RW wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 22:33:46 +0200
> Ivan Voras wrote:
>
>> Scott Bennett wrote:
>>> This is a curiousity question. I'm running 7.2-STABLE at
>>> present on an old Inspiron XPS, which has a 3.4 GHz P4 Prescott
>>> CPU. I have hyperthreading enabled in the kernel. The question
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 22:33:46 +0200
Ivan Voras wrote:
> Scott Bennett wrote:
> > This is a curiousity question. I'm running 7.2-STABLE at
> > present on an old Inspiron XPS, which has a 3.4 GHz P4 Prescott
> > CPU. I have hyperthreading enabled in the kernel. The question
> > is: is there
Scott Bennett wrote:
> This is a curiousity question. I'm running 7.2-STABLE at present on
> an old Inspiron XPS, which has a 3.4 GHz P4 Prescott CPU. I have
> hyperthreading enabled in the kernel. The question is: is there any
> appreciable performance difference to be expected with this
On Fri, 10 Apr 2009 15:17:28 -0700, "Dave Stegner"
wrote:
> I rebuilt the kernel with ULE scheduler, I think.
>
> How can I tell if it is running ULE or 4BSD??
I think that's what you're looking for:
% sysctl kern.sched.name
kern.sched.name: ULE
--
Polytropon
>From Magdebur
in few days old RELENG_7 it's great, much better than anything before.
there are something to fix with realtime priority threads scheduling, i
contacted the author and i think it will be fixed soon.
in case of usual work - just use it. it's very good.
On Sat, 11 Oct 2008, Desmond Chapman wrot
Desmond Chapman wrote:
Anyone with experience using and setting this up, please contact me. I need to learn how to work with and on it.
Replace "options SCHED_4BSD" with "options SCHED_ULE" in your kernel
config file, compile/install kernel in the usual way, reboot. End of story.
Kris
Jonathan Horne wrote:
i remember when i first started using freebsd about 2 months ago, the first
kernel i built, i did the ULE (at some articles recommendataion). but, ive
not done it since. i guess i have been noticing a bit of lag on my system
(amd 1800mhz 512rdram, u160 scsi raid0), but n
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 06:43:14AM -0300, Duane Whitty wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I decided to give the ULE scheduler a try a while ago (April 28).
> when I last built 6-STABLE
>
> Anyhow it seems great. I'm running a 2.4GHz Celeron with
> 512MB RAM and two 40GB, PATA disks. Right now I'm running
> both
i remember when i first started using freebsd about 2 months ago, the first
kernel i built, i did the ULE (at some articles recommendataion). but, ive
not done it since. i guess i have been noticing a bit of lag on my system
(amd 1800mhz 512rdram, u160 scsi raid0), but nothing unacceptable.
h
On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 01:42:40PM +0300, Andrew P. wrote:
> On 11/5/05, Albert Shih <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi anybody
> >
> > All is in the subject...on FreeBSD 6.0 i've see the default generic kernel
> > is compiled with SCHED_4BSD and SCHED_ULE is in comment.
> >
> > Can'I use SCHED_ULE
On 11/5/05, Albert Shih <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi anybody
>
> All is in the subject...on FreeBSD 6.0 i've see the default generic kernel
> is compiled with SCHED_4BSD and SCHED_ULE is in comment.
>
> Can'I use SCHED_ULE on 6.0 ? Is he stable now ?
>
> Regards.
> --
> Albert SHIH
> Universite
11 matches
Mail list logo