On 20.07.2013, at 18:34, Michael Grimm wrote:
> On 20.07.2013, at 14:53, Matthew Seaman
> wrote:
>> On 20/07/2013 12:09, Michael Grimm wrote:
>
>>> I did migrate to pkgng some month ago, and ever since I am curious
>>> how to monitor changes in inst
On 20.07.2013, at 14:53, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 20/07/2013 12:09, Michael Grimm wrote:
>> I did migrate to pkgng some month ago, and ever since I am curious
>> how to monitor changes in installed packages within jails. I am
>> looking for a functionality/port that
On 20/07/2013 12:09, Michael Grimm wrote:
> I did migrate to pkgng some month ago, and ever since I am curious
> how to monitor changes in installed packages within jails. I am
> looking for a functionality/port that works like 490.status-
> pkg-changes for my host.
>
> Ques
Hi --
I did migrate to pkgng some month ago, and ever since I am curious how to
monitor changes in installed packages within jails. I am looking for a
functionality/port that works like 490.status-pkg-changes for my host.
Question: is there any functionality within the periodic system or a
On Thu, 23 May 2013 09:42-0400, Joe wrote:
> Teske, Devin wrote:
> > snip...
> > I rendered your output by saving it in a file ("joe.dot") and then running:
> >
> > dot -Tsvg -o joe.svg < joe.dot
> >
> > I then uploaded "joe.svg" to my website:
> >
> > http://druidbsd.sf.net/downlo
Teske, Devin wrote:
snip...
I rendered your output by saving it in a file ("joe.dot") and then running:
dot -Tsvg -o joe.svg < joe.dot
I then uploaded "joe.svg" to my website:
http://druidbsd.sf.net/download/joe.svg
Compare your output to any of the following:
http://druidbsd.s
On May 18, 2013, at 5:51 PM, Joe wrote:
Teske, Devin wrote:
Sorry for top-post, but just wanted to add a quick note:
The output of "ngctl dot" would be very helpful to others in debugging your
setup.
graph netgraph {
edge [ weight = 1.0 ];
node [ shape = record, fontsize = 12 ] {
"1" [ label =
Teske, Devin wrote:
Sorry for top-post, but just wanted to add a quick note:
The output of "ngctl dot" would be very helpful to others in debugging your
setup.
graph netgraph {
edge [ weight = 1.0 ];
node [ shape = record, fontsize = 12 ] {
"1" [ label = "{rl0
select (100baseTX )
> status: active
> plip0: flags=8810 metric 0 mtu 1500
> nd6 options=29
> ipfw0: flags=8801 metric 0 mtu 65536
> nd6 options=29
> lo0: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384
> options=63
> inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
> inet
k 0xff00
nd6 options=21
The jails config file
# /root >cat /usr/local/etc/vnet/vdir4
vdir4 {
host.hostname = "vdir4";
path = "/usr/jails/vdir4";
mount.fstab = "/usr/local/etc/fstab/vdir4";
vnet;
persist;
}
The netgraph sc
All the info on vimage jails say to nooption SCTP when compiling vimage
into your kernel. Reason given is that sctp is not vimage aware. If that
is ture, then why can't I find a PR on SCTP or vimage about this problem?
___
freebsd-ques
On 14/05/2013 14:31, dweimer wrote:
> I can confirm that PostgreSQL will not run in a jail without sysvipc
> enabled, I just setup a jail running PostgreSQL a few weeks ago and had
> to do that as well. PostgreSQL will not start without it enabled,
> though perhaps there is some setting change in
2013/5/14 Joe :
> David Demelier wrote:
>>
>> 2013/5/14 Joe :
>>>
>>> David Demelier wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Le lundi 13 mai 2013 16:32:01 Joe a écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>> David Demelier wrote:
>>>>
On 05/14/2013 8:20 am, Joe wrote:
David Demelier wrote:
2013/5/14 Joe :
David Demelier wrote:
Le lundi 13 mai 2013 16:32:01 Joe a écrit :
David Demelier wrote:
Hello dear,
Does jail.conf(5) does not work for jails listed in the rc.conf ?
I've added in /etc/jail.conf:
foo {
hostname=Foo;
David Demelier wrote:
2013/5/14 Joe :
David Demelier wrote:
Le lundi 13 mai 2013 16:32:01 Joe a écrit :
David Demelier wrote:
Hello dear,
Does jail.conf(5) does not work for jails listed in the rc.conf ?
I've added in /etc/jail.conf:
foo {
hostname=Foo;
path=/jail
2013/5/14 Joe :
> David Demelier wrote:
>>
>> Le lundi 13 mai 2013 16:32:01 Joe a écrit :
>>>
>>> David Demelier wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello dear,
>>>>
>>>> Does jail.conf(5) does not work for jails listed in the rc.conf
David Demelier wrote:
Le lundi 13 mai 2013 16:32:01 Joe a écrit :
David Demelier wrote:
Hello dear,
Does jail.conf(5) does not work for jails listed in the rc.conf ?
I've added in /etc/jail.conf:
foo {
hostname=Foo;
path=/jails/foo;
allow.sysvipc=1;
}
And in /etc/rc.conf
Le lundi 13 mai 2013 16:32:01 Joe a écrit :
> David Demelier wrote:
> > Hello dear,
> >
> > Does jail.conf(5) does not work for jails listed in the rc.conf ?
> >
> > I've added in /etc/jail.conf:
> >
> > foo {
> >
> >
David Demelier wrote:
Hello dear,
Does jail.conf(5) does not work for jails listed in the rc.conf ?
I've added in /etc/jail.conf:
foo {
hostname=Foo;
path=/jails/foo;
allow.sysvipc=1;
}
And in /etc/rc.conf only foo in the jail_list parameter, but when I try to
start the ja
Hello dear,
Does jail.conf(5) does not work for jails listed in the rc.conf ?
I've added in /etc/jail.conf:
foo {
hostname=Foo;
path=/jails/foo;
allow.sysvipc=1;
}
And in /etc/rc.conf only foo in the jail_list parameter, but when I try to
start the jail it still complain
Has anyone been able to get a xorg desktop to run inside of a jail?
All information and links to howto's welcome.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
.
Regards,
Ivailo Tanusheff
"Zyumbilev, Peter"
Sent by: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
26.01.2013 15:18
To
"freebsd-questions@freebsd.org"
cc
Subject
jails bind ip
Hi,
I have successfully run multiple jails on freebsd 9.1
Two of the jails are FreeBSD and I h
at mailing list archives earlier ...See
>> mails from me.
>>
>>
>> Peter
>
>
> Ok I read the archive thread subject "jails".
> You read a reply pointing you to a French howto.
>
> http://blog.etoilebsd.net/post/Emprisonner_une_debian_dans_un_FreeBSD
>
Zyumbilev, Peter wrote:
Are you saying you installed the Debian 6.0 operating system
inside of a Freebsd jail and expect it to function?
on top of all works ;-) Look at mailing list archives earlier ...See
mails from me.
Peter
Ok I read the archive thread subject "jails".
> Are you saying you installed the Debian 6.0 operating system
> inside of a Freebsd jail and expect it to function?
>
>
on top of all works ;-) Look at mailing list archives earlier ...See
mails from me.
Peter
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mai
Zyumbilev, Peter wrote:
Hi,
I have successfully run multiple jails on freebsd 9.1
Two of the jails are FreeBSD and I have no problems with them.
However I havesome strange problem with Debian 6.0 Jail.
This is my config
jail_debian_rootdir="/jail/debian"
jail_debia
Hi,
I have successfully run multiple jails on freebsd 9.1
Two of the jails are FreeBSD and I have no problems with them.
However I havesome strange problem with Debian 6.0 Jail.
This is my config
jail_debian_rootdir="/jail/debian"
jail_debian_hostname="debian.bivol.net&
ity on the best
> >> approach in order to handle a quite large system with couple of jails
> >> (shouldn't have more than 5 to 10). Whole system is based on zfs. I'll
> >> use this as a backup server.
> >
> > You might like the sysutils/ezjail p
Le 25 janv. 2013 à 18:41, Steve O'Hara-Smith a écrit :
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 18:25:06 +0100
> bsd wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I wanted to have the point of view of the community on the best approach
>> in order to handle a quite large system with couple of jail
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 18:25:06 +0100
bsd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to have the point of view of the community on the best approach
> in order to handle a quite large system with couple of jails (shouldn't
> have more than 5 to 10). Whole system is based on zfs. I'll use
Hi,
I wanted to have the point of view of the community on the best approach in
order to handle a quite large system with couple of jails (shouldn't have more
than 5 to 10). Whole system is based on zfs. I'll use this as a backup server.
I have been using the "handbook" ap
y are case of this. One example is poudriere (a package
builder), it starts several jails to build the packages and all
the jails are bound to 127.0.0.1.
The jail IP enforces that the jailed processus cannot use another one IP
but that's all.
Regards.
_
Is there any situation where assigning the same IP address to a new jail
that has already been assigned to a previous jail valid?
I think not, but want verification.
What are your thoughts?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.f
- Original Message -
> From: "Zyumbilev, Peter"
> To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org"
> Cc:
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 3:12 AM
> Subject: Re: Jails
>
> On 15/01/2013 02:10, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
>
>>
>> Yes, and also
On Jan 14, 2013, at 10:12 PM, Zyumbilev, Peter wrote:
> On 15/01/2013 02:10, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
>
>>
>> Yes, and also defined /etc/resolv.conf. Any hint?
>>
>>
>> Leonardo M. Ramé
>> http://leonardorame.blogspot.com
>
>
> This is my jail conf.
>
> jail_debian_rootdir="/jail/debian"
>
On 15/01/2013 02:10, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
>
> Yes, and also defined /etc/resolv.conf. Any hint?
>
>
> Leonardo M. Ramé
> http://leonardorame.blogspot.com
This is my jail conf.
jail_debian_rootdir="/jail/debian"
jail_debian_hostname="debian.bivol.net"
jail_debian_ip="192.168.30.12"
jail_de
>
> From: "Zyumbilev, Peter"
>To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org"
>Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 3:53 AM
>Subject: Re: Jails
>
>
>
>On 13/01/2013 23:58, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
>>
>>
>
>> r
On 13/01/2013 23:58, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
> root@debian:/# ping www.google.com
> WARNING: setsockopt(ICMP_FILTER): Protocol not available
> WARNING: your kernel is veeery old. No problems.
> PING www.google.com (173.194.42.16) 56(84) bytes of data.
> ping: recvmsg: Invalid argument
> ping: re
On 13/01/2013 23:58, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
>
>
> root@debian:/# ping www.google.com
> WARNING: setsockopt(ICMP_FILTER): Protocol not available
> WARNING: your kernel is veeery old. No problems.
> PING www.google.com (173.194.42.16) 56(84) bytes of data.
> ping: recvmsg: Invalid argument
> pi
- Original Message -
> From: Devin Teske
> To: Leonardo M. Ramé
> Cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org"
> Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2013 2:23 PM
> Subject: Re: Jails
>
>
> On Jan 13, 2013, at 7:45 AM, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
>
>>>
On Jan 13, 2013, at 7:45 AM, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
>>
>
>> From: "Zyumbilev, Peter"
>> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org
>> Cc: Mark Felder ; Devin Teske ; Devin
>> Teske
>> Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2013
>
> From: "Zyumbilev, Peter"
>To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org
>Cc: Mark Felder ; Devin Teske ; Devin Teske
>
>Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2013 7:09 AM
>Subject: Re: Jails
>
>
>On 12/01/2013 18:41, Devin Teske wr
eemed to
>> run, but have not tested it, for plex - have not tried yet.
>>
>
> netstat isn't allowed in traditional jails (but is allowed in "vimage" jails
> which have their own network stack).
>
> If you're able/willing to compile a new kernel
>
netstat isn't allowed in traditional jails (but is allowed in "vimage" jails
which have their own network stack).
If you're able/willing to compile a new kernel to enable the "VIMAGE" feature,
then this can be improved so that you can indeed use netstat with
Hi,
I have not tested it, but so far things do not look promising...
I cannot even run "netstat -nvatp" properly, however sopcast seemed to
run, but have not tested it, for plex - have not tried yet.
Peter
On 11/01/2013 21:19, Mark Felder wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 18:28:41 +0200
> "Zyumbilev
On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 18:28:41 +0200
"Zyumbilev, Peter" wrote:
> 1. Use
> http://download.openvz.org/template/precreated/debian-6.0-x86.tar.gz
> instead the file listed in the howto.
>
> 2. Run sysctl compat.linux.osrelease=2.6.32 in Freebsd shell before
> starting the jail, otherwise you will get
On 11/01/2013 17:31, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
> Le Fri, 11 Jan 2013 17:02:19 +0200,
> "Zyumbilev, Peter" a écrit :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I run FreeBSD 9.1 64 bit(Nas4free). I have no problem setting up
>> FreeBSD jails inside. However, I wonder, is there an
On 11/01/2013 17:31, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
> Baptiste (bapt@) made a small doc for this in the past, but in french.
>
> http://blog.etoilebsd.net/post/Emprisonner_une_debian_dans_un_FreeBSD
>
>
> Regards
>
Will do the job :-) Thanks !
How stable it is ? Anyone have some experience ? I wa
Le Fri, 11 Jan 2013 17:02:19 +0200,
"Zyumbilev, Peter" a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I run FreeBSD 9.1 64 bit(Nas4free). I have no problem setting up
> FreeBSD jails inside. However, I wonder, is there any tutorial on how
> to make Debian Squeeze run inside a jail ? I know it
Hi,
I run FreeBSD 9.1 64 bit(Nas4free). I have no problem setting up FreeBSD
jails inside. However, I wonder, is there any tutorial on how to make
Debian Squeeze run inside a jail ? I know it is possible with PC-BSD,
should be possible with FreeBSD, but I have not documentation on how to
utilize
> On 11/29/2012 13:34, Fbsd8 wrote:
>
>> Stay away from using vimage with production jails (vimage provides a
>> network stack for each jail). Vimage is marked as experimental and use
>> at your own risk. You have to compile it into your kernel to deploy it.
>>
>
On 11/29/2012 13:34, Fbsd8 wrote:
> Stay away from using vimage with production jails (vimage provides a
> network stack for each jail). Vimage is marked as experimental and use
> at your own risk. You have to compile it into your kernel to deploy it.
>
FWIW we are using vimages
Rick Miller wrote:
Hi All,
I want to inquire how the majority of users manage jails within their
own environments. Do you use the utilities described in the handbook
in chapter 16 or some other management facility like qjail or ezjail?
Found qjail to be much more function rich than ezjail
On Nov 29, 2012, at 6:12 AM, Devin Teske wrote:
>
> On Nov 29, 2012, at 6:05 AM, Rick Miller wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I want to inquire how the majority of users manage jails within their
>> own environments. Do you use the utilities described in the handbo
On Thu, 29 Nov 2012 09:05:30 -0500
Rick Miller wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I want to inquire how the majority of users manage jails within their
> own environments. Do you use the utilities described in the handbook
> in chapter 16 or some other management facility like
On Nov 29, 2012, at 6:05 AM, Rick Miller wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I want to inquire how the majority of users manage jails within their
> own environments. Do you use the utilities described in the handbook
> in chapter 16 or some other management facility like qjail or ezjail?
&
Hi All,
I want to inquire how the majority of users manage jails within their
own environments. Do you use the utilities described in the handbook
in chapter 16 or some other management facility like qjail or ezjail?
--
Take care
Rick Miller
On 2012-10-19 02:48, Shane Ambler wrote:
On 19/10/2012 07:44, dweimer wrote:
First step replace the usr/src within the jail with new source using
svn, easy enough. Then start make buildworld... oops, I have a
problem now, the usr/obj/usr stuff is now under
/usr/obj/usr/jails/release91rc2
On 19/10/2012 07:44, dweimer wrote:
First step replace the usr/src within the jail with new source using
svn, easy enough. Then start make buildworld... oops, I have a
problem now, the usr/obj/usr stuff is now under
/usr/obj/usr/jails/release91rc2..., However I want it to be under
/usr/jails
this list can help em out with, to save me some trial an
error.
Steps already figured out, mount new boot environment (using 9.1rc2 to
test with) in /usr/jails/release91rc2, added the necessary settings to
rc.conf, started jail, so far so good. I now know I can run the boot
environment from
On 07/30/2012 18:03, Grzegorz Junka wrote:
FreeBSD 9 uses resolvconf tool to manage the resolv.conf file. How can
I make it working with FreeBSD jails?
In my case I am moving my laptop between networks and every time I
boot FreeBSD it gets assigned a different DNS server. The file
/etc
FreeBSD 9 uses resolvconf tool to manage the resolv.conf file. How can I
make it working with FreeBSD jails?
In my case I am moving my laptop between networks and every time I boot
FreeBSD it gets assigned a different DNS server. The file
/etc/resolv.conf gets updated but the same file in
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
> If this is a fxp bug, can you please file a PR explaining the issue
> and how to reproduce it?
kern/170081
--
Herbert
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailma
On 22 July 2012 21:55, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Jul 2012 16:10:56 +0200
> "Herbert J. Skuhra" wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Herbert J. Skuhra
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > ok, this is obviously a pf problem and the reason why the network in
>> > the jail doesn't work
On Sat, 21 Jul 2012 16:10:56 +0200
"Herbert J. Skuhra" wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Herbert J. Skuhra
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > ok, this is obviously a pf problem and the reason why the network in
> > the jail doesn't work.
> >
> > ifconfig lo1 create
> > ifconfig lo1 10.0.0.10 net
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ok, this is obviously a pf problem and the reason why the network in
> the jail doesn't work.
>
> ifconfig lo1 create
> ifconfig lo1 10.0.0.10 netmask 0xff00
> nc -s 10.0.0.10 xx.xx.xx.xx 25
>
> With pf: connections fails; se
Hi,
ok, this is obviously a pf problem and the reason why the network in
the jail doesn't work.
ifconfig lo1 create
ifconfig lo1 10.0.0.10 netmask 0xff00
nc -s 10.0.0.10 xx.xx.xx.xx 25
With pf: connections fails; server receives SYN-ACK, but nc continues
sending SYNs until nc gives up
With
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote:
> With pf:
>
> I see the packets going out/coming in on fxp0 but somehow the jail
> does not "see" them.
Running 'nc 173.194.35.177 80"
'pfctl -ss' shows:
all tcp xx.xxx.xx.xxx:54724 (192.168.1.1:30177) -> 173.194.35.177:80
ESTABLI
ert J. Skuhra
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> although I've followed the instructions in jail(8) and jail.conf(5) I
>>>>> cannot manage to setup jails on FreeBSD 9.0 STABLE (r238334).
>>>>>
>>>>> T
>> although I've followed the instructions in jail(8) and jail.conf(5) I
>>>> cannot manage to setup jails on FreeBSD 9.0 STABLE (r238334).
>>>>
>>>> The symptons:
>>>>
>>>> * ssh'ing to jail works, but it takes about 20 s
; > On a KVM virtualized host, I run FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p3 and some
>> > qjails, 8.3-RELEASE. The jails are connected all via lo0 on
>> > 10.0.0.0.
>> >
>> > While by the large working as expected, I have noticed one
>> > pecularity I have faile
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 18:23:56 -0400
Robert Huff wrote:
>
> Christopher J. Ruwe writes:
>
> > On a KVM virtualized host, I run FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p3 and some
> > qjails, 8.3-RELEASE. The jails are connected all via lo0 on
> > 10.0.0.0.
> >
> > Wh
Christopher J. Ruwe writes:
> On a KVM virtualized host, I run FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p3 and some
> qjails, 8.3-RELEASE. The jails are connected all via lo0 on
> 10.0.0.0.
>
> While by the large working as expected, I have noticed one
> pecularity I have failed to pinpoi
On a KVM virtualized host, I run FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p3 and some qjails,
8.3-RELEASE. The jails are connected all via lo0 on 10.0.0.0.
While by the large working as expected, I have noticed one pecularity I
have failed to pinpoint: When launching processes with some network
interaction, like
/usr/ports/net/rsync
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012, Frank Staals wrote:
Hey Everyone,
I'm looking for a way to synchronise two jails. More specifically, I
would like to keep/maintain an exact copy of a given jail. As an
example: Suppose I build a jail A on some system (in my particular case
build
Frank Staals wrote:
Hey Everyone,
I'm looking for a way to synchronise two jails. More specifically, I
would like to keep/maintain an exact copy of a given jail. As an
example: Suppose I build a jail A on some system (in my particular case
build with ezjail) , and I copy the jail
into jail
>
> Hey Everyone,
>
> I'm looking for a way to synchronise two jails. More specifically, I
> would like to keep/maintain an exact copy of a given jail. As an
> example: Suppose I build a jail A on some system (in my particular case
> build with ezjail) , and I copy
Frank Staals writes:
> Hey Everyone,
>
> I'm looking for a way to synchronise two jails. More specifically, I
> would like to keep/maintain an exact copy of a given jail. As an
> example: Suppose I build a jail A on some system (in my particular case
> build with ezjail
On 04/27/2012 09:35, Frank Staals wrote:
>
> Hey Everyone,
>
> I'm looking for a way to synchronise two jails. More specifically, I
> would like to keep/maintain an exact copy of a given jail. As an
> example: Suppose I build a jail A on some system (in my particular c
Hey Everyone,
I'm looking for a way to synchronise two jails. More specifically, I
would like to keep/maintain an exact copy of a given jail. As an
example: Suppose I build a jail A on some system (in my particular case
build with ezjail) , and I copy the jail
into jail B on some other s
ems very simliar to ezjails, which I used
(I didn't do jails by hand).
bye & Thanks
av.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Apr 13, 2012, at 4:58 PM, Mark Felder wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:53:49 -0500, Chad Leigh Shire.Net LLC
> wrote:
>
>> No NAT needed since they share the network stack under Jails v1 they share
>> the routing tables. It works. Try it.
>
> You're clear
On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:53:49 -0500, Chad Leigh Shire.Net LLC
wrote:
No NAT needed since they share the network stack under Jails v1 they
share the routing tables. It works. Try it.
You're clearly exploiting a bug in FreeBSD 6's jails. It must get confused
and send your pu
ail #1
> 192.168.1.3/24 <-- Jail #2
>
>
> With this configuration you had no problems accessing the internet from the
> jails.
correct.
(not that it did not matter I don't think is the private IP, host only exists
and ALL IP exist on the host in addition to whateve
ccessing the internet from
the jails.
Is this correct? This seems bizarre; this should only be possible if
you're doing NAT somewhere in there and that is not possible with Jails v1
(which share a network stack) and is only possible
Hi All
OK, so I have a server that has been running FreeBSD 6.1 and a bunch of jails,
providing a few limited services. I am migrating these from real hardware and
FreeBSD 6.1 with jail running, to a Xen based VPS running FreeBSD 9.0-R with a
kernel rebuild from a GENERIC kernel to GENERIC
forge.net/vimage.shtml to manage VIMAGE jails.
It works well. I don't use any of the jail frameworks in ports because I
don't run a large amount of jails which is where one sees the greatest
benefit from them. Of course they make certain optimization and procedures
easier, but ther
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 10:16:37AM +0200, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Plase forgive the long post and the amount of questions, but I'm new to
> jails and I'd like to be sure of what I'm doing before deploying more
> than a test one.
> Right now I
On Wed, 04 Apr 2012 09:06:25 -0500, wrote:
Firewall in a jail will not work. Only the host firewall has access to
the network.
Jailsv2 allows your own firewall in the jail. You get a full network
stack. This is not supported by ezjails, and should still be marked rather
EXPERIMENTAL but
Andrea Venturoli wrote:
Hello.
Plase forgive the long post and the amount of questions, but I'm new to
jails and I'd like to be sure of what I'm doing before deploying more
than a test one.
Right now I need to run a commercial Java app, which, ideally, I would
forbid to acces
Hello.
Plase forgive the long post and the amount of questions, but I'm new to
jails and I'd like to be sure of what I'm doing before deploying more
than a test one.
Right now I need to run a commercial Java app, which, ideally, I would
forbid to access files outside its direct
-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Email issues, relay failure, perhaps Jails is causing it.
2012-02-26 00:54, Bender, Chris skrev:
> Hi Brent
>
> Yes the system we are calling X, is jailed by another system.
>
> Here is the jailer system:
>
> zs1# netstat -aptcp | grep smtp
> tc
Message-
From: Bernt Hansson [mailto:b...@bananmonarki.se]
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2012 2:20 AM
To: Bender, Chris
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Email issues, relay failure, perhaps Jails is causing it.
2012-02-26 00:54, Bender, Chris skrev:
> Hi Brent
>
> Yes the
--As of February 26, 2012 8:20:14 AM +0100, Bernt Hansson is alleged to
have said:
http://www.uk.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/jails.html
Have you tried to telnet into the other jailed hostnames and
ip-addresses, like telnet rt3.* 25
What does it say? Can you connect?
There
*.*LISTEN
Here is about jails;
http://www.uk.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/jails.html
Have you tried to telnet into the other jailed hostnames and
ip-addresses, like telnet rt3.* 25
What does it say? Can you connect?
There seems to be either a jail problem or a routing
rebooted the jailer
system. Jails really should have no affect on
This it is a virtual machine essentially, at least that is my thoughts.
What happen to your thought that snmp needs to run as a non mailer
system?
Thanks
regards
-Original Message-
From: Bernt Hansson [mailto:b
curity patch).
We've been running amd64 hosts with both amd64 and i386 jails. Doing compiler
builds, using them as web servers, shell servers, bastion's, gateways, proxies
(both shell and web), and even for running legacy releases of FreeBSD (running
4.11 i386 on an amd64 8.1 host).
So t
On 02/03/12 17:02, Devin Teske wrote:
Please give this a try:
http://druidbsd.sf.net/vimage.shtml
http://druidbsd.sf.net/download.shtml
Hi,
Interesting.
Is it safe to run in production (VIMAGE/vnets) ?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing lis
Hugo Silva wrote:
Hello,
I didn't find much about jails v2 + epair + vimage on google; The
FreeBSD wiki pages concerning this subject seem fairly outdated (that or
not much has happened in 3 years), and the manpages don't mention much
about vimage/vnet.
According to http://
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Hugo Silva
> Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 8:17 AM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Jails V2, VIMAGE, and integration
1 - 100 of 703 matches
Mail list logo
