Re: Does spamd use Razor?

2003-02-06 Thread Mark
- Original Message - From: "Philip Hallstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 11:09 PM Subject: Re: Does spamd use Razor? > > I could have sworn that I had done a &qu

Re: Does spamd use Razor?

2003-02-06 Thread Philip Hallstrom
> > Spamd might not be running as root so it may not have write access to > > /var/log/razor-agent.log. > > Indeed, I have spamd running as the special, unprivileged user "spamd". But > you were right: spamd did not have access to /var/log/razor-agent.log. I > could have sworn that I had done a "ch

Re: Does spamd use Razor?

2003-02-06 Thread Mark
- Original Message - From: "Dan Nelson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2003 10:28 PM Subject: Re: Does spamd use Razor? > In the last episode (Feb 06), Mark said: > > &

Re: Does spamd use Razor?

2003-02-06 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Feb 06), Mark said: > I recently installed SpamAssassin 2.44, with Razor 2.22. And although > spamd says that Razor2 is available, its -D debug parameter does not > allow for a high enough debug-level to actually see whether spamd > calls Razor; the log says, > > spamd[401

Does spamd use Razor?

2003-02-06 Thread Mark
Hello, I recently installed SpamAssassin 2.44, with Razor 2.22. And although spamd says that Razor2 is available, its -D debug parameter does not allow for a high enough debug-level to actually see whether spamd calls Razor; the log says, spamd[4013]: debug: running full-text regexp tests; sc