Am 09.06.2012 um 10:51 schrieb Miroslav Lachman:
Hi,
I changed the switch to 1Gbps and run the test again.
No problems with the NICs. The iperf is running for 10 hours now. 2TB of data
was transmitted in both directions.
I am running an endless loop on a client side
while 1
iperf
Sebastian Stach schreef:
Am 09.06.2012 um 10:51 schrieb Miroslav Lachman:
Hi,
I changed the switch to 1Gbps and run the test again.
No problems with the NICs. The iperf is running for 10 hours now. 2TB of data
was transmitted in both directions.
I am running an endless loop on a client
Sebastian Stach wrote:
Thanks for doing the test.
My conditions are different in that i have a gigabit network.
The only difference in the iperf options is that i'm using
-d (dualmode).
On the weekend i will have time to do a test with the NICs
set to 100MBit.
Sebastian Stach
Hi,
I changed
Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Sebastian Stach wrote:
I just need to run a tool like iperf and let it run. After about 1-2
hours my nic will just hang
without any messages. I can't even ping the machine anymore. I also
installed Solaris to check
if it's maybe a FreeBSD problem but it's the same there.
Thanks for doing the test.
My conditions are different in that i have a gigabit network.
The only difference in the iperf options is that i'm using
-d (dualmode).
On the weekend i will have time to do a test with the NICs
set to 100MBit.
Sebastian Stach
Am 06.06.2012 um 12:18 schrieb Miroslav
hello all.
i have a new board the supermicro X9SCM-F with the latest firmware 508.
I am having some trouble with the onboard intel nics.
It only activate one nic.
From dmesg
em0: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection 7.2.3 port 0xf020-0xf03f mem
0xf780-0xf781,0xf7825000-0xf7825fff irq
I have an X9SCA-F board and recently updated the BIOS to version 2.0 (the .508
BIOS file).
Its not the same board as yours but maybe the you have the same problem. When i
downloaded
the BIOS from the Supermicro website on May 23 the included AMI.BAT only
updated the BIOS
and not the Intel ME
On 2012-06-05 (Tuesday) 19:31:44 Sebastian Stach wrote:
I have an X9SCA-F board and recently updated the BIOS to version 2.0 (the
.508 BIOS file). Its not the same board as yours but maybe the you have
the same problem. When i downloaded the BIOS from the Supermicro website
on May 23 the
Sebastian Stach schreef:
I have an X9SCA-F board and recently updated the BIOS to version 2.0 (the .508
BIOS file).
Its not the same board as yours but maybe the you have the same problem. When i
downloaded
the BIOS from the Supermicro website on May 23 the included AMI.BAT only
updated the
The AMI.BAT you have already updates the BIOS and the Intel ME. I'm still in
contact with
the support but they told me that this fixes the issue most people are having.
On my board
one of the two nics is still hanging under heavy load. I hope that they will
come up with
a solution to this.
Sebastian Stach wrote:
I have an X9SCA-F board and recently updated the BIOS to version 2.0 (the .508
BIOS file).
Its not the same board as yours but maybe the you have the same problem. When i
downloaded
the BIOS from the Supermicro website on May 23 the included AMI.BAT only
updated the
I just need to run a tool like iperf and let it run. After about 1-2 hours my
nic will just hang
without any messages. I can't even ping the machine anymore. I also installed
Solaris to check
if it's maybe a FreeBSD problem but it's the same there.
The support told me that they know about
Sebastian Stach wrote:
I just need to run a tool like iperf and let it run. After about 1-2 hours my
nic will just hang
without any messages. I can't even ping the machine anymore. I also installed
Solaris to check
if it's maybe a FreeBSD problem but it's the same there.
The support told me
The default was that IPMI is shared with the Intel NIC but i configured it to
use the dedicated interface.
Sebastian Stach
Am 05.06.2012 um 23:21 schrieb Miroslav Lachman:
The board had BIOS 1.1a with build date 2011-09-28 so I updated it to version
2.0 with build date 2012-05-08.
I am
14 matches
Mail list logo
