I recently upgraded from 5.2.1-p{something} to 5.3-p5.
The system seems fine after the upgrade, but I have one problem.
The reason for the upgrade to 5.3 was to be able to compile
OpenOffice, but when I tried to do that I got an error in the
dmake part stating that the file types.h didn't exist.
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 07:16:48PM +0100, Juergen Dankoweit wrote:
In a german documenation I have read that the -j-switch should not be
used because I makes trouble especially on SMP-systems.
This is incorrect.
I've recently seen an odd nit
Selon Peter Olsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I recently upgraded from 5.2.1-p{something} to 5.3-p5.
The system seems fine after the upgrade, but I have one problem.
The reason for the upgrade to 5.3 was to be able to compile
OpenOffice, but when I tried to do that I got an error in the
dmake part
Following up on a *very* old post of mine (to current@) which I still get
asked on:
Dan Pelleg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Trying to make use of an old system - Compaq deskpro EN 350Mhz, I ran into
the following problem: If you issue a reboot(8) the machine shuts down, but
it never comes back.
Robert Watson wrote:
I've recently seen an odd nit involving -j kernel compiles, in which
occasionally the build breaks because of a parse problem and vnode_if.awk.
I've been meaning to sit down and see if I can reproduce it, I suspect a
dependency problem. -j should always work for the kernel,
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 04:51:28PM +0200, Gareth Hopkins wrote:
Howdie,
Was wondering if the following cards would be supported in the
near future by BSD 4.10.
PERC 4e/Si and PERC 4e/Di. These are from the new Dell poweredge 1850 and
2850 servers.
Hi,
if I'm not mistaken these
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Martin Nilsson wrote:
I've seen something similar to this on 5.3 and 5.3-STABLE buildworld it
happens on fast machines (both SMP UP) when running 'make -j n
buildworld' with n larger than about 8. It does not happen everytime,
just often enough to make you wonder if the
Sorry, yes have tried it, I am still seeing a negative perofrmance
difference with the setting on 0 but the gap is greatly reduced and
its something that is a lot more acceptable, at most it has been 10%
worse then if left on auto or set to a value. Let me know if there is
any specific types of
Have tested on 3 boxes.
5.3-STABLE compiled Jan 5th
--- 127.0.0.1 ping statistics ---
61 packets transmitted, 61 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.062/0.073/0.146/0.013 ms
5.3-STABLE amd64 build compiled Jan 29th
--- 127.0.0.1 ping statistics ---
60 packets
Hello,
I connect to the office machine via serial modem after office hours
and encountered no problems until I tried using one of those USB to
Serial adapters - I could connect alright but for less than 24 hours.
It's okay during the weekdays but the office machine would hang over
the weekend.
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 01:18:38PM +, Chris wrote:
Sorry, yes have tried it, I am still seeing a negative perofrmance
difference with the setting on 0 but the gap is greatly reduced and
its something that is a lot more acceptable, at most it has been 10%
worse then if left on auto or set
Sam Leffler wrote:
I have had spectacularly bad luck with Maxtor SATA drives. I've
already RMA'd 4 of 8 drives and have 2 more waiting to go back. 1 was
DOA, the rest failed completely while in operation (typically locking
up the machine). These were all Maxtor DiamondMax Plus 9 6Y160M0
The patch to use the system compiler (created by Gentoo for an earlier release
and adapted by me to 1.1.4) was submitted to the OpenOffice port maintainer
over three weeks ago -- before the port was upgraded to 1.1.4. The patch also
included fixes to make the port use independently installed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter Olsson wrote:
| I recently upgraded from 5.2.1-p{something} to 5.3-p5. The system
| seems fine after the upgrade, but I have one problem.
|
| The reason for the upgrade to 5.3 was to be able to compile
| OpenOffice, but when I tried to do that I
Chris wrote:
Have tested on 3 boxes.
yes, it's the intended operation and If I don't see it I don't
believe it but it happens. I ever thought it would be possible.
The weirdest is that it worked in 5.3-RELEASE and some time later,
whilst I was tracking -stable, aplications began to fail
Hello,
is there a 3DM2 version for amd64? The x86-version from the
3ware homepage doesn't run correct.
Kind regards,
Thomas.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any
Hello,
I have a rl(4) driven NIC (Realtek 8139) on a Toshiba 2060CDS laptop, and
the card works fine with FreeBSD 5.2.1 (now using 5.2.1-RELEASE-p13).
I'm trying to install 5-STABLE for a while, but the card doesn't work
since version 5.3-RELEASE.
What I get is the well-known rl0: watchdog timeout
/proc/10/status:syncer 10 0 0 0 -1,-1 noflags 1103511247,149 0,0
44097,435728 vrlock 0 0 0,0 -
/proc/39506/status:postgres 39506 39505 39500 39500 -1,-1 noflags
1106713055,403942 3002,40214 4118,737982 vrlock 1001 1001 1001,1001,1001
maildb.hub.org
/proc/51927/status:postgres 51927 41068 41068
On Jan 24, 2005, at 1:55 PM, Vivek Khera wrote:
On Jan 24, 2005, at 1:44 PM, Emanuel Strobl wrote:
Maybe Sean Kelly can tell us how SW_WATCHDOG interacts with ACPI,
since I
think the problem occurs when the kernel disables ACPI, right? (just
my
feeling)
Next chance I get I'll play with the
In the last episode (Feb 01), Marc G. Fournier said:
/proc/10/status:syncer 10 0 0 0 -1,-1 noflags 1103511247,149 0,0 44097,435728
vrlock 0 0 0,0 -
/proc/39506/status:postgres 39506 39505 39500 39500 -1,-1 noflags
1106713055,403942 3002,40214 4118,737982 vrlock 1001 1001 1001,1001,1001
During make of openoffice-1.1
make -DWITHOUT_MOZILLA
snip
=
Building project sandbox
=
/usr2/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/sandbox/com/sun/star/lib/sandbox
mkout -- version: 1.3
Making dpj...
--
Making:
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 10:00:54PM +, Alex Burke wrote:
Hi,
I have some further information that might be of some use, and also
points me to a cause of this bug.
This indeed looks like the bug which is fixed by the patch in the
erratum you mentioned.
Kris
pgpFDsvAD8Le6.pgp
On Tuesday, 1 February 2005 at 16:36:26 +0900, FUJITA Kazutoshi wrote:
Hi,
I'm using recent 5-STABLE,
and try to mirror root partition with vinum.
my /boot/loader.conf is below
vinum_load=YES
vinum.autostart=YES
But I got following message when boot
...
vinum: loaded
vinum: no
I am trying to make an unofficial version for amd64 available.
I will let you know once it's done.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Thoamas Krause
-CI-
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 10:48 AM
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:
Okay, another case of replying to self
Got a proper panic message this morning:
panic: uchi_abort_xfer : not in process context
Anybody seen one of these before? Possible solutions?
David
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 22:23:43 +0800, david uy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I connect to the
On 02/01/05 18:16, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Tuesday, 1 February 2005 at 16:36:26 +0900, FUJITA Kazutoshi wrote:
Hi,
I'm using recent 5-STABLE,
and try to mirror root partition with vinum.
my /boot/loader.conf is below
vinum_load=YES
vinum.autostart=YES
But I got following message when boot
From: Jon Noack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: vinum.autostart problem
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 20:00:21 -0600
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can you mirror the root partition with regular vinum on 5-STABLE, or
does this require gvinum?
gvinum makes me happy;-)
thanks.
Regards,
Just a heads-up to say that the 5.4 release activities will begin towards
the end of February, with an expected release date of April 4th.
Here are the highlights of the proposed schedule:
Feb. 23 newvers.sh starts to say 5.4-PRERELEASE
Mar. 2 RELENG_5 code
Yet another reply to self!
Got some info from the current mailing list - seems they have a patch
for this but don't know how to apply it. Patch maybe?
Has this patch been included in the latest -stable? Building world as
I write this. Will attempt to apply the patch, too! *fingers
crossed*
Hello,
Could anyone please review kern/71910 and kern/73129 to fix IPFW
behavior before 5.4R? I have trouble using ipfw for output interface
selection after migrated to 5.x...
Thanks in advance,
--
Yoshiaki Kasahara
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Before making this machine, I did a search on the lists to see if
anyone else had questions or was willing to report on using a GEOM
RAID root device. Nobody had.
So... here's the basic recipe.
First I did a minimal install to one of the two disks in a 512M root.
I think 256M would be enough
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, 13:09+0900, Yoshiaki Kasahara wrote:
Hello,
Could anyone please review kern/71910 and kern/73129 to fix IPFW
behavior before 5.4R? I have trouble using ipfw for output interface
selection after migrated to 5.x...
AFAIK andre@ is working on them.
--
Maxim Konovalov
-- Forwarded message --
From: Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 05:16:00 +
Subject: Re: mbufs on 5.3-STABLE possible bug
To: Bosko Milekic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
0 is supposed to mean unlimited, whilst leaving it blank(commented
out) is auto. Or at least the docs say
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 05:20:56PM -0800, Andrew Konstantinov wrote:
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 02:49:09PM -0800, Doug White wrote:
Be aware that it was a weekend in the US yesterday so the people likely to
answer your question were probably out having fun, which is why you didn't
get an
Hi,
I had several PCs running 4.10, when I gradually
upgraded them to 5.3. Occassionally I had great
difficulties, which appeared to be somehow related
to the motherboard, the harddisk and the UDMA
selection.. or something like that (sorry, I'm
not an expert on this!).
All PCs have just
35 matches
Mail list logo
