At 08:22 AM 10/9/2008, Andrew D wrote:
Hi Fellow Node user :),
I have the same + similar issue.
Hi,
What about adding
disable iface-alias
iface-alias
Default: Enabled if -nat is specified. This option simply tells
ppp to add new interface
At 05:24 PM 10/6/2008, Galen Sampson wrote:
I would like to second that. The heimdal in 7.0 is quite old. It
is in fact inoperable with an mit kerberos realm when using
ssh. The byte order is incorrect such that you get MIC checksum
failures. After much googling (not documented in the
At 12:40 PM 10/1/2008, Fernan Aguero wrote:
Thanks for the tip.
Unfortunately, the PowerEdge SC1435 BIOS does not allow much
options here ... I can set the embedded SATA to 'ATA mode'
(corruption hell, tested with 7.1 BETA) or just turn it
'OFF' in which case the FreeBSD installer sees no disk
At 05:34 PM 9/30/2008, Fernan Aguero wrote:
I've been following the HT1000 chipset errata saga thread, and the
commits by sos@ to CVS (around Jan 2008), but have not seen other more
recent posts about this issue ... is it because it's already fixed and
working fine for everyone?
At 03:11 PM 9/18/2008, Jo Rhett wrote:
committing that time. (besides the obvious giving back to the
community part which we do anyway)
I am not familiar with your company nor any developers that work for
you. Perhaps you could elaborate on how you have contributed to FreeBSD ?
At 03:39 PM 9/18/2008, Jo Rhett wrote:
On Sep 18, 2008, at 12:25 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
I am not familiar with your company nor any developers that work for
you. Perhaps you could elaborate on how you have contributed to
FreeBSD ?
In my $EMPLOYER the main proposal would be to dedicate more
At 04:13 PM 9/18/2008, Jo Rhett wrote:
On Sep 18, 2008, at 12:46 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
I am sorry, I meant, what have you contributed currently or in the
past to FreeBSD ? i.e. what code, or money or physical resources
(hardware) or time testing code ?
I do a lot of testing and patches
At 05:46 PM 9/18/2008, Jo Rhett wrote:
I'd rather just drop this tangent.
Me too.
---Mike
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL
At 02:54 PM 9/16/2008, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
However, there's no sign of DMA errors in the SMART log. I'm not sure
what to make of that; I really would expect there to be some.
Would not bad cables (or trays) be consistent with symptoms like that
? i.e. the OS sees errors, but when we ask
At 11:56 PM 9/9/2008, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
The reason it might work in HEAD (did you test HEAD i386 or HEAD amd64?)
Yes, amd64 on HEAD actually.
---Mike
is that HEAD might have the variables in bpfdesc.h declared as something
like unsigned intmax_t, which might be a better
At 11:31 AM 9/10/2008, David O'Brien wrote:
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 10:31:46PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
Hi,
The change below seems to make netstat -B on RELENG_7 coredump
netstat -B
specifically,
- printf(%5d %6s %7s %9lu %9lu %9lu %5d %5d %s\n
Hi,
The change below seems to make netstat -B on RELENG_7 coredump
netstat -B
specifically,
- printf(%5d %6s %7s %9lu %9lu %9lu %5d %5d %s\n,
+ printf(%5d %6s %7s %9ju %9ju %9ju %5d %5d %s\n,
Not sure if its a netstat issue or a libc issue as it works fine
At 05:07 AM 9/1/2008, Derek KuliÅski wrote:
Now I'm honestly a bit scared about it (even if it will be fixed
before 7.1, I'm not sure I'll hurry with the update).
There have been a number of commits to releng_7
that fixed dump issues for me. A box that used
to regularly exhibit hung dump
At 12:00 PM 9/1/2008, Kevin Oberman wrote:
I have a 7-Stable system which has not been able to successfully dump(8)
for about 2 months. Since it contains almost no important data that is
subject to change, it's not too big a deal, but I worry that other
systems might start showing the same
At 05:38 PM 9/1/2008, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Can someone explain what dump frequently hangs actually means?
Does it lock up the entire machine indefinitely (and if so, how long did
you wait for it to (hopefully) recover)?
As in the process hanging. For me, it was fixed quite some time ago.
Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400
Sentex Communications,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Providing Internet since 1994www.sentex.net
Cambridge, Ontario Canada
At 04:37 PM 8/21/2008, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 10:10:42PM +0200, Rink Springer wrote:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 01:03:09PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Finally, consider moving to pf instead, if you really feel ipfw is
what's causing your machine to crash. You might be
it ? Does having it in cause any
performance issues ?
---Mike
Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400
Sentex Communications,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Providing Internet
At 07:15 PM 8/18/2008, Robert Watson wrote:
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 06:32 PM 8/18/2008, Kip Macy wrote:
Could you please check that this doesn't happen on HEAD as well?
This same code has been in 8 since shortly after the branch.
I dont have any easy way
At 04:14 AM 8/18/2008, Robert Watson wrote:
On Sun, 3 Aug 2008, Robert Watson wrote:
This is an advance warning that, late next week, I will be merging
a fairly large set of changes to the IPv4 and IPv6 protocols
layered over the inpcb/inpcbinfo kernel infrastructure. To be
specific, this
At 10:24 AM 8/18/2008, John Baldwin wrote:
Author: kmacy
Date: Thu Jul 31 22:42:27 2008
New Revision: 181075
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/181075
Log:
MFC ARP update hooks and change to arpresolve to do arp
resolution without a
pending mbuf to transmit
Modified:
At 10:24 AM 8/18/2008, John Baldwin wrote:
Edit src/sys/conf/files
Add delta 1.1243.2.32 2008.07.30.20.35.41 kmacy
Edit src/sys/netinet/tcp_subr.c
Add delta 1.300.2.4 2008.07.30.20.35.41 kmacy
Edit src/sys/netinet/tcp_syncache.c
Add delta 1.130.2.9 2008.07.30.20.35.41 kmacy
to a cluster of spam / virus
scanning machines over tcp and UDP.
---Mike
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 9:22 AM, Mike Tancsa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 10:24 AM 8/18/2008, John Baldwin wrote:
Edit src/sys/conf/files
Add delta 1.1243.2.32 2008.07.30.20.35.41 kmacy
Edit src/sys/netinet
At 06:32 PM 8/18/2008, Kip Macy wrote:
Hi Mike,
Could you please check that this doesn't happen on HEAD as well? This
same code has been in 8 since shortly after the branch.
Hi,
I dont have any easy way to migrate the box to HEAD and then
back. Can I just boot a kernel from HEAD ?
At 04:27 AM 8/14/2008, Vladimir Korkodinov wrote:
Same thing.
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2008-August/019220.html
Well, that narrows it down a bit since you are not running with Intel
nics. It seems to be in the commits below between
date=2008.07.30.18.00.00
and
At 06:20 AM 8/12/2008, Robert Watson wrote:
Anyone out there running name servers, NFS over UDP, and other UDP
workloads: your testing of this patch prior to commit would be much
appreciated.
Not sure if this is related or not, but I am seeing a 'boatload' of
strange proxy arp issues.
At 04:41 PM 8/13/2008, Robert Watson wrote:
Well, it shouldn't be related, but sometimes things get tricky with
locking if it turns out that extra locking at one layer was masking
a lack of locking at another. Let's try to diagnose this one a bit
more before concluding that is the case,
At 04:46 PM 8/13/2008, Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 04:41 PM 8/13/2008, Robert Watson wrote:
Well, it shouldn't be related, but sometimes things get tricky with
locking if it turns out that extra locking at one layer was masking
a lack of locking at another. Let's try to diagnose this one a bit
At 05:25 PM 8/13/2008, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
I will try a kernel before the em changes, as thats the only other thing
I can think of off the top of my head.
I commented out em from the kernel and loaded up a previous version
via kld, but still the same thing, although not nearly as much
At 06:22 PM 8/13/2008, Robert Watson wrote:
Any suggestions on what kernel to go back to start from ?
I'm concerned by the presence of multiple ARP entries for a single
IP -- I'll need to reread the ARP code to refresh my memory, but in
general I would expect to see at most one in-progress
At 06:22 PM 8/13/2008, Robert Watson wrote:
I'm concerned by the presence of multiple ARP entries for a single
IP -- I'll need to reread the ARP code to refresh my memory, but in
general I would expect to see at most one in-progress or complete
ARP entry for any particular IP address at a
At 06:22 PM 8/13/2008, Robert Watson wrote:
I'm concerned by the presence of multiple ARP entries for a single
IP -- I'll need to reread the ARP code to refresh my memory, but in
general I would expect to see at most one in-progress or complete
ARP entry for any particular IP address at a
At 05:21 PM 8/8/2008, Robert Watson wrote:
http://www.watson.org/~robert/freebsd/netperf/20080808-7stable-rwlock-inpcb.diff
These incude the inpcb/inpcbinfo read/write locking changes
(although not yet for raw/divert sockets). Any testing, especially
with heavy UDP loads, would be much
At 01:56 PM 8/8/2008, Markus Vervier wrote:
3) Boot FreeBSD. Let it pass the DHCP phase (ifconfig_em0=DHCP) until
login appears.
4) Attach the cable to the NIC.
5) Voila... no link.
--
If you manually type,
dhclient em0
does it work for you then ?
---Mike
At 04:04 PM 8/8/2008, Kevin Oberman wrote:
Today I was unable to build a new kernel for 7-Stable. It dies when
linking the kernel, seemingly because of not finding the definitions for
some nfs stuff. I don't use nfs and always exclude both server and
client from my kernel. (Long config attached,
At 10:16 AM 8/6/2008, Andy Dills wrote:
I'm trying to setup pptpd to enable VPN connections. This worked well in
all versions of FreeBSD prior to 7.
I would turf pptpd and look at mpd51 from the ports. It is far, far
better maintained and is quite solid as an LNS as well as PPTP
termination
This looks like a very cool feature addition to RELENG_7! Are there
any performance penalties that you know of with this built in ?
---Mike
At 09:13 PM 7/23/2008, Julian Elischer wrote:
julian 2008-07-24 01:13:22 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:(Branch:
At 07:09 AM 7/10/2008, Patrick Lamaizière wrote:
I've found, i think. The Geode handles only AES with a 128 bits key.
When setkey/ipsec opens a crypto session, the driver returns an error
(EINVAL) if the key length is != 128. So setkey fails.
There is no way to tell to the crypto framework
At 06:29 AM 7/10/2008, Oliver Brandmueller wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 03:17:26AM -0700, Xin LI wrote:
Speaking as my own: Base system needs more conservative QA process,
e.g. we want to minimize the change, we need to analyst the impact
(FWIW the security fix would negatively affect
At 11:05 AM 6/22/2008, Patrick Lamaizière wrote:
Le Fri, 6 Jun 2008 23:41:35 +0200,
Patrick Lamaizière [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Hello,
I'm trying to port the glxsb driver from OpenBSD to FreeBSD 7-STABLE
(via the NetBSD port).
The glxsb driver supports the security block of the Geode LX
At 01:32 PM 6/11/2008, Paul wrote:
Any ideas why it takes so long for this on Freebsd 7.0 stable?
The partition this folder is on it /dev/da0s1f with a total size of
1.7T and a usage of 63G
Any suggestions or help on this would be greatly appreciated.
Couple of things to check
In
At 04:04 PM 6/11/2008, Paul wrote:
Changing from compat to files fixes the problem.
It is now superfast when running ls -lh.
Hi,
Not sure, but a more proper fix might be to look at the
nscd caching daemon. Take a look at nscd and nscd.conf. I havent used
it myself, but I seem to
At 05:57 PM 4/21/2008, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
Hi,
How long does it take for the problem to show up ?
Less than an hour in general (running the same client script
simultanuously on a 100Mbps linux box and 1Gbps bds6-x86)
I am running my nic at gig speeds only... I recompiled the kernel
At 01:38 PM 4/22/2008, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
I'm out of office tomorrow but will try to find time tommorow evening
to test with another NIC.
Are you using the latest RELENG_7, or at least the latest version of
nfe thats in RELENG_7 ?
---Mike
At 02:00 PM 4/22/2008, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
Are you using the latest RELENG_7, or at least the latest version of
nfe thats in RELENG_7 ?
Think so :
OK, and it is the latest RELENG_7 ? Or just the if_nfe.c file has
been manually updated ? Also, you are using ULE or the 4BSD scheduler
At 02:35 PM 4/22/2008, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
Also, you are using ULE or the 4BSD scheduler ? I
still have 4BSD on the box I am testing on.
Interesting, this is with ULE. I didn't really test 4BSD on this
box (I believed those who said SMP needs ULE *and* am quite
satisfied with overall
At 04:13 PM 4/22/2008, pluknet wrote:
Hi, I have the same problem with data corruption (with nfe on nfs
server side),
particularly when transferring large files.
Maybe this is somehow associated with the topic.
My simple test case:
truncate -s 1000m bigfile
^^ here I get zero-filed file
cp
At 10:52 AM 4/21/2008, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
Device is :
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:0:10:0: class=0x068000 card=0x289510f1
chip=0x005710de rev=0xa3 hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Nvidia Corp'
device = 'nForce4 Ultra NVidia Network Bus Enumerator'
class = bridge
cap 01[44] =
At 05:57 PM 4/21/2008, Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
Less than an hour in general (running the same client script
simultanuously on a 100Mbps linux box and 1Gbps bds6-x86)
Hi,
I ran it for over an hour without cpufreq and powerd without
problems with just one client. I will recompile the
At 08:46 PM 4/20/2008, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
#9 0x802fefb4 in m_devget (buf=0xadf16b6a ,
totlen=18231, off=0, ifp=0xff0001041800, copy=0)
I think this should be fixed in if_rl.c rev 1.170.2.3. m_devget(9)
should never get this wrong legnth, 18231 bytes
: /tmp was not properly dismounted
WARNING: /usr was not properly dismounted
WARNING: /var was not properly dismounted
/var: mount pending error: blocks 292 files 10
rl0: link state changed to UP
Mike Tancsa
At 08:51 PM 3/25/2008, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 02:44:58PM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
I have a RELENG_7 box running in a netboot environment that is
crashing every few days. I dont have a disk on it yet, so I have no
where to send the coredump. But I hooked up
, eip = 0, esp = 0xe5273d70, ebp = 0 ---
db
Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400
Sentex Communications,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Providing Internet since 1994
At 02:06 PM 3/19/2008, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 06:53:36PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
Charlie Root [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# vmstat -i
interrupt total rate
irq1: atkbd0 12 0
At 12:02 PM 3/7/2008, Darran wrote:
Hello all,
I want to run a (FreeBSD 7) server facing the internet and running Apache and
wondered if its safe out of the box .. so to speak ?
Yes, today it is. But that does not necessarily mean you will not
need to do updates, apply patches, perhaps change
At 01:43 PM 3/7/2008, Darran wrote:
building the world etc etc, i think the question really boiled down to is it
safe to run it after an install and minor configuration and i believe that at
this point it is ..
We have a number of busy production boxes running 7.0 (spam/virus
scanning of
At 03:49 AM 3/5/2008, =?KOI8-R?B?98zBxMnTzMHXIO7FxM/TxcvJzg==?= wrote:
We are using FreeBSD as GateWay with PF.
And the problem is that some web-sites as Gmail.com or Msn.com are
unavailable from machines with Vista or Server 2008 installed.
If use external or internal proxy (Kerio WinRoute,
At 05:49 AM 2/27/2008, Holger Kipp wrote:
I therefore assume that the problem is between receiving the
irq from emx and getting the data from the interface on the firewall
itself.
I would try upgrading to 6.3R (there are several em driver bug fixes)
and then try the box with
% cat
At 03:09 PM 2/27/2008, Holger Kipp wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 08:50:58PM +0100, Holger Kipp wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 09:50:16AM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote:
more details below. as it currently is, polling seems to do
the trick, however handling several em-interfaces with the
same irq
At 09:29 AM 2/22/2008, Ken Smith wrote:
If those who experienced problems related to the hptrr driver update
could let us know one way or another whether or not you are still having
problems with it that would be appreciated.
Hi,
I just did a fresh test install with RC3 on a HighPoint
HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrProcessorFrwID.8 = OID: SNMPv2-SMI::zeroDotZero
HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrProcessorLoad.3 = INTEGER: 0
HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrProcessorLoad.8 = INTEGER: 0
---Mike
Mike Tancsa
At 01:40 PM 2/13/2008, Sean C. Farley wrote:
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Hugo Silva wrote:
Mike Tancsa wrote:
Couple of little things I noticed with a new RELENG_7 AMD64 box
(as of yesterday)
ifstat from the ports cannot seem to find interfaces for some
reason ? It works fine on i386
*snip*
Try
At 03:05 PM 2/13/2008, Sean C. Farley wrote:
I recommend filing a PR, so it will not get lost. Besides being behind
on my own PR's :), I am still a src-committer-in-training--commits must
Done !
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=120625
---Mike
At 06:17 PM 2/4/2008, Jarrod Sayers wrote:
On 03/01/2008, at 11:56 AM, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
As noted in my original report, this isn't a nagios issue per se ...
my first
experience with this issue was with Azureus/java ... so its a
'threading issue
in general' ...
A patch to force the
At 08:24 PM 1/30/2008, Steven Hartland wrote:
The plot thickens This stall is not just related to newfs you have to
have gstat running as well. If I do the newfs without gstat running then
no stall occurs. As soon as Im running gstat while doing the newfs then
everything locks as described.
At 09:00 AM 1/25/2008, Steven Hartland wrote:
When booting 7.0-PRERELEASE amd64 on our machines with areca controllers
we get the following odd message which doesn't appear on i386 is this
something to worry about or harmless?
(probe16:arcmsr0:0:16:0): inquiry data fails comparison at DV1 step
At 09:01 AM 1/22/2008, Michael Schuh wrote:
Hi @List,
i have tryed out the new coretemp driver for Intel Core CPU's
my cpu is an T2400 Intel Core (w/o Duo).
i have csup'ed the stable build from cvsup.uk.freebsd.org at this night.
then built the entire system via sources ( with ULE-Scheduler,
At 04:48 PM 1/18/2008, Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 04:11 PM 1/18/2008, Steven Hartland wrote:
I know 7 has had a lot of work done on locking and ULE but are there
any other reasons to go for that instead of 6.3? Conversely are there
any reason which would point away from 7 such as stability issues
At 04:11 PM 1/18/2008, Steven Hartland wrote:
I know 7 has had a lot of work done on locking and ULE but are there
any other reasons to go for that instead of 6.3? Conversely are there
any reason which would point away from 7 such as stability issues?
I think it depends what apps you run, what
panic or scrolling
strings ext2_new_block: bit already set for block %d. On
6.2-STABLE there is no problem with linux partitions.
Jakub Siroky
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:48:28 -0500
Mike Tancsa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 04:11 PM 1/18/2008, Steven Hartland wrote:
I know 7 has had a lot of work done
At 12:15 PM 1/11/2008, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Just to summarize some discussion we had off-list, this problem is
now resolved. It turned out to have two causes:
1) sysbench on linux was defaulting to using a unix domain socket to
communicate with pgsql, but FreeBSD was using TCP to 127.0.0.1.
At 10:55 AM 1/3/2008, Vivek Khera wrote:
As noted in my original report, this isn't a nagios issue per se ...
my first
experience with this issue was with Azureus/java ... so its a
'threading issue
in general' ...
For years now I've been running with libthr as the default threading
library as
At 08:11 AM 12/26/2007, Scott Long wrote:
How does one know if the vfs.ufs.dirhash_maxmem is set too
high and are exhausting KVA ?
Panics, freezes, failure to exec new programs, failure to create pipes, etc.
Is there anyway to know ahead of time one is getting close to the
stage
At 12:12 PM 12/24/2007, Scott Long wrote:
For others who might want help with this, tweaking
vfs.ufs.dirhash_maxmem is what is needed. A bit of a balancing act is
needed if you're on i386 since you'll risk exhausting KVA unless you
also tweak KVA_PAGES.
Hi Scott,
How does one know if
At 11:41 PM 12/21/2007, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
Another attempt to use USB-storage with FreeBSD, another moment of
hair-pulling frustration.
I attach the card-reader with the media card already inserted (detection of
card-insertion has not worked in a long time, if ever).
Perhaps its the one
At 09:28 PM 12/3/2007, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Is this related to the commit that just went through to enable on arch that
support it?
One way to check is to take a look at the status page for the tinderboxes
http://tinderbox.des.no/
which are
/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2007-December/038791.html
and
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2007-December/038792.html
and
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2007-December/038793.html
---Mike
- --On Monday, December 03, 2007 21:57:50 -0500 Mike Tancsa [EMAIL
At 07:10 AM 11/30/2007, Pete French wrote:
Check dmesg for the APIC numbers corresponding to the CPUs you want to
disable and add the corresponding entries to /boot/loader.conf, e.g.:
O.K., I did that, got it running on 4 CPU's only, and the problem
is still there - so it's not the number of
At 03:27 AM 11/27/2007, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
Hello,
I have a HiFN crypto card and can remember that it was used for ssh
connections with 3des encryption (on 6.1 afair).
But with RELENG_7 it isn't used at all (no interrupts) if I
'ssh -v -c 3des-cbc [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Any ideas what is
At 12:33 PM 11/2/2007, Jack Vogel wrote:
So at this point I'm unclear, with my reposting of if_em.c last
night has everyone seen both parts or do I have to try something
else?
Seems to work. I grabbed it from the mailing list archive off www.freebsd.org
At 06:29 PM 10/28/2007, Brian Behlendorf wrote:
On Sun, 28 Oct 2007, Brett Glass wrote:
I would like to request that some useful work on networking be MFCed from
-CURRENT to -STABLE in time for the release of FreeBSD 6.3.
The thing that's worried me, following only [EMAIL PROTECTED]
traffic,
At 08:32 PM 10/19/2007, Jack Vogel wrote:
OK, I will look into this as soon as I can.
Just a Same here I think. The time outs dont correlate with load.
The one nic is also seeing a lot of overruns. Also, I checked the
eeprom and its not an issue it seems
Oct 21 14:24:39 c1 kernel:
At 12:10 AM 10/21/2007, Mike Andrews wrote:
I haven't tried the 6.6.6 driver on mine yet, though, so this could
be something totally different. I was going to bump one of them
from RELENG_6 to RELENG_7 as a test soon.
I see this problem running RELENG_6, which has the 6.6.6 driver. I
At 04:36 PM 10/8/2007, Jack Vogel wrote:
On 10/8/07, Mike Tancsa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 04:28 PM 10/5/2007, Jack Vogel wrote:
I am preparing to update the em driver to the equivalent of my
6.6.6 driver. Just doing some last minute sanity checking, I
hope to the checkin before end of day
At 12:37 AM 10/9/2007, Jack Vogel wrote:
Thanks,
I did find this reference
http://www.higherorder.com.au/2007/6/25/intel_82573_patch
Is there a way from FreeBSD to tell remotely if its needed ?
Well, there would be a way, reading the MANC register and
seeing if the suspect bit is
At 04:28 PM 10/5/2007, Jack Vogel wrote:
I am preparing to update the em driver to the equivalent of my
6.6.6 driver. Just doing some last minute sanity checking, I
hope to the checkin before end of day.
Hi,
thanks for fixing the compile issue, but I have another
possible problem. Do
At 04:36 PM 10/8/2007, Jack Vogel wrote:
So the missed packets are only showing up on em2?
Hi,
Yes, but thats where all the packets come in.
Uh, and that is a management-capable 82573, one that is often a
problem without the eeprom patched, did you do that sometime in
the past, I
At 08:36 PM 10/8/2007, Jack Vogel wrote:
Search thru the archives of this mailing list, look for 82573. There is
a DOS patcher that I have sent out a couple times. Its harmless to
run it, if the adapter is wrong or it doesnt need the patch it should
tell you.
What it does it change a bit in
At 11:37 PM 9/16/2007, zen wrote:
Dear user,
i have this fresh install FreeBSD 6.2,
but i cant compile the kernel even it was a GENERIC kernel.
these are the error messages :
core# make depend
Hi,
What is the error you get with
cd /usr/src
make KERNCONF=GENERIC buildkernel
At 06:36 PM 9/15/2007, Karl Denninger wrote:
I'm not all that interested in using it as a RAID adapter. I am, however,
interested in using it as a disk adapter, as a way to both spread load AND
benefit from its cache memory.
Can you not turn off the RAID feature in the BIOS so that the SATA
At 04:56 PM 8/27/2007, Stephen Clark wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to get a Novatel Wireless Ovation U720 EVDO modem to
work with Freebsd.
So far I am not having any luck. When it is plugged in it is
recognizes as a ugen device it
needs to look like a serial device, as it is sort of like a hayes
At 12:46 PM 7/28/2007, Karl Denninger wrote:
Anyone know if this runs well, poorly, or is asking to unleash the demons of
the Apolcalypse into my computer?
I installed it briefly on a dual xeon quad core before upgrading to
current. It seemed to work just fine.
dmesg
Copyright (c)
At 10:50 AM 7/25/2007, Steven Hartland wrote:
I assume the security team are already working on this but
There was a posting on the security list already about it.
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/2007-July/004411.html
---Mike
cant hurt to ask:
At 08:44 PM 7/23/2007, Bill Swingle wrote:
After several tries I was able to get both disks newfs'd and mounted
but they quickly fell down with DMA timeouts. On one occasion the
machine actually panic'd too:
Hi,
What options do you have set in the BIOS for the sata
controller ? Do
At 09:43 AM 7/22/2007, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
I ran SMART diagnostics from smartmontools, and Samsung's own diag
tools which all report the drive is OK (a full captive surface
test). I see nothing untoward in the SMART info pages.
Hi Bruce,
These symptoms (the OS reporting errors, the
At 04:59 PM 7/22/2007, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
On Sun, 22 Jul 2007, Mike Tancsa wrote:
OK)
MT remind me of a bad cable/connector. Have you tried a new cable ?
Hmm, in a laptop? ;)
Details :) Dirty or weak connection point ? If the controller was
working well up until this point
code. I cant think of anything
that got merged back that was disastrous. I have quite a few boxes
that track RELENG_6 and have had good results to date.
---Mike
--Brett
At 01:54 PM 7/12/2007, Mike Tancsa wrote:
I would say from today.
---Mike
At 12:31 PM 7/12/2007, Brett Glass wrote:
We have a FreeBSD 6.0 server that needs upgrading. This is a
production server, and it needs to be stable. There is no
posted date for 6.3-RELEASE, so we're looking for a good
snapshot to install -- preferably a known good build from
6-STABLE or a build
At 04:54 PM 6/11/2007, Chuck Swiger wrote:
this unfortunate event by reordering instructions if needed, but if
you wrote your own assembly, you could in fact do a hardware DDoS if
you weren't careful. :-)
Hi,
I thought DDoS = _Distributed_ Denial of Service where
multiple attacking
At 10:00 AM 5/8/2007, Ken Sallot wrote:
I just cvsup'ed from cvsup5.freebsd.org with tag RELENG_6. When doing a
buildkernel I get the following message:
Make: don't know how to make /usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_proto.c. Stop.
uipc_proto.c doesn't exist..
There were a lot of commits (14) in the
501 - 600 of 967 matches
Mail list logo
