On 23 April 2010 12:24, Jerry wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 12:06:14 -0400
> ill...@gmail.com articulated:
>
>> 64bit executables are going to be larger,
>> sometimes as much as 2x, but do you
>> now have a bunch of (large)
>> /boot/kernel/*.symbols
>> files now?
>
> I have 1115 total files in tha
ill...@gmail.com wrote:
> On 22 April 2010 12:02, Jerry wrote:
>> I just did a fresh install of FreeBSD-8.0/amd64. Previously, I had
>> FreeBSD-7.3/i386 installed. It appears the the size of "/" has
>> increased dramatically.
>>
>> $ df -H
>> Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:18:57 -0500 (CDT)
Mark articulated:
>
> The command (as root) will show which directories in the root
> partition use the most space:
>
> # du -kx / | sort -n
>
> Sometime install will backup the boot kernel directory.
> Multiple /boot/kernel* directories can quickly ea
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 12:06:14 -0400
ill...@gmail.com articulated:
> 64bit executables are going to be larger,
> sometimes as much as 2x, but do you
> now have a bunch of (large)
> /boot/kernel/*.symbols
> files now?
I have 1115 total files in that directory. It appears that half of them
are "*.sy
On 22 April 2010 12:02, Jerry wrote:
> I just did a fresh install of FreeBSD-8.0/amd64. Previously, I had
> FreeBSD-7.3/i386 installed. It appears the the size of "/" has
> increased dramatically.
>
> $ df -H
> Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
> /dev/ad0s1a 1.0G 527M
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:26:02 -0400
Lowell articulated:
> Jerry writes:
>
> > I just did a fresh install of FreeBSD-8.0/amd64. Previously, I had
> > FreeBSD-7.3/i386 installed. It appears the the size of "/" has
> > increased dramatically.
> >
> > $ df -H
> > Filesystem SizeUsed Avail
Jerry writes:
> I just did a fresh install of FreeBSD-8.0/amd64. Previously, I had
> FreeBSD-7.3/i386 installed. It appears the the size of "/" has
> increased dramatically.
>
> $ df -H
> Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
> /dev/ad0s1a1.0G527M428M55%/
>
On Wed 2009-04-22 10:46:14 UTC-0400, Mikel King (mikel.k...@olivent.com) wrote:
> I used to run durep on my shared servers.
durep seems to have no concept of security :-) So how did you go about
restricting unwanted people from viewing its output?
Regards
Andrew
On Thu 2009-04-23 05:05:25 UTC+1000, andrew clarke (m...@ozzmosis.com) wrote:
> durep seems to have no concept of security :-) So how did you go about
> restricting unwanted people from viewing its output?
I'm referring to the CGI version of durep here, of course.
___
On Apr 22, 2009, at 3:13 PM, andrew clarke wrote:
On Thu 2009-04-23 05:05:25 UTC+1000, andrew clarke
(m...@ozzmosis.com) wrote:
durep seems to have no concept of security :-) So how did you go
about
restricting unwanted people from viewing its output?
I'm referring to the CGI version o
On Apr 22, 2009, at 3:05 PM, andrew clarke wrote:
On Wed 2009-04-22 10:46:14 UTC-0400, Mikel King (mikel.k...@olivent.com
) wrote:
I used to run durep on my shared servers.
durep seems to have no concept of security :-) So how did you go
about
restricting unwanted people from viewing
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 08:08:18PM -0700, Christopher Chambers wrote:
> Is there an easy way to analyze disk usage to determine which files and
> folders are taking up the most space?
Check out the du(1) command.
Go in to a file system and type du -sk * or maybe du -sh *
(I prefer the forme
On Apr 21, 2009, at 11:24 PM, Robert Huff wrote:
Christopher Chambers writes:
Is there an easy way to analyze disk usage to determine which
files and folders are taking up the most space?
If this isn't a FAQ, then search the mailing list archives.
This question, or something leadin
On 22 apr 2009, at 10:01, Wojciech Puchar >
it's just stupid to pursue windoze/maclame naming
It's just stupid to start another flame war about the superiority of
one or another OS.
Peter
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
h
These are called directories.
You don't call files "sheets of paper" either, do you? :-)
YES!! I'm probably too up-tight about the use of "folder",
but it just seems like waay too much stupiding-down of the
std Unix terminology. ([I thought I was the only one]. An
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 07:52:38AM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:08:18 -0700, Christopher Chambers
> wrote:
> > Is there an easy way to analyze disk usage to determine which files and
> > folders are taking up the most space?
>
> See "man du". Just for terminology: In UNIX (s
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:08:18 -0700, Christopher Chambers
wrote:
> Is there an easy way to analyze disk usage to determine which files and
> folders are taking up the most space?
See "man du". Just for terminology: In UNIX (so in FreeBSD), there
are no folders. Folders are made of paper and resid
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 9:21 PM, Adam Vande More wrote:
> Christopher Chambers wrote:
>
>> Is there an easy way to analyze disk usage to determine which files and
>> folders are taking up the most space?
>>
>>
>>
>>
> du -hd 1 | sort -n
du -kd 1 | sort -rn
Shows in ENV{BLOCKSIZE} the biggest d
Christopher Chambers wrote:
Is there an easy way to analyze disk usage to determine which files and
folders are taking up the most space?
du -hd 1 | sort -n
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=du&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=FreeBSD+7.1-RELEASE+and+Ports&format=html
___
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Could you suggest me how can I get my disk usage statistics in terms of
percentage of the possible disk activity (like in gstat) or megabytes
per second (like in iostat), please?
systat
then type
:vmstat
I need something not interactive, command that prints what it kn
Hello.
Could you suggest me how can I get my disk usage statistics in terms of
percentage of the possible disk activity (like in gstat) or megabytes
per second (like in iostat), please?
systat
then type
:vmstat
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mail
Michal wrote:
>
> Could you suggest me how can I get my disk usage statistics in terms of
> percentage of the possible disk activity (like in gstat) or megabytes
> per second (like in iostat), please?
>
> I need something that gives actual usage statistics, not any averages.
> And something that
On Wed, 5 May 2004 10:38 am, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> Michael Conlen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Any ideas what would cause the df -k and du -k discrepancy?
>
> FAQ entry:
>"The du and df commands show different amounts of disk space
> available. What is going on?"
> http://www.freebsd.org/d
Michael Conlen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Any ideas what would cause the df -k and du -k discrepancy?
FAQ entry:
"The du and df commands show different amounts of disk space available. What is
going on?"
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/disks.html#DU-VS-DF
__
On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 06:49:38PM -0400, Michael Conlen wrote:
> I have a NFS server running FreeBSD-4.9-RELEASE. It's run fine for
> several months with five FreeBSD 4.9 systems mounting it's filesystems.
> Suddenly something started using disk space at the rate of 10 GB/hour
> on one of the f
On Tuesday 04 May 2004 05:49 pm, Michael Conlen wrote:
> Any ideas what would cause the df -k and du -k discrepancy?
maybe fu-k ? :)
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any
26 matches
Mail list logo
