Re: WITHOUT_KERNEL_SYMBOLS - *.ko now with debug_info

add Cc: current@ On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 02:17:11 +0100, "Herbert J. Skuhra" wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 11:11:08PM +0100, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote: > > Hi, > > > > since upgrading to stable/13 I was wondering why /boot/kernel is much > > larger. When

Re: WITHOUT_KERNEL_SYMBOLS - *.ko now with debug_info

On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 11:11:08PM +0100, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote: > Hi, > > since upgrading to stable/13 I was wondering why /boot/kernel is much > larger. When using "WITHOUT_KERNEL_SYMBOLS=" in /etc/src.conf the > kernel modules now contain debug_info. OK? (I manual

WITHOUT_KERNEL_SYMBOLS - *.ko now with debug_info

Hi, since upgrading to stable/13 I was wondering why /boot/kernel is much larger. When using "WITHOUT_KERNEL_SYMBOLS=" in /etc/src.conf the kernel modules now contain debug_info. OK? (I manually run "objcopy --strip-debug".) FreeBSD 13.0-STABLE #60 stable/13-n245000-12349e667ced: $ cat

Re: FreeBSD-EN-21:07.caroot.asc question

On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 06:42:17PM -0600, Greg Balfour wrote: > After installing the security and errata patches that came out today > on my 12.2-RELEASE system, I see the following during the "make > installworld" step. Is this the expected output after removing > certificates from the root

Re: /dev/crypto not being used in 12-STABLE

On Thu, 06 Dec 2018 20:19:44 +0100, John Nielsen wrote: > > I have upgraded two physical machines from 11-STABLE to 12-STABLE > recently (one is 12.0-PRERELEASE r341380 and the other is > 12.0-PRERELEASE r341391). I noticed today that neither machine seems > to be utilizing /dev/crypto. Typically

Re: Error building kernel on 10.3 (building ATH module)

On Sun, 20 Aug 2017 09:17:21 +0200, Aijaz Baig wrote: > > I am getting an error while compiling the kernel. The log is as follows: > > -- > >>> stage 3.1: making dependencies >

Re: r321601 causes make buildworld to fail on stable/11

On Thu, 27 Jul 2017, Trond Endrestøl wrote: r321601 gives me these error messages on stable/11: /usr/src/usr.sbin/acpi/acpidump/acpi.c:1089:6: error: use of undeclared identifier 'ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_GIC_ITS_AFFINITY'; did you mean 'ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_GICC_AFFINITY'?

Re: STABLE-11 make buildworld as non-root

Jonathan Chen skrev: > > Hi, > I recently updated to STABLE-11/amd64, r317665, and decided to see if > I could do a buildworld as a normal user (with a public /usr/obj). > Unfortunately, the "make buildworld" stopped with > > ... > ===> lib/libedit (cleandir) > rm -f common.h editline.c emacs.h

Re: make buildkernel does not respect KERNCONF or JOBS in /etc/make.conf

Ian Lepore skrev: > > On Tue, 2016-12-13 at 10:13 -0700, Ian Lepore wrote: >> On Tue, 2016-12-13 at 10:00 +, tech-lists wrote: >> > >> > On 12/12/2016 23:40, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote: >> > > >> > > >> > > PORTS_

Re: make buildkernel does not respect KERNCONF or JOBS in /etc/make.conf

Kevin Oberman skrev: > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Herbert J. Skuhra <herb...@mailbox.org> > wrote: > >> Kevin Oberman skrev: >> > >> > Clearly the documentation is a bit behind the times. For some time people >> > have used KERNCONF to

Re: make buildkernel does not respect KERNCONF or JOBS in /etc/make.conf

Kevin Oberman skrev: > > Clearly the documentation is a bit behind the times. For some time people > have used KERNCONF to build multiple kernels, but that was a lucky things > that was not officially supported. It just happened to work. Then, with > 11.0, it no longer did in many cases sue to

Re: make buildkernel does not respect KERNCONF or JOBS in /etc/make.conf

Kevin Oberman skrev: > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 1:16 AM, tech-lists wrote: >> On 12/12/2016 09:07, Thomas Mueller wrote: >> >>> My question is, do you build modules redundantly, or just once? >>> I don't want to build the same modules more than once. >>> >> >> For me -

Re: make buildkernel does not respect KERNCONF or JOBS in /etc/make.conf

tech-lists skrev: > > Hi, > > Yep I'm sure. The only extra I've added is for > nvidia-driver. Everything else is a "without" directive. My > /etc/src.conf looks like this: > > # less src.conf > PORTS_MODULES=x11/nvidia-driver > [...] > This is the error I get when I try to build kernel and

Re: make buildkernel does not respect KERNCONF or JOBS in /etc/make.conf

Scott Bennett skrev: > > On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 12:34:58 + tech-lists > wrote: > >> I have found that make buildkernel/installkernel does not respect >> KERNCONF= variables. It also doesn't respect MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER. It *DOES* >> however respect WITH_CCACHE_BUILD.

Re: make buildkernel does not respect KERNCONF or JOBS in /etc/make.conf

tech-lists wrote: > > Hello list, > I have found that make buildkernel/installkernel does not respect > KERNCONF= variables. It also doesn't respect MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER. It > *DOES* however respect WITH_CCACHE_BUILD. It's hard to say when the > behaviour changed to what it is, but it was sometime

Re: moving ezjail-based jails from 10.3 host to 11.0 host

Oliver Peter skrev: > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 03:37:08PM +0200, Marko Cupać wrote: >> I have 10.3 host which runs a dozen or so ezjail-based jails. I have >> installed another 11.0 host, and I'd like to move jails to it. > > I would switch them to iocage+zfs, ezjail is sooo 90s. :) > Have a

Re: Building "extra" kernels in stable/11...?

David Wolfskill skrev: > > For the paast few years, up through stable/10, I've had a dedicated > "build machine" at home where I build the role-specific kernels for > a couple of "production" machines (they "only" at home, but my > spouse & I depend on them), and update the production machines by

Re: MAXCPU @ stable/10

Dmitry Morozovsky skrev: > > John, > this commit went into -current almost 2 years ago with "MFC After: 1 month" > tag > > Did something went wrong? > > > r270223 | jhb | 2014-08-20 20:06:24 +0400 (Wed, 20 Aug 2014) | 5

Re: Wrong FreeBSD version in uname

Jim Ohlstein skrev: > > Hello, >> On May 8, 2016, at 10:34 AM, Herbert J. Skuhra <herb...@mailbox.org> wrote: >> >> Jim Ohlstein skrev: >>> >>> Hello, >>> I'm a bit confused. >>> >>> I created a VM using 10.3 (a

Re: Wrong FreeBSD version in uname

Jim Ohlstein skrev: > > Hello, > I'm a bit confused. > > I created a VM using 10.3 (amd64) install iso without installing > sources. I then downloaded sources as follows: > > root@c2:/usr/src # svn co https://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/10 . > > I then created a custom kernel file and rebuilt

Re: Cross buildworld on amd64 for i386 errors

On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 00:20:18 +0100, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > On Mon, 25 Jan 2016, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 1:55 PM, Daniel Eischen > > wrote: > > > >> > >> I'm trying to build an i386 buildworld on an amd64 system. > >>

Re: 10-STABLE buildworld fails at very early stage

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 05:24:50PM +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > > I have this in /etc/src.conf (it is only one line here): > > MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/usr/home/build/obj > > > % cd /usr/src > % sudo svn up > Updating '.': > At revision 290139. > % sudo make buildworld > [one screen of output] >

Re: 10-STABLE buildworld fails at very early stage

On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 09:42:56PM +0300, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > Hello Lev, > > Friday, October 30, 2015, 4:47:31 PM, you wrote: > > > Looks like some problem with Makefile, as here is creation of /bin > > and /usr "legacy" directories. > I've found this: >

Re: 10.2-Beta i386..what's wrong..?

On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 01:57:26PM +0200, Holm Tiffe wrote: ..uh top quoting.. Trying to mount root from zfs:zroot/ROOT/default []. Fatal double fault: eip = 0xc0b416f5 esp = 0xe2673000 ebp = 0xe2673008 cpuid =0; apic id = 00 panic: double fault cpuid = 0 KDB stack backtrace: #0

Re: expr error in 9-STABLE

On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 01:33:05 -0400 (EDT) Frank Seltzer wrote: Posting because I haven't seen this yet. I have been getting this error on 2 boxes for the last 2 days. This has been answered before: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2013-August/074957.html -- Herbert

Re: RELENG_9 build error

On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 15:07:42 -0400 Mike Tancsa wrote: Does anyone have any idea how to correct this issue ? Already blew away /usr/src and /usr/obj in case something got corrupted. I think I've resolved this issue by rebuilding and reinstalling yacc from /usr/src/usr.bin/yacc before running

Re: Intel(R) PRO/1000 PT Dual Port Server Adapter not working properly

On Sun, 4 Mar 2012 14:39:01 +0800 Irjohn Junus i.ju...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, This was originally posted here: http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?p=168854posted=1#post168854 I'm building a new PF firewall box based on FreeBSD 9 Release. Motherboard is Foxconn H61S Mini-ITX with

Re: acd0: FAILURE - INQUIRY ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x24 ascq=0x00

CmdLnKid [EMAIL PROTECTED] skrev: __/_ __ \__ | | | Copyright (c) 1992-2007 The FreeBSD Project. | | Copyright (c) 1979, 1980,

Re: qiv(imlib) vs. xorg 7.3

On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 09:09:10AM +0200, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote: Edward G.J. Lee wrote: Hi, I can't use qiv after i upgrade xrog 7.2 to 7.3. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ qiv typhon.jpg Gdk-ERROR **: BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes) serial 115 error_code 8 request_code 2

Re: qiv(imlib) vs. xorg 7.3

Edward G.J. Lee wrote: Hi, I can't use qiv after i upgrade xrog 7.2 to 7.3. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ qiv typhon.jpg Gdk-ERROR **: BadMatch (invalid parameter attributes) serial 115 error_code 8 request_code 2 minor_code 0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ qiv -z typhon.jpg qiv: Your root window's

Garbage in serial console with kernel from today

something wrong? Or is this a send-pr? Best Regards, Herbert J. Skuhra To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message