how should I upgrade all these ports??

2009-01-12 Thread Tsu-Fan Cheng
Hi, I just csup my port tree this morning (01/12), and realized there is a whole lot ports need my attention (49 of them). I checked out UPDATES and found out that gnome and GTK+ have just been updated. But i don't have gtkmm or gnome-session installed, I wonder if I should still upgrade my

how should I upgrade all these ports??

2009-01-12 Thread Robert Huff
should still upgrade my ports just as described in the UPDATES. In short, yes. Many (but not all) of these a) are part of GNOME or b) have a GNOME component in their dependencies. The update procedure is there for a reason. (Advice: make sure you have the latest vesion

Re: how should I upgrade all these ports??

2009-01-12 Thread Julien Cigar
Always read /usr/ports/UPDATING before any upgrade. After that you can use portmaster (the one I use) or portupgrade to upgrade all those outdated ports with a single command : portmaster -avd On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 10:08 -0500, Tsu-Fan Cheng wrote: Hi, I just csup my port tree this morning

Can't Upgrade Python Through Ports

2006-10-02 Thread Ted Johnson
Hi; I have python 2.3.5 and I'd like to upgrade to 2.4.3. I've tried installing from FreeBSD ports and the oldfashioned way from source code, with the configure make make install dance, and still when I call up my python interpreter it tells me I'm in 2.3.5! Why? I didn't do altinstall! What

Re: Can't Upgrade Python Through Ports

2006-10-02 Thread Ivan Levchenko
Try the following in the python port directory: make install clean On 10/2/06, Ted Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi; I have python 2.3.5 and I'd like to upgrade to 2.4.3. I've tried installing from FreeBSD ports and the oldfashioned way from source code, with the configure make make

Re: Can't Upgrade Python Through Ports

2006-10-02 Thread Ted Johnson
Right. I tried that before writing, but I forgot to specify as much. No, that didn't work either. Here are a couple of peculiarities: * I took over this box from someone who didn't know the difference between FreeBSD and Linux. So, he built the original Python in a different dir. * The original

Re: Can't Upgrade Python Through Ports

2006-10-02 Thread Ivan Levchenko
What are the error messages? On 10/2/06, Ted Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Right. I tried that before writing, but I forgot to specify as much. No, that didn't work either. Here are a couple of peculiarities: * I took over this box from someone who didn't know the difference between FreeBSD

Re: Can't Upgrade Python Through Ports

2006-10-02 Thread Dave McCammon
--- Ted Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi; I have python 2.3.5 and I'd like to upgrade to 2.4.3. I've tried installing from FreeBSD ports and the oldfashioned way from source code, with the configure make make install dance, and still when I call up my python interpreter it tells me

Re: Can't Upgrade Python Through Ports

2006-10-02 Thread Ted Johnson
When I read your answer I *knew* you were right! And right you were! Thanks! Ted2 Dave McCammon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- Ted Johnson wrote: Hi; I have python 2.3.5 and I'd like to upgrade to 2.4.3. I've tried installing from FreeBSD ports and the oldfashioned way from source code,

Upgrade sendmail via ports - version in smtp greeting doesn't match

2006-01-25 Thread Barry Byrne
All: Not a major issue, but I've upgraded sendmail on a 4.11 box via the ports. All appears to be working, but if I look at the SMTP greeting, the version of sendmail or the config version is incorrect. The latter version (8.13.1) would have been the version prior to the port upgrade.

RE: Upgrade sendmail via ports - version in smtp greeting doesn't match

2006-01-25 Thread Barry Byrne
] On Behalf Of Barry Byrne Sent: 25 January 2006 11:26 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Upgrade sendmail via ports - version in smtp greeting doesn't match All: Not a major issue, but I've upgraded sendmail on a 4.11 box via the ports. All appears to be working, but if I look

upgrade then no ports

2005-12-19 Thread steve lasiter
I have Freebsd 5.4 on all my servers. It had been a while since the initial load so I decided to upgrade all source code via cvsup and then ran make buildworld, make buildkernel, make installkernel. After all was said and done everything booted fine and all was working well. When I went to

Re: upgrade then no ports

2005-12-19 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Monday 19 December 2005 13:53, steve lasiter wrote: I have Freebsd 5.4 on all my servers. It had been a while since the initial load so I decided to upgrade all source code via cvsup and then ran make buildworld, make buildkernel, make installkernel. After all was said and done everything

Re: upgrade then no ports

2005-12-19 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Monday 19 December 2005 14:00, steve lasiter wrote: --- Michael C. Shultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday 19 December 2005 13:53, steve lasiter wrote: I have Freebsd 5.4 on all my servers. It had been a while since the initial load so I decided to upgrade all

Re: upgrade then no ports

2005-12-19 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Monday 19 December 2005 14:04, Michael C. Shultz wrote: On Monday 19 December 2005 14:00, steve lasiter wrote: --- Michael C. Shultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday 19 December 2005 13:53, steve lasiter wrote: I have Freebsd 5.4 on all my servers. It had been a

Re: upgrade then no ports

2005-12-19 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Monday 19 December 2005 14:59, steve lasiter wrote: Thanks Mike, That did it. Do you think the upgrade of my system wasn't really an upgrade at all now due to that? Steve L ports and src are different things, it depends on how you had your cvs-src files set up. -Mike

Upgrade python from ports

2005-07-19 Thread David Pratt
I am relatively new to ports. When I type pkg_info, this is what I have for python: py23-MySQLdb-1.2.0_1 Access a MySQL database through Python py23-mx-base-2.0.5 The eGenix mx-Extension Series for Python py23-reportlab-1.19 Library to create PDF documents using the Python language

Re: re portmanager, how to prevent upgrade of held ports

2005-01-01 Thread nbco
On Friday 31 December 2004 23:32, Michael C. Shultz wrote: On Friday 31 December 2004 09:49 am, nbco wrote: Any ideas as to how to make portmanager ignore held ports? If you were to move /var/db/pkg/openoffice-1.1.4.20041101_1 (assuming that is the version you have installed) directory to

re portmanager, how to prevent upgrade of held ports

2004-12-31 Thread nbco
Hi list, I am trying out portmanager-0.2.2, on a 5.3-RELEASE box. I have openoffice-1.1.3.20040810 installed. I don't want to upgrade openoffice at this time, as I don't have the space for a full compile and will wait for a new package. I have set openoffice to be held in pkgtools.conf in

Re: re portmanager, how to prevent upgrade of held ports

2004-12-31 Thread Michael C. Shultz
On Friday 31 December 2004 09:49 am, nbco wrote: Hi list, I am trying out portmanager-0.2.2, on a 5.3-RELEASE box. I have openoffice-1.1.3.20040810 installed. I don't want to upgrade openoffice at this time, as I don't have the space for a full compile and will wait for a new package. I

Re: Proper way to upgrade packaes from ports

2002-10-08 Thread Roger Merritt
would regard it as a boon if the script didn't sometimes do things (at least when run remotely) that cause my machine to reboot spontaneously (fatal trap 12). I use portversion -vL= to check on what needs updating. But I then usually do portupgrade -Rra which will upgrade all ports that are out

Re: Proper way to upgrade packaes from ports

2002-10-07 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 09:00:49AM +0100, Rus Foster wrote: I've got a general question. Say I've install /usr/ports/net/foobar_0.1, I do a cvsup and see new foo_bar0.2. What is the best way to upgrade? Either pkg_rm foobar_0.1 + pkg_add foobar_0.2, force the installation of 0.2 or is there

Re: Proper way to upgrade packaes from ports

2002-10-07 Thread John Kozubik
Rus, Please take a look at /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade, as it is the appropriate tool for these sort of upgrades. Circumstantial evidence over the years has led me to believe that most ports will actually successfully and without issue overwrite their previous iterations that were also

Re: Proper way to upgrade packaes from ports

2002-10-07 Thread Kevin Oberman
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 14:49:23 -0500 From: Jack L. Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] At 12:21 PM 10.7.2002 -0700, John Kozubik wrote: Rus, Please take a look at /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade, as it is the appropriate tool for these sort of upgrades.

Re: Proper way to upgrade packaes from ports

2002-10-07 Thread Kent Stewart
Kevin Oberman wrote: Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 14:49:23 -0500 From: Jack L. Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] At 12:21 PM 10.7.2002 -0700, John Kozubik wrote: Rus, Please take a look at /usr/ports/sysutils/portupgrade, as it is the appropriate tool for these sort of upgrades.

Re: Proper way to upgrade packaes from ports

2002-10-07 Thread Chris Snyder
Kent Stewart wrote: I have usually done a pkg_version -c and know what needs to be updated. I use the pkg_version -c method as well-- it seems so much simpler than portupgrade, but am I missing something and/or running the risk of breaking things? FWIW I think that keeping your

Re: Proper way to upgrade packaes from ports

2002-10-07 Thread Kevin Oberman
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 17:23:40 -0400 From: Chris Snyder [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kent Stewart wrote: I have usually done a pkg_version -c and know what needs to be updated. I use the pkg_version -c method as well-- it seems so much simpler than portupgrade,

Re: Proper way to upgrade packaes from ports

2002-10-07 Thread parv
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], wrote Kevin Oberman thusly... The biggest down-side is the requirement that I run portsdb -Uu to update the databases after a cvsup of the ports tree. This is a pretty CPU intensive operation and can take a while on an older system. as i understand portsupgrade,

Re: Proper way to upgrade packaes from ports

2002-10-07 Thread Kevin Oberman
, portversion is a part of portupgrade. It should do almost anything pkg_version does except -c. I use portversion -vL= to check on what needs updating. But I then usually do portupgrade -Rra which will upgrade all ports that are out of date and do so in the correct bottom-up order. portupgrade also