Hi --
On 13.04.2013, at 14:29, Kimmo Paasiala kpaas...@gmail.com wrote:
[great deal of simplification by ipv6_addrs_IF]
Sorry to resurrect this thread but since nothing has happened in about
three months I have to ask: What can I do to have this commited to
HEAD?
+1
Nowadays -where IPv6
Hi --
[Upcoming code freeze in stable]
On 2013-04-13 22:15, Michael Grimm wrote:
On 13.04.2013, at 14:29, Kimmo Paasiala kpaas...@gmail.com wrote:
[great deal of simplification by ipv6_addrs_IF]
Sorry to resurrect this thread but since nothing has happened in about
three months I have
On 2013-07-12 6:56, Hiroki Sato wrote:
Kevin Oberman rkober...@gmail.com wrote
in
can6yy1srswemj2_bjx_drzmxgk4tf50_ode8o8i2d6wtrgw...@mail.gmail.com:
rk On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:46 AM, Mark Felder f...@feld.me wrote:
rk
rk On Wed, 10 Jul 2013 06:44:12 -0500, Michael Grimm
rk trash
On 12.07.2013, at 09:03, Hiroki Sato h...@freebsd.org wrote:
Please let me know if the existing configurations and/or the new
formats do not work.
First of all: great work! It is that much easier to deal with aliases, now.
There is only one minor issue, if at all:
rc.conf:
|
On 20.07.2013, at 16:46, Hiroki Sato h...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hiroki Sato h...@freebsd.org wrote in
20130718.123323.1730389945845032580@allbsd.org:
hr Michael Grimm trash...@odo.in-berlin.de wrote
hr in eb3c4472-02bf-4415-bb2d-b4929063d...@odo.in-berlin.de:
hr
hr tr On 12.07.2013
On 20.07.2013, at 19:01, Hiroki Sato h...@freebsd.org wrote:
Michael Grimm trash...@odo.in-berlin.de wrote in
5c2419e4-d5b7-4f1a-aed0-90ef73305...@odo.in-berlin.de:
tr Now, a range definition and prefixlen 56 is recognized properly:
Thank you.
Well, actually, we do have to thank you
On 2013-07-30 16:04, Mark Felder wrote:
Unbound/NSD are suitable replacements if we really need something in
base, and they have been picked up by OpenBSD for a good reason --
clean, secure, readable, maintainable codebases and their use across
the
internet and on the ROOT servers is growing.
Michael Grimm trash...@odo.in-berlin.de wrote:
I'am seeing this too. Same error messages.
Latest revision failing is:
| Relative URL: ^/stable/10
| Revision: 281372
Latest revision compiling without any issue is:
| Relative URL: ^/stable/10
| Revision: 281265
/etc/src.conf
Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote
Michael Grimm trash...@odo.in-berlin.de wrote:
Compilation at r281289 is on its way. I'll send you a link after completion.
Thanks, but you can stop that compilation now. :)
I was just about sending you my logfile :-)
I finally managed to
reproduce
Hi,
starting a couple of weeks ago, I do see mergemaster complaining after
"mergemaster -iFU":
stat: ./have: stat: No such file or directory
/usr/sbin/mergemaster: arithmetic expression: expecting primary: " ~18
& 4095 &
"
install: invalid file mode: ./have
Chris H <bsd-li...@bsdforge.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 17:38:05 +0100 Michael Grimm <trash...@odo.in-berlin.de>
> wrote
>> starting a couple of weeks ago, I do see mergemaster complaining after
>> "mergemaster -iFU":
>>
>>s
Hi -
On 15.08.2016, at 19:01, Michael Grimm <trash...@ellael.org> wrote:
> I recently upgraded from 10.3-STABLE to 11.0-PRERELEASE. Now, I am missing
> those parts in my daily security report regarding pf, e.g.:
>
> example.private pf denied packets:
> +blo
Hi,
I am running service jails (VNET/bridge/epair) and a host at 11.2-PRERELEASE
r335282, upgraded from r334874 today.
All syslog messages at each jail become forwarded to syslogd running at the
host. This setup worked for years. Today not a single syslog message becomes
forwarded to the
On 17. Jun 2018, at 16:27, Michael Grimm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am running service jails (VNET/bridge/epair) and a host at 11.2-PRERELEASE
> r335282, upgraded from r334874 today.
>
> All syslog messages at each jail become forwarded to syslogd running at the
> host. This s
On 17. Jun 2018, at 18:06, Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote:
> There was a large MFC about syslogd at r335059:
> So how about take following steps?
>
> 1. svn update -r 335058 /usr/src
> 2. Rebuild and reinstall /usr/sbin/syslogd and /usr/bin/wall on both
> host and jail.
> 3. Restart syslogd on both
On 17. Jun 2018, at 16:50, Gary Palmer wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 04:27:33PM +0200, Michael Grimm wrote:
>> Host's syslogd can be reached from inside every jail, e.g.:
>>
>> jtest> nc -4vuw 1 10.x.y.z 514
>> Connection to 10.x.y.z 514 port [u
Hi Ed --
> On 17. Jun 2018, at 19:27, Ed Schouten wrote:
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> 2018-06-17 17:52 GMT+02:00 Michael Grimm :
>> I do believe that this commit might be the cause:
>> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/stable/11/usr.sbin/syslogd/Makefile?revision=335
On 22. Jun 2018, at 22:28, Ed Schouten wrote:
> 2018-06-22 22:06 GMT+02:00 Michael Grimm :
>> After applying your patch:
>>Jun 22 21:22:01 HOSTNAME [31033]: NOTICE [JAILNAME]
>> Unban x.x.x.x
>>
>> Watch: 'fail2ban.actions' -the service- is missing.
&
On 22. Jun 2018, at 21:26, Michael Grimm wrote:
> On 22. Jun 2018, at 21:11, Ed Schouten wrote:
>> Michael, Marek, could you please give this patch a try? Thanks!
>
> Recompiled world (FreeBSD 11.2-STABLE r335532), substituted syslogd with the
> re-compiled one, and:
&g
On 22. Jun 2018, at 17:59, Marek Zarychta wrote:
> Could you please give any advice or workaround for this issue?
I switched to a workaround for the time being which you might use as well in a
similar way:
#) configure fail2ban to use /var/log/faillog
#) run something like that in the
Marek Zarychta wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 03:12:05PM +0200, Michael Grimm wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> this is 11.2-STABLE (r335532), and I am referring to the recent MFC of
>> syslogd modifications [1].
>>
>> Because I cannot judge whether fail2ban la
On 22. Jun 2018, at 21:11, Ed Schouten wrote:
> Gleb, what are your thoughts on the attached patch? It alters syslogd
> to let the 'legacy' RFC 3164 parser also accept messages without a
> timestamp. The time on the syslogd server will be used instead.
>
> Michael, Marek, could you please give
Hi,
this is 11.2-STABLE (r335532), and I am referring to the recent MFC of syslogd
modifications [1].
Because I cannot judge whether fail2ban lacks support for the renewed syslogd
or syslogd has an issue in receiving fail2ban messages I do crosspost this mail
to ports and stable.
I do have
Hi,
I am following FreeBSD 12.1-STABLE.
Clang has been upgraded to version 10.0.0 on May, 1st, and ever since that
time, I do observe a dramatic increase in compilation times of building world,
kernel and ports. I didn't benchmark the exact times, but compilation times are
at least increased
Dimitry Andric wrote:
>
> On 21 Jun 2020, at 14:36, Chris Nehren wrote:
>> On Sunday, June 21, 2020 8:11:15 AM EDT Michael Grimm wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am following FreeBSD 12.1-STABLE.
>>>
>>> Clang has been upgraded to versi
Hi,
I am preparing for the upcoming migration from svn to git.
Is git-lite flavour of the git package sufficient in order to follow STABLE
sources for compiling STABLE sources?
Or does one need a full blown git?
Thanks and regards,
Michael
___
Ryan Moeller wrote:
>
> On 12/5/20 7:16 AM, Michael Grimm wrote:
>> Is git-lite flavour of the git package sufficient in order to follow STABLE
>> sources for compiling STABLE sources?
>
> git-lite will do.
Thanks,
Michael
__
to understand it.
Anyway, I just wanted to let you know.
Regards,
Michael
> On 22. Nov 2020, at 14:37, Michael Grimm wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am running 12.2-STABLE and VNET jails, one of which host a recent Dovecot
> IMAP and a recent postfix SMTP server. Authentication is forced via T
Hi,
Warner Losh wrote:
> The FreeBSD project will be moving it's source repo from subversion to git
> starting this this weekend.
First of all I'd like to thank all those involved in this for their efforts.
Following https://github.com/bsdimp/freebsd-git-docs/blob/main/mini-primer.md
form
Renato Botelho wrote:
> If you want to switch to a different already existing branch, as svn switch
> does, you should look at git-checkout.
>
> It can be a bit expensive due to the size of src repository so if you do work
> on multiple branches too often you can improve it using
Warner Losh wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 7:32 AM Michael Grimm wrote:
>> With svn I used:
>>svn switch svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/NEW /usr/src
>>
>> For git I found:
>>git branch -m stable/OLD stable/NEW
>>or
>&g
Hi,
I am running 12.2-STABLE and VNET jails, one of which host a recent Dovecot
IMAP and a recent postfix SMTP server. Authentication is forced via TLS/SSL for
both services (ports 587 and 993). Setup is as follows:
extIF0/pf/NAT <—> epairXa (bridge0) epairXb <-> jail
A recent upgrade
Hi -
Michael Grimm wrote:
> Well, now I am able to omit this commit, but I would love to know what is
> going on, and why this commit may break 'authentication/certificate
> exchange/what so ever' of IMAP and SMTP/submission clients running in a VNET
> jail ...
It just cam
Ronald Klop wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Nov 2020 14:37:33 +0100, Michael Grimm wrote:
>> P.S. How may I update a local svn copy and simultaneously omit commit 367740
>> from being applied, or how may I revert commit 367740, only?
>
>
> From the top of my head you can do somet
34 matches
Mail list logo
