph nodes -- w
Everyone:
I've just had to resurrect a machine which apparently failed
because the kernel was built with the make -j option.
As reported in the make(1) man page, the purpose of the -j option
is to let the make program build multiple portions of a program
concurrently on a machine
d perl since you typed make deinstall in that parent
> port tree.
>
> You can type make install in /usr/ports/lang/perl5.14 to install it
> again. You don't need to reinstall FreeBSD, you're not on Windows
> here, you can repair everything :)
>
> Note: there is no perl in
On 19/03/2013 07:54, Rob Navarro wrote:
> Hi Chaps,
>
> I typed "make deinstall" within the /usr/ports/lang directory of a
> FreeBSD 9.0 and mistakenly lost Perl, Python, Ruby and a whole host of
> default compiled languages.
>
> How can I get back to the de
lang/ contains all languages and so on ruby, lua, python, perl.. Of course
you removed perl since you typed make deinstall in that parent port tree.
You can type make install in /usr/ports/lang/perl5.14 to install it again.
You don't need to reinstall FreeBSD, you're not on Windows her
Hi Chaps,
I typed "make deinstall" within the /usr/ports/lang directory of a
FreeBSD 9.0 and mistakenly lost Perl, Python, Ruby and a whole host of
default compiled languages.
How can I get back to the default FreeBSD default installed language
state (with Perl installed etc)?
C
On 7 March 2013 08:09, George Kontostanos wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 12:38 AM, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi
> wrote:
>> Em Sex, 2013-03-01 às 12:29 -0600, Paul Schmehl escreveu:
>>
>>> I'm running make buildworld on a quad processor quad core box with 16GB o
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 12:38 AM, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi
wrote:
> Em Sex, 2013-03-01 às 12:29 -0600, Paul Schmehl escreveu:
>
>> I'm running make buildworld on a quad processor quad core box with 16GB of
>> ram, and it's been running already for more than an hour and
Em Sex, 2013-03-01 às 12:29 -0600, Paul Schmehl escreveu:
> I'm running make buildworld on a quad processor quad core box with 16GB of
> ram, and it's been running already for more than an hour and a half. Has
> world really gotten that huge? Good lord! Good thing we hav
I'm running make buildworld on a quad processor quad core box with 16GB of
ram, and it's been running already for more than an hour and a half. Has
world really gotten that huge? Good lord! Good thing we have
freebsd-update!
--
Paul Schmehl, Senior Infosec Analyst
As if it wasn
On 24/02/2013 16:33, Joshua Isom wrote:
> I tried making a build jail, not with pourdriere or tinderbox. I just
> went to the ports and ran `make -DBATCH package-recursive clean` to get
> packages created. I ran `pkg add *` in the packages/All directory, but
> all failed because
On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 10:33:45 -0600
Joshua Isom wrote:
> I tried making a build jail, not with pourdriere or tinderbox. I just
> went to the ports and ran `make -DBATCH package-recursive clean` to get
> packages created. I ran `pkg add *` in the packages/All directory, but
>
I tried making a build jail, not with pourdriere or tinderbox. I just
went to the ports and ran `make -DBATCH package-recursive clean` to get
packages created. I ran `pkg add *` in the packages/All directory, but
all failed because of MANIFEST missing. I'm guessing this is a bug in
th
2013/2/22 David Demelier :
> Sorry didn't read that you have a MBR slice instead of GPT
>
> then you should take a look at that one
> https://wiki.freebsd.org/RootOnZFS/ZFSBootPartition
I have used that one, unfortunately I was unable to boot.
___
freebs
stable) on zfs root, unfortunately my bios
>> is unable to recognize GPT discs.
>> I'm using MBR disc, with BSD slice (on mbr index 4) containing
>> freebsd-zfs filesystem.
>>
>> I've no idea how to make it bootable, I've tried using:
>>
>>
t;
> I want to install freebsd9 (stable) on zfs root, unfortunately my bios
> is unable to recognize GPT discs.
> I'm using MBR disc, with BSD slice (on mbr index 4) containing
> freebsd-zfs filesystem.
>
> I've no idea how to make it bootable, I've tried using:
Hi,
I want to install freebsd9 (stable) on zfs root, unfortunately my bios
is unable to recognize GPT discs.
I'm using MBR disc, with BSD slice (on mbr index 4) containing
freebsd-zfs filesystem.
I've no idea how to make it bootable, I've tried using:
zpool export sys
dd if=/
On 9 February 2013 05:45, Mike Clarke wrote:
>
> I started off portmaster on a massive update on Thursday evening. Everything
> started off OK and I kept responding to all the make config screens until they
> were all finished and the compilation was well underway then went to bed a
I started off portmaster on a massive update on Thursday evening. Everything
started off OK and I kept responding to all the make config screens until they
were all finished and the compilation was well underway then went to bed and
left it to get on with it.
The next morning I discovered
Hello list,
I'm running 8.3-stable r245223 from a mere 2 days ago and am in the process of
building a custom release for our internal use as preconfigured firewalls.
"make release" works pretty fine except for a few quirks here and there.
First of all, I have set EXTLOCAL
orts/packages/All".
>>> If that is indeed the default location, how do I get the
>>> "make install package" command put it there automatically?
>>>
>> All packages will be stored
>> in /usr/ports/packages/All/relevant/sub/directory. There is no
On 10/01/2013 21:21, Fbsd8 wrote:
> Is the upcoming pkgng going to have any effect on this?
No.
The layout of /usr/ports/packages is controlled at a rather lower level
by the Makefiles in /usr/ports/Mk. pkgng doesn't really care about this
layout in any case since pkgng repositories don't need a
Gökşin Akdeniz wrote:
Thu, 10 Jan 2013 14:04:59 -0500 tarihinde
Fbsd8 yazmış:
What is the default path for the packages to be stored in?
Is it /usr/packages?
It is "/usr/ports/packages/All".
If that is indeed the default location, how do I get the
"make install package&
Thu, 10 Jan 2013 14:04:59 -0500 tarihinde
Fbsd8 yazmış:
>
> What is the default path for the packages to be stored in?
> Is it /usr/packages?
>
It is "/usr/ports/packages/All".
>
> If that is indeed the default location, how do I get the
> "make i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 1/10/13 2:04 PM, Fbsd8 wrote:
> When I do a "make install package" command the package gets stored
> in the directory I am in.
>
> What is the default path for the packages to be stored in? Is it
> /usr/packages?
>
>
When I do a "make install package" command the package gets stored in
the directory I am in.
What is the default path for the packages to be stored in?
Is it /usr/packages?
If that is indeed the default location, how do I get the
"make install package" command put it
Hi People,
I was wondering if I could make a FreeBSD boot-able USB or DVD with
pre-installed software and services such as DHCP Client/Server. I would be
pleased if you could help me.
Thanks
Hooman
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
On 16-Dec-12 23:12, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 16/12/2012 17:22, Manish Jain wrote:
Under /lib I have both versions - shared (libxyz.so.1) as well as static
(libxyz.a) - of a library. How do I tell make to link to the static
version, not the shared one ? The next obvious question is how to do the
On 16/12/2012 17:22, Manish Jain wrote:
> Under /lib I have both versions - shared (libxyz.so.1) as well as static
> (libxyz.a) - of a library. How do I tell make to link to the static
> version, not the shared one ? The next obvious question is how to do the
> vice versa - tell mak
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 22:52:05 +0530, Manish Jain wrote:
> Under /lib I have both versions - shared (libxyz.so.1) as well as static
> (libxyz.a) - of a library. How do I tell make to link to the static
> version, not the shared one ? The next obvious question is how to do the
> vice
Hello All,
This is not a question strictly on FreeBSD. But since freebsd-questions
is a lot quicker with its dependable responses, I decided to post my
question here.
Under /lib I have both versions - shared (libxyz.so.1) as well as static
(libxyz.a) - of a library. How do I tell make to
Здравствуйте, Boris.
Вы писали 15 декабря 2012 г., 9:30:19:
BS> (maintainer is CCed)
BS> 15.12.2012 02:24, Eugen Konkov пишет:
>> # make
>> "Makefile", line 166: Malformed conditional (${PORT_OPTIONS:MFIREBIRD} &&
>> empty(${PORT_OPTIONS:MEXPERIMENTA
On (12/15/12 11:30), Boris Samorodov wrote:
> (maintainer is CCed)
>
> 15.12.2012 02:24, Eugen Konkov ??:
>
> > # make
> > "Makefile", line 166: Malformed conditional (${PORT_OPTIONS:MFIREBIRD} &&
> > empty(${PORT_OPTIONS:MEXPERIMENTAL})
(maintainer is CCed)
15.12.2012 02:24, Eugen Konkov пишет:
> # make
> "Makefile", line 166: Malformed conditional (${PORT_OPTIONS:MFIREBIRD} &&
> empty(${PORT_OPTIONS:MEXPERIMENTAL})
> "Makefile", line 168: if-less endif
> make: fatal errors enco
Здравствуйте, FreeBSD.
# pwd
/usr/ports/net/freeradius2
Press any key to continue...
# uname -a
FreeBSD aki 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0: Wed Jun 13 13:46:00 EEST 2012
adm@aki:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/AKI i386
Press any key to continue...
# make
"Makefile", line 166:
On Dec 11, 2012, at 2:13 PM, Rick Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Devin Teske
> wrote:
>>
>> Though, to resize the mfsroot, I still rely on release(7) and the above
>> patches.
>
> Here's another question, have you applied this approach to
> boot_crunch.conf? I simply replac
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
>
> Though, to resize the mfsroot, I still rely on release(7) and the above
> patches.
Here's another question, have you applied this approach to
boot_crunch.conf? I simply replaced the default boot_crunch.conf with
my own in the source tree.
re greater in size than the space available. Would
> you agree?
Oh… forgot to mention…
The Makefile doesn't adjust the mfsroot's size.
What I do to solve that problem is patch the release(7) process to make a
bigger mfsroot (and thusly has room for more "stuff") -- this al
orm the release(7) process
> each time you want to make a change to your mfsroot.
This is a very compelling advantage.
--
Take care
Rick Miller
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
m the release(7) process each
time you want to make a change to your mfsroot.
Check it out:
http://druidbsd.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/druidbsd/druidbsd/druid/dep/freebsd/mfsroot/standard/
Basically, you'd grab the Makefile (link below):
http://druidbsd.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/druidbs
Hi All,
I generate a bootonly ISO and want to add files to the mfsroot.gz
created by the release.8 target. I want sysinstall to load an
install.cfg which makes a call to doconfig.sh. The target destination
for the files is stand/. My question is will the below patch
accomplish this for me provi
jb gmail.com> writes:
> ...
-m option to fetch explains it.
False alarm.
jb
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...
Hi,
# portsnap fetch update
...
Building new INDEX files... done.
# ls -al /usr/ports/IN*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 26626683 Nov 29 15:17 /usr/ports/INDEX-9
# cd /usr/ports/
[root@localhost /usr/ports]# make fetchindex
/usr/ports/INDEX-9.bz2100% of 1615 kB 160 kBps
>> If I edit things via vidcontrol, e.g: `vidcontrol grey black` where
>> do I put this to make it persist across reboots on all terminals?
>
> Search for vidcontrol(1) in rc.conf(5) manual.
Thanks! I ended up with just::
allscreens_flags="grey black"
Modulok wrote:
> List,
>
> If I edit things via vidcontrol, e.g: `vidcontrol grey black` where
> do I put this to make it persist across reboots on all terminals?
Search for vidcontrol(1) in rc.conf(5) manual.
--
regards, Maciej Suszko.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
List,
If I edit things via vidcontrol, e.g: `vidcontrol grey black` where do I put
this to make it persist across reboots on all terminals?
Cheers!
-Modulok-
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
Втр 13 Ноя 2012 04:10:46 от Австин Ким :
> Hi, all,
>
> While attempting to build the KDE 4 port, the build of /usr/ports/astro/gpsd
> (which recursively got pulled in somewhere) failed because make(1) tried to
> build using a version of GCC that I had installed from ports
Hi, all,
While attempting to build the KDE 4 port, the build of /usr/ports/astro/gpsd
(which recursively got pulled in somewhere) failed because make(1) tried to
build using a version of GCC that I had installed from ports at one time but
long since `make deinstall'ed:
...
cc -o gpxlog
[ John Levine wrote on Mon 8.Oct'12 at 2:42:33 - ]
> >... Note that setting the BATCH environment variable to yes will answer
> >yes to any prompts during this process, removing the need for manual
> >intervention during the build process.
> >
> >(This was said with respect to up
On 8 Oct 2012 02:42:33 -
John Levine articulated:
> >... Note that setting the BATCH environment variable to yes will
> > answer yes to any prompts during this process, removing the need
> > for manual intervention during the build process.
> >
> >(This was said with respect to upgrading p
>... Note that setting the BATCH environment variable to yes will answer
>yes to any prompts during this process, removing the need for manual
>intervention during the build process.
>
>(This was said with respect to upgrading ports via portupgrade.)
Or you can use portmaster, which ru
In message <20121008012414.34fd6a65.free...@edvax.de>,
Polytropon wrote:
...
>> ># make config-recursive
...
>This target (and several other useful ones) are listed
>and explained in the manpage: "man 7 ports". :-)
Hey! Thanks again. I didn't know abo
On Sun, 07 Oct 2012 15:57:05 -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>
> In message <20121007234043.cadf5863.free...@edvax.de>,
> Polytropon wrote:
>
> >A workaround (and not directly the answer to your question) is
> >to process the config dialogs before starting
In message <20121007234043.cadf5863.free...@edvax.de>,
Polytropon wrote:
>A workaround (and not directly the answer to your question) is
>to process the config dialogs before starting the build:
>
> # make config-recursive
>
>Once set, the options won't be re
y):
$ cat /etc/make.conf
BATCH=yes
# env BATCH=yes make
jb
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
ed-upon ports for whatever I am actually trying to install or
> upgrade.
A workaround (and not directly the answer to your question) is
to process the config dialogs before starting the build:
# make config-recursive
Once set, the options won't be requested on a second run.
a new system is instructed
to do the following:
# cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portupgrade
# make install clean
(You have to do this in order to get portinstall/portupgrade installed.
These tools can then be used to build & install other ports.)
The problem is that these days, po
I have some periodic scripts from ports that I need to run before
periodic scripts in /etc/periodic; but I can't see how to make it so.
Periodic always processes /etc/periodic before $local_periodic. If I
move /etc/periodic/*/999.local file to 000.local and set:
local_periodic="&qu
all perl in order to build an INDEX from scratch.
That's true if you use the default 'make index' target or my
p5-FreeBSD-Portindex code.
Building an INDEX is a fairly time consuming task, and honestly, most
people don't need to do it. You can download a pre-built INDEX by
fine.
Then I:
cd /usr/ports
make print-index
and this is my result:
Generating INDEX-9 - please wait..perl: not found
"Makefile", line 31: warning: "perl -V:archname" returned non-zero status
perl: not found
Done.
O.K., I'
-stylesheet=parskip
Bryan's example is using := for assignment.
That wasn't it, as it turned out. The problem was in the awk statement.
Instead of:
awk '{print $1}'
I had to use:
awk '{print $$1}'
On Wed, 5 Sep 2012, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
On 09/05/2012 07:24 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 9/5/2012 7:02 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
A bit off topic, but I'm kind of stuck. I am using gmake and want to
do something like this:
FOO := $(shell a | b | c)
But this appears not to work. Only the 'a
On 09/05/2012 07:24 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 9/5/2012 7:02 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
A bit off topic, but I'm kind of stuck. I am using gmake and want to
do something like this:
FOO := $(shell a | b | c)
But this appears not to work. Only the 'a' command is executed. The
remainder
of t
On 9/5/2012 7:02 PM, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
> A bit off topic, but I'm kind of stuck. I am using gmake and want to
> do something like this:
>
>FOO := $(shell a | b | c)
>
> But this appears not to work. Only the 'a' command is executed. The
> remainder
> of the pipeline is ignored. Is there
A bit off topic, but I'm kind of stuck. I am using gmake and want to
do something like this:
FOO := $(shell a | b | c)
But this appears not to work. Only the 'a' command is executed. The remainder
of the pipeline is ignored. Is there some clean way to implement this
kind of thing?
--
--
> > (or will gain speed if it was "emulated").
>
> MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER=2 make sense - one process I/O may overlap with other
> compute
Also, with portbuilder it splits the build process so will fetch (network
limited) on port's files while it builds another (CPU limited) and installs
anothe
A few things you could try adding to make.conf:
FORCE_MAKE_JOBS=yes
MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER=4
I'm not sure this is supported on a _single_ core Pentium 4 CPU
(or will gain speed if it was "emulated").
MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER=2 make sense - one process I/O may overlap with
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012, Ryan Noll wrote:
Does anyone else remember "The Complete FreeBSD"?
I'm looking right at it on the shelf here. "Second Edition - over 1750
pages!". It is *bristling* with post-it notes used as bookmarks.
--
Chris Hill ch...@monochrome.org
**
On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 11:36:18 +0200, David Naylor wrote:
> On Wednesday, 25 July 2012 17:02:37 Mr U wrote:
> > hi
> >
> > is it possible to speed up port make ??
> > i want to install openbox and xorg on a Pentium 4 and 2gb ram,
> > compiling xorg takes about 2
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:04:27PM -0700, Ryan Noll wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Jul 25, 2012 7:34 PM, "Chad Perrin" wrote:
> > You kids have got it easy. I used to have to compile by hand with a pair
> > of tweezers, bar copper wire, a magnifying glass, and a potato with two
> > pieces of metal stuck
On Wednesday, 25 July 2012 17:02:37 Mr U wrote:
> hi
>
> is it possible to speed up port make ??
> i want to install openbox and xorg on a Pentium 4 and 2gb ram,
> compiling xorg takes about 2 hours
A few things you could try adding to make.conf:
FORCE_MAKE_JOBS=yes
MAKE_JOBS_NUMB
-Original Message-
From: Reko Turja
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2012 12:12 PM
To: Wojciech Puchar
Subject: Re: how to speed up port make??
-Original Message-
From: Wojciech Puchar
> 2. Try switching to clang, it has lower memory requirements and
> compi
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
2. Try switching to clang, it has lower memory requirements and
compilation
this is simply not true.
This is simply not the point. Let's not start it again. The question was
clearly about compilation speed where clang
2. Try switching to clang, it has lower memory requirements and compilation
this is simply not true.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-que
Mr U wrote:
is it possible to speed up port make ??
i want to install openbox and xorg on a Pentium 4 and 2gb ram,
compiling xorg takes about 2 hours
1. You can use devel/ccache to cache compiled data. This way when you
are compiling anything for a second time you'll get a big speed
On 25 July 2012, at 23:04, Ryan Noll wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Jul 25, 2012 7:34 PM, "Chad Perrin" wrote:
>> You kids have got it easy. I used to have to compile by hand with a pair
>> of tweezers, bar copper wire, a magnifying glass, and a potato with two
>> pieces of metal stuck in it as a powe
Hello,
On Jul 25, 2012 7:34 PM, "Chad Perrin" wrote:
> You kids have got it easy. I used to have to compile by hand with a pair
> of tweezers, bar copper wire, a magnifying glass, and a potato with two
> pieces of metal stuck in it as a power source.
Ha-ha... Ah those were the days..., but does
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 08:33:36PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
>
> You kids have got it easy. I used to have to compile by hand with a pair
> of tweezers, bar copper wire, a magnifying glass, and a potato with two
> pieces of metal stuck in it as a power source.
s/bar/bare/
Now let me tell yo
> I think I can: FreeBSD 4 on a Pentium 1 with 64 MB EDO RAM.
> > The make buildworld took 24 hours. The kernel itself, if I
> > remember correctly, required 3-5 hours, of course without
> > much tweaking. :-)
>
> Luxury!
>
> I once compiled a custom kernel of
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Wed Jul 25 16:34:22 2012
> From: Robert Huff
> Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 17:31:14 -0400
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: how to speed up port make??
>
>
> Anton Shterenlikht writes:
>
> > >>
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 18:59:56 -0400, Sean Cavanaugh wrote:
> Got you beat. Compiled world on a 100MHz Pentium with 40 MB of RAM.
I think I can: FreeBSD 4 on a Pentium 1 with 64 MB EDO RAM.
The make buildworld took 24 hours. The kernel itself, if I
remember correctly, required 3-5 hours, of cou
25, 2012 6:54 PM
To: Mr U
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd org
Subject: Re: how to speed up port make??
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 08:02:37 -0700 (PDT), Mr U wrote:
>
> hi
>
> is it possible to speed up port make ??
> i want to install openbox and xorg on a Pentium 4 and 2gb ram,
> co
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 08:02:37 -0700 (PDT), Mr U wrote:
>
> hi
>
> is it possible to speed up port make ??
> i want to install openbox and xorg on a Pentium 4 and 2gb ram,
> compiling xorg takes about 2 hours
That's a fully normal make time on such a system. I've been
Robert Huff writes:
> Mr U writes:
>
>> is it possible to speed up port make ??
>> i want to install openbox and xorg on a Pentium 4 and 2gb ram,
>> compiling xorg takes about 2 hours
>
> Humorous answer:
> Yes - get a more powerful computer.
or e
1 - 100 of 3709 matches
Mail list logo
