Re: libc version
Ok thank you for your answer... the "problem" is in the postgres code and not in a compile switch or something like that... I will upgrade all my 8.2 to 8.3... systems to do this, I build an 8.3 from ground zero, and than do a rsync from this one to the others, directories: /usr/obj /usr/src than... on each target, a make installworld installkernel should do the upgrade... Any comments?? Sergio ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: libc version
> From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Mon Jun 18 08:21:38 2012 > From: Sergio de Almeida Lenzi > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 10:20:09 -0300 > Subject: libc version > > Hello... > > I upgrade the server from version 8.2 to 8.3, and rebuild all packages.. > it all works... > > Then I installed a binary package (8.3) in an old 8.2 ... > every package works... gnome, nautilus, wget about 800 of them > the only one that does not work is postgesql84-server > when I try to run it it I got the message: > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /lib/libc.so.7: version FBSD_1.3 required > by /usr/local/bin/postgres not found > > seems that only postgres is check for the libc version??? INCORRECT. Postgres is jjust the only one of those programs that _requires_ a 'minimum' version level that is newer than the one installed. > is there a compile switch to check for that??? No. > Of course, if I compile postgres in the 8.2 or upgrade to 8.3 it > works... Naturally. "do it right and it will work'. The required _minimum_ version of a runtime library is specified in the program source code -- because it uses features that did not exist in any version prior to that one. There is *NO* way to tell _at_compile_time_ what version of a runtome library will be present when the program is executed. The 'compiled on 8.3' Postgres binary requires a newer version of libc than exists in 8.2. Compile on 8.2 and it builds using diferent code that does not require the newer libc feature. hence the 8.2-compiled code works on 8.2. The solution to your problem, as you found, is to _not_ use 'more current' binaries in 'down-rev' environments. "upward compatibility" is almost always present in a package. "backward compatibility" is *always* a crap-shoot. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: libc regex word-boundary support fallen-off?
RW writes: > I've noticed for some time that claws-mail and less (which I think use > libc's regex(3)) don't support word boundaries in searches. I might be > delusional, but I think I've used \b in the past in both of those > applications in FreeBSD. > > According to regex(3) it's an implementation POSIX.2, so the feature > needn't be supported, but at the bottom of the page it says > "word-boundary matching is a bit of a kludge", so presumably it has > been. > > Does anyone know what's going on? > > > I switched from i386 to amd64 last year so it might be something to do > with that. I'm currently using 8.2p6. The only way I have found to do it is [[:<:]] and [[:>:]]. That is very awkward, so I't love to hear of a shorter way. I found them in the re_format(7) manpage. -- Carl Johnsonca...@peak.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: libc or OpenSSL patches break ssh?
On Wednesday 22 April 2009 20:11:09 Jake Evans wrote: > Am running 6.4-PRERELEASE. > > Received FreeBSD-SA-09:07.libc / FreeBSD-SA-09:08.openssl notifications > today, applied applicable patches correctly. > > However, now when anyone attempts to connect to my server via SSH, the > connection is closed after they enter their login & password. > > /var/log/messages says the following when they try to login: > > Apr 22 12:53:12 x sshd[75505]: fatal: openpty returns device for which > ttyname fails. > Apr 22 12:53:12 x sshd[75505]: error: chown 0 0 failed: No such file or > directory > Apr 22 12:53:12 x sshd[75505]: error: chmod 0666 failed: No such file or > directory You did a full buildworld and restarted sshd, or just updated openssl? -- Mel ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: libc or OpenSSL patches break ssh?
Figured it out. The libc patch instructions don't tell you to rebuild libutil. You need to do that. On Wed, 22 Apr 2009, Jake Evans wrote: Am running 6.4-PRERELEASE. Received FreeBSD-SA-09:07.libc / FreeBSD-SA-09:08.openssl notifications today, applied applicable patches correctly. However, now when anyone attempts to connect to my server via SSH, the connection is closed after they enter their login & password. /var/log/messages says the following when they try to login: Apr 22 12:53:12 x sshd[75505]: fatal: openpty returns device for which ttyname fails. Apr 22 12:53:12 x sshd[75505]: error: chown 0 0 failed: No such file or directory Apr 22 12:53:12 x sshd[75505]: error: chmod 0666 failed: No such file or directory ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: libc documentation
In the last episode (Dec 20), Robe said: > I need to know where I can find the full documentation of the last > libc library. Most of the libc documentation should be in /usr/src/lib/libc/ . Any file ending in .2 or .3 is a manpage. They are also installed in /usr/share/man and are available using the "man" command. Run "man 3 printf", for example. -- Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: libc
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 12:39:11PM +0200, Chris Knipe wrote: > Lo all, > > Is there anywhere that I can see what has changed from FreeBSD 4.11 to > FreeBSD 5.x, in regards to libc ? The CVS logs are public, e.g. http://cvsweb.freebsd.org/, but there are literally thousands of changes. Kris pgprIGyEfnh9P.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: libc (?)
> No you can't - it relies on the 5.1 kernel. OK, well I wasn't sure how much things had changed as far as the ABI goes, so I didn't want to rule it out. Ken ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: libc (?)
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 12:16:59AM +0930, james wrote: > G'day > > Probably a really stupid question - but is there a compatability port of some > sort for 4.x systems so we can run things compiled for 5.x ? :-) Why do you think you need this? The same packages are provided for 4.x systems. Kris pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: libc (?)
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 10:51:40AM -0400, Kenneth Culver wrote: > > Probably a really stupid question - but is there a compatability port of > > some sort for 4.x systems so we can run things compiled for 5.x ? :-) > > No, but you can go the other way around. You MIGHT be able to use the 5.x > libc directly on 4.x, but I wouldn't recommend it. No you can't - it relies on the 5.1 kernel. Kris pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: libc (?)
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003 00:16:59 +0930 "james" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, > Probably a really stupid question - but is there a compatability port > of some sort for 4.x systems so we can run things compiled for 5.x ? > :-) I fail to see how that could be useful, even if it worked. You can build ports on your 4.x system, and you can use packages on it too. I recommend you installing portupgrade if you haven't already. The you can use cvsup and portupgrade with the -Pp options to use packages if you don't feel compiling stuff yourself. Note that there's not a specific 4.x or 5.x ports tree, ports are ports are ports. Cheers, -- Miguel Mendez - [EMAIL PROTECTED] EnergyHQ :: http://www.energyhq.tk Tired of Spam? -> http://www.trustic.com pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: libc (?)
> Probably a really stupid question - but is there a compatability port of > some sort for 4.x systems so we can run things compiled for 5.x ? :-) No, but you can go the other way around. You MIGHT be able to use the 5.x libc directly on 4.x, but I wouldn't recommend it. Ken ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: libc (?)
G'day Probably a really stupid question - but is there a compatability port of some sort for 4.x systems so we can run things compiled for 5.x ? :-) regards james On Wed, 2 Jul 2003 16:40:30 +0200, Miguel Mendez wrote > On Wed, 2 Jul 2003 23:46:16 +0930 > "james" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~] > > /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libc.so.5" not found > > > > How would I fix this? - what do I compile etc that will remove this > > error message? > > Sounds like you've installed a 5.x package on a 4.x system. You cannot > do that. > > > I did a buildworld a while ago to 4.8 stable, and ever since then I've > > received this error message (ie, amavis doesn't work anymore :-( > > Are you installing packages for -CURRENT? Using ports? If a program is > asking for libc.so.5 it means it was compiled for 5.x. > > Cheers, > -- > Miguel Mendez - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > EnergyHQ :: http://www.energyhq.tk > Tired of Spam? -> http://www.trustic.com -- Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org) ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: libc (?)
On Wed, 2 Jul 2003 23:46:16 +0930 "james" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~] > /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libc.so.5" not found > > How would I fix this? - what do I compile etc that will remove this > error message? Sounds like you've installed a 5.x package on a 4.x system. You cannot do that. > I did a buildworld a while ago to 4.8 stable, and ever since then I've > received this error message (ie, amavis doesn't work anymore :-( Are you installing packages for -CURRENT? Using ports? If a program is asking for libc.so.5 it means it was compiled for 5.x. Cheers, -- Miguel Mendez - [EMAIL PROTECTED] EnergyHQ :: http://www.energyhq.tk Tired of Spam? -> http://www.trustic.com pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: libc tests
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 02:12:06PM -0700, Quinlan, Gerald F wrote: > We are looking to acquire or develop the capability to test for proper or > expected results for each LIBC function. Your help is appreciated. FreeBSD doesn't include anything comprehensive, except for a few regression tests for miscellaneous parts of the system in /usr/src/tools/regression/. The nearest thing to what you're asking for would be a compliance testing suite for one of the UNIX standards (except FreeBSD may not pass every test). Good luck, Kris pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
RE: libc tests
We are looking to acquire or develop the capability to test for proper or expected results for each LIBC function. Your help is appreciated. Gerry Quinlan SNL Department 9224 Scalable Systems Integration Phone 505-844-6568 Fax 505-845-7442 -Original Message- From: Kris Kennaway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 12:01 PM To: Quinlan, Gerald F Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; Kelly, Suzanne M Subject: Re: libc tests On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 10:50:32AM -0700, Quinlan, Gerald F wrote: > > We have acquired a copy of Version 4.7 of freeBSD on CD-ROM and are > searching for a way to test the libc functions. The LSB-VSX test suite from > The Open Group does not appear to meet our needs. Do you have any other > suggestions? Thanks for your help. What kind of tests are you hoping to perform? Kris To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Re: libc tests
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 10:50:32AM -0700, Quinlan, Gerald F wrote: > > We have acquired a copy of Version 4.7 of freeBSD on CD-ROM and are > searching for a way to test the libc functions. The LSB-VSX test suite from > The Open Group does not appear to meet our needs. Do you have any other > suggestions? Thanks for your help. What kind of tests are you hoping to perform? Kris pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
