Re: ULE and Prescott question

2009-07-23 Thread Ivan Voras
RW wrote: > On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 22:33:46 +0200 > Ivan Voras wrote: > >> Scott Bennett wrote: >>> This is a curiousity question. I'm running 7.2-STABLE at >>> present on an old Inspiron XPS, which has a 3.4 GHz P4 Prescott >>> CPU. I have hyperthreading enabled in the kernel. The question

Re: ULE and Prescott question

2009-07-23 Thread RW
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 22:33:46 +0200 Ivan Voras wrote: > Scott Bennett wrote: > > This is a curiousity question. I'm running 7.2-STABLE at > > present on an old Inspiron XPS, which has a 3.4 GHz P4 Prescott > > CPU. I have hyperthreading enabled in the kernel. The question > > is: is there

Re: ULE and Prescott question

2009-07-22 Thread Ivan Voras
Scott Bennett wrote: > This is a curiousity question. I'm running 7.2-STABLE at present on > an old Inspiron XPS, which has a 3.4 GHz P4 Prescott CPU. I have > hyperthreading enabled in the kernel. The question is: is there any > appreciable performance difference to be expected with this

Re: ULE scheduler

2009-04-10 Thread Polytropon
On Fri, 10 Apr 2009 15:17:28 -0700, "Dave Stegner" wrote: > I rebuilt the kernel with ULE scheduler, I think. > > How can I tell if it is running ULE or 4BSD?? I think that's what you're looking for: % sysctl kern.sched.name kern.sched.name: ULE -- Polytropon >From Magdebur

Re: ULE

2008-10-11 Thread Wojciech Puchar
in few days old RELENG_7 it's great, much better than anything before. there are something to fix with realtime priority threads scheduling, i contacted the author and i think it will be fixed soon. in case of usual work - just use it. it's very good. On Sat, 11 Oct 2008, Desmond Chapman wrot

Re: ULE

2008-10-11 Thread Kris Kennaway
Desmond Chapman wrote: Anyone with experience using and setting this up, please contact me. I need to learn how to work with and on it. Replace "options SCHED_4BSD" with "options SCHED_ULE" in your kernel config file, compile/install kernel in the usual way, reboot. End of story. Kris

Re: ULE Scheduler and overall performance on 6.x - Wow

2006-05-07 Thread Duane Whitty
Jonathan Horne wrote: i remember when i first started using freebsd about 2 months ago, the first kernel i built, i did the ULE (at some articles recommendataion). but, ive not done it since. i guess i have been noticing a bit of lag on my system (amd 1800mhz 512rdram, u160 scsi raid0), but n

Re: ULE Scheduler and overall performance on 6.x - Wow

2006-05-07 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 06:43:14AM -0300, Duane Whitty wrote: > Hi, > > I decided to give the ULE scheduler a try a while ago (April 28). > when I last built 6-STABLE > > Anyhow it seems great. I'm running a 2.4GHz Celeron with > 512MB RAM and two 40GB, PATA disks. Right now I'm running > both

Re: ULE Scheduler and overall performance on 6.x - Wow

2006-05-07 Thread Jonathan Horne
i remember when i first started using freebsd about 2 months ago, the first kernel i built, i did the ULE (at some articles recommendataion). but, ive not done it since. i guess i have been noticing a bit of lag on my system (amd 1800mhz 512rdram, u160 scsi raid0), but nothing unacceptable. h

Re: ULE or 4BSD

2005-11-05 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 01:42:40PM +0300, Andrew P. wrote: > On 11/5/05, Albert Shih <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi anybody > > > > All is in the subject...on FreeBSD 6.0 i've see the default generic kernel > > is compiled with SCHED_4BSD and SCHED_ULE is in comment. > > > > Can'I use SCHED_ULE

Re: ULE or 4BSD

2005-11-05 Thread Andrew P.
On 11/5/05, Albert Shih <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi anybody > > All is in the subject...on FreeBSD 6.0 i've see the default generic kernel > is compiled with SCHED_4BSD and SCHED_ULE is in comment. > > Can'I use SCHED_ULE on 6.0 ? Is he stable now ? > > Regards. > -- > Albert SHIH > Universite