pinoyskull wrote:
Mark Andrews wrote:
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--060508000808090604020506
---clip ---
/u1/dev
crw-r--r-- 1 root daemon2, 2 Jul 12 2002 null
crw-r--r-- 1 root daemon2, 3 Jul 12 2002 random
crw-r--r-- 1 root daemon2,
Hello,
I experience Fatal trap 12 when I shutdown if I have run the X server
(with nvidia driver 1.0.9746). This crash happen 4/5 of the time. It is
in devfs_populate_loop() in devfs.c. I don't have the vmcore anymore :-/.
To look futher, I add options INVARIANTS (and INVARIANT_SUPPORT) and
Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 11:39:33AM +0100, Henri Hennebert wrote:
Hello,
I experience Fatal trap 12 when I shutdown if I have run the X server
(with nvidia driver 1.0.9746). This crash happen 4/5 of the time. It is
in devfs_populate_loop() in devfs.c. I don't have
Erik Trulsson wrote:
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 07:34:56PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey guys, having a problem getting the sound driver to load
properly, any suggestions/solutions?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:27:0:class=0x040300 card=0x103e147b
Hello,
I have a production server which freeze from time to time
(from 5 hours to 7 days between freeze).
I try (in /boot/loader.conf.local):
- hint.acpi.0.disabled=1
- debug.mpsafevfs=0
debug.mpsafevm=0
to no avail.
I setup a serial console and go into ddb and get:
KDB: enter:
Quoting Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 06:44:22PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 06:37:16PM -0500, Mike Jakubik wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 05:07:56PM +0200, Niki Denev wrote:
On Thursday 26 January 2006 10:40, Niki
I cvsup to RELENG_6 at 2006-02-10 05:03:20 UTC ~ 6.1-BETA1
The mpt driver can't find the disk under VMWARE ESX 2.5.2.
Henri
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any
Quoting Mike Jakubik [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Glenn Dawson wrote:
At 12:06 PM 3/8/2006, you wrote:
Does anyone know how to change the release version of the source
code? I have some brain dead software (Plesk) that insists on
FreeBSD 5.3, while it will work just fine on 5.5 and even 6. I am
Robert Watson wrote:
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Henri Hennebert wrote:
I upgrade a web, squid, mail server (under SMP with 2 pentium III) to
6.1-RC (Apr 9 2006) and encounter 2 `freezing'.
The system is still responding to http requests but I can't login on
the console or through ssh -- no shell
Robert Watson wrote:
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, Henri Hennebert wrote:
Are you running with WITNESS and INVARIANTS enabled? If not, could
you do so and see if the problem is reproduceable, and if so, whether
or not WITNESS (and friends) generate any warnings?
It looks like something has leaked
Quoting Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 10:28:11PM +0200, Henri Hennebert wrote:
At the first boot I got a panic on a gif interface. I don't need it now so
I commented it out of rc.conf.local and reboot.
What panic? This shouldn't happen, naturally.
The snapshot
Morgan Reed wrote:
Not sure if this is the most appropriate place to ask, feel free to
redirect me if it isn't.
I've got an issue with a simple NAT with pf.
I've got two machines;
the first (I will call m1) has 2 ethernet interfaces (I will call them
m1.0 and m1.1)
the second (I will call m2)
Hello,
I enjoy reading A conversation with Jeff Bonwick and Bill Moore in ACM
Queue. PJD paper Porting the ZFS file system to the FreeBSD operation
system was really interesting... As a result, I switch all my
filesystems to zfs -- Yes I know: WARNING: ZFS is considered to be an
experimental
Hello
I'm running 7.0-BETA1 with patch
http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/vm_kern.c.2.patch -- without this
patch, the panic come sooner.
I setup my root fs under zfs. the boot fs is under gmirror+ufs.
loader.conf:
#--- Tuning for ZFS - http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFSTuningGuide
hello
To push zfs, I launch 2 scrub at the same time, after ~20 seconds the
system freeze:
zpool scrub pool0 zpool scrub pool2
My pools:
zpool status
pool: pool0
state: ONLINE
scrub: none requested
config:
NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM
pool0 ONLINE
Richard Arends wrote:
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 05:37:00PM +0100, Henri Hennebert wrote:
Henri,
To push zfs, I launch 2 scrub at the same time, after ~20 seconds the
system freeze:
zpool scrub pool0 zpool scrub pool2
This won't start the scrubs at the same time, but after each other
Richard Arends wrote:
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 09:35:59PM +0100, Henri Hennebert wrote:
This won't start the scrubs at the same time, but after each other. And
the second will only start if the first one not fails (exitcode == 0)
Not at all, the scrub is asynchronious, I'm sure
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 05:37:00PM +0100, Henri Hennebert wrote:
hello
To push zfs, I launch 2 scrub at the same time, after ~20 seconds the
system freeze:
[...]
I found a deadlock too. If it's reproducable for you, can you try this
patch:
I reproduce it after
AngryWolf wrote:
Hi,
Recently I upgraded my FreeBSD 6.2 system to 7.0-BETA2 using cvsup and the
following howto, except that what I first did was a `pkg_delete -a':
http://d-kriptik.com/blog/2007/10/30/updating-to-freebsd-7-beta-1-from-freebsd-62/
Everything went OK, except that, after the
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 12:39:27PM +0100, Henri Hennebert wrote:
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 05:37:00PM +0100, Henri Hennebert wrote:
hello
To push zfs, I launch 2 scrub at the same time, after ~20 seconds the
system freeze:
[...]
I found
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 12:39:27PM +0100, Henri Hennebert wrote:
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 05:37:00PM +0100, Henri Hennebert wrote:
hello
To push zfs, I launch 2 scrub at the same time, after ~20 seconds the
system freeze:
[...]
I found
Hello,
As seen in another thread, I was curious about a zpool created under
FreeBSD being available under opensolaris.
So I boot indiana and do:
zpool import -f -o ro pool2
zpool scrub pool2
all ended properly...
shutdown.
When I reboot with FreeBSD (7.0-BETA2) I get:
zpool status pool2
Henri Hennebert wrote:
Hello,
As seen in another thread, I was curious about a zpool created under
FreeBSD being available under opensolaris.
So I boot indiana and do:
zpool import -f -o ro pool2
zpool scrub pool2
all ended properly...
shutdown.
When I reboot with FreeBSD (7.0-BETA2) I
Henri Hennebert wrote:
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 12:39:27PM +0100, Henri Hennebert wrote:
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 05:37:00PM +0100, Henri Hennebert wrote:
hello
To push zfs, I launch 2 scrub at the same time, after ~20 seconds
the system
Hello,
I'm running 7.0-BETA4 - i386 with the root fs on zfs.
This nigth, the system freeze.
I can enter kdb - see attached file - If I request the wrong
informations let me know for the next time...
I use the patch http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zgd_done.patch .
Henri
show
xer wrote:
Hello
Mine 6.4-STABLE today has a strange problem regarding phpsysinfo that i use
it.
Ports are updated,but phpsysinfo (on browser) today show errors about pcre:
---
Notice: Undefined offset: 3 in
Hello,
Experiencing some deadlock, I try to reenable my serial console on
7.2-RC1. (console=comconsole,vidconsole in /boot/loader.conf and
-Dh or -Dh -S115200 in /boot.config).
/var/log/message show: 'sio0: type 16550A, console' and from the vga
point of view, console output from kernel is
Sorry for the previous wrong followup :-(
Hello,
Experiencing some deadlock, I try to reenable my serial console on
7.2-RC1. (console=comconsole,vidconsole in /boot/loader.conf and
-Dh or -Dh -S115200 in /boot.config).
/var/log/message show: 'sio0: type 16550A, console' and from the vga
Marten Vijn wrote:
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 16:49 +0200, Henri Hennebert wrote:
Hello,
Experiencing some deadlock, I try to reenable my serial console on
7.2-RC1. (console=comconsole,vidconsole in /boot/loader.conf and
-Dh or -Dh -S115200 in /boot.config).
/var/log/message show: 'sio0: type
Navdeep Parhar wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Kip Macy km...@freebsd.org wrote:
Not really a problem but a question: Is the v13 on-disk format
exactly the same as that used by Solaris/Opensolaris?
It is supposed to be. The sources are the same. However, I have not
tested
Kip Macy wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Kip Macy km...@freebsd.org wrote:
I will be MFC'ing the newer ZFS support some time this afternoon. Both
world and kernel will need to be re-built. Existing pools will
continue to work without upgrade.
If you choose to upgrade a pool to take
Henri Hennebert wrote:
Kip Macy wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Kip Macy km...@freebsd.org wrote:
I will be MFC'ing the newer ZFS support some time this afternoon. Both
world and kernel will need to be re-built. Existing pools will
continue to work without upgrade.
If you choose
Kip Macy wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Kip Macy km...@freebsd.org wrote:
I will be MFC'ing the newer ZFS support some time this afternoon. Both
world and kernel will need to be re-built. Existing pools will
continue to work without upgrade.
If you choose to upgrade a pool to take
or crash.
Henri
-Kip
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 4:16 AM, Henri Hennebert h...@restart.be wrote:
Kip Macy wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Kip Macy km...@freebsd.org wrote:
I will be MFC'ing the newer ZFS support some time this afternoon. Both
world and kernel will need to be re-built
Kip Macy wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Kip Macy km...@freebsd.org wrote:
I will be MFC'ing the newer ZFS support some time this afternoon. Both
world and kernel will need to be re-built. Existing pools will
continue to work without upgrade.
If you choose to upgrade a pool to take
and time
Henri
--Artem
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 3:00 AM, Henri Hennebert h...@restart.be wrote:
Kip Macy wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Kip Macy km...@freebsd.org wrote:
I will be MFC'ing the newer ZFS support some time this afternoon. Both
world and kernel will need to be re
Henri Hennebert wrote:
Artem Belevich wrote:
I had the same problem on -current. Try attached patch. It may not
apply cleanly on -stable, but should be easy enough to make equivalent
changes on -stable.
The patch is ok for stable.
now I get for the pool with my root:
[r...@morzine libzpool
Artem Belevich wrote:
Did you by any chance do that from single-user mode? ZFS seems to rely
on hostid being set.
Try running /etc/rc.d/hostid start and then re-try your zfs commands.
I was in multiuser with hostid set.
Henri
--Artem
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Henri Hennebert h
Kip Macy wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Artem Belevich fbsdl...@src.cx wrote:
I had the same problem on -current. Try attached patch. It may not
apply cleanly on -stable, but should be easy enough to make equivalent
changes on -stable.
--Artem
Adding to rw_init looks fine, but I'd
Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 28/05/2009 16:26 Henri Hennebert said the following:
(gdb) bt
#0 0x0008012a6f22 in strlen () from /lib/libc.so.7
#1 0x0008012a0feb in open () from /lib/libc.so.7
#2 0x00080129ea59 in open () from /lib/libc.so.7
#3 0x0008012a1f2e in vfprintf () from
Henri Hennebert wrote:
Kip Macy wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Kip Macy km...@freebsd.org wrote:
I will be MFC'ing the newer ZFS support some time this afternoon. Both
world and kernel will need to be re-built. Existing pools will
continue to work without upgrade.
If you choose
Ruben Lara wrote:
Hi all!
I just installed postfix, after build world without sendmail
If i try to send mail i get:
mail# mail aaa
Subject: a
a
.
EOT
mail# mail: /usr/sbin/sendmail: No such file or directory
Event with WITHOUT_SENDMAIL=yes in /etc/src.conf, make installworld must
create
Kip Macy wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Kip Macy km...@freebsd.org wrote:
I will be MFC'ing the newer ZFS support some time this afternoon. Both
world and kernel will need to be re-built. Existing pools will
continue to work without upgrade.
If you choose to upgrade a pool to take
, Henri Hennebert h...@restart.be wrote:
Kip Macy wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Kip Macy km...@freebsd.org wrote:
I will be MFC'ing the newer ZFS support some time this afternoon. Both
world and kernel will need to be re-built. Existing pools will
continue to work without upgrade
Lorenzo Perone wrote:
Hi,
I tried hard... but without success ;(
the result is, when choosing the disk with the zfs boot
sectors in it (in my case F5, which goes to ad6), the kernel
is not found. the console shows:
forth not found
definitions not found
only not found
(the above repeated
Hello,
During my tests (succesful) to directly boot from ZFS (with zfsboot and
gptzfsboot) I encounter the error can't boot 'kernel' if too many
devices/pools are connected to the machine. In my case:
2 SAS disks with 2 pools
2 SATA disks with 2 pools
1 USB key with one pool
`heap` command:
Henri Hennebert wrote:
Lorenzo Perone wrote:
Hi,
I tried hard... but without success ;(
the result is, when choosing the disk with the zfs boot
sectors in it (in my case F5, which goes to ad6), the kernel
is not found. the console shows:
forth not found
definitions not found
only not found
Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 29/05/2009 15:35 Andriy Gapon said the following:
So anyone else feels that this is a bug?
on 28/05/2009 16:55 Andriy Gapon said the following:
on 28/05/2009 16:26 Henri Hennebert said the following:
(gdb) bt
#0 0x0008012a6f22 in strlen () from /lib/libc.so.7
#1
Doug Rabson wrote:
On 1 Jun 2009, at 11:22, Henri Hennebert wrote:
Hello,
During my tests (succesful) to directly boot from ZFS (with zfsboot
and gptzfsboot) I encounter the error can't boot 'kernel' if too
many devices/pools are connected to the machine. In my case:
2 SAS disks with 2
Kip Macy wrote:
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Adam McDougall mcdou...@egr.msu.edu wrote:
I'm thinking that too. I spent some time taking stabs at figuring it out
yesterday but didn't get anywhere useful. I did try compiling the -current
src/sys/boot tree on 7.2 after a couple header tweaks
Hello,
I encounter this problem for the second time. The system is working
perfectly well but suddenly the command `zfs list' don't work and can't
be killed.
Here is a procstat of the culprit:
[r...@morzine ~]# procstat -k 91766
PIDTID COMM TDNAME KSTACK
91766
Henri Hennebert wrote:
Hello,
I encounter this problem for the second time. The system is working
perfectly well but suddenly the command `zfs list' don't work and can't
be killed.
Here is a procstat of the culprit:
[r...@morzine ~]# procstat -k 91766
PIDTID COMM TDNAME
Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
On Wed, June 17, 2009 11:16, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2009-06-17 16:09, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
And for virtualbox on amd64 purposes I want to run 7.2R or STABLE to use
VT-x and amd64 vm's under vbox. will I have to make anything, or it will
just work ?
Kip Macy created a
Gavin Atkinson wrote:
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 16:51 +0200, Henri Hennebert wrote:
Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
thanks, I was just looking for this update on web interface to cvs and
there is nothing in UPDATING for RELENG_7 there. is this really supposed
to happen ?
Sadly a known and ignored problem
Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
One of my FreeBSD boxes is a 7-STABLE/amd64 one on ZFS, now in
production for over a 1.5 years now and which receives regular upgrades.
The last installation of FreeBSD 7-STABLE was just about 2 weeks ago.
Today the upgrade failed the first time:
Ronald Klop wrote:
Hi.
I put zfs on my external usb-disk, so I can backup my harddisk with zfs
send/receive.
I now have corruption on this volume.
[r...@sjakie ~]# zpool status -v
pool: extern
state: ONLINE
status: One or more devices has experienced an error resulting in data
Hello,
After upgrading from 7.2-STABLE to 8.0-BETA1 I encounter a problem when
connecting with firefox to a local apache server using the global
unicast IPv6 address of the local machine. pf.conf must be updated!
My configuration:
[r...@avoriaz ~]# ifconfig em0
em0:
Hello,
After upgrading from 7.2-STABLE to 8.0-BETA1 I encounter a problem when
connecting with firefox to a local apache server using the global
unicast IPv6 address of the local machine. pf.conf must be updated!
My configuration:
[r...@avoriaz ~]# ifconfig em0
em0:
no entry for 2001:41d0:2:2d29:1:1::
This is by design as part of the new architecture in 8.0, which maintains
the L2 ARP/ND6 and L3 routing tables separately.
-- Qing
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org on behalf of Henri Hennebert
Sent: Fri 7/10/2009 5:32 AM
transmitted, 3 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/std-dev = 0.531/0.721/0.884/0.145 ms
Thanks
Henri
-Original Message-
From: Henri Hennebert [mailto:h...@restart.be]
Sent: Sat 7/11/2009 3:09 AM
To: Li, Qing
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; freebsd-...@freebsd.org
packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/std-dev = 0.531/0.721/0.884/0.145 ms
Thanks
Henri
-Original Message-
From: Henri Hennebert [mailto:h...@restart.be]
Sent: Sat 7/11/2009 3:09 AM
To: Li, Qing
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; freebsd
Hello,
When I try to boot my Fujitsu-Siemens C200, with the SMP kernel,
the system freezes:
During a boot -v, the last screen is:
SMP: AP CPU#1 Launched!
SMP CPU1 apic_initialize()
lint0: 0x00010700 lint1: 0x00010400 TPR: 0x0010 SVR: 0x01ff
adc0: FX4830T/R02N CDROM drive ...
adc0:
Hello,
Does anyone is running FreeBSD stable in SMP mode on a motherboard
_without_ any I/O Ints entry with type ExtINT (mptable output)?
I'm suspercting that my kernel freeze at boot come from:
APIC_IO: routing 8254 via IOAPIC #0 intpin 0
My PR is:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 06:17:24PM -0700, Joe Peterson wrote:
Glad you got it back! Yes, when I was first playing with ZFS, I noticed
that booting between single and multi user mode could make the pools
invisible. Import seemed to bring them back...
I did go into
Hello,
I encounter a deadlock while
1) cpio -p from a ZFS filesystem to a UFS filesystem
2) rsync from ZFS to ZFS
I was running with this patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zgd_done.patch
Here are show alllocks + showpcpu + bt from serial console:
Henri
KDB: enter: Line break on
Henri Hennebert wrote:
Hello,
I encounter a deadlock while
1) cpio -p from a ZFS filesystem to a UFS filesystem
2) rsync from ZFS to ZFS
I was running with this patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zgd_done.patch
Here are show alllocks + showpcpu + bt from serial console:
PS
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 02:47:02PM +0100, Henri Hennebert wrote:
Hello,
I encounter a deadlock while
1) cpio -p from a ZFS filesystem to a UFS filesystem
2) rsync from ZFS to ZFS
I was running with this patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zgd_done.patch
Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Ivan Voras wrote:
As some of you may already know, I'm working on a graphical installer
for FreeBSD 7, which was started as a Google SoC 2007 project but still
continues.
10+ years back when Jordan did first pre= X, 24x80 graphical installer,
soon afer he'd finished a
Julian Stacey wrote:
Henri Hennebert wrote 2 emails with same common text
To: Julian H. Stacey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2008 15:20:38 +0100
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The first private shouting got answered. Then came
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote:
Hey,
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/UPDATING?rev=1.507;only_with_tag=RELENG_7
NOTE TO PEOPLE WHO THINK THAT FreeBSD 7.x IS SLOW:
FreeBSD 7.x has many debugging features turned on, in
both the kernel and userland. These features
Thierry Herbelot wrote:
Hello,
I am using a recent 7.0-Stable (x86) and a Zfs pool for my data.
After the dtrace import, I have updated my sources (and make buildworld, make
buildkernel) and I no longer have access to my Zfs pool (just to be sure, I
have since updated twice more to work
John Baldwin wrote:
This patch merges a few changes from HEAD back to 7.x. I think the endian
changes specifically might solve the issue people saw with zpools created
with non-dtrace kernels not being readable by dtrace kernels and vice versa.
http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/zfs_7.patch
Henri Hennebert wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
This patch merges a few changes from HEAD back to 7.x. I think the
endian changes specifically might solve the issue people saw with
zpools created with non-dtrace kernels not being readable by dtrace
kernels and vice versa.
http://www.FreeBSD.org
John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday 29 August 2008 03:57:46 am Henri Hennebert wrote:
Henri Hennebert wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
This patch merges a few changes from HEAD back to 7.x. I think the
endian changes specifically might solve the issue people saw with
zpools created with non-dtrace
John Birrell wrote:
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 09:07:15AM +0200, Henri Hennebert wrote:
I try, but with the wold of 7.1-PRERELEASE I got
cc: Internal error: Segmentation fault: 11 (program ld)
Please submit a full bug report.
See URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html for instructions.
*** Error code 1
John Birrell wrote:
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 10:40:12AM +0200, Henri Hennebert wrote:
I believe that the buildworld that you have is OK, even when built with the
CTF data it's the installworld when things go bad.
Do you need me to send you any files to recover from this problem?
No problem
John Baldwin wrote:
This patch merges a few changes from HEAD back to 7.x. I think the endian
changes specifically might solve the issue people saw with zpools created
with non-dtrace kernels not being readable by dtrace kernels and vice versa.
http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/zfs_7.patch
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 09:28:36PM +0200, Henri Hennebert wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
This patch merges a few changes from HEAD back to 7.x. I think the
endian changes specifically might solve the issue people saw with
zpools created with non-dtrace kernels not being
John Birrell wrote:
For those people experiencing a performance degradation since the DTrace import,
please update your copy of
src/sys/cddl/compat/opensolaris/kern/opensolaris_kmem.c
by either cvsup of direct edit to remove #define KMEM_DEBUG.
You only need to rebuild the opensolaris kernel
Just for the record,
I add options GEOM_PART_BSD and GEOM_PART_MBR to my kernel config (I
want to see what gpart was saying abount my disks).
At boot time I get some messages as:
GEOM: ad4s2: geometry does not match label.
GEOM: ad4s2: media size does not match label.
and more important:
Le 1/01/2010 16:40, Ian Smith a écrit :
Hi,
Thought I had a clue on using cvsweb, but seem to have mislaid it ..
After updating 7.0-RELEASE to RELENG_7 sources on Dec 28, checking
UPDATING before and during buildworld, went hunting on cvsweb for the
very version of UPDATING I was reading,
On 01/09/2010 05:39, Warren Block wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jan 2010, Frank wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jan 2010, Steven Friedrich wrote:
Option AllowEmptyInput off
EndSection
Comment out the line containing AllowEmptyInput.
OK, this took care of the nothing-works-unless-mouse-is-moved problem
but why do I
On 01/19/2010 17:12, Alexander Motin wrote:
Hi.
I've made a patch, that should solve set of problems of CAM ATA and CAM
generally. I would like to ask for testing and feedback.
What patch does:
- It unifies bus reset/probe sequence. Whenever bus attached at boot or
later, CAM will
On 08/13/2010 20:02, Andreas Mayer wrote:
$ uname -a
FreeBSD wurd.dev001.net 8.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE #0: Mon Jul 19
02:36:49 UTC 2010
r...@mason.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
2010/8/13 Malcolm Waltz mwa...@pacific.edu:
Have you tried zfs list -t all ?
I
On 09/16/2010 17:18, jhell wrote:
On 09/16/2010 09:55, Mike Tancsa wrote:
Thanks again for all the ZFS fixes and enhancements! Are there any
caveats to upgrading ?
Do I just do
zpool upgrade -a
zfs upgrade -a
or are there any extra steps ?
Hi Mike,
No-one knows your bootcode better
prefer to install bootcode BEFORE. Then reboot and check it with the
printf of my simple patch. Then you can zpool/zfs upgrade without problem.
Am I understanding this correctly ?
Thanks for all the work on ZFS BTW, it's great!
Dan
On Sep 16, 2010, at 2:03 PM, Henri Hennebert wrote
Hello and merry Xmas to everybody,
I upgrade a remote server from 8.1-RELEASE to 8.2-RC1.
This server have one disk:
[r...@tignes ~]# gpart show
= 63 488397105 ada0 MBR (233G)
63 12583809 1 freebsd (6.0G)
12583872 475813296 2 freebsd [active] (227G)
=
On 06/16/2011 07:32, Zhihao Yuan wrote:
I just redo everything, and changed the order of freebsd-zfs and
freebsd-swap. The Read error still happens!
Just a me too.
Everything was working great with zfsboot from 8.2-RELEASE + a patch
(http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/153552).
On 06/16/2011 19:35, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, June 16, 2011 8:45:41 am Zhihao Yuan wrote:
Exactly. The MFCed ZFSv28 is different from any patch maintained by
mm@. Maybe some untested changes involved.
Can you try reverting this change:
Author: jhb
Date: Thu Apr 28 17:44:24 2011
New
On 06/16/2011 19:35, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, June 16, 2011 8:45:41 am Zhihao Yuan wrote:
Exactly. The MFCed ZFSv28 is different from any patch maintained by
mm@. Maybe some untested changes involved.
Can you try reverting this change:
Author: jhb
Date: Thu Apr 28 17:44:24 2011
On 06/20/2011 15:51, John Baldwin wrote:
On Saturday, June 18, 2011 5:04:07 am Henri Hennebert wrote:
On 06/17/2011 19:37, John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, June 17, 2011 1:06:22 pm Henri Hennebert wrote:
On 06/16/2011 19:35, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, June 16, 2011 8:45:41 am Zhihao Yuan
On 06/21/2011 15:01, John Baldwin wrote:
Index: zfsldr.S
===
--- zfsldr.S(revision 223339)
+++ zfsldr.S(working copy)
@@ -234,9 +234,12 @@ nread.1: xor %ecx,%ecx # Get
callw read
On 06/21/2011 17:55, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 10:50:14 am Henri Hennebert wrote:
On 06/21/2011 15:01, John Baldwin wrote:
Index: zfsldr.S
===
--- zfsldr.S(revision 223339)
+++ zfsldr.S(working copy
On 06/21/2011 19:51, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 12:15:58 pm Henri Hennebert wrote:
On 06/21/2011 17:55, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 10:50:14 am Henri Hennebert wrote:
On 06/21/2011 15:01, John Baldwin wrote:
Index: zfsldr.S
On 06/21/2011 21:25, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 3:02:28 pm Henri Hennebert wrote:
On 06/21/2011 19:51, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 12:15:58 pm Henri Hennebert wrote:
On 06/21/2011 17:55, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 10:50:14 am Henri
On 06/21/2011 23:27, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 4:13:20 pm Henri Hennebert wrote:
On 06/21/2011 21:25, John Baldwin wrote:
and I get:
Read error: 04
Hmm, that is the error for an invalid sector. Try this patch. It reshuffles
a few more things and adds code to dump
On 06/22/2011 16:19, Henri Hennebert wrote:
On 06/22/2011 15:57, John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday, June 22, 2011 7:34:05 am Henri Hennebert wrote:
I get
LBA: 8200
Read error: 04
Odd. Oh, I fubar'd and read the wrong thing for the sector. Also, we
should leave the EDD packet on the stack
On 06/22/2011 15:57, John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday, June 22, 2011 7:34:05 am Henri Hennebert wrote:
I get
LBA: 8200
Read error: 04
Odd. Oh, I fubar'd and read the wrong thing for the sector. Also, we
should leave the EDD packet on the stack so it doesn't get trashed by
calling hex8
On 06/22/2011 16:23, Henri Hennebert wrote:
On 06/22/2011 16:19, Henri Hennebert wrote:
On 06/22/2011 15:57, John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday, June 22, 2011 7:34:05 am Henri Hennebert wrote:
I get
LBA: 8200
Read error: 04
Odd. Oh, I fubar'd and read the wrong thing for the sector. Also
On 06/22/2011 17:58, John Baldwin wrote:
Index: zfsldr.S
===
--- zfsldr.S(revision 223365)
+++ zfsldr.S(working copy)
@@ -16,7 +16,6 @@
*/
/* Memory Locations */
- .set MEM_REL,0x700 #
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
