On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Pol Hallen wrote:
> Hi all :-)
>
> quick question: for a production server, what it best way?
I've done work with organizations that will not install anything that
is considered a development branch, of which stable/ is. Therefore,
for production environments, th
Hi all :-)
quick question: for a production server, what it best way?
now I using the release:
9.1-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE-p3 #0: Mon Apr 29 18:11:52 UTC 2013
r...@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
thanks!
Pol
___
On 25/07/2012 13:13, Jerry wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 13:19:53 +0200
Damien Fleuriot articulated:
I'd say it's a matter of personal preference.
We're mostly running 8.3 in production here.
I've recently installed 9-STABLE servers to try them out and fill PRs
if I get problems.
I would encour
I finally decided to take off my FreeBSD 7.2 server which is onlin esince 2009.
I will go for a new FreeBSD version and will move out all data.
you mean just new freebsd or new server? if first there is no need to move
data at all
Which version do you recommend?
Shall I go for 9 ?
or 8.3 is
message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/FreeBSD-Stable-production-version-tp5729696p5729739.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
Hi,
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 13:19:53 +0200
Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> On 7/25/12 1:13 PM, Marwan Sultan wrote:
> >
> > Hello all and Good Morning, Afternoon or evening :)
> >
> > I finally decided to take off my FreeBSD 7.2 server which is onlin
> > esince 2009.
> > I will go for a new FreeBSD v
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Marwan Sultan wrote:
>
> Well, I also like your philosophy of waiting x.1 !
> its a very good point.
>
> Maybe 8.3-R would be the best.
>
> I will wait to hear more comments.
>
>
For cowards, yes!
Whoever said that -RELEASE is bad is a joker, too.
Now, what the h
@seibercom.net
>> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
>> Subject: Re: FreeBSD Stable production version.
>>
>> On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 13:19:53 +0200
>> Damien Fleuriot articulated:
>>
>>> I'd say it's a matter of personal preference.
>>>
&
Well, I also like your philosophy of waiting x.1 !
its a very good point.
Maybe 8.3-R would be the best.
I will wait to hear more comments.
> Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 08:13:28 -0400
> From: je...@seibercom.net
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: FreeBSD Stabl
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 13:19:53 +0200
Damien Fleuriot articulated:
> I'd say it's a matter of personal preference.
>
> We're mostly running 8.3 in production here.
>
> I've recently installed 9-STABLE servers to try them out and fill PRs
> if I get problems.
>
> I would encourage you to use 9-STAB
On 7/25/12 1:13 PM, Marwan Sultan wrote:
>
> Hello all and Good Morning, Afternoon or evening :)
>
> I finally decided to take off my FreeBSD 7.2 server which is onlin esince
> 2009.
>
> I will go for a new FreeBSD version and will move out all data.
>
> My Server is mainly is a MAIL s
Hello all and Good Morning, Afternoon or evening :)
I finally decided to take off my FreeBSD 7.2 server which is onlin esince 2009.
I will go for a new FreeBSD version and will move out all data.
My Server is mainly is a MAIL server, sendmail.
and ofcourse few websites, data.etc..
Whi
10, Mike Barnard wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> Any one know where I can get a FreeBSD-9.0-STABLE ISO/IMG image?
> > >>
> > >> ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/FreeBSD-stable/
> > >>
> > >> That path does not seem to have it
On 29 March 2012 19:22, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 29/03/2012 17:18, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> > On 29/03/2012 17:10, Mike Barnard wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Any one know where I can get a FreeBSD-9.0-STABLE ISO/IMG image?
> >>
> >> ftp.freeb
On 29/03/2012 17:18, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 29/03/2012 17:10, Mike Barnard wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Any one know where I can get a FreeBSD-9.0-STABLE ISO/IMG image?
>>
>> ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/FreeBSD-stable/
>>
>> That path does not seem to have
On 29/03/2012 17:10, Mike Barnard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Any one know where I can get a FreeBSD-9.0-STABLE ISO/IMG image?
>
> ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/FreeBSD-stable/
>
> That path does not seem to have it.
>
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/amd64/amd64/ISO-IMA
Hi,
Any one know where I can get a FreeBSD-9.0-STABLE ISO/IMG image?
ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/FreeBSD-stable/
That path does not seem to have it.
--
Mike
Of course, you might discount this possibility, but remember that one in a
million chances happen 99% of the time
On 26/03/2012 08:53, Kai Gallasch wrote:
> I wonder why there are no more stable freebsd-stable snapshots made available
> on the ftp servers.
> Was there an official explanation?
>
> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots
>
> The process of publishing them someho
Hi.
I wonder why there are no more stable freebsd-stable snapshots made available
on the ftp servers.
Was there an official explanation?
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots
The process of publishing them somehow stopped in mid-2011.
From time to time it comes in very handy for testing
Hi list,
Where can I see if resource limits for jails is included in FBSD 8
STABLE or any plan to include it in 8.3?
It'd be great if you don't need to apply the patch[1] manually
[1] http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-jail/2009-May/000866.html
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Alberto Mija
2009/10/20 Jeronimo Calvo :
> I'm wondering if that /etc/exports format will work:
>
> /DATA1 192.168.11.6(rw)
> /DATA2 192.168.11.6(rw)
>
> or needs to be like this?
>
>> [root@ /DATA1]# cat /etc/exports
>> /DATA1 -rw 192.168.11.6
>> /DATA2 -rw 192.168.11.6
Try it without the "-rw" at all,
I'm wondering if that /etc/exports format will work:
/DATA1 192.168.11.6(rw)
/DATA2 192.168.11.6(rw)
or needs to be like this?
> [root@ /DATA1]# cat /etc/exports
> /DATA1 -rw 192.168.11.6
> /DATA2 -rw 192.168.11.6
2009/10/19 Jeronimo Calvo :
> Hi folks,
>
> Today I decide to change the
Hi folks,
Today I decide to change the settings from my server, allowing RW
access to 2 currently mapped NFS partions on my Freebsd box.
The used to be RO only.
What i notice is when I change it as follows:
[root@ /DATA1]# cat /etc/exports
/DATA1 -rw 192.168.11.6
/DATA2 -rw 192.168.11.6
I am
My IP Address on my FreeBSD Server 4.11-STABLE keeps changing. What I need
saying "My" suggest you are administrator - so you (your script/program)
changes IP. so you know what it is.
please more precisely specify your question
OK sorry i didn't read carefully.
you need ifconfig and route t
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 00:16:35 -0800, "Mike Price" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My IP Address on my FreeBSD Server 4.11-STABLE keeps changing. What I
> need to do is find the file or command to change it statically.
Network configuration is saved in `/etc/rc.conf' in FreeBSD. Before you
make any ch
My IP Address on my FreeBSD Server 4.11-STABLE keeps changing. What I need
saying "My" suggest you are administrator - so you (your script/program)
changes IP. so you know what it is.
please more precisely specify your question
___
freebsd-questions
My IP Address on my FreeBSD Server 4.11-STABLE keeps changing. What I need
to do is find the file or command to change it statically.
Please Help,
Thanks
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-que
Edwin L. Culp wrote:
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
eculp wrote:
This is on a relatively new Dell dualcore with 4G of ram running up
to date stable. I'm not on site so I have no idea what might be
provoking these crashes. In fact in many years of running FreeBSD
I've not seen
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
eculp wrote:
This is on a relatively new Dell dualcore with 4G of ram running up
to date stable. I'm not on site so I have no idea what might be
provoking these crashes. In fact in many years of running FreeBSD
I've not seen something just happ
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: reboot after panic : page fault for two
> consecutive days nowwith FreeBSD stable 7.0
>
> Quoting "Kris Kennaway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > eculp wrote:
> >> This is on a relatively new Dell dualcore with 4G of ram
> r
Quoting "Kris Kennaway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
eculp wrote:
This is on a relatively new Dell dualcore with 4G of ram running up
to date stable. I'm not on site so I have no idea what might be
provoking these crashes. In fact in many years of running FreeBSD
I've not seen something just hap
eculp wrote:
This is on a relatively new Dell dualcore with 4G of ram running up to
date stable. I'm not on site so I have no idea what might be provoking
these crashes. In fact in many years of running FreeBSD I've not seen
something just happen like this. It is a simi-production machine th
Quoting eculp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
This is on a relatively new Dell dualcore with 4G of ram running up
to date stable. I'm not on site so I have no idea what might be
provoking these crashes. In fact in many years of running FreeBSD
I've not seen something just happen like this. It is a
This is on a relatively new Dell dualcore with 4G of ram running up to
date stable. I'm not on site so I have no idea what might be
provoking these crashes. In fact in many years of running FreeBSD
I've not seen something just happen like this. It is a
simi-production machine that cvsups
On Jan 17, 2008, at 11:08 AM, Sean Hulbert wrote:
I am trying to download FreeBSD stable.
All I get is a cvsups file. I need to download the ISO to my winbox
then burn it to CD.
Is there a program or link to the direct ISO that will allow me to
download it.
See http://www.freebsd.org
Hello
I am trying to download FreeBSD stable.
All I get is a cvsups file. I need to download the ISO to my winbox then burn
it to CD.
Is there a program or link to the direct ISO that will allow me to download it.
Thank You
Sean Hulbert
Work Ph:925.227.8500 x136
Cell Email: [EMAIL
>
> Why am I getting spammed by questions to freebsd-stable if I just
> subscribed to freebsd-amd64 and freebsd-hardware?
Don't know. Could it be because someone is cross posting messages?
Or is this on everything posted?
jerry
>
> ___
Why am I getting spammed by questions to freebsd-stable if I just
subscribed to freebsd-amd64 and freebsd-hardware?
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Dear Patient Person,
I am at the site:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/mirrors-ftp.html
Section: A.2 FTP Sites
the address for downloading FreeBSD is:
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/
in the README file on this page it is stated that:
"FreeBSD-stable/
Florian Hengstberger schrieb am Thursday, den 11. November 2004:
> The subject is the question:
> Is the 5.3 release the stable release?
Yes it is.
--
Systemadministrator
SuedFactoring GmbH
Heilbronnerstrasse 86
70191 Stuttgart
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(+49)711/127-3865
__
Hi!
The subject is the question:
Is the 5.3 release the stable release?
When will become 5.* stable?
Florian
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PRO
Oliver Fuchs wrote:
Hi All,
I am using FreeBSD since 5.2 RELEASE and I am now running 5.2.1 RELEASE.
I upgraded between the two versions from scratch that means I backuped
the main configuration files and directories (like home), deleted the
old version, installed the new one and reconfigured the w
Hi All,
I am using FreeBSD since 5.2 RELEASE and I am now running 5.2.1 RELEASE.
I upgraded between the two versions from scratch that means I backuped
the main configuration files and directories (like home), deleted the
old version, installed the new one and reconfigured the whole system.
As I
4 2:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: freebsd-stable packages on freebsd-release-4.9
I upgraded my ports tree with cvsup using "." for the release so I
would get the latest ports. pkg_add -r downloads packages from
freebsd-release-4.9 and portupgrade -aPPR fails because it tries to
packages with version numbers matching the ports tree from
> the freebsd-release-4.9 directory. Compiling from ports give up to
> date software. I know that ports only supports freebsd-stable and
> freebsd- current, so is this what should be happening? Or should
> pkg_add -r be in synch
elease-4.9 directory. Compiling from ports give up to date
software. I know that ports only supports freebsd-stable and freebsd-
current, so is this what should be happening? Or should pkg_add -r be
in synch with ports. Is it possible to use freebsd stable packages on
freebsd-4.9, or do
FYI, release 5 did not goes to STABLE branch yet. It should be ready some times 5-3
released which is around mid summer.
Osmany Guirola Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:I am using 5.2 realese and using CTM to
get STABLE
In the CTM ftp I found these folders
08/07/03 12:00AM cvs-cur
01/04/02 12:00AM
I am using 5.2 realese and using CTM to get STABLE
In the CTM ftp I found these folders
08/07/03 12:00AM cvs-cur
01/04/02 12:00AM ports-cur
02/11/01 12:00AM src-2.2
08/07/03 12:00AM src-3
03/13/01 12:00AM src-4
08/07/03 12:00AM src-cur
I s
ss:\
ha=0050fce9306f:\
tc=.default:
---
But then I get in /var/log/messages this line:
Feb 6 20:06:45 cisr bootpd[842]: in entry named ".default", symbol "T128": bad syntax
Feb 6 20:06:45 cisr bootpd[842]: can't find tc=".default"
W
henko'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: verify md5 for /sbin/init (v1.7.2.3 2002/08/12
> 11:17:37 ) on FreeBSD Stable 4.9
>
>
> Edmund Craske wrote:
>
> >1.2 is not greater than 1.7. Check your logic.
> >
> >
> >
> >>-Original Mess
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.8)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 17:05:12 +0300
Sergey 'DoubleF' Zaharchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> probably wrote:
/sbin/init (v1.7.2.3 2002/08/12
11:17:37 ) on FreeBSD Stable 4.9
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 07:21:39 -0500
"treeml" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> probably wrote:
ident /mnt/sbin/init
Gave out a long list of results, but at the end of the
list, which is
also the most recent is the
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 13:51:16 -
"Edmund Craske" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> probably wrote:
> 1.2 is not greater than 1.7. Check your logic.
>
I mean the dates. Revision numbers have no correspondence between them.
If you have two *different* files, and one of them has a revision number
greated than th
erify md5 for /sbin/init (v1.7.2.3 2002/08/12
> 11:17:37 ) on FreeBSD Stable 4.9
>
>
> On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 07:21:39 -0500
> "treeml" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> probably wrote:
>
> > ident /mnt/sbin/init
> >
> > Gave out a long list of results, but at
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004 07:21:39 -0500
"treeml" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> probably wrote:
> ident /mnt/sbin/init
>
> Gave out a long list of results, but at the end of the list, which is also
> the most recent is the following. $FreeBSD:
> src/lib/libc/locale//ldpart.c,v1.7.2.3 2002/08/12 11:17:37 ache Exp
treeml wrote:
My machine hangs at /sbin/init on boot, I just want to check if /sbin/init
is corrupted or not. I have FreeBSD 4.9 stable on PIII 866.
Here is the md5
MD5 (/mnt/sbin/init) = a7dc0528ae8a102c96f51dc516aa7f62
ident /mnt/sbin/init
Gave out a long list of results, but at the end of the
My machine hangs at /sbin/init on boot, I just want to check if /sbin/init
is corrupted or not. I have FreeBSD 4.9 stable on PIII 866.
Here is the md5
MD5 (/mnt/sbin/init) = a7dc0528ae8a102c96f51dc516aa7f62
ident /mnt/sbin/init
Gave out a long list of results, but at the end of the list, which
IL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Need help: HyperThreading-CPU + FreeBSD-Stable +
Multi-threading
Hi!
That was removed, it's not in 4.9!
/ Stefan
-Original Message-
From: Minnesota Slinky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: den 14 december 2003 01:13
To: 'Stefan Cars'; 'Rob&
Hi!
That was removed, it's not in 4.9!
/ Stefan
-Original Message-
From: Minnesota Slinky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: den 14 december 2003 01:13
To: 'Stefan Cars'; 'Rob'
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Need help: HyperThreading-CPU + FreeBSD-St
, 2003 1:58 PM
To: 'Rob'
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Need help: HyperThreading-CPU + FreeBSD-Stable +
Multi-threading
Hi!
This is strange, my system doesn't even show mchdep.hlt_logical_cpus,
very weird. My system have HT
/S
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
g-CPU + FreeBSD-Stable + Multi-threading
Hello,
Recently I've got a new PC: P4 Titan 2.6 GHz.
It says in the brochure that it has "HyperThreading", which I think is
somehow related to the HyperThread thing in the FreeBSD kernel, right?
I know there's this message in
Hello,
Recently I've got a new PC: P4 Titan 2.6 GHz.
It says in the brochure that it has "HyperThreading", which I think is
somehow related to the HyperThread thing in the FreeBSD kernel, right?
I know there's this message in /usr/src/UPDATING, which unfortunately does
not clear up the matter for
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 12:07:12PM -0800, Max Clark wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> What are the file system, file size limits for FreeBSD-stable? I
> understand that there is a 2TB file system limit, but what about the
> file size? I have a friend who cannot create a file over 2GB. Should
Hi all,
What are the file system, file size limits for FreeBSD-stable? I understand that there
is a 2TB file system limit, but what about the file size? I have a friend who cannot
create a file over 2GB. Should he be able to? Does 5.x handle this differently?
Thanks in advance,
Max
--
Max
On Sun, Jul 06, 2003 at 05:19:26AM +, DanB wrote:
> Where do you get it and how do you load sendmail? It not listed on the
> port packages.
Sendmail is included in the base system.
--
Jonathan Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
Where do you get it and how do you load sendmail? It not listed on the
port packages.
Dan
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002 23:32:27 -0500, David Banning wrote:
>> >> /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/lib/libm.so.2: Undefined symbol
>> >
>> >Does /usr/lib/libm.so.2 exist?
>>
>> seems to:
for anyone running Frontpage 5.0 (and probably 4.0), and planning to
upgrade to 4.7-STABLE after 11-10-02 (i believ
> >> /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/lib/libm.so.2: Undefined symbol
> >
> >Does /usr/lib/libm.so.2 exist?
>
> seems to:
My only guess would be that some of the dependencies are not
meshing as they should. I would do a cvsup of your ports and reinstall
the dependencies.
Sorry I can't be of more
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002 00:48:31 -0500, David Banning wrote:
>> Will chown web to www as part of install.
>> Will chgrp web to www as part of install.
>> /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/lib/libm.so.2: Undefined symbol
>
>Does /usr/lib/libm.so.2 exist?
seems to:
[root@/]>dir /usr/lib/libm.so*
lrwxr-xr-
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Andy Akins wrote:
> Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2002 08:20:02 -0600
> From: Andy Akins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Creative Labs Dxr3 MPEG decoder and FreeBSD-STABLE
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Will chown web to www as part of install.
> Will chgrp web to www as part of install.
> /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/lib/libm.so.2: Undefined symbol
Does /usr/lib/libm.so.2 exist?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
On Sun, 08 Dec 2002 23:37:35 -0500, Doug Reynolds wrote:
>I am having a problem with the frontpage 5 extentions.
>
>everytime i run the fp_install.sh script I get:
oh - wantd to mention i've been google'n for the last 2 hrs looking for
an answer :(
---
doug reynolds | the maverick | [EMAIL PROTE
I am having a problem with the frontpage 5 extentions.
everytime i run the fp_install.sh script I get:
Creating and modifying new
/usr/local/frontpage/version5.0/frontpage.cnf...
Note: Local version of Apache must use the FrontPage Apache patch.
See http://www.microsoft.com/frontpage/ for mo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Just curious...
Has anyone had any luck getting FreeBSD to recognize and use the Dxr3 MPEG
decoder card?
I'd appreciate any insight anyone might have. Thanks!
Andy
- --
+--+--+
| And
74 matches
Mail list logo