9.1-RELEASE-p4 on amd64. This is a laptop with an Atheros 9280 wireless
chip in a domestic setting with a single router and a cable modem.
I have never had to use wireless before, but am now in another room. I
have followed the handbook, and it seems to be working well. One question
though:
On Wednesday, July 10, 2013, Walter Hurry wrote:
9.1-RELEASE-p4 on amd64. This is a laptop with an Atheros 9280 wireless
chip in a domestic setting with a single router and a cable modem.
I have never had to use wireless before, but am now in another room. I
have followed the handbook, and
On Thu, 21 Feb 2013, Shane Ambler wrote:
It's been a while since I experimented with jails but I'm pretty sure it is
the reason I changed my sshd_config
When you start sshd on the base system by default it binds against 0.0.0.0
and :: which is every ip4 and ip6 address configured on the base
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of d...@safeport.com
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 11:00 AM
To: Shane Ambler
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Bernt Hansson
Subject: Re: jail and networking
On 22/02/2013 05:52, Devin Teske wrote:
What I find strange is that:
1. I knew about ListenAddress w/respect to jails, but...
2. We are not changing it (sshd_config has no ListenAddress -- leading to
default values used), yet...
3. Base machine and jails both work fine
Not sure when it's
On Thu, 21 Feb 2013, Shane Ambler wrote:
On 22/02/2013 05:52, Devin Teske wrote:
What I find strange is that:
1. I knew about ListenAddress w/respect to jails, but...
2. We are not changing it (sshd_config has no ListenAddress -- leading to
default values used), yet...
3. Base
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Bernt Hansson wrote:
Hello list!
I dont seem to get net working in a test jail.
These I've tried;
ftp, fetch, telnet
They time out.
Ssh sort of work.
32bit# ssh 10.0.0.3
ssh_askpass: exec(/usr/local/bin/ssh-askpass): No such file or directory
Host key
On 02/20/2013 19:42, Bernt Hansson wrote:
On 2013-02-20 17:23, Teske, Devin wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Bernt Hansson wrote:
Hello list!
I dont seem to get net working in a test jail.
These I've tried;
ftp, fetch, telnet
They time out.
Ssh sort of work.
32bit# ssh 10.0.0.3
ssh_askpass:
On 20/02/2013 18:23, Bernt Hansson wrote:
The ID did change, didn't know about that, thank you.
But still, sshd isn't running in the jail
32bit# ps ax
PID TT STAT TIME COMMAND
2385 ?? IsJ0:00,00 sendmail: Queue runner@00:30:00 for
/var/spool/clientmqueue (sendmail)
2391 ??
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Bernt Hansson wrote:
On 2013-02-20 17:23, Teske, Devin wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Bernt Hansson wrote:
Hello list!
I dont seem to get net working in a test jail.
These I've tried;
ftp, fetch, telnet
They time out.
Ssh sort of work.
32bit# ssh
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Bernt Hansson wrote:
On 2013-02-20 19:07, Jeff Tipton wrote:
On 02/20/2013 19:42, Bernt Hansson wrote:
On 2013-02-20 17:23, Teske, Devin wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Bernt Hansson wrote:
Hello list!
I dont seem to get net working in a test jail.
These I've
On 02/20/2013 20:59, Teske, Devin wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Bernt Hansson wrote:
On 2013-02-20 19:07, Jeff Tipton wrote:
On 02/20/2013 19:42, Bernt Hansson wrote:
On 2013-02-20 17:23, Teske, Devin wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Bernt Hansson wrote:
Hello list!
I dont seem to get net
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Jeff Tipton wrote:
On 02/20/2013 20:59, Teske, Devin wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Bernt Hansson wrote:
On 2013-02-20 19:07, Jeff Tipton wrote:
On 02/20/2013 19:42, Bernt Hansson wrote:
On 2013-02-20 17:23, Teske, Devin wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Bernt Hansson wrote:
2013-02-20 19:59, Teske, Devin skrev:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Bernt Hansson wrote:
On 2013-02-20 19:07, Jeff Tipton wrote:
On 02/20/2013 19:42, Bernt Hansson wrote:
On 2013-02-20 17:23, Teske, Devin wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Bernt Hansson wrote:
Hello list!
I dont seem to get net working
2013-02-20 20:10, Jeff Tipton skrev:
On 02/20/2013 20:59, Teske, Devin wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Bernt Hansson wrote:
On 2013-02-20 19:07, Jeff Tipton wrote:
On 02/20/2013 19:42, Bernt Hansson wrote:
On 2013-02-20 17:23, Teske, Devin wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Bernt Hansson wrote:
2013-02-20 22:17, doug skrev:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Jeff Tipton wrote:
On 02/20/2013 20:59, Teske, Devin wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Bernt Hansson wrote:
On 2013-02-20 19:07, Jeff Tipton wrote:
On 02/20/2013 19:42, Bernt Hansson wrote:
On 2013-02-20 17:23, Teske, Devin wrote:
On Wed, 20
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Bernt Hansson wrote:
2013-02-20 22:17, doug skrev:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Jeff Tipton wrote:
On 02/20/2013 20:59, Teske, Devin wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Bernt Hansson wrote:
On 2013-02-20 19:07, Jeff Tipton wrote:
On 02/20/2013 19:42, Bernt Hansson wrote:
On
It's been a while since I experimented with jails but I'm pretty sure it
is the reason I changed my sshd_config
When you start sshd on the base system by default it binds against
0.0.0.0 and :: which is every ip4 and ip6 address configured on the base
system, which includes the aliased ip's
System Administrator
Working and Playing with FreeBSD since 2002
From: sub...@80386.org
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 00:06:56 +0530
To: dhanes...@hotmail.com
CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Networking IP Address Issues : NetBSD on Xen VM
On 03-Jul-2012, at 12:34 PM, dhaneshk k
On 04/07/2012 05:52, dhaneshk k wrote:
Please ignore my previous mail with the same subject line because there was
a terrible formatting mistake.
Please see the attached pdf which briefs the problem in assigning the IP
address to the netbsd virtual machine.
The Xen VM is running on
List,
Little bit offtopic of FreBSD, Hope some one can help with some suggestions..
The Objective is to
port NetBSD as a Virtual Machine into Cloud.
Steps Involved in
Porting NetBSD as a Virtual Machine:
Porting of NetBSD as
a Virtual Machine involves 2 steps.
A. Porting NetBSD
On 03-Jul-2012, at 12:34 PM, dhaneshk k wrote:
The Same problems
discussed here were faced.
Any hints to solve these issues much appreciated.
No hints till you learn how to format your email properly, a basic requirement
when posting to a mailing list.
Thank you
You are welcome.
the attached document for detailed description.
Any hints much appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Dhanesh
From: sub...@80386.org
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 00:06:56 +0530
To: dhanes...@hotmail.com
CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Networking IP Address Issues : NetBSD on Xen VM
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 415, Issue 6, Message: 1
On Fri, 18 May 2012 08:07:16 -0400
David Banning david+dated+1337774837.907...@skytracker.ca wrote:
It is machines that connect and receive via DHCP 192.168.1.2 and above
that
can't connect to the internet though the server.
At 07:07 AM 5/18/2012, David Banning wrote:
It is machines that connect and receive via DHCP 192.168.1.2 and
above that
can't connect to the internet though the server. I don't know a whole
lot about route - I have been attempting a variation of route commands
without success.
You
It is machines that connect and receive via DHCP 192.168.1.2 and above that
can't connect to the internet though the server. I don't know a whole
lot about route - I have been attempting a variation of route commands
without success.
You need to implement NAT on this box, since
I am having a problem getting users who get their dhcp from my
system to be able to connect to the internet. On one network interface
my server can connect to the internet no problem - that's device vr0.
On another, rl0 - I have a connection to the local network - no problem
connecting to local
Hi--
On May 16, 2012, at 1:08 PM, David Banning wrote:
[ ... ]
It is machines that connect and receive via DHCP 192.168.1.2 and above that
can't connect to the internet though the server. I don't know a whole
lot about route - I have been attempting a variation of route commands
without
On Apr 13, 2012, at 4:58 PM, Mark Felder wrote:
On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:53:49 -0500, Chad Leigh Shire.Net LLC c...@shire.net
wrote:
No NAT needed since they share the network stack under Jails v1 they share
the routing tables. It works. Try it.
You're clearly exploiting a bug in
Hi All
OK, so I have a server that has been running FreeBSD 6.1 and a bunch of jails,
providing a few limited services. I am migrating these from real hardware and
FreeBSD 6.1 with jail running, to a Xen based VPS running FreeBSD 9.0-R with a
kernel rebuild from a GENERIC kernel to GENERIC
Do I understand this right?
Working in FreeBSD 6.x:
interface em0: 1.2.3.4/24 -- public IP, host only
192.168.1.1/24 -- private IP, host only
192.168.1.2/24 -- Jail #1
192.168.1.3/24 -- Jail #2
With this configuration you had no problems accessing the
On Apr 13, 2012, at 1:50 PM, Mark Felder wrote:
Do I understand this right?
Working in FreeBSD 6.x:
interface em0: 1.2.3.4/24 -- public IP, host only
192.168.1.1/24 -- private IP, host only
192.168.1.2/24 -- Jail #1
192.168.1.3/24 -- Jail #2
On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:53:49 -0500, Chad Leigh Shire.Net LLC
c...@shire.net wrote:
No NAT needed since they share the network stack under Jails v1 they
share the routing tables. It works. Try it.
You're clearly exploiting a bug in FreeBSD 6's jails. It must get confused
and send your
I'm running Transmission (http://www.transmissionbt.com/), а BitTorrent
client on my FreeBSD 7.2 box. It requests large recieve buffers for its
network connections. This leaves my system with absolutely no free
memory. If some process frees a large amount of memory, it gets consumed
about 1.5
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Dmitriy Kryuk kryukdmit...@rambler.ruwrote:
How do I make FreeBSD keep some memory free (and so avoid swapping) with
Transmission running?
Your top(1) output doesn't indicate to me that swapping is a problem.
There were some performance problems with
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 00:57:52 +0700
Dmitriy Kryuk wrote:
I'm running Transmission (http://www.transmissionbt.com/), а
BitTorrent client on my FreeBSD 7.2 box. It requests large recieve
buffers for its network connections. This leaves my system with
absolutely no free memory. If some process
I was running 8.2 stable and kde3.5. Originally I want to install chrome. I
trying to update the many interlocking components I eventually got to the point
where I thought I would just start again so I removed all ports.
At this point I lost networking, neither DHCP or manually configuring
I lost networking, neither DHCP or manually configuring an IP
address worked so I put my data on a USB drive and really started over. My
question is would rebuilding the world likely have worked? If what else
should I
have tried before jumping off the deep end? Thanks for any thoughts
removed all ports.
At this point I lost networking, neither DHCP or manually configuring an IP
address worked so I put my data on a USB drive and really started over. My
question is would rebuilding the world likely have worked? If what else should I
have tried before jumping off the deep end
be _no_ package for xdm, so I checked:
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8.2-release/x11/xdm-1.1.8_2.tbz
It's present as a package.
It was after trying to find xdm and configuring
X[org] that networking 'disappeared'.
Really very strange.
I was so perplexed I did
I'm trying to track down a problem that seems to have been introduced
after FreeBSD 8.0.
I'm trying to install FreeBSD inside a virtualbox guest whose host is
a Win7 64bit box running Vbox 4.0.2
PC-BSD based on FreeBSD 8.0 works fine. But FreeBSD 8.1 does not.
Here is what does not work means
to find about your devices, and check you've a driver to use them:
pciconf -lv
Samuel Martín Moro
{EPITECH.} tek5
CamTrace S.A.S
(+033) 1 41 38 37 60
1 Allée de la Venelle
92150 Suresnes
FRANCE
Nobody wants to say how this works.
Maybe nobody knows ...
On Tuesday 21 September 2010 04:12:45, William Kindler wrote:
-- I have 2 wireless adapter that I am able to use for my system. One is
a usb device, a D-Link DWA130, and the other is a PCI device, a Netgear
WN311T. I can find no information about Linux or UNIX support, or
drivers for either,
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 21:12:45 -0500
William Kindler williamkind...@att.net articulated:
-- I have 2 wireless adapter that I am able to use for my system. One
is a usb device, a D-Link DWA130, and the other is a PCI device, a
Netgear WN311T. I can find no information about Linux or UNIX
-- I have 2 wireless adapter that I am able to use for my system. One is
a usb device, a D-Link DWA130, and the other is a PCI device, a Netgear
WN311T. I can find no information about Linux or UNIX support, or
drivers for either, on your website or on the respective manufacturer's
sites,
I have all the pertinent kernel modules loaded, and I have tried all
different combination of network settings in virtualbox. This is a
FreeBSD host running on a FreeBSD client.
Any suggestions appreciated.
Thanks,
Chris Maness
___
On Jul 15, 2010, at 11:20 PM, Chris Maness wrote:
I have all the pertinent kernel modules loaded, and I have tried all
different combination of network settings in virtualbox. This is a
FreeBSD host running on a FreeBSD client.
Any suggestions appreciated.
Suggestion 1: What are the
I am not able to ping anything. I cannot ping the gateway or the
host. I tried bridge, NAT, and host only.
Chris
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Remko Lodder re...@elvandar.org wrote:
On Jul 15, 2010, at 11:20 PM, Chris Maness wrote:
I have all the pertinent kernel modules loaded, and I
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Thu Jul 15 16:22:58 2010
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 14:20:50 -0700
From: Chris Maness ch...@chrismaness.com
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Virtualbox Networking Issues
I have all the pertinent kernel modules loaded, and I have tried all
On 15 July 2010 17:35, Chris Maness ch...@chrismaness.com wrote:
I am not able to ping anything. I cannot ping the gateway or the
host. I tried bridge, NAT, and host only.
Can you provide the output of ifconfig and the contents of rc.conf
from the virtual machine?
(Purpose - to see if the
On Jul 15, 2010, at 11:35 PM, Chris Maness wrote:
I am not able to ping anything. I cannot ping the gateway or the
host. I tried bridge, NAT, and host only.
Chris
OK, and what does tcpdump tell you about the interface? is it passing traffic
at all?
--
/\ Best regards,
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 14:35:23 -0700
From: Chris Maness ch...@chrismaness.com
Subject: Re: Virtualbox Networking Issues
I am not able to ping anything. I cannot ping the gateway or the
host. I tried bridge, NAT, and host only.
Really, not _anything_ ?? how about 127.0.0.1 ?
Have you
I tried the second Intel adapter in the list and it worked under bridge mode.
Thanks,
Chris
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
On Jul 15, 2010, at 11:57 PM, Chris Maness wrote:
I tried the second Intel adapter in the list and it worked under bridge mode.
This is really unsatisfying, can you generate an ifconfig -a and report it back
so that we can see what you did?
did you assign multiple interfaces to the machine?
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Remko Lodder re...@elvandar.org wrote:
On Jul 15, 2010, at 11:57 PM, Chris Maness wrote:
I tried the second Intel adapter in the list and it worked under bridge mode.
This is really unsatisfying, can you generate an ifconfig -a and report it
back so that we
On Jul 16, 2010, at 12:05 AM, Chris Maness wrote:
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Remko Lodder re...@elvandar.org wrote:
On Jul 15, 2010, at 11:57 PM, Chris Maness wrote:
I tried the second Intel adapter in the list and it worked under bridge
mode.
This is really unsatisfying, can
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Remko Lodder re...@elvandar.org wrote:
On Jul 16, 2010, at 12:05 AM, Chris Maness wrote:
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Remko Lodder re...@elvandar.org wrote:
On Jul 15, 2010, at 11:57 PM, Chris Maness wrote:
I tried the second Intel adapter in the list
to use VirtualBox NAT has never worked on
FreeBSD Host/Guest setup. TCP/UDP connections generally work though.
This perhaps explains it more, http://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/1247
Bridged networking mode hasn't failed me since shortly after it was patched
to work with FreeBSD. Make sure you
Hello Chip,
On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 18:03:21 -0700
Chip Camden sterl...@camdensoftware.com wrote:
On Apr 30 2010 13:39, S Roberts wrote:
Hello Chip,
Good to hear from you..,
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 15:52:13 -0700
Chip Camden sterl...@camdensoftware.com wrote:
On Apr 26 2010
Hello Chip,
Good to hear from you..,
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 15:52:13 -0700
Chip Camden sterl...@camdensoftware.com wrote:
On Apr 26 2010 22:00, Carl Chave wrote:
More info: I found the following in the output of pciconf -vl:
no...@pci0:2:0:0: class=0x028000 card=0x10891a3b
On Apr 30 2010 13:39, S Roberts wrote:
Hello Chip,
Good to hear from you..,
On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 15:52:13 -0700
Chip Camden sterl...@camdensoftware.com wrote:
On Apr 26 2010 22:00, Carl Chave wrote:
More info: I found the following in the output of pciconf -vl:
On Apr 26 2010 22:00, Carl Chave wrote:
More info: I found the following in the output of pciconf -vl:
no...@pci0:2:0:0: class=0x028000 card=0x10891a3b chip=0x002b168c
rev=0x01 hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Atheros Communications Inc.'
class = network
From here:
On Apr 26 2010 22:00, Carl Chave wrote:
More info: I found the following in the output of pciconf -vl:
no...@pci0:2:0:0: class=0x028000 card=0x10891a3b chip=0x002b168c
rev=0x01 hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Atheros Communications Inc.'
class = network
From here:
On Apr 25 2010 22:15, Kevin Kinsey wrote:
Let me preface my commentary with I'm way out of my league, so #include
disclaimer.h and all that ...
For starters, in re: above, didn't someone suggest libpciaccess as the
source for scanpci? I can't tell if you are misunderstanding what S
More info: I found the following in the output of pciconf -vl:
no...@pci0:2:0:0: class=0x028000 card=0x10891a3b chip=0x002b168c
rev=0x01 hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Atheros Communications Inc.'
class = network
From here:
http://www.pcidatabase.com/vendor_details.php?id=174
On Apr 24 2010 23:51, S Roberts wrote:
I believe its been bundled into the libpciaccess port:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/devel/libpciaccess/
Doesn't seem to be there, and google isn't being helpful. A search of
freshports.org didn't turn up anything either. Searching
Chip Camden wrote:
On Apr 24 2010 23:51, S Roberts wrote:
I believe its been bundled into the libpciaccess port:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/devel/libpciaccess/
Doesn't seem to be there, and google isn't being helpful. A search of
freshports.org didn't turn up anything
Hello Chip,
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 12:10:40 -0700
Chip Camden sterl...@camdensoftware.com wrote:
On Apr 24 2010 23:51, S Roberts wrote:
I believe its been bundled into the libpciaccess port:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/devel/libpciaccess/
Doesn't seem to be there, and
On Apr 25 2010 21:26, S Roberts wrote:
Hmmm.., you sure your ports system is installed / up-to-date there?
Do you have any of the docs that would have shipped with the notebook?
If not, I searched ASUS, and found a link to the English version manual
here:
On Apr 25 2010 16:18, Chip Camden wrote:
On Apr 25 2010 21:26, S Roberts wrote:
Hmmm.., you sure your ports system is installed / up-to-date there?
Do you have any of the docs that would have shipped with the notebook?
If not, I searched ASUS, and found a link to the English version
Chip Camden wrote:
On Apr 25 2010 16:18, Chip Camden wrote:
On Apr 25 2010 21:26, S Roberts wrote:
Hmmm.., you sure your ports system is installed / up-to-date there?
Do you have any of the docs that would have shipped with the notebook?
If not, I searched ASUS, and found a link to the
A new notebook (ASUS K72F) has integrated wireles networking. The technical
specifications are sadly lacking, so I don't know what chipset. The
wired ethernet appears to use uath, but that's not working as a wlandev.
Since most everything else is Intel, I figured it could be an Intel
chipset
Hello Chip,
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 13:39:47 -0700
Chip Camden sterl...@camdensoftware.com wrote:
A new notebook (ASUS K72F) has integrated wireles networking. The
technical specifications are sadly lacking, so I don't know what
chipset. The wired ethernet appears to use uath, but that's
On Apr 24 2010 13:39, Chip Camden wrote:
A new notebook (ASUS K72F) has integrated wireles networking. The technical
specifications are sadly lacking, so I don't know what chipset. The
wired ethernet appears to use uath, but that's not working as a wlandev.
Since most everything else
On Apr 24 2010 21:55, S Roberts wrote:
snip
Easiest option would be to run a livecd of another more populous *nix
flavour and see what it makes of the hardware.
Needless to say, if you're so bold, you **can** always load windows
and let window tell you what it is ;-)
Regards,
S Roberts
Hello Chip,
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 14:00:29 -0700
Chip Camden sterl...@camdensoftware.com wrote:
On Apr 24 2010 13:39, Chip Camden wrote:
A new notebook (ASUS K72F) has integrated wireles networking. The
technical specifications are sadly lacking, so I don't know what
chipset. The wired
On Apr 24 2010 22:07, S Roberts wrote:
Not a whole lot there..,
Does scanpci -v tell you any more details about the hardware?
Regards,
S Roberts
I don't seem to have scanpci on my system, nor do I see it in the ports
tree -- where would I find it?
Thanks
--
Sterling (Chip) Camden
Hello Chip,
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 15:00:34 -0700
Chip Camden sterl...@camdensoftware.com wrote:
On Apr 24 2010 22:07, S Roberts wrote:
Not a whole lot there..,
Does scanpci -v tell you any more details about the hardware?
Regards,
S Roberts
I don't seem to have scanpci
questi...@freebsd.org
Subject
Re: Routers, switches, and
networking hardware
Subject
Re: Routers, switches, and
networking hardware
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 14:46, Lee Shackelford
lee_shackelf...@dot.ca.gov wrote:
Good afternoon, dear FreeBSD enthusiast. Is anyone
Good afternoon, dear FreeBSD enthusiast. Is anyone aware of any brand name
of router, switch, or other similar networking hardware that is based on
any variant of the BSD operating system? Any comments are appreciated.
Yours truly, L e e _ S h a c k e l f o r dAT d o t dot c adot
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 14:46, Lee Shackelford
lee_shackelf...@dot.ca.gov wrote:
Good afternoon, dear FreeBSD enthusiast. Is anyone aware of any brand name
of router, switch, or other similar networking hardware that is based on
any variant of the BSD operating system? Any comments
On Mar 26, 2010, at 18:05, Kurt Buff kurt.b...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 14:46, Lee Shackelford
lee_shackelf...@dot.ca.gov wrote:
Good afternoon, dear FreeBSD enthusiast. Is anyone aware of any
brand name
of router, switch, or other similar networking hardware
of router, switch, or other similar networking hardware that is based on
any variant of the BSD operating system? Any comments are appreciated.
Yours truly, L e e _ S h a c k e l f o r d AT d o t dot c a
dot
g o v
Unless memory fails me, F5, Juniper, and for sure Sidewinder (now
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Lee Shackelford lee_shackelf...@dot.ca.gov
wrote:
Good afternoon, dear FreeBSD enthusiast. Is anyone aware of any brand name
of router, switch, or other similar networking hardware that is based on
any variant of the BSD operating system? Any comments
for it
to activate right at the very start. It also has a 'precmd' that checks
for dhcp interfaces and sets up the -dynamic flag. Might be related. I
have no way of knowing though, unless I add some debug messages and
figure out to log them. I added REQUIRE: NETWORKING and now I'm
waiting to see
On 9. 11. 2009 1:27, umage wrote:
When the connection goes down and comes back up it will take 5 minutes
before my FreeBSD gateway box checks the lease and decides if a
renewal is
in order. This is automatic. If I am sitting in front of my computer
and I
want to speed this up I issue
umage wrote:
[snip]
In my case the router does get the renewed ip, as I described earlier.
However, even after waiting 8+ hours, the system will not recover from
the outage properly (reason unknown). That's what this thread is all
about.
When I started the system today, I found that again it
When the connection goes down and comes back up it will take 5 minutes
before my FreeBSD gateway box checks the lease and decides if a
renewal is
in order. This is automatic. If I am sitting in front of my computer
and I
want to speed this up I issue /etc/rc.d/netif restart on the gateway
Hello. I have had 3 network outages this week, and everytime it
happened, I found that my freebsd8rc1 machine/router was unable to
communicate over the WAN interface even after the outages ended. A
reboot helps, but that's not an acceptable solution.
The symptoms are very weird: even though
Have you tried restarting routing?
/etc/rc.d/routing restart
I have found the same symptoms with other outages and not performing the
above.
I have done /etc/rc.d/netif restart and /etc/rc.d/routing restart.
Wtih using these commands, I have found this to be successful in restoring
network
of netstat -r was identical to what it is currently...
FYI: I've been using freebsd 6.2 - 7.2 until now, and I never had to
intervene - the system resumed networking as usual. It might have
something to do with migrating to 8rc1 (most likely not), or that I'm
now using DHCP and there's a glitch
, I will try it when this happens again.
Note: the output of netstat -r was identical to what it is currently...
FYI: I've been using freebsd 6.2 - 7.2 until now, and I never had to
intervene - the system resumed networking as usual. It might have
something to do with migrating to 8rc1 (most
Setup - DSL modem/router 192.168.2.1. Static IP of 192.168.2.100 to
FreeBSD jimmiejaz.org 7.2-STABLE FreeBSD 7.2-STABLE #0: Sun Aug 2
01:00:16 EDT 2009 r...@jimmiejaz.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/FORTYTWO
i386. DHCP in the .2.10 to .2.100 with two XP machines.
I've turned IPFW off, as
Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Joel Dahlj...@vnode.se wrote:
[snip description of network flakiness on one server, out
of several on the same switch behind the same gateway]
Any ideas? :-)
I have 2:
1.) Bad NIC
2.) Bad CPU
3. Bad cable from
Glen Barber skrev:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 6:53 PM, Glen Barberglen.j.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
I have 2:
1.) Bad NIC
2.) Bad CPU
A while back, I found out I had a bad CPU after replacing everything
else on the machine -- I would still receive CRC mismatch errors with
portsnap(8).
The NIC is
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 1:56 AM, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Joel Dahlj...@vnode.se wrote:
[snip description of network flakiness on one server, out
of several on the same switch behind the same gateway]
Any
Adam Vande More skrev:
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 1:56 AM, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Joel Dahlj...@vnode.se wrote:
[snip description of network flakiness on one server, out
of several on the same switch behind the
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 5:52 PM, Joel Dahlj...@vnode.se wrote:
And now everything seems to be working. I've been doing some tests for a
few hours, but I can't get the machine to crap out again. Looking good so
far... :-)
Good to hear. :-)
--
Glen Barber
Yesterday I noticed something weird with one of my mail servers (FreeBSD 7.2),
which is located far away from me. At first I thought it was my mail client
that was misbehaving since a couple of mails that I retrieved from the server
looked...odd. Characters were missing, and the mail headers
1 - 100 of 443 matches
Mail list logo
