On Monday 10 February 2003 16:49, Doug Poland wrote:
>
> nfsserver:/data /data nfs fsv3,intr,rdirplus,-r=32768,-w=32768,rw
>
> On the NFS server I have in my /etc/sysctl.conf:
> vfs.nfs.async=1
The -r=32768,-w=32768 options did improve the transfert a little bit.
I didn't put vfs.nfs.async=1 o
>> You may be able to increase the -r and -w sizes to improve
>> things.
>
> Yes, well I already tried that but it didn't work (it was even
> worse !)
>
>> My understanding is: you should use UDP mounts if the servers
>> are close together (i.e., one hub/switch between them, low
>> latency) but us
Search the archives ... I seem to remember this being discussed in great
> depth a few years ago.
>
> You may be able to increase the -r and -w sizes to improve things.
Yes, well I already tried that but it didn't work (it was even worse !)
> My understanding is: you should use UDP mounts if th
Selon Dan Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> In the last episode (Feb 09), Antoine Jacoutot said:
> > I wanted to know if someone could help me speed up NFS transfers with
> > FreeBSD-4.7-STABLE. With Linux clients+server, the transfers are
> > exactly twice faster than with freeBSD, so I am sure I mus
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 05:48:25PM -0600, Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Feb 09), Tillman said:
> > Which sysctl is this? The closest I can find is:
> >
> > # sysctl -a | grep nfs | grep sync
> > vfs.nfs.async: 0
>
> Same one. They split the server sysctls out into nfsrv in 5.*.
Tha
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 06:43:58PM -0500, Bill Moran wrote:
> Tillman wrote:
> > I'm getting about
> > 8.5-9 Megabytes/s on NFS reads from a Linux 2.4 client (on a 100Mbit
> > switched LAN) with it set to 0, as measured by Bonnie++. This is fairly
> > close to the 12MB/s fast ethernet theoretical m
In the last episode (Feb 09), Tillman said:
> Which sysctl is this? The closest I can find is:
>
> # sysctl -a | grep nfs | grep sync
> vfs.nfs.async: 0
Same one. They split the server sysctls out into nfsrv in 5.*.
> If that's the one, it may still not be necessary. I'm getting about
> 8.5-
Tillman wrote:
I'm getting about
8.5-9 Megabytes/s on NFS reads from a Linux 2.4 client (on a 100Mbit
switched LAN) with it set to 0, as measured by Bonnie++. This is fairly
close to the 12MB/s fast ethernet theoretical maximum, so I'm happy with
performance.
What did you change to get it runnin
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 01:28:39PM -0600, Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Feb 09), Antoine Jacoutot said:
> > I wanted to know if someone could help me speed up NFS transfers with
> > FreeBSD-4.7-STABLE. With Linux clients+server, the transfers are
> > exactly twice faster than with freeBS
Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
Hi !
I wanted to know if someone could help me speed up NFS transfers with
FreeBSD-4.7-STABLE.
With Linux clients+server, the transfers are exactly twice faster than with
freeBSD, so I am sure I must have screwed the configuration somewhere.
Here are the options used for
In the last episode (Feb 09), Antoine Jacoutot said:
> I wanted to know if someone could help me speed up NFS transfers with
> FreeBSD-4.7-STABLE. With Linux clients+server, the transfers are
> exactly twice faster than with freeBSD, so I am sure I must have
> screwed the configuration somewhere.
11 matches
Mail list logo
