hello guys
i am newbie in nat and have some problem with it.
i want to nat inside traffic to outside and when i ping outside from
inside, every thing is ok and nat is done perfectly. but when i ping inside
from outside, request packets are sent without any nat translation while
reply packets
On 4/04/2013 6:41 PM, s m wrote:
request packets: src:192.168.2.1 dst: 192.168.1.1
reply packets: src: 192.168.2.50 dst:192.168.2.1
This sort of thing tends to happen when the the packets are not being
sent via divert socket properly.
Look carefully, step by step, at your ipfw
Hi all.
I have one machine with problems. I changed memory, motherboard,
interface card with no luck. Yesterday it panics twice.
Apr 3 12:16:50 kohrah kernel: interrupt total
Apr 3 12:16:50 kohrah kernel: irq1: atkbd0 534
Apr 3 12:16:52 kohrah
Hi all,
Hopefully someone here is much more clever than I am. I've run out of
ideas on how to cleanly convert this chunk of ksh to posix sh. This is
from a BB/Hobbit/Xymon monitoring script for ZFS. I'd really like to have
this working cleanly on FreeBSD without requiring any funky shells
I'd really like to
have this working cleanly on FreeBSD without requiring any funky shells
Define funky shell. Does it have to be straight up plain sh? Can it
use csh or tcsh syntax? Does bash count as 'funky'?
or using any temporary files.
Do you mean manually created temp files?
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 07:47:09 -0500, Quartz qua...@sneakertech.com wrote:
I'd really like to
have this working cleanly on FreeBSD without requiring any funky shells
Define funky shell. Does it have to be straight up plain sh? Can it
use csh or tcsh syntax? Does bash count as 'funky'?
Any
fail on an unwritable
filesystem.
...By which I mean you can't create new files because your disk is
completely full or you're booting from a ramdisk that's messed up, etc.
__
it has a certain smooth-brained appeal
On 4/4/2013 3:32 μμ, Mark Felder wrote:
Hi all,
Hopefully someone here is much more clever than I am. I've run out of
ideas on how to cleanly convert this chunk of ksh to posix sh. This is
from a BB/Hobbit/Xymon monitoring script for ZFS. I'd really like to
have this working cleanly on FreeBSD
On Apr 4, 2013, at 5:32 AM, Mark Felder wrote:
Hi all,
Hopefully someone here is much more clever than I am. I've run out of ideas
on how to cleanly convert this chunk of ksh to posix sh.
/me takes the challenge (and shame on some of the current responses; this is
trivial in sh and
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 08:54:30 -0500, Teske, Devin
devin.te...@fisglobal.com wrote:
Wait, you can't? Then I've been doing something wrong all these years…
#!/bin/sh
printf line1\nline2\n | while read line
do
echo line=[$line]
done
You sort-of can, but it's not portable at all. As
Original Message
From: Beeblebrox zap...@berentweb.com
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Wed, April 3, 2013 10:50:55 AM
Subject: Re: [ZFS] recover destroyed zpool - what are the available options?
Volodymyr, thank you very much for answering.
A strange problem is that ZFS
On Apr 4, 2013, at 7:42 AM, Mark Felder wrote:
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 08:54:30 -0500, Teske, Devin devin.te...@fisglobal.com
wrote:
Wait, you can't? Then I've been doing something wrong all these years…
#!/bin/sh
printf line1\nline2\n | while read line
do
echo line=[$line]
done
Oh, and just to cover all bases…
If you suspect you have sub-shells in the loop, use export to export the vars
so that the sub-shells get the vars in the loop.
--
Devin
On Apr 4, 2013, at 8:04 AM, Teske, Devin wrote:
On Apr 4, 2013, at 7:42 AM, Mark Felder wrote:
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013
Sorry, my email client did something weird with collapsing and I didn't
see you mention that it appeared to be working for you.
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 08:54:30 -0500, Teske, Devin
devin.te...@fisglobal.com wrote:
The only things I saw that needed changing to go from ksh to /bin/sh
were:
04.04.2013 08:08, Beeblebrox пишет:
I had a second pool on another partition of the same HDD, which was in the
same degraded state as the bsdr pool. The data on that pool had been
backed-up previously. I decided to try the export re-import method on that
pool (-Z gives message: invalid option
Hi Mark.
What does gpart show return?
= 34 625142381 ada0 GPT (298G)
34 62914560 1 freebsd-zfs (30G)
62914594 562227821 2 freebsd-zfs (268G)
Are all the pool members there and working?
Yes - ada0p2 is the ONLY pool member.
My guess is that one member is missing or a mbr
2013-04-04 18:50, Beeblebrox wrote:
Hi Mark.
What does gpart show return?
= 34 625142381 ada0 GPT (298G)
34 62914560 1 freebsd-zfs (30G)
62914594 562227821 2 freebsd-zfs (268G)
Are all the pool members there and working?
Yes - ada0p2 is the ONLY pool member.
My
Thanks Volodymyr.
The pools do not show up as deleted.
# zpool list (the pool that had disappeared has returned)
NAME SIZE ALLOC FREECAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROOT
asp - - - - - FAULTED -
bsdr - - - - - FAULTED -
bsds 48.8G 12.9G
On Apr 4, 2013, at 8:11 AM, Mark Felder wrote:
Sorry, my email client did something weird with collapsing and I didn't see
you mention that it appeared to be working for you.
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 08:54:30 -0500, Teske, Devin devin.te...@fisglobal.com
wrote:
The only things I saw that
test them with `zdb -l device`. When the output would be correct - you
guessed your slice!
LABEL 1
version: 28
name: 'bsdr'
state: 2
txg: 10
pool_guid: 12018916494219117471
hostid: 2193536600
hostname: 'mfsbsd'
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 11:16:11 -0500, Teske, Devin
devin.te...@fisglobal.com wrote:
Here's what I suggest (the following works for me -- lists all my pools
and shows healthy):
Fantastic! I'd have never considered wrapping the entire thing into
STRING=$STRING$().
I can't tell you how much
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 461, Issue 6, Message: 1
(sorry about the threading)
On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 15:12:17 +0200 Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Tue, 02 Apr 2013 19:10:59 -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
See how the entire ioctl() interface for these device types is completely
Its seems certain that pkg_add is not [going to] be[ing] restored.
Index of ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/amd64/9.1-RELEASE/
NameSizeLast Modified
File:MANIFEST 1 KB12/04/12 10:10:00
File:base.txz 58452 KB
On Fri, 5 Apr 2013 05:23:31 +1100 (EST), Ian Smith wrote:
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 461, Issue 6, Message: 1
(sorry about the threading)
On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 15:12:17 +0200 Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Tue, 02 Apr 2013 19:10:59 -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
It doesn't
On 4/4/2013 1:57 PM, d...@safeport.com wrote:
Its seems certain that pkg_add is not [going to] be[ing] restored.
Progress is being made on providing pkg_add and pkgng packages again.
They will come back.
Index of ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/amd64/9.1-RELEASE/
Name
On 4 Apr 2013, at 21:21, Bryan Drewery bdrew...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 4/4/2013 1:57 PM, d...@safeport.com wrote:
Its seems certain that pkg_add is not [going to] be[ing] restored.
Progress is being made on providing pkg_add and pkgng packages again.
They will come back.
For those who
Hi Terje !
sorry for late reply, I've been checking my mail, forgetting that all my
mailing list mail are sorted into their own folders skipping inbox :p
the zfs sync setup is a huge advantage over rsync simply because
incremental rsync of the volume takes ~12 hours, while the zfs differential
I set up NFSv4, did some performance tests, setup looks like this:
Server rc.conf:
nfs_server_enable=YES
nfsv4_server_enable=YES
nfsuserd_enable=YES
exports:
/share -mapall=nobody 10.10.14.2 10.10.14.3
V4: / -sec=sys
Client(s) fstab mount:
srv:/share /mnt nfs nfsv4,rsize=32768,wsize=32768,rw
Considering Debian's ported the standard Linux userland to the FreeBSD
kernel, I'm wondering if it's possible/practical to use Debian inside of
a jail instead of a Linux CentOS jail, which has been documented. I
know some applications are linux specific, but are they really linux
specific or
Waitman Gobble
San Jose California USA
On Apr 4, 2013 2:07 PM, Joar Jegleim joar.jegl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Terje !
sorry for late reply, I've been checking my mail, forgetting that all my
mailing list mail are sorted into their own folders skipping inbox :p
the zfs sync setup is a huge
On Thu, 4 Apr 2013, Mark Blackman wrote:
On 4 Apr 2013, at 21:21, Bryan Drewery bdrew...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 4/4/2013 1:57 PM, d...@safeport.com wrote:
Its seems certain that pkg_add is not [going to] be[ing] restored.
Progress is being made on providing pkg_add and pkgng packages again.
I archive using the pax command like this
pax -wzXt -x cpio -f ${archive_path_file} ${ip_path_file} ${ip_path_dir}
and restore
pax -rz -pe -f ${archive_path_file}
and it restores the contents back to the same location it came from
which is what I want.
Now I would like to restore that
32 matches
Mail list logo
