Venkat Duvvuru wrote:
> Does this procedure hold good for a device driver module's patch as well?
Yes
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
>
> > Venkat Duvvuru wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > Could somebody please point me to a procedure
Does this procedure hold good for a device driver module's patch as well?
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> Venkat Duvvuru wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Could somebody please point me to a procedure to apply a patch to the
> > sources?
> > I have a d
Venkat Duvvuru wrote:
> Hi,
> Could somebody please point me to a procedure to apply a patch to the
> sources?
> I have a driver patch that I would like to commit.
If you want to send from local mail client
man send-pr
If you want to send via web
http://www
Hi,
Could somebody please point me to a procedure to apply a patch to the
sources?
I have a driver patch that I would like to commit.
/Venkat
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
/sys/GENERIC i386), one of
> the patches failed to apply:
> --
> ===> Applying extra patch /usr/ports/www/chromium/files/extra-patch-gcc
> ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for chromium-20.0.1132.57
> patch: malformed patch at line 15:
:
--
===> Applying extra patch /usr/ports/www/chromium/files/extra-patch-gcc
===> Applying FreeBSD patches for chromium-20.0.1132.57
patch: malformed patch at line 15: #if PLATFORM(CHROMIUM)
=> Patch patch-third_party__WebKit__Source__WebCore__config.h failed to
appl
On Friday 01 June 2012 04:25:12 Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 01/06/2012 09:34, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> > On 6/1/12 9:49 AM, Brent Clark wrote:
> >> Hiya
> >>
> >> I would just like to ask / know. Did anything weird or wonderful happen
> >> on the FreeBSD ports.
> >>
> >> To show you what I mean.
>
On 01/06/2012 09:34, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> On 6/1/12 9:49 AM, Brent Clark wrote:
>> Hiya
>>
>> I would just like to ask / know. Did anything weird or wonderful happen
>> on the FreeBSD ports.
>>
>> To show you what I mean.
>>
>> [root@torry /usr/home/bclark]# portaudit -F -a; portsnap fetch upda
On 6/1/12 9:49 AM, Brent Clark wrote:
> Hiya
>
> I would just like to ask / know. Did anything weird or wonderful happen
> on the FreeBSD ports.
>
> To show you what I mean.
>
> [root@torry /usr/home/bclark]# portaudit -F -a; portsnap fetch update;
> pkg_version -vIL=; freebsd-update fetch inst
Hiya
I would just like to ask / know. Did anything weird or wonderful happen on the
FreeBSD ports.
To show you what I mean.
[root@torry /usr/home/bclark]# portaudit -F -a; portsnap fetch update;
pkg_version -vIL=; freebsd-update fetch install
auditfile.tbz 100
Hi.
I have one of these cards.
I notice the PR is open - does this mean the patch was not committed?
Is there anything I can do to get eyeballs on this?
I've never compiled from source or applied a diff but if it needs
testng and someone's willing to give me a basic outline of the
proc
ONFIG= yes
! ONLY_FOR_ARCHS= i386
PLIST_FILES= include/fec.h lib/libfec.so lib/libfec.a
post-patch:
@${REINPLACE_CMD} -e 's|gcc|${CC}|g' ${WRKSRC}/makefile.in
.include
--- 22,35
GNU_CONFIGURE=yes
USE_GMAKE=yes
USE_LDCONFIG= yes
! ONLY_FOR_ARC
On 3 October 2011 16:15, R. Clayton wrote:
>
> Odd, I find no such file as patch-p11-kit-modules.c here (9.0-BETA3-amd64),
> either in /usr/ports/distfiles/ or in /usr/ports/security/p11-kit/files/.
>
> It was in /usr/ports/security/p11-kit/files:
>
> # cat /tmp/pa
well I know about the newvers.sh. But as far as I understand the advisory (and
the patch) the file sys/kern/uipc_usrreq.c is modified. I'm not that much into
the FreeBSD kernel code. However, isn't this affecting the kernel image?
regards - Michael
On 07.10.2011 13:33, n dhert wrote:
&
s -p4,
which makes sense, since rebuilding the kernel from source files wrote the
information contained in /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh into the kernel
binary, from which uname -a extracts the patch version ..
2011/10/7 Michael Schaefer
> On 07.10.2011 09:01, Jason Helfman wrote:
> >
On 07.10.2011 09:01, Jason Helfman wrote:
> If your kernel wasn't touched during the update, then uname won't bump.
but as -p4 for 8.2 fixes FreeBSD-SA-11:05.unix, it should have touched the
kernel, shouldn't it?
regards - Michael
___
freebsd-questions@
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 08:55:26AM +0200, n dhert thus spake:
I just applied security patch -p4 (last week -p3) to a freebsd 8.2 system
(generic kernel)
# freebsd-update fetch
# freebsd-update install
# ls -la /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh
has date of today and contains
REVISION="8.2&qu
I just applied security patch -p4 (last week -p3) to a freebsd 8.2 system
(generic kernel)
# freebsd-update fetch
# freebsd-update install
# ls -la /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh
has date of today and contains
REVISION="8.2"
BRANCH="RELEASE-p4"
reboot
# uname -r
8.2-RELEASE-p3
I would try moving the patch file elsewhere (or deleting it) and trying again.
That worked; thanks.
Odd, I find no such file as patch-p11-kit-modules.c here (9.0-BETA3-amd64),
either in /usr/ports/distfiles/ or in /usr/ports/security/p11-kit/files/.
It was in /usr/ports/security/p11-kit
On 3 October 2011 11:04, R. Clayton wrote:
...
> ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for p11-kit-0.7
> Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
> 1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to p11-kit/modules.c.rej
> => Patch patch-p11-kit-modules.c failed to apply cleanly.
=> p11-kit-0.7 depends on package: libtool>=2.4 - found
===> Applying FreeBSD patches for p11-kit-0.7
Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch.
1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to p11-kit/modules.c.rej
=> Patch patch-p11-kit-modules.c failed to apply cleanly.
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 22/09/2011 11:21, Andy Zammy wrote:
File to patch: files/patch-defaultopacity
No file found--skip this patch? [n] n
File to patch: /usr/home/user/Downloads/dwm.defaultopacity.patch
patch: malformed patch at line 9: @@ -52,6 +54,9 @@
=> Pa
On 22/09/2011 11:21, Andy Zammy wrote:
> File to patch: files/patch-defaultopacity
> No file found--skip this patch? [n] n
> File to patch: /usr/home/user/Downloads/dwm.defaultopacity.patch
> patch: **** malformed patch at line 9: @@ -52,6 +54,9 @@
> => Patch patch-defaultopaci
e: Pre-5.6 config.h-files no longer work.
===> License MIT accepted by the user
===> Found saved configuration for dwm-5.9
===> Extracting for dwm-5.9
=> SHA256 Checksum OK for dwm-5.9.tar.gz.
===> Patching for dwm-5.9
===> Applying FreeBSD patches for dwm-5.9
File to patch: files/
t it
> didn't work (malformed patch).
This is pretty much the correct approach. Although to do it in the best
ports fashion, you'ld save the patch file to
${PORTSDIR}/x11-wm/dwm/files/patch-something-or-other and then the ports
would patch the sources for you automatically any time you reb
Hi all,
First time poster to the lists!
Using dwm, loving the minimalism and it's forcing me to learn stuff the hard
way which is all good. But I can't seem to figure out how to apply a patch
to it.
According to the instructions listed here: http://dwm.suckless.org/patches/ I
figured
p Cir Dulles, VA 20166
VerisignInc.com
On 8/18/11 10:35 AM, "Herbert J. Skuhra" wrote:
>On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 12:20:41 +
>"Miller, Vincent (Rick)" wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I have a patch that I applied to the FreeBSD source in /
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 12:20:41 +
"Miller, Vincent (Rick)" wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I have a patch that I applied to the FreeBSD source in /usr/src/. I
> then executed a make buildworld that succeeded. I ran make release
> to generate media. However, it looks as th
Hello all,
I have a patch that I applied to the FreeBSD source in /usr/src/. I then
executed a make buildworld that succeeded. I ran make release to generate
media. However, it looks as though the driver I patched was updated by CVS
during the make release process as seen in the make
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 00:25:38 +0400
Pan Tsu wrote:
> "Christopher J. Ruwe" writes:
>
> [...]
> > In this setup, I should not have any problems. However, I do not
> > realize (and very much doubt) that I changed anything in the order
> > of the services (lacking the capability to deterministicall
"Christopher J. Ruwe" writes:
[...]
> In this setup, I should not have any problems. However, I do not
> realize (and very much doubt) that I changed anything in the order of
> the services (lacking the capability to deterministically do so,
> anyway).
>
> From rcorder I understand that all that
On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 22:23:36 +0400
Pan Tsu wrote:
> "Christopher J. Ruwe" writes:
>
> [...]
> > /etc/rc.d/zvol
> > /etc/rc.d/zfs
> > /etc/rc.d/dumpon
> > /etc/rc.d/ddb
> > /etc/rc.d/initrandom
> > /etc/rc.d/geli
> > /etc/rc.d/gbde
> > /etc/rc.d/encswap
> > /etc/rc.d/ccd
> > /etc/rc.d/swap1
> >
On 07/10/2011 07:05, Christopher J. Ruwe wrote:
> $> rcorder /etc/rc.d/zfs
You want to use: service -r
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the
"Christopher J. Ruwe" writes:
[...]
> /etc/rc.d/zvol
> /etc/rc.d/zfs
> /etc/rc.d/dumpon
> /etc/rc.d/ddb
> /etc/rc.d/initrandom
> /etc/rc.d/geli
> /etc/rc.d/gbde
> /etc/rc.d/encswap
> /etc/rc.d/ccd
> /etc/rc.d/swap1
> /etc/rc.d/fsck
> /etc/rc.d/root
> /etc/rc.d/hostid_save
> /etc/rc.d/mdconfig
> /
On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 07:50:44 -0700
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 04:05:04PM +0200, Christopher J. Ruwe wrote:
> > On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 16:38:43 +0400
> > Pan Tsu wrote:
> >
> > > "Christopher J. Ruwe" writes:
> > >
> > > > Nearly a week ago I posted this question to freebsd-
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 04:05:04PM +0200, Christopher J. Ruwe wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 16:38:43 +0400
> Pan Tsu wrote:
>
> > "Christopher J. Ruwe" writes:
> >
> > > Nearly a week ago I posted this question to freebsd-fs, but
> > > probalby my question is a) worded too complicatedly, b) not
then unlock GELI and then
mount all other remaining fs on zpool B.
I could either mount all remaining zfs'es in mountcritlocal, which
requires another line there, which I have added locally as put in my
patch. I cannot shift the order so that GELI-unlock comes first, because
my keys for GELI re
"Christopher J. Ruwe" writes:
> Nearly a week ago I posted this question to freebsd-fs, but probalby my
> question is a) worded too complicatedly, b) not really a
> filesystem-issue or c) both.
>
> To rephrase: In setups requiring one or more ZFS-dataset to be mounted
> before another service is
heers,
--
Christopher J. Ruwe
TZ GMT + 2
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 20:59:48 +0200
From: "Christopher J. Ruwe"
To:
Subject: zpool-zfs'es on a GELI-encrypted volume are not mounted at
boot [patch included]
I run my notebook under FreeBSD 8.2-stable, r223699. I
1. I don't think that the proposed patch by itself would be reasonable.
Some limit should be imposed.
According to the RFC-1123 (2.1) (circa October 1989),
"Host software MUST handle host names of up to 63 characters and
SHOULD handle host names of up to 255 charact
Currently, I have issues mailing to *@freebsd.org, so please reply to
c...@cruwe.de.
I have started looking at FreeBSD bug reports recently to improve my
skills in C, to learn more about operating systems which I am
concentrating on at university and, at some point, contribute should my
abilities
I was doing some exercises to get familiar with diff/patch.
Tried:
cd
mkdir tmp
cd tmp
mkdir original
mkdir changed
echo Line1 > original/File1
echo Line2 >>original/File1
echo Line4 >>original/File1
echo Line1 > changed/File1
echo Line2 >>changed/File1
echo Line3 &g
bsd writes:
> Hello,
>
> I have a patch for clamav that was submited by a developer of clamav.
> I don't know how to apply It to the source code of the port.
>
> What I would like to do:
>
> 1. Get the source code
> 2. cd to the source directory
> 3. A
On 03/09/2010 08:53, bsd wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a patch for clamav that was submited by a developer of clamav.
> I don't know how to apply It to the source code of the port.
>
> What I would like to do:
>
> 1. Get the source code
> 2. cd to the source dire
Hello,
I have a patch for clamav that was submited by a developer of clamav.
I don't know how to apply It to the source code of the port.
What I would like to do:
1. Get the source code
2. cd to the source directory
3. Apply the patch
4. Recompile
5. Test
If this is ok, then
On Wednesday 21 July 2010 10:37:54 Martin Schweizer wrote:
> Since some days I tried to download the latest Java patch from
> http://www.eyesbeyond.com/. But the site is not reachable. I tried it from
> a europe and from us server but no luck. Do you have any ideas?
I can recommend i
Hello
Since some days I tried to download the latest Java patch from
http://www.eyesbeyond.com/. But the site is not reachable. I tried it from a
europe and from
us server but no luck. Do you have any ideas?
Regards,
--
Martin Schweizer
PC-Service M. Schweizer GmbH; Bannholzstrasse 6
es that include at least *part* of the pathname, e.g. when patches
for ports are created I diff at the toplevel /usr/ports tree, so that
both the port-categogy and the port-name are visible in the patch file.
When generating patches for the /usr/src tree it is also useful to see
the relative path under /
On Mon 22 Mar 2010 at 15:08:43 PDT Charlie Kester wrote:
On Mon 22 Mar 2010 at 14:50:03 PDT Alejandro Imass wrote:
Hi,
I have finally tested and verified a patch for /usr/ports/graphics/sane-backends
To whon or where should I submit it?
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books
On Mon 22 Mar 2010 at 14:50:03 PDT Alejandro Imass wrote:
Hi,
I have finally tested and verified a patch for /usr/ports/graphics/sane-backends
To whon or where should I submit it?
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/porting-submitting.html
> I have finally tested and verified a patch for
> /usr/ports/graphics/sane-backends
>
> To whon or where should I submit it?
>
There's no specific maintainer for this port. Write to
po...@freebsd.org and submit the patch.
Regar
Hi,
I have finally tested and verified a patch for /usr/ports/graphics/sane-backends
To whon or where should I submit it?
Thanks in advance,
Alejandro Imass
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
On Fri 19 Mar 2010 at 15:20:49 PDT Adam PAPAI wrote:
Hi,
As of today I'll try to help and create bugfix patches for usr/src
and usr/ports.
I've already done 2 patches and posted it to the -current list but
don't really know what is the best way to post the patches. Who will
"check" them? wh
Hi,
As of today I'll try to help and create bugfix patches for usr/src and
usr/ports.
I've already done 2 patches and posted it to the -current list but don't
really know what is the best way to post the patches. Who will "check"
them? who will make the decision to use them? How should I sen
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 22:00, Jason Garrett wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 02:38, James Colannino wrote:
>
>> Hey everyone,
>>
>> I have an Asus EEE PC 1005HA, which has an Atheros 9285 wireless chipset.
>> I discovered that Rui Paulo wrote a dr
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 02:38, James Colannino wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> I have an Asus EEE PC 1005HA, which has an Atheros 9285 wireless chipset.
> I discovered that Rui Paulo wrote a driver, and put up a patch for the 8.0
> stable kernel here:
>
> http://peopl
Hey everyone,
I have an Asus EEE PC 1005HA, which has an Atheros 9285 wireless
chipset. I discovered that Rui Paulo wrote a driver, and put up a patch
for the 8.0 stable kernel here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~rpaulo/ar9285_stable_8.diff
It seems to have worked for some people. After
I apologize for ignorance but I have freenas and not sure freebsd is the
same. But the version of freenas I have is:
i386 07.1.4997
I am pretty sure I need the patch. Whenever I reboot my system I get an
error that states the GPT is rejected. If I unplug the power to the hard
drive and reboot
; how to apply the patch. I would appreciate any help.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mike Krafczyk
Are you certain that you need to? What version of FreeBSD are you using?
Chris
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mail
Hi,
I am new to FreeBSD and recently created a FreeNAS server. I had a problem
with GEOM: GPT rejected. I have Award Bios and found this fix
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=115406. I, though, do not know
how to apply the patch. I would appreciate any help.
Thanks,
Mike Krafczyk
Dan Naumov wrote:
What exactly is "gart" and where do I find it's manpage,
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi comes up with nothing? Also, does
this mean that GPT is _NOT_ in fact fixed regarding this bug?
That's gpart(8). With a 'p'. gpart has had significant amounts of
work put into it for
I have a few questions about this PR:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=115406&cat=bin
1) Is this bug now officially fixed as of 8.0-RELEASE? Ie, can I
expect to set up a completely GPT-based system using an Intel
D945GCLF2 board and not have the installation crap out on me later?
2) The
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Joe S wrote:
I have the same problem as reported in this bug:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=122551
Someone attached a patch to the bug that resolves the problem.
I don't know how to apply the patch.
Can someone please show me how?
Okay, but realize
I have the same problem as reported in this bug:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=122551
Someone attached a patch to the bug that resolves the problem.
I don't know how to apply the patch.
Can someone please show me how?
___
fr
Hi maillist.
After applying non kernel-level patch set via freebsd-update my system after
rebooting show FreeBSD 8.0 version, not 8.0-p1. New instance of freebsd-update
check system again by checksum and show that system is already patched as -p1.
With updating i see changing of file
Коньков Евгений wrote:
Hello, .
Link to news:
http://www.kes.net.ua/softdev/fib_patch.html
rc.subr.patch
-
2c2
< # $FreeBSD: src/etc/rc.subr,v 1.77.2.1.2.1 2008/11/25 02:59:29 kensmith Exp $
---
# $FreeBSD: src/etc/rc.subr,v 1.77.2.1 2008/05/12 07:29:03 mtm Exp $
605d604
<
664a6
Hello, .
Link to news:
http://www.kes.net.ua/softdev/fib_patch.html
rc.subr.patch
-
2c2
< # $FreeBSD: src/etc/rc.subr,v 1.77.2.1.2.1 2008/11/25 02:59:29 kensmith Exp $
---
> # $FreeBSD: src/etc/rc.subr,v 1.77.2.1 2008/05/12 07:29:03 mtm Exp $
605d604
<
664a664,669
>
Hi All,
I've a patch to opencrypto and I have a crypto driver that I would
like to present for inclusion with the freebsd 7 release. Could you
give me some pointers on getting that done?
The opencrypto patch is relavent for FreeBSD 8 and 9 also...
Some questions for the driver re
I can't actually apply this patch to FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE. It seems
ataraid is something not to be used in FreeBSD so I have started to
use gmirror instead. Only downside of it is there are 2 disks shown in
boot loader not one so if F1 (first disk goes) goes you have to
manually select other
Hi,
Has anyone had experience applying this patch to their FreeBSD 6.x setup?
http://www.nabble.com/Vital-Patches-for-ataraid-with-Intel-Matrix-RAID-(ICH7)-td16179257.html
I've couple of machines using ICH8/ICH9 which seem to exhibit the same problems
and would be interested in applyin
there are new updates i installed them
> with `freebsd-update install`,
> and eventually i got around to restarting, but when I log back in and type
> `uname -a` I get the same message
> as above: `7.1-RELEASE #0`
This is (probably) normal. uname -a shows the kernel version, h
t;
> > No updates needed to update system to 7.0-RELEASE-p10.
> >
> > Now I'm new to the BSD world, but i do have a fair amount of experience
> > with Linux. What I am trying to figure
> > out here, is why uname -a reports a different patch number than
Inspecting system... done.
> Preparing to download files... done.
>
> No updates needed to update system to 7.0-RELEASE-p10.
>
> Now I'm new to the BSD world, but i do have a fair amount of experience with
> Linux. What I am trying to figure
> out here, is
mount of experience with
Linux. What I am trying to figure
out here, is why uname -a reports a different patch number than it should.
Thanks
James
--
James
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fr
5_4.tar.gz.
===> Patching for aureal-kmod-1.5_6
===> Applying FreeBSD patches for aureal-kmod-1.5_6
1 out of 6 hunks failed--saving rejects to au88x0.c.rej
=> Patch patch-au88x0.c failed to apply cleanly.
=> Patch(es) patch-10_Makefile patch-20_Makefile patch-30_Makefile
patch-Makefi
After patching our systems, do we need to remake our keys/certs? Or are we
just patching the mechanism to check the keys?
_
Windows Live™ Hotmail®: Chat. Store. Share. Do more with mail.
http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGL
On 11/19/08 17:34, Fbsd1 wrote:
> Greg Larkin wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Fbsd1 wrote:
>>> On the developers website there is a patch i want to apply
>>>
>>> http://developer.berlios.de/patch/?func=detailpat
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 8:34 PM, Fbsd1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greg Larkin wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Fbsd1 wrote:
>>
>>> On the developers website there is a patch i want to apply
>>>
Greg Larkin wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Fbsd1 wrote:
On the developers website there is a patch i want to apply
http://developer.berlios.de/patch/?func=detailpatch&patch_id=2283&group_id=2663
[ Patch #2283 ] Add a variable to run shutdown commands without r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Fbsd1 wrote:
> On the developers website there is a patch i want to apply
>
> http://developer.berlios.de/patch/?func=detailpatch&patch_id=2283&group_id=2663
>
>
> [ Patch #2283 ] Add a variable to run shutdown commands w
On the developers website there is a patch i want to apply
http://developer.berlios.de/patch/?func=detailpatch&patch_id=2283&group_id=2663
[ Patch #2283 ] Add a variable to run shutdown commands without root pass.
How can i get "make install" to apply this patch while compili
ld somebody please explain me what wrong with the patch is?
> Why didn't the state changed?
>
> See the pr here :
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=128124
>
> --
> Kind Regards, Yuriy Grishin
>
> ___
> freebsd-
Hello,
More than 2 weeks ago I tried to take maintainership of www/sams because
it hasn't been updated for a long time.
Current state : feedback. (but I've sent the file)
Could somebody please explain me what wrong with the patch is?
Why didn't the state changed?
See the
--- ld/x86_aout.h.orig 2003-01-28 17:17:14.0 -0500
+++ ld/x86_aout.h 2005-05-07 22:40:05.0 -0400
@@ -13,7 +13,9 @@
typedef long Long;
#define __OUT_OK 1
#else
-typedef char Long[4];
+#define __OUT_OK 1
+#include
+typedef int32_t Long;
#endif
Sorry about that.
___
On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 19:12:39 -0700 (PDT), Unga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Recently I have submitted a patch to the FreeBSD current mailing list,
> it seems the patch is not applied
> yet.
> (http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2008-July/08681
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 2:12 AM, Unga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Recently I have submitted a patch to the FreeBSD current mailing list, it
> seems the patch is not applied yet.
> (http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2008-July/086814.html)
>
&g
--- On Fri, 7/11/08, Beech Rintoul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Beech Rintoul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: How to submit a patch to FreeBSD project?
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Friday, July 11, 2008, 10:25 AM
> On Thurs
On Thursday 10 July 2008, Unga said:
> Hi all
>
> Recently I have submitted a patch to the FreeBSD current mailing
> list, it seems the patch is not applied yet.
> (http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2008-July/08681
>4.html)
>
> I'm not sure whether
Hi all
Recently I have submitted a patch to the FreeBSD current mailing list, it seems
the patch is not applied yet.
(http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2008-July/086814.html)
I'm not sure whether the FreeBSD project does not accept patches from
non-committers or may be
On Monday 23 June 2008 18:03:34 Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 8:32 AM, Warren Liddell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Below is the hunk of ports that continually fail to upgrade due to
> > problems with patching. i use the command portupgrade -aDkp -m BATCH=yes
> >
> > Any ass
Warren Liddell writes:
> > Do you have the latest ports tree (via cvsup or csup)?
>
> I csup'd my ports today and am re-doing it at present.
Can't speak to the other ports, but the current version of ruby
is ruby-1.8.6.111_3,1 which built yesterday for me with zero
problems.
On Monday 23 June 2008 05:03:34 Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 8:32 AM, Warren Liddell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Below is the hunk of ports that continually fail to upgrade due to
> > problems with patching. i use the command portupgrade -aDkp -m BATCH=yes
> >
> > Any ass
On Monday 23 June 2008 18:03:34 Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 8:32 AM, Warren Liddell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Below is the hunk of ports that continually fail to upgrade due to
> > problems with patching. i use the command portupgrade -aDkp -m BATCH=yes
> >
> > Any ass
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 8:32 AM, Warren Liddell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Below is the hunk of ports that continually fail to upgrade due to problems
> with patching. i use the command portupgrade -aDkp -m BATCH=yes
>
> Any assistance with this greatly appreciated.
Do you have the latest ports
Below is the hunk of ports that continually fail to upgrade due to problems
with patching. i use the command portupgrade -aDkp -m BATCH=yes
Any assistance with this greatly appreciated.
** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed)
! lang/ruby18 (ruby-1.8.6.111_1,1) (patch
I'm attempting to portinstall ruby-iconv on FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE #7,
but I'm getting the following error:
===> Patching for ruby-1.8.6.111_2,1
===> Applying FreeBSD patches for ruby-1.8.6.111_2,1
1 out of 3 hunks failed--saving rejects to lib/rexml/rexml.rb.rej
=> Patch patch-
Just as a best practice you might want to consider running a weekly cvsup
out of cron.
You should probably always run it before installing anything out of ports,
but if you have it as a weekly scheduled task, it will decrease the time it
takes to run when you ³need² to run it.
Of course portsnap
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> > Sent: Sun May 11 16:46:31 2008
> > Subject: Imagemagick port seems broken - jp2.c patch fails
> >
> > I may be not thinking straight due to a head cold- in which case just
> >
On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 08:03 +0100, Glyn Millington wrote:
> Da Rock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 08:02 +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
> >> On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 09:46:31AM +1000, Da Rock wrote:
> >> > I may be not thinking straight due to a head cold- in which case just
>
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 04:58:54PM +1000, Da Rock wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 08:02 +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
> > On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 09:46:31AM +1000, Da Rock wrote:
> > > I may be not thinking straight due to a head cold- in which case just
> > > tell me so- but building Imagemagick-6.
1 - 100 of 489 matches
Mail list logo
