Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-20:33.openssl

2020-12-14 Thread John Baldwin
On 12/14/20 4:37 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 11:44:27AM -0800, John Baldwin wrote: >> If we import 3.0.0 into, say, 13.2, then when 13.0/13.1 are EOLd we are >> no longer having to maintain 1.1.1 in 13. If people want to keep older >> applications built on unsupported

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-20:33.openssl

2020-12-14 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 11:44:27AM -0800, John Baldwin wrote: > If we import 3.0.0 into, say, 13.2, then when 13.0/13.1 are EOLd we are > no longer having to maintain 1.1.1 in 13. If people want to keep older > applications built on unsupported releases still working without > recompiling, etc.

FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-20:33.openssl [REVISED]

2020-12-14 Thread FreeBSD Security Advisories
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 = FreeBSD-SA-20:33.opensslSecurity Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic:

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-20:33.openssl

2020-12-14 Thread Wall, Stephen
As a party with a vested interest in FIPS, you can guess were I stand on replacing OpenSSL with some other crypto engine in FreeBSD.  ;) We are currently building FreeBSD 11.4 against a copy of the latest OpenSSL 1.0.2 release by diverting the build to a separate part of our source tree in

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-20:33.openssl

2020-12-14 Thread John Baldwin
On 12/12/20 4:57 PM, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > John Baldwin wrote this message on Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 11:40 -0800: >> On 12/10/20 10:46 PM, John-Mark Gurney wrote: >>> I have not heard if OpenSSL has bother to address the breakage of >>> /dev/crypto that also recently came up, but it does appear

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-20:33.openssl

2020-12-14 Thread Jung-uk Kim
On 20. 12. 14., Ed Maste wrote: > On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 at 11:46, Ed Maste wrote: >> >> On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 10:43, Wall, Stephen wrote: >>> A query: am I right that the patch doesn’t bump the OpenSSL version to 1.1.1.i ? >>> >>> That is correct. >> >> Further to that, OpenSSL 1.1.1i

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-20:33.openssl

2020-12-14 Thread Ed Maste
On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 at 11:46, Ed Maste wrote: > > On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 10:43, Wall, Stephen wrote: > > > > > A query: am I right that the patch doesn’t bump the OpenSSL version to > > > 1.1.1.i ? > > > > That is correct. > > Further to that, OpenSSL 1.1.1i includes some additional, minor >

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-20:33.openssl

2020-12-14 Thread Ed Maste
On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 10:43, Wall, Stephen wrote: > > > A query: am I right that the patch doesn’t bump the OpenSSL version to > > 1.1.1.i ? > > That is correct. Further to that, OpenSSL 1.1.1i includes some additional, minor changes beyond the vulnerability fix. 1.1.1i is now in HEAD (as of

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-20:33.openssl

2020-12-14 Thread Ed Maste
On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 at 18:03, FreeBSD Security Advisories wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > = > FreeBSD-SA-20:33.opensslSecurity Advisory >

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-20:33.openssl

2020-12-13 Thread John-Mark Gurney
Benjamin Kaduk wrote this message on Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 18:07 -0800: > On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 04:57:08PM -0800, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > > > > If FreeBSD is going to continue to use OpenSSL, better testing needs to > > be done to figure out such breakage earliers, and how to not have them > >

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-20:33.openssl

2020-12-13 Thread Gordon Tetlow via freebsd-security
On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 12:12:08PM +, John Long via freebsd-security wrote: > Hi Guys, > > What about adopting OpenBSD's libressl? I was expecting it to take a > long time to be compatible but from my uneducated point of view it > looks like they did an incredible job. I think everything on

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-20:33.openssl

2020-12-13 Thread John Long via freebsd-security
Hi Guys, What about adopting OpenBSD's libressl? I was expecting it to take a long time to be compatible but from my uneducated point of view it looks like they did an incredible job. I think everything on OpenBSD uses it. I was running OpenBSD until I put FreeBSD 12.2 on a new box, so I haven't

Re: Kerberos: base or port? [Was: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-20:33.openssl]

2020-12-13 Thread Andrea Venturoli
On 12/12/20 7:18 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: Having two different instances of libcrypto in the same address space is generally asking for trouble Of course. That's why I was always wary about switching to a newer/shinier OpenSSL from ports (wihtout eradicating the old one from base). You are

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-20:33.openssl

2020-12-12 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 04:57:08PM -0800, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > > If FreeBSD is going to continue to use OpenSSL, better testing needs to > be done to figure out such breakage earliers, and how to not have them > go undetected for so long. I don't think anyone would argue against increasing

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-20:33.openssl

2020-12-12 Thread John-Mark Gurney
John Baldwin wrote this message on Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 11:40 -0800: > On 12/10/20 10:46 PM, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > > FreeBSD Security Advisories wrote this message on Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at > > 23:03 +: > >> versions included in FreeBSD 12.x. This vulnerability is also known to > >> affect

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-20:33.openssl

2020-12-12 Thread The Doctor via freebsd-security
On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 11:40:13AM -0800, John Baldwin wrote: > On 12/10/20 10:46 PM, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > > FreeBSD Security Advisories wrote this message on Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at > > 23:03 +: > >> versions included in FreeBSD 12.x. This vulnerability is also known to > >> affect

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-20:33.openssl

2020-12-12 Thread John Baldwin
On 12/10/20 10:46 PM, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > FreeBSD Security Advisories wrote this message on Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 23:03 > +: >> versions included in FreeBSD 12.x. This vulnerability is also known to >> affect OpenSSL versions included in FreeBSD 11.4. However, the OpenSSL >> project is

Re: Kerberos: base or port? [Was: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-20:33.openssl]

2020-12-12 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 11:21:14AM +0100, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > On 12/11/20 9:23 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > > > It would be useful to give more specifics on the failures, as there's a few > > classes of things that can go wrong. > > I thought this would be OT in this thread, but I'll gladly

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-20:33.openssl

2020-12-12 Thread The Doctor via freebsd-security
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 01:36:13PM +0100, Tomasz CEDRO wrote: > On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:44 PM Franco Fichtner wrote: > > > On 11. Dec 2020, at 12:38 PM, Martin Simmons wrote: > > >> On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 22:46:28 -0800, John-Mark Gurney said: > > >> What are peoples thoughts on how to

Kerberos: base or port? [Was: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-20:33.openssl]

2020-12-12 Thread Andrea Venturoli
On 12/11/20 9:23 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: It would be useful to give more specifics on the failures, as there's a few classes of things that can go wrong. I thought this would be OT in this thread, but I'll gladly comply :) It doesn't look like openssl from ports attempts to support the

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-20:33.openssl

2020-12-12 Thread Tomasz CEDRO
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 1:57 PM Franco Fichtner wrote: > > On 11. Dec 2020, at 1:36 PM, Tomasz CEDRO wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:44 PM Franco Fichtner wrote: > >>> On 11. Dec 2020, at 12:38 PM, Martin Simmons wrote: > On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 22:46:28 -0800, John-Mark Gurney said: >

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-20:33.openssl

2020-12-12 Thread Tomasz CEDRO
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:44 PM Franco Fichtner wrote: > > On 11. Dec 2020, at 12:38 PM, Martin Simmons wrote: > >> On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 22:46:28 -0800, John-Mark Gurney said: > >> What are peoples thoughts on how to address the support mismatch between > >> FreeBSD and OpenSSL? And how to

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-20:33.openssl

2020-12-11 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 02:35:42PM -0800, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > Benjamin Kaduk wrote this message on Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:38 -0800: > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 10:46:28PM -0800, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > > > FreeBSD Security Advisories wrote this message on Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at > > > 23:03

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-20:33.openssl

2020-12-11 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 05:11:07AM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 06:42:13PM -0800, Gordon Tetlow via freebsd-security > wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 02:35:42PM -0800, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > > > Benjamin Kaduk wrote this message on Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:38

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-20:33.openssl

2020-12-11 Thread Konstantin Belousov
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 06:42:13PM -0800, Gordon Tetlow via freebsd-security wrote: > On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 02:35:42PM -0800, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > > Benjamin Kaduk wrote this message on Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:38 -0800: > > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 10:46:28PM -0800, John-Mark Gurney

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-20:33.openssl

2020-12-11 Thread Gordon Tetlow via freebsd-security
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 02:35:42PM -0800, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > Benjamin Kaduk wrote this message on Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:38 -0800: > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 10:46:28PM -0800, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > > > FreeBSD Security Advisories wrote this message on Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at > > > 23:03

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-20:33.openssl

2020-12-11 Thread John-Mark Gurney
Benjamin Kaduk wrote this message on Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:38 -0800: > On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 10:46:28PM -0800, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > > FreeBSD Security Advisories wrote this message on Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at > > 23:03 +: > > > versions included in FreeBSD 12.x. This vulnerability is

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-20:33.openssl

2020-12-11 Thread Franco Fichtner
Hi Ben, > On 11. Dec 2020, at 9:13 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > > Could you please clarify what you mean by "second tier crypto" and "first > tier crypto"? I'm having a hard time understanding this statement. Sorry for being unclear. First tier = base system crypto for ports Second tier =

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-20:33.openssl

2020-12-11 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
Hi John-Mark, On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 10:46:28PM -0800, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > FreeBSD Security Advisories wrote this message on Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 23:03 > +: > > versions included in FreeBSD 12.x. This vulnerability is also known to > > affect OpenSSL versions included in FreeBSD

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-20:33.openssl

2020-12-11 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 11:11:54AM +0100, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > On 12/10/20 12:03 AM, FreeBSD Security Advisories wrote: > > > Note: The OpenSSL project has published publicly available patches for > > versions included in FreeBSD 12.x. This vulnerability is also known to > > affect OpenSSL

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-20:33.openssl

2020-12-11 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
Hi Franco, On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 01:28:43PM +0100, Franco Fichtner wrote: > > > On 11. Dec 2020, at 13:20, Martin Simmons wrote: > > > > > > I'm talking about the binary packages from pkg.FreeBSD.org. Don't they > > always > > use the base OpenSSL at the moment? > > Yes, and if it would

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-20:33.openssl

2020-12-11 Thread John-Mark Gurney
Robert Schulze wrote this message on Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 10:14 +0100: > Hi, > > Am 11.12.20 um 07:46 schrieb John-Mark Gurney: > > > > Assuming 13 releases w/ OpenSSL, we'll be even in a worse situation > > than we are now. OpenSSL 3.0.0 has no support commitment announced > > yet, and

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-20:33.openssl

2020-12-11 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 13:28:43 +0100, Franco Fichtner said: > > > On 11. Dec 2020, at 13:20, Martin Simmons wrote: > > > >  > >> > >> On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 12:44:17 +0100, Franco Fichtner said: > >> > On 11. Dec 2020, at 12:38 PM, Martin Simmons > wrote: > >>> >

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-20:33.openssl

2020-12-11 Thread Franco Fichtner
> On 11. Dec 2020, at 1:36 PM, Tomasz CEDRO wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:44 PM Franco Fichtner wrote: >>> On 11. Dec 2020, at 12:38 PM, Martin Simmons wrote: On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 22:46:28 -0800, John-Mark Gurney said: What are peoples thoughts on how to address the

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-20:33.openssl

2020-12-11 Thread Franco Fichtner
> On 11. Dec 2020, at 13:20, Martin Simmons wrote: > >  >> >> On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 12:44:17 +0100, Franco Fichtner said: >> On 11. Dec 2020, at 12:38 PM, Martin Simmons wrote: >>> On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 22:46:28 -0800, John-Mark Gurney said: What are peoples

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-20:33.openssl

2020-12-11 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 12:44:17 +0100, Franco Fichtner said: > > > On 11. Dec 2020, at 12:38 PM, Martin Simmons wrote: > > > >> On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 22:46:28 -0800, John-Mark Gurney said: > >> > >> What are peoples thoughts on how to address the support mismatch between > >> FreeBSD and

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-20:33.openssl

2020-12-11 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 23:03:00 + (UTC), FreeBSD Security Advisories > said: > > Note: The OpenSSL project has published publicly available patches for > versions included in FreeBSD 12.x. This vulnerability is also known to > affect OpenSSL versions included in FreeBSD 11.4.

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-20:33.openssl

2020-12-11 Thread Franco Fichtner
> On 11. Dec 2020, at 12:38 PM, Martin Simmons wrote: > >> On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 22:46:28 -0800, John-Mark Gurney said: >> >> What are peoples thoughts on how to address the support mismatch between >> FreeBSD and OpenSSL? And how to address it? > > Maybe it would help a little if the

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-20:33.openssl

2020-12-11 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 22:46:28 -0800, John-Mark Gurney said: > > What are peoples thoughts on how to address the support mismatch between > FreeBSD and OpenSSL? And how to address it? Maybe it would help a little if the packages on pkg.FreeBSD.org all used the pkg version of OpenSSL?

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-20:33.openssl

2020-12-11 Thread Fabian Keil
Andrea Venturoli wrote on 2020-12-11: > On 12/10/20 12:03 AM, FreeBSD Security Advisories wrote: > > > Note: The OpenSSL project has published publicly available patches for > > versions included in FreeBSD 12.x. This vulnerability is also known to > > affect OpenSSL versions included in

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-20:33.openssl

2020-12-11 Thread Andrea Venturoli
On 12/10/20 12:03 AM, FreeBSD Security Advisories wrote: Note: The OpenSSL project has published publicly available patches for versions included in FreeBSD 12.x. This vulnerability is also known to affect OpenSSL versions included in FreeBSD 11.4. However, the OpenSSL project is only giving

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-20:33.openssl

2020-12-11 Thread Robert Schulze
Hi, Am 11.12.20 um 07:46 schrieb John-Mark Gurney: > > Assuming 13 releases w/ OpenSSL, we'll be even in a worse situation > than we are now. OpenSSL 3.0.0 has no support commitment announced > yet, and sticking with 1.1.1 for 13 will put us even in a worse > situation than we are today. > >

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-20:33.openssl

2020-12-10 Thread John-Mark Gurney
FreeBSD Security Advisories wrote this message on Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 23:03 +: > versions included in FreeBSD 12.x. This vulnerability is also known to > affect OpenSSL versions included in FreeBSD 11.4. However, the OpenSSL > project is only giving patches for that version to premium

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-20:33.openssl

2020-12-10 Thread Wall, Stephen
> A query: am I right that the patch doesn’t bump the OpenSSL version to > 1.1.1.i ? That is correct. - Steve Wall ___ freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security To unsubscribe, send any mail

Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-20:33.openssl

2020-12-10 Thread Bob Bishop
Hi, > On 9 Dec 2020, at 23:03, FreeBSD Security Advisories > wrote: > > Signed PGP part > = > FreeBSD-SA-20:33.opensslSecurity Advisory >

FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-20:33.openssl

2020-12-09 Thread FreeBSD Security Advisories
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 = FreeBSD-SA-20:33.opensslSecurity Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic: