the board.
Thanks again for doing the test on your system.
Sebastian Stach
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Thanks for doing the test.
My conditions are different in that i have a gigabit network.
The only difference in the iperf options is that i'm using
-d (dualmode).
On the weekend i will have time to do a test with the NICs
set to 100MBit.
Sebastian Stach
Am 06.06.2012 um 12:18 schrieb Miroslav
I have an X9SCA-F board and recently updated the BIOS to version 2.0 (the .508
BIOS file).
Its not the same board as yours but maybe the you have the same problem. When i
downloaded
the BIOS from the Supermicro website on May 23 the included AMI.BAT only
updated the BIOS
and not the Intel ME
to this.
Sebastian Stach
Am 05.06.2012 um 20:39 schrieb Johan Hendriks:
Thanks for the pointer.
But my ami.bat file from the just downloaded .508 (2.0) firmware is the same
as the one i used.
this is my ami.bat
@echo off
REN AFUDOSU.SMC AFUDOSU.EXE
AFUDOSU.EXE %1 /P /B /N /K /R /FDT /MER /OPR
problems with the nics and the BIOS
version 2.0
but that the new update should fix it.
Which BIOS version do you have?
Sebastian Stach
Am 05.06.2012 um 22:16 schrieb Miroslav Lachman:
There is a differenc between X9SCM-F and X9SCA-F. The SCM version has 82579V
and 82574L NIC, but X9SCA-F has both
The default was that IPMI is shared with the Intel NIC but i configured it to
use the dedicated interface.
Sebastian Stach
Am 05.06.2012 um 23:21 schrieb Miroslav Lachman:
The board had BIOS 1.1a with build date 2011-09-28 so I updated it to version
2.0 with build date 2012-05-08.
I am
When using pkg_version with the -o argument to print the origin
instead of the package name it doesn't work correct.
# pkg_version -o
(output stripped)
x11/xorg=
x11/xorg=
x11/xorg=
(output stripped)
The output
