Re: portupgrade(1) | portmaster(8) -- which is more effective for large upgrade?

2013-06-28 Thread Ronald Klop
On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 16:14:31 +0200, Chris H wrote: Warren Block wrote: On Wed, 26 Jun 2013, Chris H wrote: On Wed, 26 Jun 2013, Chris H wrote: Okay, look up the last time you installed or upgraded a port: % ls -ltr /var/db/pkg The last one is the most recently modified. Update your ports tr

Re: portupgrade(1) | portmaster(8) -- which is more effective for large upgrade?

2013-06-27 Thread Warren Block
On Thu, 27 Jun 2013, Garrett Wollman wrote: In article , wbl...@wonkity.com writes: On Thu, 27 Jun 2013, Garrett Wollman wrote: Having just gone through this in two different environments, I can very very strongly recommend doing the following. It's not the "easy button" of the TV commercial

Re: portupgrade(1) | portmaster(8) -- which is more effective for large upgrade?

2013-06-27 Thread Garrett Wollman
In article , wbl...@wonkity.com writes: >On Thu, 27 Jun 2013, Garrett Wollman wrote: > >> Having just gone through this in two different environments, I can >> very very strongly recommend doing the following. It's not the "easy >> button" of the TV commercials, but it will make things much much >

Re: portupgrade(1) | portmaster(8) -- which is more effective for large upgrade?

2013-06-27 Thread Chris H
> Warren Block wrote: >> On Wed, 26 Jun 2013, Chris H wrote: On Wed, 26 Jun 2013, Chris H wrote: Okay, look up the last time you installed or upgraded a port: % ls -ltr /var/db/pkg The last one is the most recently modified. Update your ports tree, follow all the

Re: portupgrade(1) | portmaster(8) -- which is more effective for large upgrade?

2013-06-27 Thread Miroslav Lachman
Warren Block wrote: On Wed, 26 Jun 2013, Chris H wrote: On Wed, 26 Jun 2013, Chris H wrote: Okay, look up the last time you installed or upgraded a port: % ls -ltr /var/db/pkg The last one is the most recently modified. Update your ports tree, follow all the steps that apply to your system sin

Re: portupgrade(1) | portmaster(8) -- which is more effective for large upgrade?

2013-06-27 Thread Warren Block
On Thu, 27 Jun 2013, Garrett Wollman wrote: Having just gone through this in two different environments, I can very very strongly recommend doing the following. It's not the "easy button" of the TV commercials, but it will make things much much easier in the future. This is an interesting pro

Re: portupgrade(1) | portmaster(8) -- which is more effective for large upgrade?

2013-06-27 Thread Don Lewis
On 26 Jun, Bob Willcox wrote: > On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 01:23:32PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 09:42:43AM -0700, Chris H wrote: >> > Greetings, >> > I haven't upgraded my tree(s) for awhile. My last attempt to rebuild >> > after an updating >> > src && ports, resulted

Re: portupgrade(1) | portmaster(8) -- which is more effective for large upgrade?

2013-06-26 Thread Chris H
> In article <5e20544e3580a75759c3858f31894dc9.authentica...@ultimatedns.net>, > bsd-li...@lcommand.com writes: > >> I haven't upgraded my tree(s) for awhile. My last attempt to rebuild >>after an updating >>src && ports, resulted in nearly installing the entire ports tree, which >>is why I've >>wa

Re: portupgrade(1) | portmaster(8) -- which is more effective for large upgrade?

2013-06-26 Thread Garrett Wollman
In article <5e20544e3580a75759c3858f31894dc9.authentica...@ultimatedns.net>, bsd-li...@lcommand.com writes: > I haven't upgraded my tree(s) for awhile. My last attempt to rebuild >after an updating >src && ports, resulted in nearly installing the entire ports tree, which >is why I've >waited so l

re: portupgrade(1) | portmaster(8) -- which is more effective for large upgrade?

2013-06-26 Thread Warren Block
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013, Chris H wrote: On Wed, 26 Jun 2013, Chris H wrote: Okay, look up the last time you installed or upgraded a port: % ls -ltr /var/db/pkg The last one is the most recently modified. Update your ports tree, follow all the steps that apply to your system since that date. That

Re: portupgrade(1) | portmaster(8) -- which is more effective for large upgrade?

2013-06-26 Thread chrish
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 05:34:45PM -0700, Chris H wrote: >> Greetings, and thank you for your reply. >> >> I understand that portupgrade _will_ pull in other dependencies _as >> needed_ -- I _do_ read the man(1) pages. :) >> >> But it installed (pulled in) far more than those dependencies >> actu

re: portupgrade(1) | portmaster(8) -- which is more effective for large upgrade?

2013-06-26 Thread Chris H
> On Wed, 26 Jun 2013, Chris H wrote: > >> But it installed (pulled in) far more than those dependencies actually >> required. > > It may bring in build dependencies, but should be no different than > manually installing ports. > >> I believe, due to the fact that it doesn't appear to honor the or

Re: portupgrade(1) | portmaster(8) -- which is more effective for large upgrade?

2013-06-26 Thread Scott Lambert
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 05:34:45PM -0700, Chris H wrote: > Greetings, and thank you for your reply. > > I understand that portupgrade _will_ pull in other dependencies _as > needed_ -- I _do_ read the man(1) pages. :) > > But it installed (pulled in) far more than those dependencies > actually requ

re: portupgrade(1) | portmaster(8) -- which is more effective for large upgrade?

2013-06-26 Thread Warren Block
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013, Chris H wrote: But it installed (pulled in) far more than those dependencies actually required. It may bring in build dependencies, but should be no different than manually installing ports. I believe, due to the fact that it doesn't appear to honor the original build

re: portupgrade(1) | portmaster(8) -- which is more effective for large upgrade?

2013-06-26 Thread Chris H
> Am 26.06.2013 18:42, schrieb Chris H: >> Greetings, >> I haven't upgraded my tree(s) for awhile. My last attempt to rebuild after >> an updating >> src && ports, resulted in nearly installing the entire ports tree, which is >> why I've >> waited so long. Try as I might, I've had great difficul

Re: portupgrade(1) | portmaster(8) -- which is more effective for large upgrade?

2013-06-26 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On 27/06/2013, at 5:53, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > cd /usr/ports/whatever > make install clean > {lather rinse repeat until done} The faster version of this is find /usr/ports -maxdepth 3 -name work -type d -print0 | xargs -0 rm -rf Simpler is to put.. WRKDIRPREFIX=/foo/bar in /etc/make.conf The

Re: portupgrade(1) | portmaster(8) -- which is more effective for large upgrade?

2013-06-26 Thread Warren Block
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: When rebuilding everything, I have always resorted to this: rsync -avH /usr/local/ /usr/local.old/ pkg_delete -a -f rm -fr /usr/local/* rm -fr /var/db/ports/* rm -fr /usr/ports/distfiles/* cd /usr/ports/whatever make install clean {lather rinse repeat

Re: portupgrade(1) | portmaster(8) -- which is more effective for large upgrade?

2013-06-26 Thread Bob Willcox
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 01:23:32PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 09:42:43AM -0700, Chris H wrote: > > Greetings, > > I haven't upgraded my tree(s) for awhile. My last attempt to rebuild after > > an updating > > src && ports, resulted in nearly installing the entire port

Re: portupgrade(1) | portmaster(8) -- which is more effective for large upgrade?

2013-06-26 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 01:23:32PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 09:42:43AM -0700, Chris H wrote: > {snipping} Also, hoping the OP is subscribed to -stable -- you should probably deal with this. This is not the first time I've seen problems with mail delivery to a 1comma

Re: portupgrade(1) | portmaster(8) -- which is more effective for large upgrade?

2013-06-26 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 09:42:43AM -0700, Chris H wrote: > Greetings, > I haven't upgraded my tree(s) for awhile. My last attempt to rebuild after > an updating > src && ports, resulted in nearly installing the entire ports tree, which is > why I've > waited so long. Try as I might, I've had gre

Re: portupgrade(1) | portmaster(8) -- which is more effective for large upgrade?

2013-06-26 Thread Matthias Andree
Am 26.06.2013 18:42, schrieb Chris H: > Greetings, > I haven't upgraded my tree(s) for awhile. My last attempt to rebuild after > an updating > src && ports, resulted in nearly installing the entire ports tree, which is > why I've > waited so long. Try as I might, I've had great difficulty findi

portupgrade(1) | portmaster(8) -- which is more effective for large upgrade?

2013-06-26 Thread Chris H
Greetings, I haven't upgraded my tree(s) for awhile. My last attempt to rebuild after an updating src && ports, resulted in nearly installing the entire ports tree, which is why I've waited so long. Try as I might, I've had great difficulty finding something that will _only_ upgrade what I alre