Re: 5.3 -> 6.2 should work right?

2007-01-24 Thread Javier Henderson
On Jan 24, 2007, at 7:52 AM, RW wrote: On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 18:44:26 +0100 Nagy László Zsolt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: By the way, updating a system from 5 to 6 is a headache. (Updating from 4 to 5 is much easier.) Many will suggest (including me) to install your new 6.2 system from binaries,

Re: 5.3 -> 6.2 should work right?

2007-01-24 Thread RW
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 18:44:26 +0100 Nagy László Zsolt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > By the way, updating a system from 5 to 6 is a headache. (Updating > from 4 to 5 is much easier.) Many will suggest (including me) to > install your new 6.2 system from binaries, and then transfer your > programs an

Re: 5.3 -> 6.2 should work right?

2007-01-22 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 06:44:26PM +0100, Nagy László Zsolt wrote: > B. Cook wrote: > >I'm inheriting an older network and I'm trying to update it.. > > > >cvsup to 6_2.. > > > >Doing a build kernel && install kernel > > > >then reboot and build world && install world && mergemaster -p if needed >

Re: 5.3 -> 6.2 should work right?

2007-01-22 Thread Nagy László Zsolt
B. Cook wrote: I'm inheriting an older network and I'm trying to update it.. cvsup to 6_2.. Doing a build kernel && install kernel then reboot and build world && install world && mergemaster -p if needed then rebuild the kernel and reinstall it.. right? I couldn't see anything major in UPDA

Re: 5.3 -> 6.2 should work right?

2007-01-22 Thread Abdullah Al-Marrie
On 1/22/07, B. Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm inheriting an older network and I'm trying to update it.. cvsup to 6_2.. Doing a build kernel && install kernel then reboot and build world && install world && mergemaster -p if needed then rebuild the kernel and reinstall it.. right? I cou