- Original Message -
[snip]
> On Sat, 21 Jun 2003, Joshua Oreman wrote:
> What "ls" command can I do IN THE CURRENT WORKING DIRECTORY to just see
the
> "myfiles/" listing? That is, if I type "ls -alF myfiles" (or myfiles/),
> why does the output delve *into* this directory and list its co
dionysus: {1030} man ls
-d Directories are listed as plain files (not searched
recursively)
and symbolic links in the argument list are not indirected
through.
...
:-)
gr,
Axel Scheepers
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] m
On Sun, 22 Jun 2003, Peter Leftwich wrote:
>
> [1] If I'm in a directory, and do "ls -alF" and see for example:
>
> drwx-- 2 pete users 512 Jun 22 13:41 myfiles/
>
> What "ls" command can I do IN THE CURRENT WORKING DIRECTORY to just see the
> "myfiles/" listing? That is, if I type "
On Sun, 22 Jun 2003, Axel Scheepers wrote:
> prompt$ man ls
> -d Directories are listed as plain files (not searched recursively)
> and symbolic links in the argument list are not indirected through.
> :-)
> gr,
> Axel Scheepers
Awesome! The post before had just said "don't
On Sat, 21 Jun 2003, Joshua Oreman wrote:
> > On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Patrick O'Reilly wrote:
> > > And see 'man ls' and the switches -c, -t and -u.
> > I was aware of and often use the -t switch (in a tcsh alias), but these
> > have to do with sorting. What if I wanted to see (maybe not as output fr
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 12:41:36AM -0400 or thereabouts, Peter Leftwich seemed to
write:
> On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Patrick O'Reilly wrote:
> > > I have noticed in the man page for 'find' that the primaries allow
> > > selection based on time last "accessed", last "modified" and last
> > > "change" of
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Patrick O'Reilly wrote:
> > I have noticed in the man page for 'find' that the primaries allow
> > selection based on time last "accessed", last "modified" and last
> > "change" of status. Evidently this info is held somewhere. I don't
> > have more info off hand, but perhaps
|
| Ponder this... Why does M$FT Windows have Created, Accessed, and
Modified,
| while UNIX (beware of unresearched, wide-sweeping generalizations...)
only
| provides one the "Last modified" date and time stamp?
|
I have noticed in the man page for 'find' that the primaries allow
selection based
+-- Peter Leftwich [freebsd] [18-06-03 20:02 -0700]:
| Ponder this... Why is it "/etc/fstab" and not "/etc/mount.conf" ??
mount.conf would contain the default options to be
passed to the mount command.
e.g. '-f' option
fstab = File System TABle (?)
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Peter Leftwich wrote:
> Ponder this... Why is it "/etc/fstab" and not "/etc/mount.conf" ??
File System Table - not all things in it are mounted
>
> Ponder this... Why does M$FT Windows have Created, Accessed, and Modified,
> while UNIX (beware of unresearched, wide-swee
In the last episode (Jun 18), Peter Leftwich said:
> Ponder this... Why is it "/etc/fstab" and not "/etc/mount.conf" ??
It's a shortcut for "filesystem table", I believe. fsck, dump,
edquota, swapon and tunefs use it too. See the fstab manpage for more
info.
> Ponder this... Why does M$FT Wi
Ponder this... Why is it "/etc/fstab" and not "/etc/mount.conf" ??
Ponder this... Why does M$FT Windows have Created, Accessed, and Modified,
while UNIX (beware of unresearched, wide-sweeping generalizations...) only
provides one the "Last modified" date and time stamp?
Ponder this... Does thi
12 matches
Mail list logo
