Re: Registry corrupt?

2009-01-26 Thread Mel
On Monday 26 January 2009 03:27:43 Jack L. Stone wrote: At 04:27 PM 1.25.2009 -0900, you wrote: On Saturday 24 January 2009 04:06:39 Jack L. Stone wrote: At 04:33 PM 1.23.2009 +0100, cpghost wrote: On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 05:56:45PM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote: On Fri, Jan 23, 2009

Re: Registry corrupt?

2009-01-25 Thread Mel
On Saturday 24 January 2009 04:06:39 Jack L. Stone wrote: At 04:33 PM 1.23.2009 +0100, cpghost wrote: On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 05:56:45PM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote: On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Jack L. Stone ja...@sage-american.comwrote: During an upgrade from fbsd-6.3 --

Re: Registry corrupt?

2009-01-24 Thread Wojciech Puchar
describe something more. and what you mean rehash? Rehashing forces the shell to reinitialise (for want of a better term) so that it rechecks the path and can sometimes discover new programs installed if they don't seem to work. Alternatively you can exit and ok you mean shell rehashing. so

Re: Registry corrupt?

2009-01-24 Thread Jack L. Stone
At 04:33 PM 1.23.2009 +0100, cpghost wrote: On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 05:56:45PM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote: On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Jack L. Stone ja...@sage-american.comwrote: During an upgrade from fbsd-6.3 -- fbsd-7.0, something strange happened. Some of the programs will

Re: Registry corrupt?

2009-01-24 Thread Robert Huff
Jack L. Stone writes: Some programs will not run because of a library version bump. Those programs will need to be recompiled, i.e. rebuild all ports. You can check this by running 'ldd' on the specific program. Let's assume that you have zip installed: Thanks for that tip.

Re: Registry corrupt?

2009-01-24 Thread Jack L. Stone
At 07:06 AM 1.24.2009 -0600, Jack L. Stone wrote: At 04:33 PM 1.23.2009 +0100, cpghost wrote: On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 05:56:45PM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote: On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Jack L. Stone ja...@sage-american.comwrote: During an upgrade from fbsd-6.3 -- fbsd-7.0,

Re: Registry corrupt?

2009-01-24 Thread Jack L. Stone
At 07:29 AM 1.24.2009 -0600, Jack L. Stone wrote: At 07:06 AM 1.24.2009 -0600, Jack L. Stone wrote: At 04:33 PM 1.23.2009 +0100, cpghost wrote: On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 05:56:45PM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote: On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Jack L. Stone ja...@sage-american.comwrote:

Re: Registry corrupt?

2009-01-24 Thread Daniel Bye
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 07:53:47AM -0600, Jack L. Stone wrote: At 07:29 AM 1.24.2009 -0600, Jack L. Stone wrote: At 07:06 AM 1.24.2009 -0600, Jack L. Stone wrote: At 04:33 PM 1.23.2009 +0100, cpghost wrote: On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 05:56:45PM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote: On Fri, Jan 23,

Re: Registry corrupt?

2009-01-24 Thread Wojciech Puchar
Some of the programs will not run after rehash or even when given the precise path to the program. System doesn't see several but not all programs. I've upgraded several servers (using source files -- cvsup) withoug any such problem. It's just this one machine. BTW2: Yes, I do know this

Re: Registry corrupt?

2009-01-24 Thread Tim Judd
Jack L. Stone wrote: At 04:33 PM 1.23.2009 +0100, cpghost wrote: On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 05:56:45PM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote: On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Jack L. Stone ja...@sage-american.comwrote: During an upgrade from fbsd-6.3 -- fbsd-7.0, something strange happened. Some of

Re: Registry corrupt?

2009-01-24 Thread perryh
Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl wrote: describe something more. and what you mean rehash? Rehashing forces the shell to reinitialise (for want of a better term) so that it rechecks the path and can sometimes discover new programs installed if they don't seem to work ...

Registry corrupt?

2009-01-23 Thread Jack L. Stone
During an upgrade from fbsd-6.3 -- fbsd-7.0, something strange happened. Some of the programs will not run after rehash or even when given the precise path to the program. System doesn't see several but not all programs. I've upgraded several servers (using source files -- cvsup) withoug any such

Re: Registry corrupt?

2009-01-23 Thread Odhiambo Washington
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Jack L. Stone ja...@sage-american.comwrote: During an upgrade from fbsd-6.3 -- fbsd-7.0, something strange happened. Some of the programs will not run after rehash or even when given the precise path to the program. System doesn't see several but not all

Re: Registry corrupt?

2009-01-23 Thread Bill Moran
In response to Jack L. Stone ja...@sage-american.com: During an upgrade from fbsd-6.3 -- fbsd-7.0, something strange happened. Some of the programs will not run after rehash or even when given the precise path to the program. System doesn't see several but not all programs. I've upgraded

Re: Registry corrupt?

2009-01-23 Thread cpghost
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 05:56:45PM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote: On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Jack L. Stone ja...@sage-american.comwrote: During an upgrade from fbsd-6.3 -- fbsd-7.0, something strange happened. Some of the programs will not run after rehash or even when given the

Re: Registry corrupt?

2009-01-23 Thread Andreas Rudisch
On Fri, 23 Jan 2009 17:56:45 +0300 Odhiambo Washington odhia...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Jack L. Stone ja...@sage-american.comwrote: During an upgrade from fbsd-6.3 -- fbsd-7.0, something strange happened. Any ideas? You'll most likey have to reinstall all ports!

Re: Registry corrupt?

2009-01-23 Thread Wojciech Puchar
it's not windows. there are fortunately no registry in unix. your problem explanation is too short to help you. describe something more. and what you mean rehash? On Fri, 23 Jan 2009, Jack L. Stone wrote: During an upgrade from fbsd-6.3 -- fbsd-7.0, something strange happened. Some of the

Re: Registry corrupt?

2009-01-23 Thread Wojciech Puchar
withoug any such problem. It's just this one machine. Some programs will not run because of a library version bump. Those programs will need to be recompiled, i.e. rebuild all ports. it's as simple as installing compat6x from ports/misc ! ___

Re: Registry corrupt?

2009-01-23 Thread Daniel Bye
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 05:02:27PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: it's not windows. there are fortunately no registry in unix. your problem explanation is too short to help you. describe something more. and what you mean rehash? `rehash' is a builtin in some shells - csh and zsh come to

Re: Registry corrupt?

2009-01-23 Thread cpghost
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 05:03:06PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: withoug any such problem. It's just this one machine. Some programs will not run because of a library version bump. Those programs will need to be recompiled, i.e. rebuild all ports. it's as simple as installing compat6x

Re: Registry corrupt?

2009-01-23 Thread Da Rock
On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 17:02 +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: it's not windows. there are fortunately no registry in unix. your problem explanation is too short to help you. describe something more. and what you mean rehash? Rehashing forces the shell to reinitialise (for want of a better