So the suggestion is still to use official freebsd.org url where possible?
> Belatedly, this has now happened. Before the stable and master branches on GH
> were the legacy kind that we need to get rid of. As of yesterday, the main
> and stable branches on GH now match what is on
that's what I was thinking thanks.
> I just removed the previous workspace and did git clone -b stable/12 --depth
> 1 https://git.freebsd.org/src.git src
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
__
> > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
> > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
> "
>
>
--
--
-Tj Hariharan
_
Hmm yea will try that and let you know. Switching to -head though...maybe
that'll make it better.
I have to say though..wow this driver's come a long way in a year. Thanks
for all the work...
-Tj
On Aug 19, 2013 8:58 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi,
Please just do it manually
(back when
current was version 9), back then it was basically unusable. Looks like
you're right, it gets a little better and a little worse.
--
Tj Hariharan
Email: t...@archlinux.us
pgpmgj2kuxXtQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
/003769.html
...and 90% of those are related to ath.
LOL...damn, I guess I should avoid ATH card for future laptop purchases.
--
Tj Hariharan
Email: t...@archlinux.us
pgpQTK50STmBu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:15:32AM +0530, Tj Hariharan wrote:
O never mind, it still happens, though obviously more intermittently,
since I didn't notice anything odd for almost an entire day. A few more
things this time though:
a. It IS intermittent, there seems to be very little pattern
.
--
Tj Hariharan
Email: t...@archlinux.us
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
to
narrow down when things broke?
It may be something other than the wifi driver/stack.
Thanks!
-adrian
On 17 August 2013 05:12, Tj t...@archlinux.us wrote:
(Sorry emailed from wrong address, re emailing)
Hi, I just upgraded to 9.2-PRERELEASE from 9.1-RELEASE, I have
this will take a lot longer as compiling world takes about a full day on
this machine.
Thanks,
-Tj
--
Tj Hariharan
Email: t...@archlinux.us
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 09:02:41AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
good to know!
-adrian
On 18 August 2013 05:19, Tj Hariharan t...@archlinux.us wrote
service fixes it, until it happens again -
which it does in a short while (though sometimes I have to restart netif
twice).
As I said, this happened just as I upgraded from 9.1 to 9.2. Anyone have
any idea what's causing this?
-Tj Hariharan
___
freebsd
it does in a short while (though sometimes I have to restart netif
twice).
As I said, this happened just as I upgraded from 9.1 to 9.2. Anyone have
any idea what's causing this?
-Tj Hariharan
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
(on -CURRENT, not sure if
it's in 8-STABLE yet). Perhaps you're referring to the earlier USAS which
does 3Gbps and is supported by the mpt driver.
--
TJ
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
/atacontrol logs
would be useful here.
You may want to try dd with the of=/dev/null instead to remove the 2nd
variable and benchmark solely the read speed of the 1st hdd.
regards,
TJ
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
. From a 2005 post,
http://forum.thinkpads.com/viewtopic.php?f=2t=13036start=0
Check out the link to the hddbenchmark,
http://img57.imageshack.us/img57/6430/hddbenchmark1no.jpg
regards,
TJ
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 6:24 PM, Jean Pereira ad...@olostech.com wrote:
yes, is load ahd
correct?
On 05/20/2010 06:29 AM, Matthias Gamsjager wrote:
did you load the driver?
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Jean Pereiraad...@olostech.com wrote:
Hi.
I'm trying to install FreeBSD on a
Aragon Gouveia wrote:
snip
No, I don't think you will need a CF-SATA adapter. A simple CF-ATA
adapter should do. Those systems just have an Intel GCLF2 board in
them, which has both SATA and ATA:
Aragon Gouveia wrote:
Hi,
Pete French wrote:
I'm not 100% sure, but fairly sure that you'll have a hard time
finding something that combines the low-power standalone type spec with
a 64-bit capable processor. Once you get the higher-end processor,
That was my experiense when shopping
Did you ever find a solution?
I have finally found the time to try to upgrade and have the same problem.
I suspect my Cyrix processor, but it did work on 4.8, eventually.
TJ Olney
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
19 matches
Mail list logo
