Followup to fallback to PIO mode on dual processor AMD systems

2003-01-02 Thread Bruce Campbell
By the way, I've determined our removable IDE disk trays are manufactured by SNT (http://www.snt.com.tw/metal.htm) and are part number SNT-129. It looks like these are the same ones startech sells. I've placed my hardware configuration here:

Re: Followup to 'fallback to PIO mode' on dual processor AMD systems

2003-01-02 Thread nate
Bruce Campbell said: - try UDMA100 with the drives directly attached (ie. no removable tray) - maybe try a non onboard IDE controller yes I would reccomend a PCI ide controller, such as the Promise ATA/100, or Promise ATA/66. Also be sure your IDE cables are 18 and not 24 or 32 some people

Re: Followup to fallback to PIO mode on dual processor AMD systems

2003-01-02 Thread Bruce Evans
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Bruce Campbell wrote: At present, I don't suspect bad media because the error message is WRITE command timeout tag=0 serv=0 which doesn't suggest a specific sector/track etc, and running with UDMA33 instead of UDMA100 makes the problem appear to vanish. The fallback is

Re: Followup to fallback to PIO mode on dual processor AMD systems

2003-01-02 Thread Bruce Campbell
Quoting Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Bruce Campbell wrote: At present, I don't suspect bad media because the error message is WRITE command timeout tag=0 serv=0 which doesn't suggest a specific sector/track etc, and running with UDMA33 instead of UDMA100 makes the

Re: Followup to fallback to PIO mode on dual processor AMD systems

2003-01-02 Thread Barney Wolff
On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 06:36:29AM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote: The fallback is clearly wrong because it turns isolated media errors into pessimized i/o for the whole disk at best, system hangs during resets next best, and system crashes at worst. I keep a disk with bad media on line for