Re: Applications using hard disk too often
Kevin Kinsey wrote: Frank J. Laszlo wrote: Michael Tuchman wrote: I am running freeBSD 5.4 stable on a P133 box with 128 Mb ram. Although I don't think I'm overloading the system, it seems that my system is using virtual memory too often. Admittedly, this is a subjective question where 'too often' means only 'more often than I remember with other *nix-like operating environments on even weaker machines'. Without some clue as to what the system is doing, IMHO it's difficult for anyone to speculate why you'd be "swapping" so much. FreeBSD uses all the memory it has because the designers know that "free memory is wasted memory" ... I don't know where that statement originated, but you'll hear it from FreeBSD programmers if you keep your ears open. One possibility is that you have actually configured **too much swap space** (Joshua Coombs, http://www.bsdnews.org/03/tuning.pdf). I'd also have to say that I'd consider this box to be a tad slow for a workstation unless your graphical environment was rather lightweight. I've tried GNOME2 on an AMD K6-2 475 with 128 MB and it just crawled. It's slightly better with XFCE, but to get much performance from a box like that I'd recommend black/fluxbox or something equally easy on the resources. If this isn't a graphical environment, then something *is* wrong, I'd think. Can anybody offer advice on memory management, appropriate places to read in the documentation, or other useful links? Advice: with 128MB of RAM, don't open 127MB PDF files Reading: Chapter 2 of McCusick's "Design & Implementation": http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/design-44bsd/index.html and tuning(7) are a couple of canonical resources. Google is always your friend, also. I apologize if that seems like "RTFM, newb"; it's just that IANAE and don't play one on the Internet, either. I realize that the answer is 'it depends', so what I am asking is really * How can I find out if I change this annoying behavior for the better? Experiment? Add RAM; take away RAM; add more swap; take away some swap. Of course, not all of those could be called exactly 'trivial' to the system. * Would upgrading to 6.0 help? Possibly, but without knowing the cause it's hard to say for sure; IOW, no silver bullet there. This is an experimental box only. There is no critical data on it, so data loss is not an issue when considering options. The 5.x series was a "transition" release, to ease the pain between 4.x and 6.x. Hmm, I wonder. 4.X to 5.X wasn't completely "painless", (at least, you had to take some pains to get it right), so I might contest this. Any further discussion or speculation on this would place this posting in the political rather than technical realm, which I am loathe to do. For one reason or another, 6.X is out. 6.X is good. AFAIAC, 5.X was also good and 4.X was good too. I would recommend going up to 6.0 (or 6.1, But I have not yet tested it) Doing a fresh install would probably be in your best interest. The transition from 5.4 to 6.X is quite trivial; the only reason a "fresh install" might benefit is if the OP has too much swap and wants to configure less during slicing. It's also possible that doing a fresh install of 6.0 would fix the problem, but teach us nothing about the situation we'd hoped to learn from?? I suggested a fresh install due to the fact that 6.0 has improved FS support. Including multi threading capabilities. And yes, the upgrade from 4.x -> 5.x was a PITA, But imagine the pain involved with a 4.x -> 6.x upgrade. ;) -Frank ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Applications using hard disk too often
Frank J. Laszlo wrote: Michael Tuchman wrote: I am running freeBSD 5.4 stable on a P133 box with 128 Mb ram. Although I don't think I'm overloading the system, it seems that my system is using virtual memory too often. Admittedly, this is a subjective question where 'too often' means only 'more often than I remember with other *nix-like operating environments on even weaker machines'. Without some clue as to what the system is doing, IMHO it's difficult for anyone to speculate why you'd be "swapping" so much. FreeBSD uses all the memory it has because the designers know that "free memory is wasted memory" ... I don't know where that statement originated, but you'll hear it from FreeBSD programmers if you keep your ears open. One possibility is that you have actually configured **too much swap space** (Joshua Coombs, http://www.bsdnews.org/03/tuning.pdf). I'd also have to say that I'd consider this box to be a tad slow for a workstation unless your graphical environment was rather lightweight. I've tried GNOME2 on an AMD K6-2 475 with 128 MB and it just crawled. It's slightly better with XFCE, but to get much performance from a box like that I'd recommend black/fluxbox or something equally easy on the resources. If this isn't a graphical environment, then something *is* wrong, I'd think. Can anybody offer advice on memory management, appropriate places to read in the documentation, or other useful links? Advice: with 128MB of RAM, don't open 127MB PDF files Reading: Chapter 2 of McCusick's "Design & Implementation": http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/design-44bsd/index.html and tuning(7) are a couple of canonical resources. Google is always your friend, also. I apologize if that seems like "RTFM, newb"; it's just that IANAE and don't play one on the Internet, either. I realize that the answer is 'it depends', so what I am asking is really * How can I find out if I change this annoying behavior for the better? Experiment? Add RAM; take away RAM; add more swap; take away some swap. Of course, not all of those could be called exactly 'trivial' to the system. * Would upgrading to 6.0 help? Possibly, but without knowing the cause it's hard to say for sure; IOW, no silver bullet there. This is an experimental box only. There is no critical data on it, so data loss is not an issue when considering options. The 5.x series was a "transition" release, to ease the pain between 4.x and 6.x. Hmm, I wonder. 4.X to 5.X wasn't completely "painless", (at least, you had to take some pains to get it right), so I might contest this. Any further discussion or speculation on this would place this posting in the political rather than technical realm, which I am loathe to do. For one reason or another, 6.X is out. 6.X is good. AFAIAC, 5.X was also good and 4.X was good too. I would recommend going up to 6.0 (or 6.1, But I have not yet tested it) Doing a fresh install would probably be in your best interest. The transition from 5.4 to 6.X is quite trivial; the only reason a "fresh install" might benefit is if the OP has too much swap and wants to configure less during slicing. It's also possible that doing a fresh install of 6.0 would fix the problem, but teach us nothing about the situation we'd hoped to learn from?? Also running a custom kernel will ease some of the overhead, if you aren't already doing that. Remove anything from the kernel you do not use, etc.. Absolutely. But, be careful and read the config files carefully, or we'll be hearing from you that your kernel won't compile There are numerous documents for doing this. The freebsd handbook is a excellent resource for both newbies and seasoned system admins. (http://www.freebsd.org/handbook) The output of `ps uxaww` will give us more of an idea of what you can get rid of as far as running daemons. Hope this helps. -Frank Good advice. Michael: tell us more about the system? Kevin Kinsey -- We don't care how they do it in New York. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Applications using hard disk too often
Michael Tuchman wrote: I am running freeBSD 5.4 stable on a P133 box with 128 Mb ram. Although I don't think I'm overloading the system, it seems that my system is using virtual memory too often. Admittedly, this is a subjective question where 'too often' means only 'more often than I remember with other *nix-like operating environments on even weaker machines'. Can anybody offer advice on memory management, appropriate places to read in the documentation, or other useful links? I realize that the answer is 'it depends', so what I am asking is really * How can I find out if I change this annoying behavior for the better? * Would upgrading to 6.0 help? This is an experimental box only. There is no critical data on it, so data loss is not an issue when considering options. The 5.x series was a "transition" release, to ease the pain between 4.x and 6.x. I would recommend going up to 6.0 (or 6.1, But I have not yet tested it) Doing a fresh install would probably be in your best interest. Also running a custom kernel will ease some of the overhead, if you aren't already doing that. Remove anything from the kernel you do not use, etc.. There are numerous documents for doing this. The freebsd handbook is a excellent resource for both newbies and seasoned system admins. (http://www.freebsd.org/handbook) The output of `ps uxaww` will give us more of an idea of what you can get rid of as far as running daemons. Hope this helps. -Frank ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Applications starting problem (from /usr/local/etc/rc.d/) after upgrade
> I'm not sure we are talking about the same thing. Is the "x" > executable bit set when you do an ls -l in /usr/local/etc/rc.d? > > # ls -l /usr/local/etc/rc.d > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel635 Jun 15 05:58 apache.sh >^ ^ ^ > > Are these bits set for all of the scripts in the directory? > > -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA As I said - yes, they are: (%:/usr/local/etc/rc.d)- ls -lCzwartek 06:24:23 total 18 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel50 23 Maj 14:42 000.compat4x.sh -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 181 24 Cze 23:50 000.mysql-client.sh -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 248 13 Lip 19:11 000.pkgtools.sh -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 1809 21 Lip 20:30 apache2.sh -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 407 31 Maj 20:29 apache2.sh.orig -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 227 9 Lip 14:27 helix.sh -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 549 24 Cze 23:41 mysql-server.sh -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 550 24 Cze 13:48 oidentd.sh -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 558 21 Lip 20:23 pure-ftpd.sh ([EMAIL PROTECTED])(110/ttyp0)(06:24P:07/22/04)- (%:/usr/local/etc/rc.d)- ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Applications starting problem (from /usr/local/etc/rc.d/) after upgrade
On Thu, 22 Jul 2004, /root/of/all/evil wrote: On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 05:12:27PM -0600, Warren Block wrote: On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, /root/of/all/evil wrote: The only daemon (called application somwhere in my mail) that starts normally during system boot is apache2. Rest of them does not boot normally, but if I add them (I mean 'them' == the full path to their starting scripts in /usr/local/etc/rc.d/) to the end of apache`s script, then they are starting.. Are they all set to executable (chmod +x)? Yes, they all are executable - if I add them to the end of the only script that is starting normally (wich i s apache2 in this case) they execute normally and the deamons are starting. But leaving them in /usr/local/etc/rc.d/ just do nothing. I'm not sure we are talking about the same thing. Is the "x" executable bit set when you do an ls -l in /usr/local/etc/rc.d? # ls -l /usr/local/etc/rc.d -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel635 Jun 15 05:58 apache.sh ^ ^ ^ Are these bits set for all of the scripts in the directory? -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Applications starting problem (from /usr/local/etc/rc.d/) after upgrade
On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 05:12:27PM -0600, Warren Block wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, /root/of/all/evil wrote: > > >The only daemon (called application somwhere in my mail) that starts > >normally during > >system boot is apache2. Rest of them does not boot normally, but if I add > >them (I mean > >'them' == the full path to their starting scripts in /usr/local/etc/rc.d/) > >to the end of > >apache`s script, then they are starting.. > > Are they all set to executable (chmod +x)? > > -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA Yes, they all are executable - if I add them to the end of the only script that is starting normally (wich i s apache2 in this case) they execute normally and the deamons are starting. But leaving them in /usr/local/etc/rc.d/ just do nothing. :( Any ideas? r. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Applications starting problem (from /usr/local/etc/rc.d/) afterupgrade
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004, /root/of/all/evil wrote: The only daemon (called application somwhere in my mail) that starts normally during system boot is apache2. Rest of them does not boot normally, but if I add them (I mean 'them' == the full path to their starting scripts in /usr/local/etc/rc.d/) to the end of apache`s script, then they are starting.. Are they all set to executable (chmod +x)? -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Applications starting problem (from /usr/local/etc/rc.d/) afterupgrade
The only daemon (called application somwhere in my mail) that starts normally during system boot is apache2. Rest of them does not boot normally, but if I add them (I mean 'them' == the full path to their starting scripts in /usr/local/etc/rc.d/) to the end of apache`s script, then they are starting.. r. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: applications
On Wednesday 03 September 2003 12:01 pm, Doug Love wrote: > A friend recommends your OS over Linux for my home system. > I've taken a 2 day Linux Admin course, and know just about that much. > I don't see a quick answer on your webpages to my questions. > Where can I find > A Database similar to Access You will not find this yet. The KDE project is working on an application called Kexi, that is similar to Access in that it is a desktop database system (using a very small, lightweight SQL backend). There is a similar commercial application from thekompany.com, but I have no idea if it would run on FreeBSD, even under Linux compat. > Spreadsheets Gnumeric. OpenOffice has one as does KOffice. > Pkzip > There are more compression tools than you can shake a stick at :) -- Todd Stephens ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: applications
On Wednesday 03 September 2003 11:01 am, Doug Love wrote: > A friend recommends your OS over Linux for my home system. > I've taken a 2 day Linux Admin course, and know just about that much. > I don't see a quick answer on your webpages to my questions. > Where can I find >Fortran > Basic > A Database similar to Access There are no products similar to MS Access. MS Access is a **desktop** database with good connectivity and some **nifty** RAD/GUI tools. Even with Codeweaver's CrossOffice 2.0, however, MS Access has memory problems running on Linux. (This is from personal experience.) Database servers include PostgreSQL and MySQL (there are others). If you tend to push your hardware limits, I recommend PostgreSQL on FreeBSD over either database on Linux. (I've tried both databases on Linux and FreeBSD on the same hardware. Your Mileage May Vary.) Privilege administration is easier in MySQL since it allows the use of wildcards in place of database and table names. MySQL, however, does not have a boolean (true/false, yes/no) data type. ODBC drivers are available for both PostgreSQL and MySQL. Using MS Access as a GUI, client to PostgreSQL or MySQL works very well for applications and data analysis; but is not a good choice for database server administration. > Spreadsheets Spreadsheet programs include gnumeric, OpenOffice and Kspread. > Pkzip There are various compression utilities. I actually prefer to use gzip on the command line in both FreeBSD and Windows. There is also a GUI gzip for Windows: wingz. > > I hear a lot about the system being a server, but all I need to do is > browse the web and use email similar to Netscape. How easy is it to set > up? Install a desktop and run Mozilla, which is at the core of Netscape. It will look very familiar. It includes the browser, email client, etc. Be Advised: There is a Supply-Side Economics aspect to FreeBSD. You may find that the possibilities increase your "needs".;-) > > -- > Douglas L. Love, Database Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] > UMUC Faculty Recruitment > SFSC Room 3271FPhone: 301 985 7071 > 3501 University Blvd. East Fax: 301 985 7075 > Adelphi, MD 20783 Have fun, Andrew Gould ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: applications
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 12:01:58PM -0400, Doug Love wrote: > A friend recommends your OS over Linux for my home system. > I've taken a 2 day Linux Admin course, and know just about that much. > I don't see a quick answer on your webpages to my questions. > Where can I find >Fortran f77 -- part of gcc, comes with the base system. > Basic Various ports: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/url.cgi?ports/lang/bwbasic/pkg-descr http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/url.cgi?ports/lang/pbasic/pkg-descr http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/url.cgi?ports/lang/yabasic/pkg-descr > A Database similar to Access Well, there are a few to choose from in http://www.freebsd.org/ports/databases.html. The most popular are: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/url.cgi?ports/databases/mysql40-server/pkg-descr http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/url.cgi?ports/databases/postgresql7/pkg-descr But those are full-featured RDBMSes, and probably a bit too heavyweight for your purposes. > Spreadsheets http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/url.cgi?ports/math/gnumeric2/pkg-descr http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/url.cgi?ports/editors/openoffice/pkg-descr > Pkzip http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/url.cgi?ports/archivers/zip/pkg-descr > I hear a lot about the system being a server, but all I need to do is > browse the web and use email similar to Netscape. How easy is it to set > up? In my opinion, not that hard at all. Of course I've been using FreeBSD day in, day out for many years so I would say that, wouldn't I? It will be a learning experience if you've never used a Unixoid system before -- in which case, it would be a good idea to pick up one of the many fine FreeBSD guide books of which a selection can be found here: http://www.freebsdmall.com/cgi-bin/fm/search?id=qoBA4QWC&mv_pc=6 Greg Lehey's "The Complete FreeBSD", 4th Ed. is I think the latest available, but there are 3 or 4 alternatives covering similar ground, such as "FreeBSD Unleashed" by Michael Urban or "Absolute BSD: The Ultimate Guide to FreeBSD" by Michael Lucas. Not forgetting the Handbook, which is on-line at: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/index.html Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: applications
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 12:01, Doug Love wrote: > A friend recommends your OS over Linux for my home system. > I've taken a 2 day Linux Admin course, and know just about that much. > I don't see a quick answer on your webpages to my questions. > Where can I find >Fortran > Basic > A Database similar to Access > Spreadsheets > Pkzip You can search the FreeBSD ports collection here: http://www.freebsd.org/ports/ http://www.freshports.org/ As for databases, I'd recommend using PostgreSQL with a nice GUI/web frontend. There are several available that works on FreeBSD, including PGAccess and phpPgAdmin. However, I would NEVER consider PostgreSQL to be "similar to Access". That'd be a huge insult to PostgreSQL. For spreadsheet, there's none better than gnumeric2. I think you'll be very happy with that one. For compression utilities, you'll find yourself using tar, bzip2, gzip, zip, and unzip, which are all included in the base OS. There's also a RAR compression tool in the ports, if you need it. > I hear a lot about the system being a server, but all I need to do is > browse the web and use email similar to Netscape. How easy is it to set > up? FreeBSD is a fantastic OS for a workstation. For web browsing, I'd recommend either Galeon2 or Epiphany, depending on your needs. For email, go for either Evolution or Sylpheed, or the new Thunderbird port (once it's available). It's quite simple to set up, and there are dozens of pages out there to pretty much hold your hand on every step. You'll just need to make the effort to search and read! -- Adam McLaurin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: applications
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003 09:26:30 -0700, "Joshua Oreman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 12:01:58PM -0400 or thereabouts, Doug Love wrote: > > A friend recommends your OS over Linux for my home system. > > I've taken a 2 day Linux Admin course, and know just about that much. > > I don't see a quick answer on your webpages to my questions. > > Where can I find > >Fortran > > Basic > > Search the ports; I don't know about those languages. Here's a web page with links to the various categories in which the 9037+ applications ported to FreeBSD can be found: http://www.freebsd.org/ports/index.html> In addition to the search function on that page, Google, Google Groups and any other search engine you like may be of help. Jud ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: applications
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 12:01:58PM -0400 or thereabouts, Doug Love wrote: > A friend recommends your OS over Linux for my home system. > I've taken a 2 day Linux Admin course, and know just about that much. > I don't see a quick answer on your webpages to my questions. > Where can I find >Fortran > Basic Search the ports; I don't know about those languages. > A Database similar to Access But without the pretty interface? Try MySQL. With a pretty web-based interface? MySQL + phpmyadmin. > Spreadsheets Gnumeric or OpenOffice spreadsheet or KSpread (part of KOffice) > Pkzip There's a program called `zip' and one called `unzip' in ports. > > I hear a lot about the system being a server, but all I need to do is > browse the web and use email similar to Netscape. How easy is it to set > up? Pretty easy. For Web browser use KDE Konqueror, Mozilla, Galeon, Opera, or Dillo; for mail use KMail, Mozilla, Thunderbird (not in ports yet but should be someday), Sylpheed, or Evolution; if you want console-based email (VERY clean but a bit... err... different) try mutt or pine. By your program descriptions above it seems you've come from Windows. I think you'll find the KDE desktop most familiar (GNOME works too). -- Josh ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Applications crash in KDE
Thx a lot Antoine. Recompiling qt -DWITHOUT_OPENGL did the trick. /Geir. On Friday 01 August 2003 22.53, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > Selon Hasse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Yes, downloaded from http://www.nvidia.com > > Didn't get the one from ports to build. > > It seems like something got built threaded, that's not supposed to. > > /Geir. > > OK, so you have to recompile qt (and kde) with the following option: > -DWITHOUT_OPENGL > > Antoine -- Best Regards Hasse. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Applications crash in KDE
That will be KDE-Base ? /Geir. On Friday 01 August 2003 22.53, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > Selon Hasse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Yes, downloaded from http://www.nvidia.com > > Didn't get the one from ports to build. > > It seems like something got built threaded, that's not supposed to. > > /Geir. > > OK, so you have to recompile qt (and kde) with the following option: > -DWITHOUT_OPENGL > > Antoine > ___ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -- Best Regards Hasse. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Applications crash in KDE
Hi Antoine. Will do. Thx a lot. /Geir. On Friday 01 August 2003 22.53, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > Selon Hasse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Yes, downloaded from http://www.nvidia.com > > Didn't get the one from ports to build. > > It seems like something got built threaded, that's not supposed to. > > /Geir. > > OK, so you have to recompile qt (and kde) with the following option: > -DWITHOUT_OPENGL > > Antoine > ___ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Applications crash in KDE
Selon Hasse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Yes, downloaded from http://www.nvidia.com > Didn't get the one from ports to build. > It seems like something got built threaded, that's not supposed to. > /Geir. OK, so you have to recompile qt (and kde) with the following option: -DWITHOUT_OPENGL Antoine ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Applications crash in KDE
Yes, downloaded from http://www.nvidia.com Didn't get the one from ports to build. It seems like something got built threaded, that's not supposed to. /Geir. On Friday 01 August 2003 22.25, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Friday 01 August 2003 21:02, Hasse Hund wrote: > > Below are a snip from the Crash-handler. > > Are you using the NVidia binary drivers ? > > - -- > Antoine Jacoutot > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.lphp.org > PGP/GnuPG key: http://www.lphp.org/ressources/ajacoutot.asc > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) > > iD8DBQE/KsyuY3Hnhkr+5cQRAjR1AJ9Foy2noxiC32uIP3e7kF3+KivHowCcCyFV > FuHBqvR7IYLUm+cpfPd13lQ= > =DW5r > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > > ___ > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -- Best Regards Hasse. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Applications crash in KDE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 01 August 2003 21:02, Hasse Hund wrote: > Below are a snip from the Crash-handler. Are you using the NVidia binary drivers ? - -- Antoine Jacoutot [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lphp.org PGP/GnuPG key: http://www.lphp.org/ressources/ajacoutot.asc -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/KsyuY3Hnhkr+5cQRAjR1AJ9Foy2noxiC32uIP3e7kF3+KivHowCcCyFV FuHBqvR7IYLUm+cpfPd13lQ= =DW5r -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
