Hello,
I have a problem with FreeBSD 7.x 32bit running the standard PAE kernel
on a dell R210 server with 16GB of RAM. All servers spec'ed like this have the
same identical problem and it is not a hardware issue because all memory tests
have been negative.
basically the issue c
Try to install FreeBSD 8.2 on Hyper-V but some-virt-hdd.VHD not bigger then
30Gb.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...
On 14 April 2011 08:05, Dennis Nikiforov wrote:
> Hello,
>
>I have a problem with FreeBSD 7.x 32bit running the standard PAE
> kernel on a dell R210 server with 16GB of RAM. All servers spec'ed like this
> have the same identical problem and it is not a hardware issue because all
> memory
There is a legacy piece of custom software that runs only on 32 bit systems, so
going to 64 bit is not possible.
On Apr 14, 2011, at 12:08 PM, krad wrote:
>
>
> On 14 April 2011 08:05, Dennis Nikiforov wrote:
> Hello,
>
>I have a problem with FreeBSD 7.x 32bit running the standard PA
On 14 April 2011 11:14, Dennis Nikiforov wrote:
> There is a legacy piece of custom software that runs only on 32 bit
> systems, so going to 64 bit is not possible.
>
> On Apr 14, 2011, at 12:08 PM, krad wrote:
>
>
>
> On 14 April 2011 08:05, Dennis Nikiforov wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>>I hav
Well, the idea was to run many instances of the app (each process does not need
more than a couple of gigs of ram). Using virtualization is another option, but
it will require a lot more maintenance of every VM. It would be a lot better if
a single OS can use PAE.
On Apr 14, 2011, at 3:47 PM, k
On 12/04/2011 13:33, Lars Wilke wrote:
Now i upgraded one machine to 8.2R and i get very good write performance
over NFS but read performance drops to a ridiciously low value, around
1-2 MB/s. While writes are around 100MB/s. The network is a dedicated
If you don't get any answer here, try pos
On 14/04/2011 12:14, Dennis Nikiforov wrote:
There is a legacy piece of custom software that runs only on 32 bit systems, so
going to 64 bit is not possible.
Some ideas:
1) You can run 32-bit applications on 64-bit FreeBSD (and / or set up a
32-bit jail)
2) You can try booting a snapshot of
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 05:14:37 -0500, Dennis Nikiforov
wrote:
There is a legacy piece of custom software that runs only on 32 bit
systems, so going to 64 bit is not possible.
Run it in a 32bit jail. PAE has never been very stable/reliable.
Regards,
Mark
__
On 4/13/11 6:40 PM, Michael J. Kearney wrote:
> /var/log/security and "ipfw list" ftw. .. if a rule maches your configuration
> atm
>
> afiddler10 wrote:
>
>
> Hi, I am new to the Linux environment. I am trying to build a virtual
> Freebsd server to run another virtual device (a Juniper ro
On 4/12/11 1:33 PM, Lars Wilke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There are quite a few threads about ZFS and performance difficulties,
> but i did not find anything that really helped :)
> Therefor any advice would be highly appreciated.
> I started to use ZFS with 8.1R, only tuning i did was setting
>
> vm.kme
Yesterday I received some very helpful advice from your technician. I hope you
can answer these two questions today!
I am trying to configure Freebsd so that I can access it from my host PC, which
is Windows 7. Yesterday the technician told me to configure bridging in VMware
when I created t
Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>
>
> On 4/13/11 6:40 PM, Michael J. Kearney wrote:
[snip]
>>
>> Hi, I am new to the Linux environment.
FreeBSD is *NOT* Linux!
>> I am trying to build a virtual
>> Freebsd server to run another virtual device (a Juniper router). I have
>> found that after building
I have a special situation where I'd like to do either
first.last_somedomain.com or first.l...@somedomain.com but the former is
rejected due to length and the latter due to the "@" by pw(8).
How do I extend this from 16 chars to 32 or 64? I have been finding it
difficult to find explicit detail
On Apr 14, 2011, at 2:20 PM, Ryan Coleman wrote:
> I have a special situation where I'd like to do either
> first.last_somedomain.com or first.l...@somedomain.com but the former is
> rejected due to length and the latter due to the "@" by pw(8).
>
> How do I extend this from 16 chars to 32 or 64
I already run 10 domains worth of emails here, I would prefer to avoid adding
anything that will screw with already functioning accounts...
But maybe there's an option on Dovecot to reroute specific username requests to
masquerade that... I'll check that out tomorrow.
Thanks.
On Apr 14, 2011,
16 matches
Mail list logo
