Re: 5.3 stable when?

2004-09-22 Thread arden
On Wed, 2004-09-22 at 00:29, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 10:35:38AM -0700, Curtis Vaughan wrote:
> > Isn't 5.3 supposed to be going stable here soon?  Any time line?
> > 
> > Also, since I have 5.3-BETA1 and I see it's at 5.3-BETA5, should I 
> > worry about upgrading to BETA5 or just wait till it goes stable?
> 
> Updating to BETA5 (and reporting any problems you encounter) will help
> to test the release, thus making it better for everyone.
> 
> Kris

Taking your advice downloading it now. Is there a list anywhere of tests
that are required? and what is the process of reporting bugs?

Arden 

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: 5.3 stable when?

2004-09-21 Thread Guillermo García-Rojas
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.3R/schedule.html


On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 10:35:38 -0700, Curtis Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Isn't 5.3 supposed to be going stable here soon?  Any time line?
> 
> Also, since I have 5.3-BETA1 and I see it's at 5.3-BETA5, should I
> worry about upgrading to BETA5 or just wait till it goes stable?
> 
> Curtis
> 
> ___
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> 



-- 
---
Guillermo García Rojas Covarrubias
Director General 
SoloBSD
http://www.solobsd.org
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: 5.3 stable when?

2004-09-21 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 10:35:38AM -0700, Curtis Vaughan wrote:
> Isn't 5.3 supposed to be going stable here soon?  Any time line?
> 
> Also, since I have 5.3-BETA1 and I see it's at 5.3-BETA5, should I 
> worry about upgrading to BETA5 or just wait till it goes stable?

Updating to BETA5 (and reporting any problems you encounter) will help
to test the release, thus making it better for everyone.

Kris


pgp2pMcVhFnzZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: 5.3 stable when?

2004-09-21 Thread doug
I just finishing installing 5.3. I was going to compose an email saying how well
it worked for me. Appending to this thread seems applicable.

I have a 9 year old Dell Inspiron 7500. With 5.1 and 5.2 I had issues with the
ACPI (Intel's gift to the work, I am told) and the ep driver, so I had to drop
back to 4.10

I just reinstalled a 5.2 CD and cvsup'd to RELENG_5. Everything worked like a
charm.  All ACPI errors were handled and even the ep driver worked. 5.3 may or
may not be ready for production servers but it is ready for prime time as a
workstation.  I am not sure where Kris found such ancient hardware to test on,
but thanks. I hope to keep using this thing until 64 bit processors become
cheap.



On Tue, 21 Sep 2004, Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wrote:

> Curtis Vaughan wrote:
>
> > Isn't 5.3 supposed to be going stable here soon?  Any time line?
> >
> > Also, since I have 5.3-BETA1 and I see it's at 5.3-BETA5, should I
> > worry about upgrading to BETA5 or just wait till it goes stable?
> >
> > Curtis
>
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.3R/schedule.html
>
> Kevin Kinsey
> ___
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>


_
Douglas Denault
http://www.safeport.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: 301-469-8766
  Fax: 301-469-0601
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: 5.3 stable when?

2004-09-21 Thread Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P.
Curtis Vaughan wrote:
Isn't 5.3 supposed to be going stable here soon?  Any time line?
Also, since I have 5.3-BETA1 and I see it's at 5.3-BETA5, should I
worry about upgrading to BETA5 or just wait till it goes stable?
Curtis

http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.3R/schedule.html
Kevin Kinsey
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: 5.3 stable when?

2004-09-21 Thread Kevin A. Pieckiel
On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 10:35:38AM -0700, Curtis Vaughan wrote:
> Isn't 5.3 supposed to be going stable here soon?  Any time line?

http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.3R/schedule.html

> Also, since I have 5.3-BETA1 and I see it's at 5.3-BETA5, should I 
> worry about upgrading to BETA5 or just wait till it goes stable?

I'm no authority, but I don't see that it matters much unless you're
having problems with BETA1.  I have some test machines that are
running 5.3, so I compile/install weekly with each BETA release.
If you're using the system for any "real" work, you may want to just
wait (unless, as I've said, you're having specific problems).

Kevin
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"


Re: 5.3 stable when?

2004-09-21 Thread Chris
Curtis Vaughan wrote:
Isn't 5.3 supposed to be going stable here soon?  Any time line?
Also, since I have 5.3-BETA1 and I see it's at 5.3-BETA5, should I worry 
about upgrading to BETA5 or just wait till it goes stable?

Curtis

http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.3R/schedule.html
--
Best regards,
Chris
An easily-understood, workable falsehood is more useful
than a complex, incomprehensible truth.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"