> On Apr 12, 2020, at 01:48, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>
> There is very simple way to prevent such problem, use: zfs set reservation=1G
> for single "root" file system of the pool.
>
> This way ZFS won't allow applications to fill the pool to the point it starts
> crawling.
> Instead, writing a
> On Apr 11, 2020, at 14:33, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>
> 12.04.2020 0:36, Chris Ross wrote:
>
>> I have a FreeBSD 11.3-STABLE server that is my router, using a ZFS mirror
>> (of two GPT disks) as it’s disk. It’s many years old, and has only been
>> misbehaving l
I have a FreeBSD 11.3-STABLE server that is my router, using a ZFS mirror (of
two GPT disks) as it’s disk. It’s many years old, and has only been
misbehaving like this for a day or so. I’m trying to figure out what’s wrong.
I confirmed that internet connectivity isn’t the problem, and a reboot
> On Nov 9, 2019, at 16:07, Toomas Soome wrote:
>> On 9. Nov 2019, at 22:42, Chris Ross wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 09, 2019 at 11:24:49AM -0600, Kyle Evans wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> That helps- thanks! I'm CC'ing tsoome@, as this is
On Sat, Nov 09, 2019 at 04:51:38PM -0500, Chris Ross wrote:
> > > Can you provide some guidance of what I need to do to get the mrsas
> > > driver to identify it when booting the install ISO?
> >
> > See the "PRIORITY" section of
> >
> > https
On Sat, Nov 09, 2019 at 04:48:10PM +, Gary Palmer wrote:
> > Hi Doug! Thanks. Okay, I infer from that that the mpr driver is for
> > HBAs that aren't raid? Grepping through the sources for 3516 found me
> > only mpr. Looking more carefully, at mrsas while knowing specifically
> > what I'm l
On Sat, Nov 09, 2019 at 11:24:49AM -0600, Kyle Evans wrote:
> Hi,
>
> That helps- thanks! I'm CC'ing tsoome@, as this is basically just
> r353501 in that range. Can you give the latest -CURRENT snapshot boot
> as another data point?
Thanks. And yeah, happily, I was already in the process of buil
On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 02:53:25PM -0500, Chris Ross wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 9:46 AM Julian Elischer wrote:
> > >> You could try some bisection back along the 12 branch..
>
> Yeah. I was hoping for an easier path, but. I can try slogging back
> throu
On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 02:28:17PM -0800, Doug Ambrisko wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 09:44:36PM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> | Chris Ross wrote on 11/05/2019 21:19:
> | > On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 08:20:15PM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> | >> Chris Ross wrot
On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 10:56:00AM +1000, George Michaelson wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 10:21 AM Julian Elischer wrote:
> >
> > I suspect a separate bug because the OP specified that it worked in
> > 12.0 where those bugs go back to 9.x
>
> Oh, I didn't realize I updated a PXE boot PR. I am
On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 05:04:41PM -0500, Chris Ross wrote:
> > However, if you've already placed
> > mpr_load="YES" in your /etc/loader.conf and rebooted your device, then you
> > probably need to move into a diagnostic phase.
>
> Yeah. I think I see what
On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 02:17:11PM -0500, Chris Ross wrote:
>
> Hi there. I tried booting FreeBSD-12.1-RELEASE-amd64-disc1.iso on a system
> here, which didn't work, and I found that FreeBSD-12.0-RELEASE-amd64-disc1.iso
> did work on that same system. [Systems were configure
Hi there. I tried booting FreeBSD-12.1-RELEASE-amd64-disc1.iso on a system
here, which didn't work, and I found that FreeBSD-12.0-RELEASE-amd64-disc1.iso
did work on that same system. Another [older] system I had was working with
FreeBSD-12.1-RELEASE-amd64-disc1.iso, but after I had reason to c
On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 08:44:35AM +1100, Dewayne Geraghty wrote:
> Chris,
> After you've booted the kernel, the correct way to load a module that isn't
> already in the kernel, is to:
> kldload mpr
> To check if mpr is loaded, try
> kldstat -v|grep mpr
Thanks for this. I was able to boot and ver
On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 12:29:00PM -0800, Freddie Cash wrote:
> > I tried "load", but wasn't able to devine how to load the mpr module with
> > that. Is that needed, or should 'mpr_load="YES"' have accomplished the
> > desired result?
>
> modulename_load="YES" is the syntax used in the loader.con
On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 08:20:15PM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> Chris Ross wrote on 11/05/2019 19:34:
> > Hello. I have a Cisco UCS C220-M5 with a RAID controller. It calls itself
> > "Cisco 12G Modular Raid Controller with 2GB cache", PPID UCSC-RAID-M5.
> > Lo
Hello. I have a Cisco UCS C220-M5 with a RAID controller. It calls itself
"Cisco 12G Modular Raid Controller with 2GB cache", PPID UCSC-RAID-M5.
Looking at the CIMC, it shows the PCI vendor/device ids 1000:0014, which
looks to be an LSI MegaRAID Tri-Mode SAS3516. It looks like this should
be sup
class="gmail-m-2425094833965102802gmail-msonospacing">style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,78,121)">Hi,
Hope this
note finds you well!
style="margin-bottom:0.0001pt;line-height:normal">style="color:rgb(31,78,121)">I think there is an opportunity for us to help
y
> On Jul 3, 2017, at 14:46, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
>
> Use __FreeBSD_version from sys/param.h:
>
> https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/versions.html
Thanks. That looks great. Also, for my specific case of the addition of
clock_nanosleep(), it looks from time.h l
Some time ago, I ported a linux program that was using clock_nanosleep(). I
see now that the extra code I’d put in isn’t needed anymore in 11-stable, as it
appears this call was added in 11.1. My question is, to properly protect these
changes, what is the best way to know at compile time, e
On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Bengt Ahlgren wrote:
Ross Alexander writes:
I have notice over the last month or two that I don't seem to
be able to get the VirtualBox UI to come up on an X11 forwarding
ssh connection. I'm seeing the same problem with libreoffice.
[...]
I don't hav
well.
Any clues, or further debug info I can supply? All boxes amd64, 10.3-STABLE.
regards,
Ross
--
Ross Alexander, (780) 675-6823 desk / (780) 689-0749 cell, r...@athabascau.ca
The fear of infinity is a form of myopia that destroys the possibility
of seeing the actual infinite, even thoug
I'm in the process of updating 10.3 to 11.0 and I'm at the step where I
need to rebuild all my packages. As suggested, I run "pkg-static install
-f
pkg" command. Unfortunetly, that fails:
...
FreeBSD repository update completed. 25860 packages processed.
pkg-static: warning: database version 34 is
> On Jul 1, 2015, at 11:34, Kurt Lidl wrote:
> I discovered that if I comment out the following lines
> from my /etc/rc.conf, the machine boots reliably:
>
> ifconfig_bge0="DHCP"
> ifconfig_bge0_ipv6="inet6 accept_rtadv"
>
> Of course, with no network connection, it's not a very useful machine,
On Jul 1, 2015, at 05:18 , Fabian Keil wrote:
> Does it make a difference if you boot with hw.bge.allow_asf=0?
>
> According to the man page it is known to "cause system lockup problems
> on a small number of systems". It's not obvious to me why it's enabled
> by default on FreeBSD and I disable
On Jun 30, 2015, at 22:36 , Glen Barber wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 10:27:21PM -0400, Chris Ross wrote:
>>
>> Yeah, this is the same panic you, I, and others have been seeing on
>> sparc64's
>> with bge's, or at least v240's (and one other IIRC
Yeah, this is the same panic you, I, and others have been seeing on sparc64's
with bge's, or at least v240's (and one other IIRC) for many many months.
Thanks
for grabbing a core!
When I was trying to search for a commit that caused the change of behavior,
I had difficultly doing it, but it
On Apr 21, 2015, at 10:10 , Gareth Wyn Roberts
wrote:
> This may be caused by DMA alignment problems.
> See
> https://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=145859+0+archive/2015/freebsd-stable/20150419.freebsd-stable
> for a recent thread about the msk driver. The msk maintainer Yonghyeon Pyu
I got a new [to me] system recently, a Dell PE 1950. It has two bce parts on
the motherboard that identify as:
bce#:
The OS I installed and kernel I'm running are from a download of a 10.1
STABLE ISO, r281235, April 7, 2015.
I had gone on to check out a newer stable from subversion, a
On Wed, 04 Mar 2015 01:36:18 +0100, Rumen Telbizov
wrote:
Hello everyone,
We have a server running 9.3-RELEASE which is exhibiting a high number of
TIME_WAIT tcp connections which are NOT being recycled. That is, netstat
reports them over and over again, no matter how long we wait for them t
On Jul 30, 2013, at 10:07 , Mark Felder wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013, at 8:42, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
>>
>> and every contrib part which is removed, detracts from this.
>
> And every contrib part that is added to base is another piece of
> software that rots for the life of a major release an
On Jul 1, 2013, at 22:30 , Chris Ross wrote:
> Maybe I messed something up in the kernel I was building. Let me drop back
> to a GENERIC
> from the same stable/9 and see if that will boot. I just have to figure out
> how to get it onto the
> disks. :-)
User error. Thanks
On Mon Jul 1 19:51:45 UTC 2013, Gary Palmer wrote:
> What is the interface that the disk(s) that ZFS are on? If it's the
> AcerLabs ATA controller, then there are no disks found. There is an
> earlier ATA bus (at a guess from the fact ata2 and ata3 are shown above),
> however I don't see any d
I had a sparc64 (Netra X1) running a stable/9 from late March 2013.
Actually, the kernel may've been a bit newer than that as I was working with
folks to diagnose and repair some Netra-X1 specific issues. But, ZFS worked
fine. I have two pools, zroot as a RAID1 (using equally sized partiti
s - I'm at home, work is 150 k away, the phone
keeps ringing, there are a lot of boxes, I'm sleep deprived, whine &
snivel, grumble & moan ;)
regards,
Ross
--
Ross Alexander, (780) 675-6823 desk / (780) 689-0749 cell, r...@athabascau.ca
"Always do right. This will g
rts that the system clock slews badly - machine time drops
behind wall clock time. Something is locking the clock update off.
(Hmmm, I see I'm running a pre-5000/feature flags ZFS pool, FWTW.
I'll run zpool upgrade, my bad.)
regards,
Ross
--
Ross Alexander, (780) 675-6823 / (780) 689-0
Folks,
Hate to follow myself up, but - on the one 9.1-STABLE machine where
the disk i/o bogging down issue was a showstopper, I fixed it by
reverting to 8.4-STABLE. Symptoms instantly went away, box became
performant and responsive.
regards,
Ross
--
Ross Alexander, (780) 675-6823 / (780) 689
On May 12, 2013, at 23:17 , Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 10:20:26PM -0400, Chris Ross wrote:
>> In the past, I've found I've been unable to install all of the bootblocks if
>> I
>> boot from the ZFS root. When booting from a cd, the basic
On May 12, 2013, at 16:58 , Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> The command is "gpart bootcode", however I cannot be bothered to
> remember the syntax; I imagine it greatly depends on if you're using GPT
> vs. MBR, in addition to what your partition layout look like. Meaning:
> there is no "universal stand
So, I've long known and it makes sense that when you're booted from a ZFS
volume, you can't mess with the boot-loader. And, I know a few months ago I
had a set of commands I would use when booted from a CD that would initialize
the network and copy the "release/boot" from somewhere else so t
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:15:35 +0100, John Mehr wrote:
On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:16:53 -0400
Patrick McEvoy wrote:
Hello John,
This is Patrick the BSDTV guy. If you have the time / inclination,
would you like to do a quick walk through svnup?**If you have a machine
that will run Skype, I cou
013 1:17:41 pm Chris Ross wrote:
>>
>> So, I was looking at a v240 I have running stable/9 (9.1-STABLE), and
>> noticed something odd. The per-CPU information displayed by top seems
>> inconsistent. To simplify things, while I'm running a "make release&quo
On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 05:16:38 +0100, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 04:56:23AM +0100, Michael Ross wrote:
On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 04:15:09 +0100, Jeremy Chadwick
wrote:
>On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 03:45:57AM +0100, Michael Ross wrote:
>>On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 01:36:36 +0
On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 04:15:09 +0100, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 03:45:57AM +0100, Michael Ross wrote:
On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 01:36:36 +0100, John Mehr wrote:
> Hello all,
> I've believe I've made just about all of the progress optimizing
svnup
>
On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 01:36:36 +0100, John Mehr wrote:
Hello all,
I've believe I've made just about all of the progress optimizing svnup
as I can and I've just submitted it as a new port. With my ~ 350kb/s
DSL connection, it now takes just under 30 minutes to download a fresh
base
On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 01:33:57 +0200, Kevin Oberman
wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Claude Buisson
wrote:
- I had to install a complete VCS I have no (other) need of,
Unfortunate, but not hugely significant (Just a bit of disk space).
I think it is rather significant:
pkg_i
art from that, he's *perfectly* alright."
regards,
Ross
[1] M. Python
--
Ross Alexander, (780) 675-6823 / (780) 689-0749, r...@athabascau.ca
"Always do right. This will gratify some people,
and astound the rest." -- Samuel Clemens
--
This communication is inte
Am 17.07.2012, 06:06 Uhr, schrieb Doug Barton :
Have you tried switching your scheduler to 4BSD?
Just out of interest I tried, no change.
Thanks,
Michael
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
Am 16.07.2012, 15:34 Uhr, schrieb Steven Hartland
:
- Original Message - From: "Michael Ross"
To:
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 2:23 PM
Subject: 8.2 ->8.3 regression on disk writes
Hello,
using 8.2 the machine runs fine,
using 8.3 or higher, not so much.
In layman
Hello,
using 8.2 the machine runs fine,
using 8.3 or higher, not so much.
In laymans terms,
if I do "too many" writes/time just once, the machine can't do any disk
access for a couple of hours.
As in: What's already running stays running, no crashes or anything,
but as soon as I need to read
I've got to correct and update myself:
Am 06.07.2012, 19:19 Uhr, schrieb Michael Ross :
Hello,
I rented a new machine a couple of days ago,
and it happens:
Test: Transfer some 5GB of files to the machine
Works fine as long as I use one of the drives individually.
If I gmirror the d
Hello,
I rented a new machine a couple of days ago,
and it happens:
Test: Transfer some 5GB of files to the machine
Works fine as long as I use one of the drives individually.
If I gmirror the drives
gmirror label gm0 ada0
gmirror insert gm0 ada1
...wait for rebuild
th
Am 15.12.2011, 11:55 Uhr, schrieb Michael Larabel
:
On 12/15/2011 04:41 AM, Michael Ross wrote:
Am 15.12.2011, 11:10 Uhr, schrieb Michael Larabel
:
On 12/15/2011 02:48 AM, Michael Ross wrote:
Anyway these tests were performed on different hardware, FWIW.
And with different filesystems
Am 15.12.2011, 11:10 Uhr, schrieb Michael Larabel
:
On 12/15/2011 02:48 AM, Michael Ross wrote:
Anyway these tests were performed on different hardware, FWIW.
And with different filesystems, different compilers, different GUIs...
No, the same hardware was used for each OS.
The
Am 15.12.2011, 08:32 Uhr, schrieb O. Hartmann
:
Just saw this shot benchmark on Phoronix dot com today:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTAyNzA
It may be worth to discuss the sad performance of FBSD in some parts of
the benchmark. A difference of a factor 10 or 100 is simp
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Stefan Bethke wrote:
> Am 23.10.2011 um 13:11 schrieb Ross:
>
>> On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Stefan Bethke wrote:
>>> Am 23.10.2011 um 08:47 schrieb Chris Rees:
>>>
>>>> Worst of all, you're running portu
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 6:43 AM, Ken Smith wrote:
>
> The first of the Release Candidate builds of the 9.0-RELEASE release
> cycle is now available. Since this is the first release of a brand
> new branch I cross-post the announcements on both -current and -stable.
> But just so you know most of
Quoting "Peter Ross" :
Quoting "Scott Sipe" :
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 4:21 AM, Peter Ross
wrote:
Quoting "Peter Ross" :
Quoting "Peter Ross" :
Quoting "Jeremy Chadwick" :
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 01:54:12PM +1000, Peter Ross wrote:
Quoting "Scott Sipe" :
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 4:21 AM, Peter Ross
wrote:
Quoting "Peter Ross" :
Quoting "Peter Ross" :
Quoting "Jeremy Chadwick" :
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 01:54:12PM +1000, Peter Ross wrote:
Quoting "Jeremy Chadwick&
Quoting "Peter Ross" :
Quoting "Peter Ross" :
Quoting "Jeremy Chadwick" :
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 01:54:12PM +1000, Peter Ross wrote:
Quoting "Jeremy Chadwick" :
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 01:07:53PM +1000, Peter Ross wrote:
Quoting "Jeremy Cha
Quoting "Peter Ross" :
Quoting "Jeremy Chadwick" :
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 01:54:12PM +1000, Peter Ross wrote:
Quoting "Jeremy Chadwick" :
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 01:07:53PM +1000, Peter Ross wrote:
Quoting "Jeremy Chadwick" :
On Wed, Jul 06, 20
Quoting "Jeremy Chadwick" :
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 01:54:12PM +1000, Peter Ross wrote:
Quoting "Jeremy Chadwick" :
>On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 01:07:53PM +1000, Peter Ross wrote:
>>Quoting "Jeremy Chadwick" :
>>
>>>On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 1
Quoting "Jeremy Chadwick" :
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 01:07:53PM +1000, Peter Ross wrote:
Quoting "Jeremy Chadwick" :
>On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 12:23:39PM +1000, Peter Ross wrote:
>>Quoting "Jeremy Chadwick" :
>>
>>>On Tue, Jul 05, 2011
Quoting "Jeremy Chadwick" :
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 12:23:39PM +1000, Peter Ross wrote:
Quoting "Jeremy Chadwick" :
>On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 01:03:20PM -0400, Scott Sipe wrote:
>>I'm running virtualbox 3.2.12_1 if that has anything to do with it.
>&
Scott
On Jul 5, 2011, at 3:00 AM, Peter Ross wrote:
Hi all,
just as an addition: an upgrade to last Friday's FreeBSD-Stable
and to VirtualBox 4.0.8 does not fix the problem.
I will experiment a bit more tomorrow after hours and grab some statistics.
Regards
Peter
Quoting "Pete
Hi all,
just as an addition: an upgrade to last Friday's FreeBSD-Stable and to
VirtualBox 4.0.8 does not fix the problem.
I will experiment a bit more tomorrow after hours and grab some statistics.
Regards
Peter
Quoting "Peter Ross" :
Hi all,
I noticed a similar problem l
Hi all,
I noticed a similar problem last week. It is also very similar to one
reported last year:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2010-September/058708.html
My server is a Dell T410 server with the same bge card (the same
pciconf -lvc output as described by Mahlon:
http
Am 12.05.2011, 08:59 Uhr, schrieb Jeremy Chadwick
:
Are you using any sort of LC_CTYPE or LANG setting in your dotfiles that
gets propagated to the root environment (during su, sudo, etc.)? I see
that you're in .de which is why I ask.
I have
:lang=de_DE.ISO8859-1:\
in /etc/login.
Am 11.05.2011, 22:56 Uhr, schrieb joerg_surmann :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey Lowell,
Thank's for reply.
I'm running FreeBSD-8.2 amd 64.
I have rebuild libtool - same rsult.
Here the complete compiler-message:
[snip]
I can confirm this error for 8.2-STABLE amd64,
fre
USB
1.0 or 2.0, through hubs or straight off the m/b, etc.. I'm keeping a
backup box (intel atom / i386) running 7.3-STABLE around specifically
to work around the problem. I'd have said something eralier, but I've
gotten used to small nits poppping up and then disappearing; this one
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 2:13 AM, Markus Hitter wrote:
>
> Am 26.02.2009 um 18:44 schrieb Ross Penner:
>
>> When I enable powerd, it is only but a matter of time before my
>> machine will lock up completely. I've had this problem since I've
>> migrated to FreeBS
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 3:46 AM, Paul B. Mahol wrote:
> On 2/27/09, Ross Penner wrote:
>> Perhaps, but I rarely run Xorg. I use the machine as a gateway for our
>> network in the house. I've noticed it most often when under a network
>> load but that might not be a real
Perhaps, but I rarely run Xorg. I use the machine as a gateway for our
network in the house. I've noticed it most often when under a network
load but that might not be a real correlation.
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Paul B. Mahol wrote:
> On 2/26/09, Ross Penner wrote:
>> Hi
at would be of assistance?
Thank you,
Ross Penner
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Henry Hu wrote:
>> rosbox# pkg_delete -f gpgme-1.1.5_1
>> pkg_delete: package 'gpgme-1.1.5_1' is required by these other packages
>> and may not be deinstalled (but I'll delete it anyway):
>> seahorse-2.24.1_1
>> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
>
> I've had simil
I've recently upgraded my system to 7.1Stable. While upgrading my
ports, pkg_delete spontaneously ceased functioning. Some of the ports
were upgraded successfully so pkg_delete must have worked at some
point. I'm sort of a novice so I'm at a loss as to how to go about
diagnosing and fixing this pro
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
Surely you don't have that many users who SSH into the NAT router from
random public IPs all over the world, rather than via the LAN? Surely
if you yourself often SSH into your NAT router from a Blackberry device,
that you wouldn't have much of a pr
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 4:40 AM, Tom Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2008-03-07 at 23:07 -0700, Ross Penner wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've recently run the upgrade gamut and moved from 6.3 to 7.0. I've
> > had a few hick ups but this
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 6:10 AM, Jan-Olof Lindqvist
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ross Penner wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've recently run the upgrade gamut and moved from 6.3 to 7.0. I've
> > had a few hick ups but this one I can't resolve. I
Hi,
I've recently run the upgrade gamut and moved from 6.3 to 7.0. I've
had a few hick ups but this one I can't resolve. I used musicpd
(http://www.freshports.org/audio/musicpd/) on 6.3 to stream to a
shoutcast server. When I start mpd on 7.0, it immediately has a
segmentation fault and dumps its
I'm having very similar problems on my system that I just upgraded
last night. It's a MiniITX board, model EN1200. My system can't remain
up for more than 10minutes before something locks it up and frequently
the screen will output error messages relating to DMA.
I'd love to be able to help and
Hi, I'm sorry if this is the wrong place to report such a thing but it seems
appropriate to me.
I have a Linux binary which I got from *http://preview.tinyurl.com/2qwob4*.
The binary works fine for a short period but after 10 minutes or so, the
system will completely lock up. It won't be responsiv
Hi,
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, Bernd Walter wrote:
> > We have a very interesting Embebed FreeBSD base system using
> > Netgraph, BGP, Voip over IP (SER and Asterisk), PF, Remote Desktop Client
> > (netboot), VLANs, Q-in-Q Vlan, VPN, L2tp, pptp, Xmail, Dhcp server, Wireless
> > etc.. All th
I'm currently running 6.0-STABLE on my IBM Thinkpad 600e 2645-4AU with
a custom kernel. I updated the
BIOS to the latest version that IBM offers ( INET36WW
http://www-307.ibm.com/pc/support/site.wss/document.do?lndocid=DSHY-46HLKQ ).
I have two issues that I would love to get some hints on how to
I am experiencing problems keeping FreeBSD 5.4 connected. I have uptimes of
5 or 6 days - sometimes 10 or 11, then, without freezing the machine
totally, it stops responding to network traffic. I get DOS attacked every
once and a while and my logs are also filled with failed auths from password
Richard, perhaps this is another point. Instead of proposing additional
semantics to the pkg_* functions we might want to look at libh and see if
it already supports such versatility. Anyone here try libh?
-r
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in
Hi, I was wondering if this wheel has been invented already and
I just haven't been looking for it hard enough.
proposed wheel: that pkg_info have an option to reports 'ideal'
packages, that is, packages which are not requirements of any other
packages.
This would allow a person to quickly find
Hey, I once tried to do a pure
make kde2
from the ports and it took more than a day on a 300 Mhz. Granted it
was a 56k modem, but at least 80% of the time was in the compile. I
gave up and used the CD's.
When you look at the gnome philosophy, which is having a bazillion
g-apps written by ev
OK, I take it back. I don't think it is a signed versus unsigned
issue, though I still think it is dangerous the way atapi_read
mixes them.
I've been trying to follow the two pr's (kern/31530 and kern/31460)
to see if the panics they're getting were related to the problem I
reported earlier.
OK, I take it back. I don't think it is a signed versus unsigned
issue, though I still think it is dangerous the way atapi_read
mixes them.
I've been trying to follow the two pr's (kern/31530 and kern/31460)
to see if the panics they're getting were related to the problem I
reported earlier. I
In my last message, I wrote:
"The PC is a Compaq Presario 7360 (a desktop) with a Lucent PC<->PCMCIA
adaptor (but with *no* PCMCIA card in the adaptor)."
Er, I meant Lucent *PCI*<->PCMCIA adaptor.
Ross.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "
: card inserted, slot 1
And then nothing.
For comparison, the log from a successful boot (using an August 8th
4.4-PRERELEASE kernel) can be found at <http://www.live.com/goodlog.txt>
Ross.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable&qu
I don't know if this thread is really relevant to this list,
but assuming it is, my $.02.
Mine came way late only after multiple emails with windriver.
Once alerted they responded quickly. I wasn't sure how soon
after a RELEASE was announced to start nagging them (anyone want
to answer that?).
93 matches
Mail list logo
