On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 09:22:25AM +0200, Roland Smith wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 10:54:29PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
> > is there any way t o not upgrade "all installed ports", but only
> > those that are not current?
>
> portmaster -a -B -d
>
> > tired of having my main box
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 10:54:29PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote:
> is there any way t o not upgrade "all installed ports", but only
> those that are not current?
portmaster -a -B -d
> tired of having my main box grinding away for endless days
:-)
Roland
--
R.F.Smith
Gary Kline writes:
> is there any way t o not upgrade "all installed ports", but only
> those that are not current?
>
> tired of having my main box grinding away for endless days
portupgrade -akOP does the trick here.
The time taken depends in large part on how many po
Gary Kline wrote:
is there any way t o not upgrade "all installed ports", but only
those that are not current?
tired of having my main box grinding away for endless days
This is what programs like portmaster and portupgrade are designed to
do. If you update your ports
Gary Kline wrote:
is there any way t o not upgrade "all installed ports", but only
those that are not current?
portsnap fetch update && portupgrade -a
or you could
portsnap fetch update && pkg_version -v
.. and update the ports of your choice that are not up-to-date with the
por
On Sun, 12 Apr 2009, Gary Kline wrote:
is there any way t o not upgrade "all installed ports", but only
those that are not current?
What are you using to upgrade "all installed ports" that rebuilds ports that
are current?
This shouldn't happen with portupgrade or other port ma
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 11:54 PM, Gary Kline wrote:
>is there any way t o not upgrade "all installed ports", but only
>those that are not current?
>
>tired of having my main box grinding away for endless days
>
>gary
>
>
>
>
> --
> Gary Kline kl...@thought.or
