Hello all,
I'm in the process of rolling out a new shell server and for numerous
reasons have decided 6.x is the best fit (jail improvements, SMP
improvements, 3Ware driver, pf). The shell server is within a jail, and
the uids there are unique so that quotas remain sane. There are about
On Sat, 8 Jul 2006, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 10:56:47PM -0400 I heard the voice of
Charles Sprickman, and lo! it spake thus:
Trying again, it reported the same inconsistencies then sat there
for more than an hour taking up all the available CPU on the box
until I
On Mon, 10 Jul 2006, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 12:41:07AM -0400, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Sat, 8 Jul 2006, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 10:56:47PM -0400 I heard the voice of
Charles Sprickman, and lo! it spake thus:
Trying again, it reported
On Mon, 10 Jul 2006, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 01:39:01AM -0400, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Mon, 10 Jul 2006, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 12:41:07AM -0400, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Sat, 8 Jul 2006, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006
Jul 2006, Charles Sprickman wrote:
Hello all,
I'm in the process of rolling out a new shell server and for numerous reasons
have decided 6.x is the best fit (jail improvements, SMP improvements, 3Ware
driver, pf). The shell server is within a jail, and the uids there are
unique so that quotas
Hello all,
I've been digging through Google for more information on this. I have a
4.8 box that's been up for about 430 days. In the last week or so, top
and ps have started reporting all CPU usage numbers as zero, and running
systat -vmstat results in the message The alternate system clock
On Fri, 18 Nov 2005, Uwe Doering wrote:
Charles Sprickman wrote:
Hello all,
I've been digging through Google for more information on this. I have a
4.8 box that's been up for about 430 days. In the last week or so, top and
ps have started reporting all CPU usage numbers as zero
/6.1p2-dmesg.txt
http://www.bway.net/~spork/6.2-dmesg.txt
Thanks,
Charles
___
Charles Sprickman
NetEng/SysAdmin
Bway.net - New York's Best Internet - www.bway.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - 212.655.9344
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, Philipp Ost wrote:
Charles Sprickman wrote:
[snipped]
Performace with scp was around 200KB/s, ftp wavered between 300-500KB/s.
This did not appear to be a duplex mismatch - unmanaged switch showed them
all at 100/Full, put some other hosts on the same ports/cabling
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
Mark Kirkwood wrote:
Charles Sprickman wrote:
I also did a little more digging and noticed that once I start pinging
from one of these hosts using large packet sizes, I get about 50-60%
packet loss (ie: ping -s 1500 other.vr0.host). If I ping
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Jamie Clark wrote:
Charles Sprickman wrote:
Hi all,
I spent some time trying to track down slow tcp performance on a small
office switched 100 LAN. We just put in a number of whitebox PCs running
FreeBSD 6.1-p2/PC-BSD 1.2 that all have onboard Via Rhine 10/100 ethernet
On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, Jorn Argelo wrote:
Jamie Clark wrote:
Steven Hartland wrote:
Charles Sprickman wrote:
Backing up the 4.10 box was within an acceptable margin of wire
speed (~8MB/s on 100M ethernet) given that a router was in the
middle. That's roughly how the box has always performed
Hi all,
I'm running a 6.2-RC1 box (cvsup'd today) that has two broadcom nics. One
is an internal network (nfs) and the other is external.
PF has this rule for all traffic on the private net:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /home/jails]# pfctl -sr|grep bge1
pass in quick on bge1 inet from 192.168.1.0/24
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Jim Pingle wrote:
Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
So the 1000$ question: is there any chance of getting at least the state
of the RAID and its disk out into the open? It shure would give me a
much better feeling, knowing that at least serious trouble would be
detected by me.
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Pete French wrote:
I'm running a 6.2-RC1 box (cvsup'd today) that has two broadcom nics. One
is an internal network (nfs) and the other is external.
...
Doing something like ls /usr/ports will just hang until interrupted.
Using tcp for nfs makes it workable, but very
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, Christopher Hilton wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
Dimitry Andric wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
What does stuttering mean? Is it similar to sendmail's
greet_pause feature?
See here:
http://www.ualberta.ca/~beck/nycbug06/spamd/mgp00014.html
OK, so the answer to my
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006, Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Heinrich Rebehn [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Colin Percival wrote:
John Smith wrote:
Support for FreeBSD 4.11 is going to end sometime in late January.
Originally, FreeBSD 6.2 was supposed to be released back in October. This
would have given
Hi all,
I'm about to hit a number of machines with 6.2-RC2 since we're nearing the
release. Many of course are remote, so shuffling CDs around and the like
is not practical.
I've not been able to find anything in the handbook or FAQ about the
process, and Google is returning very few
Hi all,
Just killed what had been a fairly stable 6.2-RC2 box with NFS.
I have four boxes that run spamd (spamassassin spamd, not pf spamd).
Since they are all now in sync and running 6.2-RC2, I set one up as an NFS
server to make updates across all four boxes easier. I got a little bit
() at
/usr/src/sys/i386/i386/exception.s:200
#17 0x0033 in ?? ()
Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)
(kgdb)
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, Charles Sprickman wrote:
Hi all,
Just killed what had been a fairly stable 6.2-RC2 box with NFS.
I have four boxes that run spamd (spamassassin spamd
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, J. W. Ballantine wrote:
I rebuilt and installed the kernel and world, and now when I
try to boot the system it fails with a Fatal Trap 12: page
fault while in kernel mode, with current process of 594 (ntpd).
I dont' have the thread subject handy, but I remember something
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007, Jan Mikkelsen wrote:
Hi,
Jo Rhett wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:56:43 -0800 Jo Rhett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the reply. The problem is that I have a single 6-drive
(550gb/ea) RAID-5 array. If I split two disks off to make a RAID-1
boot device, I'll lose 1TB
)), although the details
vary.
On Jan 11, 2007, at 8:02 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
I can confirm 3Ware controllers also work that way.
Please enlighten me. I see no such options in the BIOS menu.
I've done it in 3DM2, but look at pages 23+24 (printed page numbers) here
and the stuff regarding
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Jo Rhett wrote:
On Jan 11, 2007, at 10:00 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Jo Rhett wrote:
Not any one that I've ever seen in commodity disks. Yes, on big fiber
channel disk cabinets. No to 6-8 drive raid controllers.
I'd be very surprised if you
Hello all,
I've never noticed this on any 4.x boxes, but on 6.2 I'm seeing the
following in the daily security run:
Checking setuid files and devices:
find: /usr/src: Operation timed out
find: /usr/ports: Operation timed out
find: /usr/obj: Operation timed out
Those three directories are
On Fri, 9 Feb 2007, Geoffrey Giesemann wrote:
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 04:34:57PM -0500, Charles Sprickman wrote:
-They added a moving part (2-wire fan, no tach) to a mission-critical
part. That seems real stupid. After the bearings die in 2-3 years, what
happens to your card? Does it melt
Václav Haisman wrote:
Hi,
yesterday, I tried to build kernel and world with the gjournal patch. It
does not apply cleanly. This brings me to question, are there some
outstanding issues that prevent it from being commited to RELENG_6? I
tried to search ml archives but I did not find any.
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 12:15:04AM +0300, Artem Kuchin wrote:
The othe question, is there such technology for Supermicro mainboards?
Yes, Supermicro makes IPMI add-on cards (they require IPMI capability on
the mainboard, however).
Be warned about
On Dec 19, 2006, at 6:56 PM, Christopher Hilton wrote:
Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, Christopher Hilton wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
Dimitry Andric wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
What does stuttering mean? Is it similar to sendmail's
greet_pause feature?
See here
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007, Jonathan Stewart wrote:
Does anyone know of any work towards updating the spamd port to the latest
version? The makefile shows version 3.7 and OpenBSD is up to 4.1 now. I'm
looking at setting it up so helping test would not be a problem for me.
There's an unofficial
this stuff, this does not seem like
hardware.
What's next?
Thanks,
Charles
___
Charles Sprickman
NetEng/SysAdmin
Bway.net - New York's Best Internet - www.bway.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - 212.655.9344
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
Hello,
Second panic on this box in less than two weeks. Can someone help me
figure out whether this looks to be a hardware issue or not? Am I on the
correct list for this type of problem?
Previous info is at:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.freebsd.stable/28428 (no followups)
Here's what
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Doug White wrote:
On Sun, 5 Jun 2005, Charles Sprickman wrote:
Here's what gdb has for me this time:
Can you go to frame 38 and print the value of source? Comparing it to
NULL shouldn't cause a fault, but I suspect its another one of the cases
in that if statement
On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
In LAST_ACK state, the machine should keep retransmitting the FIN
until it gets an ACK from the peer, or the connection times out,
which should take roughly 8 minutes. If the connections stay around
forever, then something is broken.
The one thing
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Doug Barton wrote:
I agree on the need for LB's to do things right, but they aren't just for
helping MS software. :)
I understand, but I would bet there's been at least a quadrupling of
machines backing hotmail/msn since they moved to windows... :)
I'm curious about
On Sun, 16 Mar 2003, Doug Barton wrote:
On Sat, 15 Mar 2003, Alban Hertroys wrote:
One thing that doesn't seem to work is installing the XFree-4 metaport
of 4.3.0 over the old XFree 4.2.1 installation. The metaport succesfully
finds all it's dependencies, and just registers - without
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, Don Lewis wrote:
I'd also check to make sure that all the fans are operational and
something isn't overheating.
I ran into two boxes with the same bad CPU fans. Took a while to track it
down. Symptoms were seemingly random reboots, but the reboots could be
made to happen
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Mike Tancsa wrote:
The 3ware cards work quite well for this. ~ $120 USD for the 2 port
version. During rebuilds the server is still available and you can control
for the most part how fast or slow the rebuild process works. Its not very
granular, but it does afford some
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004, Ken Smith wrote:
On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 06:35:27PM -0700, Doug White wrote:
There was a nasty bug just about as 4.10 went out the door with the twe
driver. I thought the fix went into the release, though. If you get a
chance you might try moving up to the -stable
Hi,
I'm looking for some feedback on the following two SATA RAID controllers:
http://www.3ware.com/products/serial_ata8000.asp (4 port)
http://www.adaptec.com/worldwide/product/proddetail.html?sess=nolanguage=English+USprodkey=AAR-2410SAcat=%2fTechnology%2fRAID%2fSerial+ATA+RAID
I'd love to
use of jail.
Thanks,
Charles
--
Charles Sprickman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is unclear..
Greets,
Samuel Trommel
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles Sprickman
Sent: woensdag 27 oktober 2004 3:12
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Best jail howto/FAQ
I know this is something of a frequent question, but jail
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles Sprickman
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 9:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Serial ATA RAID Controllers (5.x)
Hi,
I'm looking for some feedback on the following two SATA RAID controllers:
http://www.3ware.com/products/serial_ata8000.asp (4 port
Hello,
I recently made the jump to -stable from 6.0 on a box that I'm looking to
bring into production as soon as 6.1 hits. Everything seems fine so far
but for one issue that I am guessing is related to the rc changes in
-stable.
This host has two jails, both started via the rc.conf
Hi all,
Here's a quicky...
I've been running around upgrading some boxes to 6.2 from 4.11 using the
directions in UPDATING. I noticed that in the 4.x to 5.x step it's
basically mandatory to install the new bootloader:
cd /sys/boot
make STRIP= install
I see no such notes in the 5.x to 6.x
On Fri, 18 May 2007, Philipp Ost wrote:
The only other concern I have is the
I-don't-know-which-field-is-in-focus-bug. But I have to admit that I rarely
use sysinstall, so I don't bother that much...
Jeremy hit the nail on the head with that one. I do use it fairly often
and have gotten
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007, Jonathan Dama wrote:
From Erwin Lansing [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 12:59:50AM +0200:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 03:05:30PM -0700, Jon Dama wrote:
Is there a port index file that corresponds to the FREEBSD_4_EOL tag?
I am unable to rebuild the index from the
Hi all,
Any ideas on this one? This machine (one of those ancient VALinux 2U
boxes, Intel L440GX+ board, dual PIII) hangs for a very long time between
the second processor launching and geom_mirror kicking in. It does always
boot, but the hang is more than a minute - just enough to make one
info on USB for users would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Charles
___
Charles Sprickman
NetEng/SysAdmin
Bway.net - New York's Best Internet - www.bway.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - 212.655.9344
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
Andreas Pettersson wrote:
Mark Andrews wrote:
Why don't you go the other way and get yourself IPv6
connectivity. You do realise that you will require it to
reach many sites in about 3 years time as they will be IPv6
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007, Gary Palmer wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 01:26:33PM -0700, Jon wrote:
Check the freebsd-questions list for more info
For those, like me, who are not subscribed to freebsd-questions,
the list archives can be accessed at:
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009, Robert Watson wrote:
Just a minor heads up: I've merged both Kip Macy's lock order fixes to the
kernel routing code, and the route locking and reference counting fixes from
kern/130652 to stable/7. These fixes should correct a number of reported
network-related hangs.
to have to hit the host just to alter quotas in one jail that needs them.
Just looking for any warnings/caveats about the above and what might be
different 6+ years later...
Thanks,
Charles
___
Charles Sprickman
NetEng/SysAdmin
Bway.net - New York's Best Internet - www.bway.net
sp...@bway.net
@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Charles Sprickman
NetEng/SysAdmin
Bway.net - New York's Best Internet www.bway.net
sp...@bway.net - 212.655.9344
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Marat N.Afanasyev wrote:
Peter Ankerst?l wrote:
On Mar 24, 2009, at 8:20 PM, Scott Long wrote:
Peter Ankerst?l wrote:
On Mar 24, 2009, at 8:00 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
dev.mpt.0.nonoptimal_volumes: 0
Don't test whether the nonoptimal_volumes parameter works
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009, Michael R. Wayne wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 03:05:05AM -0400, Charles Sprickman wrote:
The subject describes my goal. I'm aware of the usual caveats - if
there's more than one jail, no UID overlap, this will really only work in
one jail if all jails are on the same
}
ad_attach() is trying to dereference atadev-param, which is NULL.
-
I'm still set up with remote gdb ready to go if you need any other info.
I also used to get the falling back to PIO delays/resets, regardless of
whether I turn off dma in loader.conf.
Thanks,
Charles
--
Charles Sprickman
Just out of curiousity, what does the following return?
sysctl kern.maxusers
Charles
--
Charles Sprickman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 11 Aug 2002, lewwid wrote:
Frequently I have had to
kill -INT 1 to reboot because nothing on the box would respond.
I used portupgrade bash and ever since
On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Kevin G. Eliuk wrote:
Add PKG_SUFX=.tgz to your /etc/make.conf
I look forward to when the full convergence to bzip'd packages.
In the meantime, perhaps someone could add PKG_SUFX=.tgz to
/etc/defaults/make.conf so that someone following the upgrade procedure
(including
send/recv space.
Can anyone clarify the netstat output for me?
Thanks,
Charles
--
Charles Sprickman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message
On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Mike Tancsa wrote:
Perhaps something about the cable ?
What are you using to make a null modem (xover) cable? Maybe cu is
sensitive to CTS/RTS working and kermit is not?
Charles
---Mike
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe
up...
Thanks,
Charles
--
Charles Sprickman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-stable in the body of the message
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, randall ehren wrote:
sbp0:0:0 XPT_SCSI_IO: cmd: 12 01 80 00 ff 00 00 00 00 00, flags: 0x40, 6b cmd/255b
data/18b sense
da0 at sbp0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0
da0: Apple Co iPod 2700 Removable Simplified Direct Access SCSI-2 device
da0: 50.000MB/s transfers
da0: 4775MB
Hi all,
I've been doing a number of 4.11 - 5.5 - 6.2 upgrades. All of them I've
done have gone very well. One that was handled by someone else following
my step-by-step directions ended up missing some items from
/usr/lib/compat and all the timestamps on the files in that directory are
Hey all,
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, Christian Walther wrote:
Hello Bob,
On 15/01/2008, Bob Vaughan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been having a problem on one particular machine with Firefox locking up
on me, requiring a hard kill to get rid of it.
The problem is thus: Firefox starts normally, but
Just following-up to myself, please correct me if I got anything wrong...
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, Charles Sprickman wrote:
Hi all,
I've been doing a number of 4.11 - 5.5 - 6.2 upgrades. All of them I've
done have gone very well. One that was handled by someone else following my
step-by-step
On Sun, 9 Mar 2008, Mike Lempriere wrote:
I've had it with the list spam -- is the any possibility of moderating this
list, or changing it to must-be-subscriber-to-post?
I have a humble suggestion that perhaps the FreeBSD Foundation could
handle... Seeing as Cisco recently bought a company
On Sun, 18 May 2008, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
On Sun, 18 May 2008 09:56:17 -0300
JoaoBR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
after trying to mount my zfs pools in single user mode I got the
following message for each:
May 18 09:09:36 gw kernel: ZFS: WARNING: pool 'cache1' could not be
loaded as it was
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 12:20:42AM +0800, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
I fully understand and second efforts on educating people
how to configure BIND to be stong to attacks and keep them from using
query-source address with port option but how about
On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Jul 16, 2008, at 8:51 PM, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 06:34:38PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
The 'query-source' options don't have to be specified: the system
will just choose some appropriate address according to the state of
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008, Kevin Oberman wrote:
From: Max Laier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 21:38:46 +0200
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Monday 21 July 2008 21:14:22 Doug Barton wrote:
Brett Glass wrote:
| Everyone:
|
| Will FreeBSD 7.1 be released in time to use it as an upgrade to
|
I'm forking the thread on fsck/soft-updates in hopes of getting some
practical advice based on the discussion here of background fsck,
softupdates and write-caching on SATA drives.
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Let's be realistic. We're talking about ATA and SATA hard disks,
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 03:51:02AM +1100, Ian Smith wrote:
Well, I believe HZ was increased from 100 to 1000 long ago (RELENG_6?)
as a default. I'm really not sure of the implications of decreasing it,
besides having less granularity for some
Hello all,
I've been searching around and have come up with no current discussions on
this issue. I'll keep it brief:
In 7.0 or 7.1 is there any provision to have multiple IP addresses in a
jail?
I'm stumped on this, as I just started a new hosting project that needs a
few jails. At
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008, Robert Watson wrote:
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Chris St Denis wrote:
Serious question here (not trolling).
These patches have been around for years, why have they never been
committed to trunk/stable?
...
The current patches Bjoern is preparing address most of these
,
Charles
___
Charles Sprickman
NetEng/SysAdmin
Bway.net - New York's Best Internet - www.bway.net
sp...@bway.net - 212.655.9344
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, Richard Tector wrote:
Charles Sprickman wrote:
Hello,
I think this needs a few more eyes:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-scsi/2009-January/003782.html
In short, writes are slow, likely do to the write-cache being enabled on
the controller. The sysctl used
On Fri, 30 Jan 2009, Gary Palmer wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 11:43:11PM -0500, Charles Sprickman wrote:
[ snip ]
Any idea what happened to the sysctl? Is there some other method to
verify the loader tunable took (other than testing the throughput)?
Boot with -v. If the loader tunable
On Sat, 31 Jan 2009, Gary Palmer wrote:
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 01:48:46AM -0500, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jan 2009, Gary Palmer wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 11:43:11PM -0500, Charles Sprickman wrote:
[ snip ]
Any idea what happened to the sysctl? Is there some other method
a
bug, or bring it over to freebsd-scsi if more appropriate.
Thanks,
Charles
___
Charles Sprickman
NetEng/SysAdmin
Bway.net - New York's Best Internet - www.bway.net
sp...@bway.net - 212.655.9344
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
Howdy,
I'm not expert at getting info out of a dump, but I'll do my best to
provide some information.
This is a Dell PE2970 w/PERC6/i RAID running FreeBSD 7.2/amd64. Brand new
box, has been doing very light work for about two weeks. Last night I
started a very long mstone run on a jailed
that wants it.
Thanks,
Charles
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009, Charles Sprickman wrote:
Howdy,
I'm not expert at getting info out of a dump, but I'll do my best to provide
some information.
This is a Dell PE2970 w/PERC6/i RAID running FreeBSD 7.2/amd64. Brand new
box, has been doing very light work
a proper prompt.
Once I'm logged-in, there seem to be no issues. vi, top and other
things that rely on the terminal being sane work fine.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Charles
___
Charles Sprickman
NetEng/SysAdmin
Bway.net - New York's Best Internet - www.bway.net
sp...@bway.net - 212.655.9344
On Jan 12, 2010, at 12:04 PM, Boris Samorodov b...@ipt.ru wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:14:44 +0200 Marin Atanasov wrote:
I'm thinking about the following situation - 1 system acting like a
host
with a serial port hub, each port of the hub is connected to a
different
machine on sio0,
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Jan 12, 2010, at 12:04 PM, Boris Samorodov b...@ipt.ru wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:14:44 +0200 Marin Atanasov wrote:
I'm thinking about the following situation - 1 system acting like a host
with a serial port hub, each port of the hub
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 02:50:29PM -0500, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Jan 12, 2010, at 12:04 PM, Boris Samorodov b...@ipt.ru wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:14:44 +0200 Marin Atanasov wrote:
I'm
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010, Gerrit Kühn wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 03:24:49 -0800 Jeremy Chadwick
free...@jdc.parodius.com wrote about Re: immense delayed write to file
system (ZFS and UFS2), performance issues:
JC JC If you want a consumer-edition drive that's better tuned for
JC JC server work,
, except for perhaps ps, top and other utilities that
might have issues.
Any pointers appreciated...
Thanks,
Charles
___
Charles Sprickman
NetEng/SysAdmin
Bway.net - New York's Best Internet - www.bway.net
sp...@bway.net - 212.655.9344
___
freebsd-stable
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking at creating a large home use storage machine. Budget is a
concern, but size and reliability are also a priority. Noise is also a
concern, since this will be at home, in the basement. That, and cost, pretty
much rules out a
On Tue, 9 Feb 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
Also, it seems like
people who use zfs (or gmirror + gstripe) generally end up buying pricey
hardware raid cards for compatibility reasons. There seem to be no decent
add-on SATA cards
On Tue, 9 Feb 2010, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 06:53:26AM -0600, Karl Denninger wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 05:21:32PM +1100, Andrew Snow wrote:
http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/ATOM/ICH9/X7SPA.cfm?typ=H
Supermicro just released a
Any hints on that one?
I finally got around to getting dhcp/tftp/nfs setup on an internal network
to perform normal installs (and with some pxelinux hackery, the ability to
boot a DOS disk or memtest86 disk images).
Sysinstall in general is kind of an unweildy beast over serial, but one
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
Dan Naumov wrote:
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010, Dan Langille wrote:
After creating three different system configurations (Athena,
Supermicro, and HP), my configuration of choice is this Supermicro
setup:
1. Samsung SATA CD/DVD Burner $20 (+ $8 shipping)
the machine's locked up as it's
confused about a ro root...
Thanks,
Charles
http://wiki.freebsd.org/RootOnZFS/GPTZFSBoot/RAIDZ2
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 7:27 AM, Charles Sprickman sp...@bway.net wrote:
Any hints on that one?
I finally got around to getting dhcp/tftp/nfs setup on an internal
network
Howdy,
I'm having some problems getting 8.0 to install over the network. I've
got my dhcp, tftp and nfs server working well, and I've tested all three
services from this host before attempting to boot over the network.
pxeboot seems to work, and I see it get loaded via tftp. The kernel
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 08:28:03PM -0500, Charles Sprickman wrote:
Howdy,
I'm having some problems getting 8.0 to install over the network.
I've got my dhcp, tftp and nfs server working well, and I've tested
all three services from this host before
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Charles Sprickman sp...@bway.net wrote:
Howdy,
I'm having some problems getting 8.0 to install over the network. I've got
my dhcp, tftp and nfs server working well, and I've tested all three
services from this host
for 93 days. Nothing has changed in
the past few days as far as software or overall load. The crash did
happen during or shortly after the daily periodic run.
Any interest in this one? Is it something to file a PR on?
dmesg is below...
Thanks,
Charles
___
Charles Sprickman
NetEng/SysAdmin
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
On 17-3-2010 9:27, Matthias Gamsjager wrote:
sharenfs does work in freebsd but iscsi does not. I'm not sure about smb.
about nfs: you should take a look at /etc/zfs/exports
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 9:15 AM, Harald Schmalzbauer
On Sat, 20 Mar 2010, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
On 20-3-2010 0:50, Charles Sprickman wrote:
Just wondering, is this using the base nfsd/mountd, or is there some
in-kernel nfs code strictly for zfs? I haven't found much info on the
share* options in the manpage or wiki.
There's also
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
